Parkinson DiseaseNCT04269577
Motor Learning in Parkinson's Disease: Underlying Effective Connectivity and Influential Factors
A study testing SSP training in people with Parkinson Disease, run by KU Leuven at 1 site in Belgium.
Trial summary
Parkinson's disease (PD) is characterized by severe motor symptoms that can only be partially alleviated by medication. It was shown previously that rehabilitation is an important therapeutic supplement for micrographia in early disease. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 to 80 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Parkinson Disease
- What is being tested?
- SSP training
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBelgium
- Study dates
- 10 May 2021to Mar 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 to 80 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of Parkinson's disease based on the 'UK Brain Bank' criteria
- Right handed
- No dementia (Mini Mental State Examination > 24/30)
- Early PD group: disease duration of ≤ 2 year since appearance of first symptoms in combination with a maximum score of 2 on each of the upper limb items of the MDS-UPDRS-III
- Mid stage PD group: patients are considered as mid-stage in case one of the criteria for early PD is not fulfilled
Who cannot join
- Comorbidities of the upper limb that could interfere with the study and are not caused by Parkinson's disease (e.g. arthritis, fractures of the hand, etc.)
- Other medical or psychiatric impairments that could interfere with the study protocol
- Contra-indications for Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Tremor of the head or right hand, as determined by the Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson's disease Rating scale part III
- Color blindness as determined by the Ishihara test for color deficiency
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Parkinson's disease (PD) is characterized by severe motor symptoms that can only be partially alleviated by medication. It was shown previously that rehabilitation is an important therapeutic supplement for micrographia in early disease. However, what is unknown is how motor learning impacts on the underlying neural networks in patients with different disease progression and how this interacts with dopaminergic medication. Furthermore, difficulties with upper limb motor control has a severe impact on the daily lives of PD patients since fine motor skills become increasingly important for the use of smartphones and tablets. Therefore, the current project will include a newly developed Swipe-Slide Pattern test, resembling the pattern codes used to unlock smartphones and tablets. This task will be used to determine learning-induced neuroplasticity of cortico-striatal effective connectivity across disease stages in PD. Using a combination of behavioral assessment and functional magnetic resonance imaging, the investigators aim to contribute to the understanding of upper limb motor learning in patients with PD for the development of individualized rehabilitation programs.
Read the detailed description
For this study, 25 healthy controls, 25 early patients and 25 mid-stage patients will be included. The sample size was predicted by a power-analysis based on our own pilot study and the study of Dan et al., using a β=0.20, α=0.05. Mean movement time after the first 18 blocks of the SSP-task were available for healthy controls and PD patients in the mid-stage and predicted for early-stage patients. To counter potential dropout from the studies or data loss, the recruitment numbers are at least 30% higher than the ones resulting from the power analysis. Patients will be tested during the OFF phase of the medication cycle, i.e. approximately 12 h after last medication intake. The distinction between early and mid-stage patients is based on a combined criterion of disease duration and upper limb items of the MDS-UPDRS-III (while OFF medication). Patients are considered as early when ≤ 2 years have passed since the first symptoms emerged (note this is not years since diagnosis) in combination with maximal score of 2 on each of the upper limb MDS-UPDRS-III items. Patients are considered as mid-stage when either one of these criteria is not fulfilled.
Participants will first undergo an inclusion session at home. During this session, they will undergo an extensive behavioral test battery, assessing cognitive and motor skills. Patients will start this session in the OFF phase of the medication phase and will therefore be asked to postpone their morning medication. First, motor skills will be assessed by means of the Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) and Clinch token transfer test (C3T). Cognitive assessment includes the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Trail Making Test (TMT). Additionally, tablet skills will be tested extensively using a newly developed test battery, including performance of tapping between two spots, swiping in a single direction and swiping in multiple directions in random order, in single and dual task conditions. Additionally, a mobile phone task will be performed in which participants have to type in a pre-defined phone number on a smartphone. This part of the assessment will take approximately 60 min. Afterwards patients will be able to take their regular medication and several questionnaires will be filled out. These include the New Freezing Of Gait Questionnaire (NFOG-Q), the non-gait freezing questionnaire, the Dexterity questionnaire (DextQ-24), the Mobile Device Proficiency Questionnaire (MDPQ-16), questions regarding smartphone and tablet use and remaining parts of the MDS-UPDRS. Furthermore, daily levodopa doses will be recorded. Healthy controls will undergo a similar protocol, though disease-specific assessments and questionnaires will not be performed (i.e. MDS-UPDRS, NFOG-Q, non-gait freezing questionnaire and medication intake).
Following inclusion, participants will be invited to the radiology dept. UZ Leuven. They will train the SSP-task on an MRI-compatible tablet, while their hemodynamic responses are measured using fMRI. Training will include two runs of 7 min 50 s. The SSP-task is based on the finger movements that have to be made to unlock smartphones or tablets or the trajectory that can be used to quickly form words using a keyboard on a smartphone. During this test, participants will have to make different pre-defined patterns. To reduce cognitive load, the pattern will be visible in one of the upper corners of the screen. During the task, participants will be able to see the lines they are drawing. Every pattern will begin in one of nine circles and will consist of equally long movements. Participants will be asked to move the hand without fully lifting the finger stylus from the screen to maintain the online trace. In addition, participants will be instructed to return to a fixed starting point when the pattern is complete. An MRI-compatible version of the touch-sensitive tablet will be used. Participants will see the trace of their pen on the tablet by means of a built-in mirror on top of the head coil. In addition to the task-based fMRI, a high-resolution T1-weighted anatomical scan and diffusion weighted imaging will be performed. Before and after the scan, participants will perform the mobile phone task, a single- and dual-task version of the SSP (to test automatization) and the tapping between two spots test outside the scanner. Additionally, participants will fill out the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI).
From day 2 till 5, participants will continue practice of the SSP-task at home. For this, participants will be asked to perform the SSP-task on a tablet each morning, for patients this will be just before taking their regular medication. These training sessions will be limited to 10 minutes and contain the pattern that was learned on day 1, as well as two new patterns to allow variation. The patterns will be offered in a random order, as research has shown that random practice can improve retention and transfer in both healthy elderly adults and patients with PD. On day 5, the researcher will go to the participants' home and perform an immediate retention test, involving the single- and dual task version of the SSP-task. On days 6 and 7 participants will not practice to allow for a retention period. On day 8, all participants will have a (delayed) retention/transfer scan, consisting of two runs: (i) a run containing the learned pattern; and (ii) a run including a new pattern to assess transfer. Again, ST and DT performance on the SSP-task will be assessed outside the scanner, using a different pattern to avoid learning. Participants will also perform the mobile phone task and tapping between two spots test. To minimize head movements during the scan itself, a vacuum fixation pillow to accommodate these difficulties will be used.
- Conditions
- Parkinson Disease
- Being tested
- SSP training
- Keywords
- Neurologic rehabilitation, Motor learning, Disease progression
- Medical subject headings
- Parkinson Disease, Disease Progression
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SSP trainingBehavioural
Participants will practice the Swipe Slide Pattern (SSP) task. On day 1, participants perform two runs of the SSP-task (only one pattern), each lasting approx. 10 min, within an MR scanner. During each run, nine trials of 30s are performed, alternated with rest periods of 14s. In addition, instructions are provided before each trial (i.e. view of the pattern, 4s), as well as an answer option (i.e. participants have circle a random number from zero to nine, 6s). For the following four days (day 2-5), participants will continue practice of the SSP-task at home. During the at-home-sessions, participants will perform nine trials of 12 patterns each, alternated with rest periods of 14s. Instruction are also included. During at home practice, the same pattern as during scans is included, in combination with two new patterns.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| SSP training - early PD | Experimental | Practice of the Swipe Slide Pattern task alone for a group of patients with early Parkinson's disease (PD) Receives: Behavioral: SSP training |
| SSP training - mid PD | Experimental | Practice of the Swipe Slide Pattern task alone for a group of patients with mid-stage Parkinson's disease (PD) Receives: Behavioral: SSP training |
| SSP training - HC | Experimental | Practice of the Swipe Slide Pattern task alone for a group of healthy age-matched controls (HC) Receives: Behavioral: SSP training |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in movement time (s) of trained pattern
Using the behavioral data gathered during task-based fMRI, the learning index and retention index, as described in Nackaerts et al. 2020, will be determined and compared between groups (early PD vs mid PD vs HC).
Measured: 7 days
Change in dual task effect
Using the behavioral data gathered before and immediately after task-based fMRI, as well as at immediate and delayed retention, dual task interference will be calculated and compared between groups (early PD vs mid PD vs HC) and time points
Measured: 7 days
Change in brain activity during performance of trained pattern
The BOLD activity pattern will be determined and compared between the 3 training phases (i.e. early learning, late learning and retention) and groups (early PD vs mid PD vs HC).
Measured: 7 days
Change in brain connectivity during performance of trained pattern
The BOLD activity pattern will be determined and connectivity measures will be extracted. Neural network changes will be compared between the 3 training phases (i.e. early learning, late learning and retention) and groups (early PD vs mid PD vs HC).
Measured: 7 days
Diffusion weighted imaging as a predictor
Anatomical connectivity at baseline will be calculated and investigated as a predictive factor for learning capacity.
Measured: 7 days
Secondary outcomes (5)
Change in Euclidean distance of trained pattern
Using the behavioral data gathered during task-based fMRI, the learning index and retention index, as described in Nackaerts et al. 2020, will be determined and compared between groups (early PD vs mid PD vs HC).
Measured: 7 days
Change in movement time (s) of the untrained pattern
Using the behavioral data gathered during task-based fMRI, the transfer index, as described in Nackaerts et al. 2020, will be determined and compared between groups (early PD vs mid PD vs HC).
Measured: 7 days
Change in Euclidean distance of the untrained pattern
Using the behavioral data gathered during task-based fMRI, the transfer index, as described in Nackaerts et al. 2020, will be determined and compared between groups (early PD vs mid PD vs HC).
Measured: 7 days
Change in brain activity during performance of untrained pattern
The BOLD activity pattern will be determined and compared between the training phases and groups (early PD vs mid PD vs HC).
Measured: 7 days
Change in brain connectivity during performance of untrained pattern
The BOLD activity pattern will be determined and connectivity measures will be extracted. Neural network changes will be compared between the training phases and groups (early PD vs mid PD vs HC).
Measured: 7 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Feb 2020
- Study start10 May 2021
- Primary completionMar 2024 (estimated)
- Study completionMar 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Parkinson DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by KU LeuvenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- KU Leuven
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Research Foundation Flanders
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Alice Nieuwboer, KU Leuven
- Investigators
- Alice Nieuwboer, PhD, Principal investigator, KU Leuven
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04269577
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 12F4719N
- Status last verified
- Nov 2023
- First submitted
- 10 Feb 2020
- Last updated
- 18 Nov 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Nackaerts E, Ginis P, Heremans E, Swinnen SP, Vandenberghe W, Nieuwboer A. Retention of touchscreen skills is compromised in Parkinson's disease. Behav Brain Res. 2020 Jan 27;378:112265. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2019.112265. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
PubMed 31568836Lin CH, Chiang MC, Wu AD, Iacoboni M, Udompholkul P, Yazdanshenas O, Knowlton BJ. Age related differences in the neural substrates of motor sequence learning after interleaved and repetitive practice. Neuroimage. 2012 Sep;62(3):2007-20. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.015. Epub 2012 May 11.
PubMed 22584226Sidaway B, Ala B, Baughman K, Glidden J, Cowie S, Peabody A, Roundy D, Spaulding J, Stephens R, Wright DL. Contextual Interference Can Facilitate Motor Learning in Older Adults and in Individuals With Parkinson's Disease. J Mot Behav. 2016 Nov-Dec;48(6):509-518. doi: 10.1080/00222895.2016.1152221. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
PubMed 27340809Dan X, King BR, Doyon J, Chan P. Motor Sequence Learning and Consolidation in Unilateral De Novo Patients with Parkinson's Disease. PLoS One. 2015 Jul 29;10(7):e0134291. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134291. eCollection 2015.
PubMed 26222151
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Nov 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Motor Learning in Parkinson's Disease: Underlying Effective Connectivity and Influential Factors
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04269577
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 12F4719N
- Conditions
- Parkinson Disease
- Keywords
- Neurologic rehabilitation, Motor learning, Disease progression
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- KU LeuvenUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Research Foundation Flanders
- Study start
- 10 May 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Mar 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Mar 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 17 Feb 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Parkinson's disease (PD) is characterized by severe motor symptoms that can only be partially alleviated by medication. It was shown previously that rehabilitation is an important therapeutic supplement for micrographia in early disease. However, what is unknown is how motor learning impacts on the underlying neural networks in patients with different disease progression and how this interacts with dopaminergic medication. Furthermore, difficulties with upper limb motor control has a severe impact on the daily lives of PD patients since fine motor skills become increasingly important for the use of smartphones and tablets. Therefore, the current project will include a newly developed Swipe-Slide Pattern test, resembling the pattern codes used to unlock smartphones and tablets. This task will be used to determine learning-induced neuroplasticity of cortico-striatal effective connectivity across disease stages in PD. Using a combination of behavioral assessment and functional magnetic resonance imaging, the investigators aim to contribute to the understanding of upper limb motor learning in patients with PD for the development of individualized rehabilitation programs.
Detailed description
For this study, 25 healthy controls, 25 early patients and 25 mid-stage patients will be included. The sample size was predicted by a power-analysis based on our own pilot study and the study of Dan et al., using a β=0.20, α=0.05. Mean movement time after the first 18 blocks of the SSP-task were available for healthy controls and PD patients in the mid-stage and predicted for early-stage patients. To counter potential dropout from the studies or data loss, the recruitment numbers are at least 30% higher than the ones resulting from the power analysis. Patients will be tested during the OFF phase of the medication cycle, i.e. approximately 12 h after last medication intake. The distinction between early and mid-stage patients is based on a combined criterion of disease duration and upper limb items of the MDS-UPDRS-III (while OFF medication). Patients are considered as early when ≤ 2 years have passed since the first symptoms emerged (note this is not years since diagnosis) in combination with maximal score of 2 on each of the upper limb MDS-UPDRS-III items. Patients are considered as mid-stage when either one of these criteria is not fulfilled.
Participants will first undergo an inclusion session at home. During this session, they will undergo an extensive behavioral test battery, assessing cognitive and motor skills. Patients will start this session in the OFF phase of the medication phase and will therefore be asked to postpone their morning medication. First, motor skills will be assessed by means of the Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) and Clinch token transfer test (C3T). Cognitive assessment includes the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Trail Making Test (TMT). Additionally, tablet skills will be tested extensively using a newly developed test battery, including performance of tapping between two spots, swiping in a single direction and swiping in multiple directions in random order, in single and dual task conditions. Additionally, a mobile phone task will be performed in which participants have to type in a pre-defined phone number on a smartphone. This part of the assessment will take approximately 60 min. Afterwards patients will be able to take their regular medication and several questionnaires will be filled out. These include the New Freezing Of Gait Questionnaire (NFOG-Q), the non-gait freezing questionnaire, the Dexterity questionnaire (DextQ-24), the Mobile Device Proficiency Questionnaire (MDPQ-16), questions regarding smartphone and tablet use and remaining parts of the MDS-UPDRS. Furthermore, daily levodopa doses will be recorded. Healthy controls will undergo a similar protocol, though disease-specific assessments and questionnaires will not be performed (i.e. MDS-UPDRS, NFOG-Q, non-gait freezing questionnaire and medication intake).
Following inclusion, participants will be invited to the radiology dept. UZ Leuven. They will train the SSP-task on an MRI-compatible tablet, while their hemodynamic responses are measured using fMRI. Training will include two runs of 7 min 50 s. The SSP-task is based on the finger movements that have to be made to unlock smartphones or tablets or the trajectory that can be used to quickly form words using a keyboard on a smartphone. During this test, participants will have to make different pre-defined patterns. To reduce cognitive load, the pattern will be visible in one of the upper corners of the screen. During the task, participants will be able to see the lines they are drawing. Every pattern will begin in one of nine circles and will consist of equally long movements. Participants will be asked to move the hand without fully lifting the finger stylus from the screen to maintain the online trace. In addition, participants will be instructed to return to a fixed starting point when the pattern is complete. An MRI-compatible version of the touch-sensitive tablet will be used. Participants will see the trace of their pen on the tablet by means of a built-in mirror on top of the head coil. In addition to the task-based fMRI, a high-resolution T1-weighted anatomical scan and diffusion weighted imaging will be performed. Before and after the scan, participants will perform the mobile phone task, a single- and dual-task version of the SSP (to test automatization) and the tapping between two spots test outside the scanner. Additionally, participants will fill out the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI).
From day 2 till 5, participants will continue practice of the SSP-task at home. For this, participants will be asked to perform the SSP-task on a tablet each morning, for patients this will be just before taking their regular medication. These training sessions will be limited to 10 minutes and contain the pattern that was learned on day 1, as well as two new patterns to allow variation. The patterns will be offered in a random order, as research has shown that random practice can improve retention and transfer in both healthy elderly adults and patients with PD. On day 5, the researcher will go to the participants' home and perform an immediate retention test, involving the single- and dual task version of the SSP-task. On days 6 and 7 participants will not practice to allow for a retention period. On day 8, all participants will have a (delayed) retention/transfer scan, consisting of two runs: (i) a run containing the learned pattern; and (ii) a run including a new pattern to assess transfer. Again, ST and DT performance on the SSP-task will be assessed outside the scanner, using a different pattern to avoid learning. Participants will also perform the mobile phone task and tapping between two spots test. To minimize head movements during the scan itself, a vacuum fixation pillow to accommodate these difficulties will be used.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| SSP training - early PD | Experimental | Behavioral: SSP trainingPractice of the Swipe Slide Pattern task alone for a group of patients with early Parkinson's disease (PD) |
| SSP training - mid PD | Experimental | Behavioral: SSP trainingPractice of the Swipe Slide Pattern task alone for a group of patients with mid-stage Parkinson's disease (PD) |
| SSP training - HC | Experimental | Behavioral: SSP trainingPractice of the Swipe Slide Pattern task alone for a group of healthy age-matched controls (HC) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Diagnosis of Parkinson's disease based on the 'UK Brain Bank' criteria
- Right handed
- No dementia (Mini Mental State Examination > 24/30)
- Early PD group: disease duration of ≤ 2 year since appearance of first symptoms in combination with a maximum score of 2 on each of the upper limb items of the MDS-UPDRS-III
- Mid stage PD group: patients are considered as mid-stage in case one of the criteria for early PD is not fulfilled
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Comorbidities of the upper limb that could interfere with the study and are not caused by Parkinson's disease (e.g. arthritis, fractures of the hand, etc.)
- Other medical or psychiatric impairments that could interfere with the study protocol
- Contra-indications for Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Tremor of the head or right hand, as determined by the Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson's disease Rating scale part III
- Color blindness as determined by the Ishihara test for color deficiency
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SSP trainingParticipants will practice the Swipe Slide Pattern (SSP) task. On day 1, participants perform two runs of the SSP-task (only one pattern), each lasting approx. 10 min, within an MR scanner. During each run, nine trials of 30s are performed, alternated with rest periods of 14s. In addition, instructions are provided before each trial (i.e. view of the pattern, 4s), as well as an answer option (i.e. participants have circle a random number from zero to nine, 6s). For the following four days (day 2-5), participants will continue practice of the SSP-task at home. During the at-home-sessions, participants will perform nine trials of 12 patterns each, alternated with rest periods of 14s. Instruction are also included. During at home practice, the same pattern as during scans is included, in combination with two new patterns. | Behavioural | SSP training - HC, SSP training - early PD, SSP training - mid PD |
Primary outcome
Change in movement time (s) of trained pattern
Time frame: 7 days
Using the behavioral data gathered during task-based fMRI, the learning index and retention index, as described in Nackaerts et al. 2020, will be determined and compared between groups (early PD vs mid PD vs HC).
Change in dual task effect
Time frame: 7 days
Using the behavioral data gathered before and immediately after task-based fMRI, as well as at immediate and delayed retention, dual task interference will be calculated and compared between groups (early PD vs mid PD vs HC) and time points
Change in brain activity during performance of trained pattern
Time frame: 7 days
The BOLD activity pattern will be determined and compared between the 3 training phases (i.e. early learning, late learning and retention) and groups (early PD vs mid PD vs HC).
Change in brain connectivity during performance of trained pattern
Time frame: 7 days
The BOLD activity pattern will be determined and connectivity measures will be extracted. Neural network changes will be compared between the 3 training phases (i.e. early learning, late learning and retention) and groups (early PD vs mid PD vs HC).
Diffusion weighted imaging as a predictor
Time frame: 7 days
Anatomical connectivity at baseline will be calculated and investigated as a predictive factor for learning capacity.
5 secondary outcomes
Change in Euclidean distance of trained pattern
Time frame: 7 days
Change in movement time (s) of the untrained pattern
Time frame: 7 days
Change in Euclidean distance of the untrained pattern
Time frame: 7 days
Change in brain activity during performance of untrained pattern
Time frame: 7 days
Change in brain connectivity during performance of untrained pattern
Time frame: 7 days
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Nov 2023.
- Background: PubMed 31568836Nackaerts E, Ginis P, Heremans E, Swinnen SP, Vandenberghe W, Nieuwboer A. Retention of touchscreen skills is compromised in Parkinson's disease. Behav Brain Res. 2020 Jan 27;378:112265. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2019.112265. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
- Background: PubMed 22584226Lin CH, Chiang MC, Wu AD, Iacoboni M, Udompholkul P, Yazdanshenas O, Knowlton BJ. Age related differences in the neural substrates of motor sequence learning after interleaved and repetitive practice. Neuroimage. 2012 Sep;62(3):2007-20. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.015. Epub 2012 May 11.
- Background: PubMed 27340809Sidaway B, Ala B, Baughman K, Glidden J, Cowie S, Peabody A, Roundy D, Spaulding J, Stephens R, Wright DL. Contextual Interference Can Facilitate Motor Learning in Older Adults and in Individuals With Parkinson's Disease. J Mot Behav. 2016 Nov-Dec;48(6):509-518. doi: 10.1080/00222895.2016.1152221. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
- Background: PubMed 26222151Dan X, King BR, Doyon J, Chan P. Motor Sequence Learning and Consolidation in Unilateral De Novo Patients with Parkinson's Disease. PLoS One. 2015 Jul 29;10(7):e0134291. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134291. eCollection 2015.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Parkinson Disease
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Early Molecular Biomarkers for Differentiating Parkinsonian Syndromes
PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder), Atypical Parkinsonism
RecruitingPhase 3
A Clinical Study of Sacituzumab Tirumotecan (MK-2870) in Combination With Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) as First-line Maintenance Treatment of Cervical Cancer (MK-2870-036/TroFuse-036/GOG-3123/ENGOT-cx22)
Cervical Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Clinical Safety and Efficacy of Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stromal Cells-derived Exosomes in Patients With Parkinson's Disease
Parkinson Disease (PD)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Adaptive DBS to Offset STN Dysregulation During Exercise in PD
Parkinson Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Alice Nieuwboer, PhD principal investigator
KU Leuven
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing SSP training in people with Parkinson Disease, run by KU Leuven at 1 site in Belgium.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Nov 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in movement time (s) of trained pattern (time frame: 7 days). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04269577, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Nov 2023.