Colorectal CancerPhase 2NCT04268290
Single Incision Plus One Port Laparoscopic Surgery Assistant Enhanced Recovery After Surgery on Colorectal Cancer
A Phase 2 study testing Single incision plus one port laparoscopic surgery in people with Colorectal Cancer, run by Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University.
Trial summary
Conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) for colorectal cancer has been demonstrated to be safe and feasible and present minimally invasive benefits including faster recovery, reduced postoperative pain and shorter hospital stay, also acquiring comparable oncologic outcomes with open surgery. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Colorectal Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Single incision plus one port laparoscopic surgery
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 15 Feb 2020to 15 Feb 2022
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Primary tumor diagnosed as adenocarcinoma confirmed pathologically by endoscopic biopsy
- cT1-4a, N0-3, M0 at preoperative evaluation according to the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual Seventh Edition
- Located in the cecum, ascending colon, transverse colon, descending colon, sigmoid colon, the upper segment of the rectum.
- Diameter ≦ 5cm
- No severe organ dysfunction
- Performance status of 0 or 1 on ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) scale
- ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) score class I or II
- Written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Unsuitable for patients undergoing single incision plus one port laparoscopic surgery
- Patients with Complications caused by colorectal cancer ( bleeding , perforation, obstruction or incomplete obstruction )
- Previous abdominal surgery
- Malignant diseases within the past 5years
- Requirements of simultaneous surgery for another diseases
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
About this study
Official title: Effect of Single Incision Plus One Port Laparoscopic Surgery Assistant Enhanced Recovery After Surgery on Colorectal Cancer : A Single Arm Trial
Conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) for colorectal cancer has been demonstrated to be safe and feasible and present minimally invasive benefits including faster recovery, reduced postoperative pain and shorter hospital stay, also acquiring comparable oncologic outcomes with open surgery. To achieve further minimally invasive outcomes, SILS plus one port surgery was attempted by some surgeons. Preliminary results showed that SILS+1 could achieve better minimally invasive benefits than CLS while preserving oncologic feasibility.
Till now, ERAS has been practiced in colorectal cancer surgery for approximately 20 years. Studies have proven that ERAS is safe and significantly improved the recovery course of patients during perioperative period, meanwhile, the expense could be greatly reduced.
Based on ERAS studies protocols and SILS+1 trials, investigators tried to combine SILS+1 with ERAS, hopefully to provide patients with more safe, economic, feasible and rapid surgery and perioperative strategies.
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer
- Being tested
- Single incision plus one port laparoscopic surgery
- Keywords
- Colorectal Cancer, ERAS, Single Incision plus one, Laparoscopic surgery
- Medical subject headings
- Colorectal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Single incision plus one port laparoscopic surgeryCombination product
Also called The program of enhanced recovery After Surgery
SILS plus one port surgery and enhanced recovery after surgery protocol both are methods taking the minimally invasive benefits for the patients including faster recovery, reduced postoperative pain and shorter hospital stay.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| SILS plus one assistant ERAS | Experimental | Preoperative:
preadmission information, education, counseling, optimization ( breathing training), shortening fasting time and carbohydrate load
Intraoperative:
The intravenous fluid therapy is restricted. All patients undergo single incision plus one port laparoscopic surgery(SILS plus one).
A suitable warming device (such as forced-air heating blankets) and warmed intravenous fluids are been adopted routinely to keep body temperature
Postoperative:
multimodal analgesia (surgical site infiltration, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, epidural analgesia) early oral intake and move. nasogastric tubes should not be used routinely. Nasogastric tubes inserted during surgery are been removed before reversal of an aesthesia. Receives: Combination Product: Single incision plus one port laparoscopic surgery |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Rehabilitative rate
The percentage of patients who met discharge criteria in the fourth day after surgery
Measured: 4 days
Postoperative hospital stays
Days from surgery to discharge
Measured: 1 month
Secondary outcomes (8)
Medical cost
The patient's expenses from surgery to discharge are recorded in RMB "yuan"
Measured: 1 month
Postoperative pain score
Postoperative pain is recorded using the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score tool on postoperative day . On a scale of 1 to 10, the higher the score, the greater the pain.
Measured: Once a day from 6 hours to the fourth day after surgery
Postoperative recovery index
The first Time to early mobilization(hour), flatus(hour), liquid diet(hour), soft diet(hour), removal of the Nasogastric tubes(hour) , removal of the peritoneal drainage(hour) are used to assess the postoperative recovery
Measured: 1 month
Postoperative inflammatory immune response
It includes the number of white blood cells and lymphocytes,CRP, IL-6
Measured: 3 days
compliance with ERAS measures
It is defined as if the patients complete every ERAS measure or not. We can defined it "yes " or "not".
Measured: perioperative
6 min postoperative walking test(6MWT)
Study site, subject preparation, trial procedures, and medical monitoring refer to the 6MWT guidelines issued by the American thoracic society in 2002.
Measured: Once a day from the frist to the fourth day after surgery
hospital readmissions
It can be defined as the number of patients readmitted within 30 days because of postoperative complications.
Measured: 30days
Morbidity and mortality rates
Morbidity and mortality rates are defined as postoperative complications graded according to Clavien-Dindo within 30 days.
Measured: 30 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Feb 2020
- Study start15 Feb 2020 (estimated)
- Primary completion15 Feb 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion15 Feb 2022 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Colorectal CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Wang Yannan, M.D, Principal investigator, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04268290
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NFEC-2019-156
- Status last verified
- Nov 2019
- First submitted
- 25 Dec 2019
- Last updated
- 13 Feb 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Zhang X, Li G, Li X, Liang Z, Lan X, Mou T, Xu Z, Fu J, Wu M, Li G, Wang Y. Effect of single-incision plus one port laparoscopic surgery assisted with enhanced recovery after surgery on colorectal cancer: study protocol for a single-arm trial. Transl Cancer Res. 2021 Dec;10(12):5443-5453. doi: 10.21037/tcr-21-1361.
PubMed 35116390
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Feb 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Single Incision Plus One Port Laparoscopic Surgery Assistant Enhanced Recovery After Surgery on Colorectal Cancer : A Single Arm Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04268290
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NFEC-2019-156
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer
- Keywords
- Colorectal Cancer, ERAS, Single Incision plus one, Laparoscopic surgery
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Feb 2020 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 15 Feb 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 15 Feb 2022 (estimated)
- First posted
- 13 Feb 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) for colorectal cancer has been demonstrated to be safe and feasible and present minimally invasive benefits including faster recovery, reduced postoperative pain and shorter hospital stay, also acquiring comparable oncologic outcomes with open surgery. To achieve further minimally invasive outcomes, SILS plus one port surgery was attempted by some surgeons. Preliminary results showed that SILS+1 could achieve better minimally invasive benefits than CLS while preserving oncologic feasibility.
Till now, ERAS has been practiced in colorectal cancer surgery for approximately 20 years. Studies have proven that ERAS is safe and significantly improved the recovery course of patients during perioperative period, meanwhile, the expense could be greatly reduced.
Based on ERAS studies protocols and SILS+1 trials, investigators tried to combine SILS+1 with ERAS, hopefully to provide patients with more safe, economic, feasible and rapid surgery and perioperative strategies.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| SILS plus one assistant ERAS | Experimental | Combination Product: Single incision plus one port laparoscopic surgeryPreoperative: preadmission information, education, counseling, optimization ( breathing training), shortening fasting time and carbohydrate load Intraoperative: The intravenous fluid therapy is restricted. All patients undergo single incision plus one port laparoscopic surgery(SILS plus one). A suitable warming device (such as forced-air heating blankets) and warmed intravenous fluids are been adopted routinely to keep body temperature Postoperative: multimodal analgesia (surgical site infiltration, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, epidural analgesia) early oral intake and move. nasogastric tubes should not be used routinely. Nasogastric tubes inserted during surgery are been removed before reversal of an aesthesia. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Primary tumor diagnosed as adenocarcinoma confirmed pathologically by endoscopic biopsy
- cT1-4a, N0-3, M0 at preoperative evaluation according to the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual Seventh Edition
- Located in the cecum, ascending colon, transverse colon, descending colon, sigmoid colon, the upper segment of the rectum.
- Diameter ≦ 5cm
- No severe organ dysfunction
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Unsuitable for patients undergoing single incision plus one port laparoscopic surgery
- Patients with Complications caused by colorectal cancer ( bleeding , perforation, obstruction or incomplete obstruction )
- Previous abdominal surgery
- Malignant diseases within the past 5years
- Requirements of simultaneous surgery for another diseases
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Single incision plus one port laparoscopic surgeryAlso: The program of enhanced recovery After SurgerySILS plus one port surgery and enhanced recovery after surgery protocol both are methods taking the minimally invasive benefits for the patients including faster recovery, reduced postoperative pain and shorter hospital stay. | Combination product | SILS plus one assistant ERAS |
Primary outcome
Rehabilitative rate
Time frame: 4 days
The percentage of patients who met discharge criteria in the fourth day after surgery
Postoperative hospital stays
Time frame: 1 month
Days from surgery to discharge
8 secondary outcomes
Medical cost
Time frame: 1 month
Postoperative pain score
Time frame: Once a day from 6 hours to the fourth day after surgery
Postoperative recovery index
Time frame: 1 month
Postoperative inflammatory immune response
Time frame: 3 days
compliance with ERAS measures
Time frame: perioperative
6 min postoperative walking test(6MWT)
Time frame: Once a day from the frist to the fourth day after surgery
hospital readmissions
Time frame: 30days
Morbidity and mortality rates
Time frame: 30 days
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Feb 2020.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35116390Zhang X, Li G, Li X, Liang Z, Lan X, Mou T, Xu Z, Fu J, Wu M, Li G, Wang Y. Effect of single-incision plus one port laparoscopic surgery assisted with enhanced recovery after surgery on colorectal cancer: study protocol for a single-arm trial. Transl Cancer Res. 2021 Dec;10(12):5443-5453. doi: 10.21037/tcr-21-1361.
Related trials for Colorectal Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingObservational study
Pre- and On-treatment Multi-omics Profiling of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Rectal Neoplasms
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Tislelizumab in People With Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Wang Yannan, M.D principal investigator
Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Single incision plus one port laparoscopic surgery in people with Colorectal Cancer, run by Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Feb 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Wang Yanan, M.D (+86-131-8909-6629, wyn8116@163.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Rehabilitative rate (time frame: 4 days). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04268290, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Feb 2020.