Arthritis RheumatoidNCT04267380
A Study To Compare The Effectiveness Of Tofacitinib 11 Mg Once A Day To Tofacitinib 5 Mg Twice A Day
An observational study of Arthritis Rheumatoid, run by Pfizer at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
It is hypothesized that patients prescribed tofacitinib 11 mg Modified Release (MR) formulation once daily (QD) will achieve similar benefit to those prescribed tofacitinib 5 mg twice a day (BID) dosage in real world use. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 0 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Arthritis Rheumatoid
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- How many people
- 298 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 30 Sep 2018to 31 Aug 2019
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 0 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients prescribed Tofacitinib in routine clinical practice
Who may be able to join
- All US Corrona RA Registry patients who initiated tofacitinib 5 mg twice a day (BID) or tofacitinib 11 mg once daily (QD) after it became available in February 2016
- Patients must have a follow-up visit at 6 months (+/- 3 months) after tofacitinib initiation. These 6 month visits are part of routine practice and is not associated with this protocol.
- Patients must have a valid clinical disease activity index (CDAI) at initiation and at 6-month follow-up visit
Who cannot join
- There are no exclusion criteria for this study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Compare Effectiveness of Tofacitinib 11 mg QD to Tofacitinib 5 mg BID
It is hypothesized that patients prescribed tofacitinib 11 mg Modified Release (MR) formulation once daily (QD) will achieve similar benefit to those prescribed tofacitinib 5 mg twice a day (BID) dosage in real world use. This study will therefore seek to compare the effectiveness of the MR 11 mg QD regimen to the IR 5 mg BID regimen for the treatment of RA in a real-world registry of RA patients.
- Conditions
- Arthritis Rheumatoid
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Corrona US RA Registry 11 mg | patients with RA who have been exposed to tofacitinib 11 mg QD tablet | |
| Corrona US RA Registry 5 mg | patients with RA who have been exposed to tofacitinib 5 mg BID tablet |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants Achieving Minimally Clinically Important Difference (MCID) Improvement From Baseline Upto 6 Months
MCID improvement assessed based on Clinical disease activity index (CDAI). CDAI: numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: tender joint count (TJC) and swollen joint count (SJC) based on a 28-joint assessment, patient global assessment (PtGA) and physician global assessment (PGA) assessed on 0-10 centimeter (cm) Visual analogue scale (VAS); CDAI total score = 0-76, higher scores=greater affection due to disease activity (DA). CDAI less than or equal to (<=) 2.8 indicates disease remission, greater than (>) 2.8 to 10 = low DA, >10 to 22 = moderate DA, and >22 = high DA. MCID improvement defined by difference in CDAI from baseline (at time of tofacitinib initiation) to 6 month visit. Participants were considered to show improvement from baseline on 3 cut points (1) greater than or equal (>=) to 2 (for participants in low DA at baseline); (2) >= 6 (moderate DA at baseline, and (3) >= 11 (high DA at baseline). Here, overall number of participants who showed improvement have been reported.
Measured: Baseline Up to 6 Months
Secondary outcomes (19)
Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Month 6
CDAI is the numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: tender joint count and swollen joint count based on a 28-joint assessment, patient global assessment and physician global assessment assessed on 0 to 10 cm VAS; CDAI total score = 0 to 76, higher scores=greater affection due to disease activity. CDAI <= 2.8 indicates disease remission, >2.8 to 10 = low disease activity, >10 to 22 = moderate disease activity, and >22 = high disease activity. Here, all participants who achieved remission (CDAI <=2.8) at Month 6 have been reported.
Measured: Baseline, Month 6
Number of Participants Achieving Remission at Month 6 (All Participants)
CDAI is the numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: tender joint count and swollen joint count based on a 28-joint assessment, patient global assessment and physician global assessment assessed on 0 to 10 cm VAS; CDAI total score = 0 to 76, higher scores=greater affection due to disease activity. CDAI <= 2.8 indicates disease remission, >2.8 to 10 = low disease activity, >10 to 22 = moderate disease activity, and >22 = high disease activity. Here, all participants who achieved remission (CDAI <=2.8) at Month 6 have been reported.
Measured: Month 6
Number of Participants Achieving Remission at Month 6 (For Participants With Baseline CDAI >2.8)
CDAI is the numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: tender joint count and swollen joint count based on a 28-joint assessment, patient global assessment and physician global assessment assessed on 0 to 10 cm VAS; CDAI total score = 0 to 76, higher scores=greater affection due to disease activity. CDAI <= 2.8 indicates disease remission, >2.8 to 10 = low disease activity, >10 to 22 = moderate disease activity, and >22 = high disease activity. Here, only those participants who had baseline CDAI greater than 2.8, and who achieved remission (CDAI <= 2.8) at Month 6 have been reported.
Measured: Month 6
Number of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity at Month 6 (All Participants)
CDAI is the numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: tender joint count and swollen joint count based on a 28-joint assessment, patient global assessment and physician global assessment assessed on 0 to 10 cm VAS; CDAI total score = 0 to 76, higher scores=greater affection due to disease activity. CDAI <= 2.8 indicates disease remission, >2.8 to 10 = low disease activity, >10 to 22 = moderate disease activity, and >22 = high disease activity. Here, all participants who achieved low disease activity (CDAI > 2.8 to 10) at Month 6 have been reported.
Measured: Month 6
Number of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity at Month 6 (Participants With Baseline CDAI >10)
CDAI is the numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: tender joint count and swollen joint count based on a 28-joint assessment, patient global assessment and physician global assessment assessed on 0 to 10 cm VAS; CDAI total score = 0 to 76, higher scores=greater affection due to disease activity. CDAI <= 2.8 indicates disease remission, >2.8 to 10 = low disease activity, >10 to 22 = moderate disease activity, and >22 = high disease activity. Here, only those participants who had baseline CDAI greater than 10, and who achieved low disease activity (CDAI > 2.8 to 10) at Month 6 have been reported.
Measured: Month 6
Number of Participants With Decrease From Baseline in Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (mHAQ) Score at Month 6
Modified HAQ: participant-reported questionnaire for the assessment of ability to perform tasks due to rheumatoid arthritis. It comprised of 8 questions on 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; grip; walk; hygiene; reach; and common activities over past week before specified time point. Eight items were rated on a 4-point Likert scale from 0 to 3, where 0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty, and 3 = unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score ranged from 0 to 3, where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty, higher scores indicating worse functioning. Participants who had a baseline mHAQ score of >=0.25 were evaluable for this outcome measure and number of participants who had decrease from baseline in mHAQ score at Month 6 were reported.
Measured: Month 6
Number of Participants With Decrease From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Score at Month 6
HAQ: participant-reported questionnaire for the assessment of rheumatoid arthritis. It comprised of 20 questions in 8 categories of activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; grip; walk; hygiene; reach; and activities over past week. Each activity was assessed on a 4-point Likert scale from 0 to 3, where 0 = without difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty, and 3 = unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score ranged from 0 to 3, where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty, higher scores indicating worse functioning. Participants who had a baseline HAQ score of >=0.22 were evaluable for this outcome measure and number of participants who had decrease from baseline in HAQ score at Month 6 were reported.
Measured: Month 6
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Score at Month 6: Dichotomous Variable
Measured: Baseline, Month 6
Change From Baseline in Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (mHAQ) Score at Month 6
Modified HAQ: participant-reported questionnaire for the assessment of ability to perform tasks due to rheumatoid arthritis. It comprised of 8 questions in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; grip; walk; hygiene; reach; and common activities over past week. Eight item were rated on a 4-point Likert scale from 0 to 3, where 0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty, and 3 = unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score ranged from 0 to 3, where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty, higher scores indicating worse functioning.
Measured: Baseline, Month 6
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Score at Month 6
HAQ: participant-reported questionnaire for the assessment of rheumatoid arthritis. It comprised of 20 questions in 8 categories of activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; grip; walk; hygiene; reach; and activities over past week. Each activity was assessed on a 4-point Likert scale from 0 to 3, where 0 = without difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty, and 3 = unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score ranged from 0 to 3, where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty, higher scores indicating worse functioning.
Measured: Baseline, Month 6
Change From Baseline in Modified Disease Activity Score Based on 28-joints Count (mDAS28) at Month 6
Modified DAS28: Indicator of disease activity calculated as weighted average of six components: tender joint counts (TJC), swollen joint counts (SJC), mHAQ measure of disease activity, participant reported pain, physician reported global health assessment (PGA) and participant reported global health assessment (PtGA). TJC and SJC calculated using 28 joints count; mHAQ scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = least difficulty, 3 = extreme difficulty); participant reported pain scored on a scale of 0 to 100 (0 = no pain, 100= pain as bad as it could be); PGA and PtGA recorded on a visual analog scale (VAS) of 0 millimeter (mm) to 100 mm (0 = no disease activity and 100=high disease activity). Transformed mDAS28 score ranged from 0 to 9.4, where higher scores indicated more disease activity.
Measured: Baseline, Month 6
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-joints Count (DAS28) Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Month 6
DAS28 is a measure of disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis, derived using differential weighting given to each of the four components. The components of the DAS28 (ESR) assessment included: TJC with 28 joints assessed, SJC with 28 joints assessed, ESR (millimeters per hour) and PtGA recorded on 100mm VAS (scores ranging 0 [very well] to 100 mm [extremely bad]). DAS28 (ESR) was calculated as 0.56*sqrt (TJC28) + 0.28*sqrt (SJC28) + 0.70*ln(ESR [mm/hour] + 0.014*PtGA [mm]; where, ln = natural logarithm, sqrt = square root of. Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity.
Measured: Baseline, Month 6
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-joints Count (DAS28) C- Reactive Protein (CRP) at 6 Month
DAS28 is a measure of disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis. DAS28 (CRP) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, CRP (milligrams per liter [mg/L]) and PtGA on a 100 mm VAS (VAS: scores ranging from 0 mm [very well] to 100 mm [worst], higher scores indicate worse health condition). DAS28 (CRP) was calculated as = 0.56*sqrt(TJC28) + 0.28*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.36*ln(CRP in mg/L +1) + 0.014*PtGA in mm+ 0.96.Total DAS28 (CRP) score range: 0 (none) to 9.4 (extreme disease activity), higher score indicated more disease activity.
Measured: Baseline, 6 months
Change From Baseline in Participant Pain Score at Month 6
Participants were asked the following question to answer on a numeric rating scale (NRS): "How much pain have you had because of your arthritis in the past week?" The scale ranged from 0-100, where 0=no pain and 100=pain as bad as it could be. Higher scores indicated worsening of condition.
Measured: Baseline, Month 6
Change From Baseline in Participant Fatigue Score at Month 6
Participants were asked the following question to answer on NRS: "How much of a problem has unusual fatigue of tiredness been for you in the past week?" The scale ranged from 0-100, where 0=no fatigue and 100=fatigue as bad as it could be. Higher scores indicated worsening of condition.
Measured: Baseline, Month 6
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life- 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Index at Month 6
EQ-5D index: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. It assesses level of current health in 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. Each dimension had 3 levels: no problems (1), some problems (2) and severe problems (3). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range 0 to 1, where 0=death and 1=perfect health; higher score indicates a better health state.
Measured: Baseline, Month 6
Number of Participants Achieving Modified American College of Rheumatology 20% (mACR20) Response
mACR20 response: >= 20 percent (%) improvement in tender and swollen joint count and 20% improvement in 2 of the following 4 criteria: 1) participant assessment of pain (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsening of pain) ; 2) participant global assessment of disease activity (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsening of condition); 3) physician global assessment of disease activity (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsening of condition); 4) self-assessed disability index of the mHAQ (scored from 0 to 3, higher scores indicated worsening of function).
Measured: Month 6
Number of Participants Achieving Modified American College of Rheumatology 50% (mACR50) Response
mACR50 response: >= 50% improvement in tender and swollen joint count and 50% improvement in 2 of the following 4 criteria: 1) participant assessment of pain (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsening of pain) ; 2) participant global assessment of disease activity (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsening of condition); 3) physician global assessment of disease activity (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsening of condition); 4) self-assessed disability index of the mHAQ (scored from 0 to 3, higher scores indicated worsening of function).
Measured: Month 6
Number of Participants Achieving Modified American College of Rheumatology 70% (mACR70) Response
mACR70 response: >= 70% improvement in tender and swollen joint count and 70% improvement in 2 of the following 4 criteria: 1) participant assessment of pain (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsening of pain) ; 2) participant global assessment of disease activity (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsening of condition); 3) physician global assessment of disease activity (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsening of condition); 4) self-assessed disability index of the mHAQ (scored from 0 to 3, higher scores indicated worsening of function).
Measured: Month 6
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Feb 2020
- Study start30 Sep 2018
- Primary completion31 Aug 2019
- Study completion31 Aug 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Arthritis RheumatoidStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by PfizerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 298 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04267380
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- A3921359
- Status last verified
- May 2023
- First submitted
- 10 Feb 2020
- Last updated
- 22 May 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.
Publications
Cohen SB, Greenberg JD, Harnett J, Madsen A, Smith TW, Gruben D, Zhang R, Lukic T, Woolcott J, Dandreo KJ, Litman HJ, Blachley T, Lenihan A, Chen C, Rivas JL, Dougados M. Real-World Evidence to Contextualize Clinical Trial Results and Inform Regulatory Decisions: Tofacitinib Modified-Release Once-Daily vs Immediate-Release Twice-Daily for Rheumatoid Arthritis. Adv Ther. 2021 Jan;38(1):226-248. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01501-z. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
PubMed 33034006
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 May 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Compare Effectiveness of Tofacitinib 11 mg QD to Tofacitinib 5 mg BID
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04267380
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- A3921359
- Conditions
- Arthritis Rheumatoid
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 298 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 30 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Aug 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Aug 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Feb 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 18 Sep 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
It is hypothesized that patients prescribed tofacitinib 11 mg Modified Release (MR) formulation once daily (QD) will achieve similar benefit to those prescribed tofacitinib 5 mg twice a day (BID) dosage in real world use. This study will therefore seek to compare the effectiveness of the MR 11 mg QD regimen to the IR 5 mg BID regimen for the treatment of RA in a real-world registry of RA patients.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Corrona US RA Registry 11 mg | – | –patients with RA who have been exposed to tofacitinib 11 mg QD tablet |
| Corrona US RA Registry 5 mg | – | –patients with RA who have been exposed to tofacitinib 5 mg BID tablet |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 0 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients prescribed Tofacitinib in routine clinical practice
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- All US Corrona RA Registry patients who initiated tofacitinib 5 mg twice a day (BID) or tofacitinib 11 mg once daily (QD) after it became available in February 2016
- Patients must have a follow-up visit at 6 months (+/- 3 months) after tofacitinib initiation. These 6 month visits are part of routine practice and is not associated with this protocol.
- Patients must have a valid clinical disease activity index (CDAI) at initiation and at 6-month follow-up visit
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- There are no exclusion criteria for this study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Number of Participants Achieving Minimally Clinically Important Difference (MCID) Improvement From Baseline Upto 6 Months
Time frame: Baseline Up to 6 Months
MCID improvement assessed based on Clinical disease activity index (CDAI). CDAI: numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: tender joint count (TJC) and swollen joint count (SJC) based on a 28-joint assessment, patient global assessment (PtGA) and physician global assessment (PGA) assessed on 0-10 centimeter (cm) Visual analogue scale (VAS); CDAI total score = 0-76, higher scores=greater affection due to disease activity (DA). CDAI less than or equal to (<=) 2.8 indicates disease remission, greater than (>) 2.8 to 10 = low DA, >10 to 22 = moderate DA, and >22 = high DA. MCID improvement defined by difference in CDAI from baseline (at time of tofacitinib initiation) to 6 month visit. Participants were considered to show improvement from baseline on 3 cut points (1) greater than or equal (>=) to 2 (for participants in low DA at baseline); (2) >= 6 (moderate DA at baseline, and (3) >= 11 (high DA at baseline). Here, overall number of participants who showed improvement have been reported.
19 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Month 6
Time frame: Baseline, Month 6
Number of Participants Achieving Remission at Month 6 (All Participants)
Time frame: Month 6
Number of Participants Achieving Remission at Month 6 (For Participants With Baseline CDAI >2.8)
Time frame: Month 6
Number of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity at Month 6 (All Participants)
Time frame: Month 6
Number of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity at Month 6 (Participants With Baseline CDAI >10)
Time frame: Month 6
Number of Participants With Decrease From Baseline in Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (mHAQ) Score at Month 6
Time frame: Month 6
Number of Participants With Decrease From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Score at Month 6
Time frame: Month 6
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Score at Month 6: Dichotomous Variable
Time frame: Baseline, Month 6
Change From Baseline in Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (mHAQ) Score at Month 6
Time frame: Baseline, Month 6
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Score at Month 6
Time frame: Baseline, Month 6
Change From Baseline in Modified Disease Activity Score Based on 28-joints Count (mDAS28) at Month 6
Time frame: Baseline, Month 6
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-joints Count (DAS28) Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Month 6
Time frame: Baseline, Month 6
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-joints Count (DAS28) C- Reactive Protein (CRP) at 6 Month
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months
Change From Baseline in Participant Pain Score at Month 6
Time frame: Baseline, Month 6
Change From Baseline in Participant Fatigue Score at Month 6
Time frame: Baseline, Month 6
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life- 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Index at Month 6
Time frame: Baseline, Month 6
Number of Participants Achieving Modified American College of Rheumatology 20% (mACR20) Response
Time frame: Month 6
Number of Participants Achieving Modified American College of Rheumatology 50% (mACR50) Response
Time frame: Month 6
Number of Participants Achieving Modified American College of Rheumatology 70% (mACR70) Response
Time frame: Month 6
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 May 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33034006Cohen SB, Greenberg JD, Harnett J, Madsen A, Smith TW, Gruben D, Zhang R, Lukic T, Woolcott J, Dandreo KJ, Litman HJ, Blachley T, Lenihan A, Chen C, Rivas JL, Dougados M. Real-World Evidence to Contextualize Clinical Trial Results and Inform Regulatory Decisions: Tofacitinib Modified-Release Once-Daily vs Immediate-Release Twice-Daily for Rheumatoid Arthritis. Adv Ther. 2021 Jan;38(1):226-248. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01501-z. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.
Related trials for Arthritis Rheumatoid
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of PTC844 in Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Ascending Dose Study of DKB903 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
R-2487 in Patients With Sjogren's Syndrome (SjD)
Sjogren's Syndrome, Sjögren
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled AP01 in Participants With Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Pulmonary Fibrosis, Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Arthritis Rheumatoid, run by Pfizer at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 May 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 18 Sep 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants Achieving Minimally Clinically Important Difference (MCID) Improvement From Baseline Upto 6 Months (time frame: Baseline Up to 6 Months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04267380, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 May 2023.