Stroke PatientsNCT04268446
Turkish Version of the Brief-BESTest Scale
An observational study of Stroke Patients, run by Kırıkkale University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
The aim of this study is to investigate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the brief-BESTest (short BESTest) scale in stroke patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke Patients
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 29 Mar 2019to 30 Jun 2020
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients who are able to walk 10 m independently with or without a device over 40 years old with a diagnosis of stroke.
Who may be able to join
- Being 40 years old or older,
- Diagnosis of stroke,
- No cooperation and communication problems
- To be able to walk 10 m independently with or without an auxiliary device
Who cannot join
- Another neurological or orthopedic problem other than stroke that will affect functionality and balance
- Individuals with advanced contraindications for cardiovascular disease and mobilization will not be included in the study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Investigation of the Turkish Version, Validity and Reliability of Brief-BESTest Scale in Stroke Patients
The aim of this study is to investigate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the brief-BESTest (short BESTest) scale in stroke patients.
Read the detailed description
Brief Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Brief-BESTest) is a short version of the Balance evaluation systems test (BESTest). Balance assessment systems test (BESTest) The balance assessment systems test developed by Horak consists of 6 sub-sections that evaluate the systems related to balance; 1) biomechanical limitations, 2) stability limit, 3) postural responses, 4) intuitive postural adjustments, 5) sensory orientation and 6) walking. It consists of 36 tests in total. Each question is rated between 0-3. The highest score that can be obtained is 108. Low test scores show that the balance is disturbed. BESTest has been found to be reliable among raters evaluating a cohort of individuals with and without various neurological diagnoses. In studies conducted, it was stated that BESTest is reliable when compared to other scales evaluating balance.
The necessary permissions have been obtained from the authors for Short BESTest, whose validity and reliability features will be tested, and the translation process to Turkish has been completed and the survey has been finalized. The basis for the use of special tools such as the scale is to prove the usability of the tool in the sample group to which it will be applied. The first step for this is the translation stage from the original language to the other language.
At the stage of translation into Turkish, two experts who knew a good level of English translated the questionnaire from English into Turkish. These translations have been translated back into Turkish by two native speakers of English and distant medical subjects. In addition, these translations were re-examined by the researchers and turned into a single form. This form was sent to five specialists in the field, checking the content and compliance with Turkish was evaluated. With the opinion of experts, the scale was finalized.
The study will include individuals over 40 years of age who have been diagnosed with an ischemic or hemorhagic stroke, who applied to the Kırıkkale University Faculty of Medicine Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Hospital.
- Conditions
- Stroke Patients
- Keywords
- brief BESTest, stroke patients, Turkish version
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Berg Balance Test
It is a 14-item scale that evaluates the tasks used in daily life activities.Standing up without support, standing without support, sitting without support, standing up, transfers, standing with feet, standing with legs while standing, reaching out while standing, picking up from the ground, looking back, 360 degree rotation, firm side standing on the stool, one foot standstill and standstill functions are evaluated.Each item is planned between 0-4; 0 is unable to fulfill the task, 4 is to fulfill the task successfully. The total score of the test is between 0-56.0-20 points: wheelchair dependent, 21-40: assisted walking, 41-56: means independent ambulation.
Measured: 15 minutes
Functional Reach Test
Subjects will asked to stand comfortably, to make a fist, and to raise their arm until it was parallel to the yardstick (position 1). The placement of the end of the third metacarpal along the yardstick will recorded. Subjects will then asked to reach as far forward as they could without losing their balance (position 2), and the position of the end of the third metacarpal along the yardstick will again recorded. No attempt will make to control the subject's method of reach, but if he will touch the wall or took a step during the maneuver, that trial will consider invalid and repeated.
Measured: 5 minutes
Time Up and Go Test
This test is applied to assess the risk of falling and mobility.This test starts with the individual leaving the chair without receiving arm support by giving the go command while sitting in a chair.The distance of 3 meters is asked to return and sit again in the chair.The elapsed time is recorded in seconds.
Measured: 5 minutes
10 Meter Walk Tests
Walking speed are measure by timing subjects over 10 meters with a stopwatch. To avoid the effects of acceleration and deceleration, measurements take over the middle 10 meters of a 14-meter walkway. It is repeated 2 times.
Measured: 3 minutes
Falls Efficacy Scale
FES is a 10-item scale and these items are; To enter and get out of bed, to sit and stand on the chair, to take a bath or shower, to dress and undress, to lie on the shelves, to walk in the house, to answer the door or phone, to prepare food without lifting heavy objects and to do simple shopping. Individuals score between 0 (not safe) and 10 (very safe) for each question, and when all scores are summed, a total score between 0 and 100 is obtained.
Measured: 5 minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Feb 2020
- Study start29 Mar 2019
- Primary completion30 May 2020
- Study completion30 Jun 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Stroke PatientsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Kırıkkale University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Kübra Uğurlu, Kırıkkale University
- Investigators
- Saniye Aydoğan Arslan, Study director, Kırıkkale UniversityKübra Uğurlu, Principal investigator, Kırıkkale UniversityCevher Demirci, Principal investigator, Balikesir UniversityZekiye İpek Katırcı Kırmacı, Principal investigator, Sanko University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04268446
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- turkishbriefBESTest
- Status last verified
- Nov 2020
- First submitted
- 11 Feb 2020
- Last updated
- 6 Nov 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Padgett PK, Jacobs JV, Kasser SL. Is the BESTest at its best? A suggested brief version based on interrater reliability, validity, internal consistency, and theoretical construct. Phys Ther. 2012 Sep;92(9):1197-207. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20120056. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
PubMed 22677295Smith PS, Hembree JA, Thompson ME. Berg Balance Scale and Functional Reach: determining the best clinical tool for individuals post acute stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2004 Nov;18(7):811-8. doi: 10.1191/0269215504cr817oa.
PubMed 15573838Schmidt S, Bullinger M. Current issues in cross-cultural quality of life instrument development. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 Apr;84(4 Suppl 2):S29-34. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2003.50244.
PubMed 12692769Chinsongkram B, Chaikeeree N, Saengsirisuwan V, Viriyatharakij N, Horak FB, Boonsinsukh R. Reliability and validity of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) in people with subacute stroke. Phys Ther. 2014 Nov;94(11):1632-43. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130558. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
PubMed 24925073Bergstrom M, Lenholm E, Franzen E. Translation and validation of the Swedish version of the mini-BESTest in subjects with Parkinson's disease or stroke: a pilot study. Physiother Theory Pract. 2012 Oct;28(7):509-14. doi: 10.3109/09593985.2011.653707. Epub 2012 Jan 30.
PubMed 22288658O'Hoski S, Sibley KM, Brooks D, Beauchamp MK. Construct validity of the BESTest, mini-BESTest and briefBESTest in adults aged 50 years and older. Gait Posture. 2015 Sep;42(3):301-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.06.006. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
PubMed 26183191Franchignoni F, Horak F, Godi M, Nardone A, Giordano A. Using psychometric techniques to improve the Balance Evaluation Systems Test: the mini-BESTest. J Rehabil Med. 2010 Apr;42(4):323-31. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0537.
PubMed 20461334Horak FB, Wrisley DM, Frank J. The Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) to differentiate balance deficits. Phys Ther. 2009 May;89(5):484-98. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20080071. Epub 2009 Mar 27.
PubMed 19329772
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Nov 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Investigation of the Turkish Version, Validity and Reliability of Brief-BESTest Scale in Stroke Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04268446
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- turkishbriefBESTest
- Conditions
- Stroke Patients
- Keywords
- brief BESTest, stroke patients, Turkish version
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Kırıkkale UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 29 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 May 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Feb 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study is to investigate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the brief-BESTest (short BESTest) scale in stroke patients.
Detailed description
Brief Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Brief-BESTest) is a short version of the Balance evaluation systems test (BESTest). Balance assessment systems test (BESTest) The balance assessment systems test developed by Horak consists of 6 sub-sections that evaluate the systems related to balance; 1) biomechanical limitations, 2) stability limit, 3) postural responses, 4) intuitive postural adjustments, 5) sensory orientation and 6) walking. It consists of 36 tests in total. Each question is rated between 0-3. The highest score that can be obtained is 108. Low test scores show that the balance is disturbed. BESTest has been found to be reliable among raters evaluating a cohort of individuals with and without various neurological diagnoses. In studies conducted, it was stated that BESTest is reliable when compared to other scales evaluating balance.
The necessary permissions have been obtained from the authors for Short BESTest, whose validity and reliability features will be tested, and the translation process to Turkish has been completed and the survey has been finalized. The basis for the use of special tools such as the scale is to prove the usability of the tool in the sample group to which it will be applied. The first step for this is the translation stage from the original language to the other language.
At the stage of translation into Turkish, two experts who knew a good level of English translated the questionnaire from English into Turkish. These translations have been translated back into Turkish by two native speakers of English and distant medical subjects. In addition, these translations were re-examined by the researchers and turned into a single form. This form was sent to five specialists in the field, checking the content and compliance with Turkish was evaluated. With the opinion of experts, the scale was finalized.
The study will include individuals over 40 years of age who have been diagnosed with an ischemic or hemorhagic stroke, who applied to the Kırıkkale University Faculty of Medicine Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Hospital.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients who are able to walk 10 m independently with or without a device over 40 years old with a diagnosis of stroke.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Being 40 years old or older,
- Diagnosis of stroke,
- No cooperation and communication problems
- To be able to walk 10 m independently with or without an auxiliary device
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Another neurological or orthopedic problem other than stroke that will affect functionality and balance
- Individuals with advanced contraindications for cardiovascular disease and mobilization will not be included in the study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Berg Balance Test
Time frame: 15 minutes
It is a 14-item scale that evaluates the tasks used in daily life activities.Standing up without support, standing without support, sitting without support, standing up, transfers, standing with feet, standing with legs while standing, reaching out while standing, picking up from the ground, looking back, 360 degree rotation, firm side standing on the stool, one foot standstill and standstill functions are evaluated.Each item is planned between 0-4; 0 is unable to fulfill the task, 4 is to fulfill the task successfully. The total score of the test is between 0-56.0-20 points: wheelchair dependent, 21-40: assisted walking, 41-56: means independent ambulation.
Functional Reach Test
Time frame: 5 minutes
Subjects will asked to stand comfortably, to make a fist, and to raise their arm until it was parallel to the yardstick (position 1). The placement of the end of the third metacarpal along the yardstick will recorded. Subjects will then asked to reach as far forward as they could without losing their balance (position 2), and the position of the end of the third metacarpal along the yardstick will again recorded. No attempt will make to control the subject's method of reach, but if he will touch the wall or took a step during the maneuver, that trial will consider invalid and repeated.
Time Up and Go Test
Time frame: 5 minutes
This test is applied to assess the risk of falling and mobility.This test starts with the individual leaving the chair without receiving arm support by giving the go command while sitting in a chair.The distance of 3 meters is asked to return and sit again in the chair.The elapsed time is recorded in seconds.
10 Meter Walk Tests
Time frame: 3 minutes
Walking speed are measure by timing subjects over 10 meters with a stopwatch. To avoid the effects of acceleration and deceleration, measurements take over the middle 10 meters of a 14-meter walkway. It is repeated 2 times.
Falls Efficacy Scale
Time frame: 5 minutes
FES is a 10-item scale and these items are; To enter and get out of bed, to sit and stand on the chair, to take a bath or shower, to dress and undress, to lie on the shelves, to walk in the house, to answer the door or phone, to prepare food without lifting heavy objects and to do simple shopping. Individuals score between 0 (not safe) and 10 (very safe) for each question, and when all scores are summed, a total score between 0 and 100 is obtained.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Nov 2020.
- Background: PubMed 22677295Padgett PK, Jacobs JV, Kasser SL. Is the BESTest at its best? A suggested brief version based on interrater reliability, validity, internal consistency, and theoretical construct. Phys Ther. 2012 Sep;92(9):1197-207. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20120056. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
- Background: PubMed 15573838Smith PS, Hembree JA, Thompson ME. Berg Balance Scale and Functional Reach: determining the best clinical tool for individuals post acute stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2004 Nov;18(7):811-8. doi: 10.1191/0269215504cr817oa.
- Background: PubMed 12692769Schmidt S, Bullinger M. Current issues in cross-cultural quality of life instrument development. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 Apr;84(4 Suppl 2):S29-34. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2003.50244.
- Background: PubMed 24925073Chinsongkram B, Chaikeeree N, Saengsirisuwan V, Viriyatharakij N, Horak FB, Boonsinsukh R. Reliability and validity of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) in people with subacute stroke. Phys Ther. 2014 Nov;94(11):1632-43. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130558. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
- Background: PubMed 22288658Bergstrom M, Lenholm E, Franzen E. Translation and validation of the Swedish version of the mini-BESTest in subjects with Parkinson's disease or stroke: a pilot study. Physiother Theory Pract. 2012 Oct;28(7):509-14. doi: 10.3109/09593985.2011.653707. Epub 2012 Jan 30.
- Background: PubMed 26183191O'Hoski S, Sibley KM, Brooks D, Beauchamp MK. Construct validity of the BESTest, mini-BESTest and briefBESTest in adults aged 50 years and older. Gait Posture. 2015 Sep;42(3):301-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.06.006. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
- Background: PubMed 20461334Franchignoni F, Horak F, Godi M, Nardone A, Giordano A. Using psychometric techniques to improve the Balance Evaluation Systems Test: the mini-BESTest. J Rehabil Med. 2010 Apr;42(4):323-31. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0537.
- Background: PubMed 19329772Horak FB, Wrisley DM, Frank J. The Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) to differentiate balance deficits. Phys Ther. 2009 May;89(5):484-98. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20080071. Epub 2009 Mar 27.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Stroke Patients
Not yet recruiting
The Effects of an Augmented Reality-Based Mirror Therapy System in Patients With Stroke
Stroke
Recruiting
A Pivotal Study Evaluating Safety and Effectiveness of Adaptative Tip Catheter in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke
Ischemic Stroke
Recruiting
CT Stress Myocardial Perfusion, Fractional Flow Reserve and Angiography in Patients With Stable Chest Pain Syndromes
Coronary Artery Disease, Chest Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 2
The Efficacy and Safety of HRS-4029 in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients
Acute Ischemic Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of iNstroke 5F Aspiration Catheter for Thrombectomy
Acute Ischemic Stroke
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Saniye Aydoğan Arslan study director
Kırıkkale University
Kübra Uğurlu principal investigator
Kırıkkale University
Cevher Demirci principal investigator
Balikesir University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Stroke Patients, run by Kırıkkale University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Nov 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Berg Balance Test (time frame: 15 minutes). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04268446, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Nov 2020.