Overactive BladderPhase 4NCT04270526
Minimizing Pain During Office Intradetrussor Botox Injection
A Phase 4 study testing Bicarbonate protocol and Standard protocol in people with Overactive Bladder and Overactive Detrusor, run by Boston Urogynecology Associates at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This will be a prospective double-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing two pre-treatment protocols for patients undergoing intradetrussor botox injections to determine if a buffered lidocaine solution offers superior pain control. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Overactive Bladder, Overactive Detrusor, Overactive Bladder Syndrome
- What is being tested?
- Bicarbonate protocol and Standard protocol
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 85 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 15 Aug 2020to 30 Jun 2023
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Female patient
- Primary diagnosis of overactive bladder
- Failed first and second line therapy for overactive bladder
- Planning to undergo bladder botox injections
Who cannot join
- Neurogenic bladder
- Urinary retention
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Boston Urogynecology Associates
Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02138
About this study
Official title: Minimizing Pain During Office Intradetrussor Botox Injection: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Two Protocols
This will be a prospective double-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing two pre-treatment protocols for patients undergoing intradetrussor botox injections to determine if a buffered lidocaine solution offers superior pain control.
Read the detailed description
Lidocaine is a commonly used amide-type local anesthetic. Lidocaine exists as both a quaternary water soluble structure, and a tertiary lipid-soluble structure. Only the tertiary lipid-soluble structure can cross the lipid bilayer of a cell membrane and thereby enter a neurons axoplasm and induce the desired effect. The ionization constant of lidocaine is 7.7 which means that at a pH of 7.7, 50% of lidocaine is available in the tertiary lipid-soluble structure. At a physiologic pH between 7.35 and 7.45 only around 44% of lidocaine is in the tertiary lipid-soluble structure. However, for lidocaine to be stable in solution, it is typically formulated as a hydrochloride salt and the pH of most commercially available lidocaine solutions are at a pH of 6.09. In an acidic solution the majority of lidocaine is available in the quaternary water-soluble structure and at this pH only 2.5% of lidocaine is in the tertiary lipid-soluble structure. A Cochrane review found that increasing the pH of lidocaine prior to injection decreased pain and increased patient satisfaction perhaps because of the aforementioned pharmacokinetic principles.
Lidocaine is typically used as anesthetic for intradetrussor injections of onabotulinum toxin A for the treatment of refractory overactive bladder. In 2003, a technique for intradetrussor injections of onabotulinum toxin A was first described using only local anesthesia. At that time, the procedure involved intrauerthral lidocaine. The procedure has evolved since that time and currently many physicians utilize protocols with both utraurethral and intravesical lidocaine. At baseline intradetrusor onabotulinum toxin A injections are generally well tolerated and with reported mean VAS scores around 3.
For patients with refractory overactive bladder, the standard of care is intradetrussor onabotulinum toxin A injections. The standard protocol used by the investigators involves emptying the bladder then retrograde filling the bladder with a 1:1 mixture of 1% lidocaine normal saline. This solution remains in the bladder for approximately 15 minutes prior to injection. Given that urine is typically acidic and commercially available lidocaine solutions are similarly acidic, it is likely that only a fraction of intravesical lidocaine is in the active tertiary lipid-soluble form. The goal of this study is to determine if the investigators can improve the procedural pain of intradetrusor onabotulinum toxin A injections using a buffered solution compared to our standard solution.
After approval by the IRB, investigators will approach possible participants who are having intradetrussor botox injection for overactive bladder which is the standard of care for patients with refractory overactive bladder. If the patient meets eligibility criteria, consent forms will be signed and the patient will be randomized 1:1 to receive either our standard pretreatment regimen with 50 mL 1% lidocaine + 50ml of 0.9% normal saline or our buffered bicarbonate protocol with 50 mL 1% lidocaine + 45ml of 0.9% normal saline + 5 mL 8.4% sodium bicarbonate. The primary end point of this trial is to assess the pain scores measured on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) immediately following the procedure. Secondary end points include patient satisfaction, willingness to undergo repeat treatment and adverse events.
All subjects will be randomized 1:1 at the first intervention visit to one of the two protocols using a random block design . At the completion of the procedure, patients will be asked to complete a brief questionnaire about their experience. Patients will follow up in clinic for a post-void residual check two weeks after the procedure as is standard for our clinical practice.
- Conditions
- Overactive Bladder, Overactive Detrusor, Overactive Bladder Syndrome, Overactivity; Behavior, Urge Incontinence
- Being tested
- Bicarbonate protocol, Standard protocol
- Medical subject headings
- Urinary Bladder, Overactive, Spasm, Urinary Incontinence, Urge
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Bicarbonate protocolDrug
Intradetrussor treatment with 50 mL 1% lidocaine + 45ml of 0.9% normal saline + 5 mL 8.4% sodium bicarbonate
Standard protocolDrug
Intradetrussor treatment with 50 mL 1% lidocaine + 50ml of 0.9% normal saline
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Active treatment | Active comparator | 50 mL 1% lidocaine + 45ml of 0.9% normal saline + 5 mL 8.4% sodium bicarbonate Receives: Drug: Bicarbonate protocol |
| Placebo treatment | Placebo comparator | 50 mL 1% lidocaine + 50ml of 0.9% normal saline Receives: Drug: Standard protocol |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain: VAS
Pain on visual analog scale from 0-100 with higher scores worse
Measured: Immediately after the procedure
Secondary outcomes (2)
Satisfaction: Likert Scale
Likert scale questions assessing overall satisfaction with the procedure with responses from very 1 (dissatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied) with higher scores representing more satisfaction. We reported the percentage of participants who were satisfied we defined as a response of 4 or 5.
Measured: Immediately after the procedure
Willingness to Undergo Repeat Procedure
Likert scale questions assessing the patient's willingness to undergo a repeat procedure from very likely (1) to very unlikely (5) with five items total. We defined willingness to undergo repeat procedure as a score of 1 or 2 on the Likert scale and outcome measured was the percentage of patients who responded with a 1 or 2.
Measured: Immediately after the procedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Feb 2020
- Study start15 Aug 2020
- Primary completion30 Jun 2023
- Study completion30 Jun 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Overactive BladderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- All subjects will be randomized 1:1 at the first intervention visit to one of the two protocols using a random block design
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 85 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Boston Urogynecology Associates
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, William D. Winkelman, Boston Urogynecology Associates
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04270526
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 037-2019
- Status last verified
- Feb 2025
- First submitted
- 12 Feb 2020
- Last updated
- 6 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Ward SA, Macharia A, Hacker MR, Elkadry EA, Winkelman WD. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Instillation Protocols Prior to Intradetrusor OnabotulinumtoxinA. Int Urogynecol J. 2025 Apr;36(4):849-855. doi: 10.1007/s00192-025-06080-7. Epub 2025 Mar 1.
PubMed 40025238
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Mar 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Minimizing Pain During Office Intradetrussor Botox Injection: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Two Protocols
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04270526
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 037-2019
- Conditions
- Overactive Bladder, Overactive Detrusor, Overactive Bladder Syndrome, Overactivity; Behavior, Urge Incontinence
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 85 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Boston Urogynecology AssociatesUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Aug 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Feb 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 6 Mar 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This will be a prospective double-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing two pre-treatment protocols for patients undergoing intradetrussor botox injections to determine if a buffered lidocaine solution offers superior pain control.
Detailed description
Lidocaine is a commonly used amide-type local anesthetic. Lidocaine exists as both a quaternary water soluble structure, and a tertiary lipid-soluble structure. Only the tertiary lipid-soluble structure can cross the lipid bilayer of a cell membrane and thereby enter a neurons axoplasm and induce the desired effect. The ionization constant of lidocaine is 7.7 which means that at a pH of 7.7, 50% of lidocaine is available in the tertiary lipid-soluble structure. At a physiologic pH between 7.35 and 7.45 only around 44% of lidocaine is in the tertiary lipid-soluble structure. However, for lidocaine to be stable in solution, it is typically formulated as a hydrochloride salt and the pH of most commercially available lidocaine solutions are at a pH of 6.09. In an acidic solution the majority of lidocaine is available in the quaternary water-soluble structure and at this pH only 2.5% of lidocaine is in the tertiary lipid-soluble structure. A Cochrane review found that increasing the pH of lidocaine prior to injection decreased pain and increased patient satisfaction perhaps because of the aforementioned pharmacokinetic principles.
Lidocaine is typically used as anesthetic for intradetrussor injections of onabotulinum toxin A for the treatment of refractory overactive bladder. In 2003, a technique for intradetrussor injections of onabotulinum toxin A was first described using only local anesthesia. At that time, the procedure involved intrauerthral lidocaine. The procedure has evolved since that time and currently many physicians utilize protocols with both utraurethral and intravesical lidocaine. At baseline intradetrusor onabotulinum toxin A injections are generally well tolerated and with reported mean VAS scores around 3.
For patients with refractory overactive bladder, the standard of care is intradetrussor onabotulinum toxin A injections. The standard protocol used by the investigators involves emptying the bladder then retrograde filling the bladder with a 1:1 mixture of 1% lidocaine normal saline. This solution remains in the bladder for approximately 15 minutes prior to injection. Given that urine is typically acidic and commercially available lidocaine solutions are similarly acidic, it is likely that only a fraction of intravesical lidocaine is in the active tertiary lipid-soluble form. The goal of this study is to determine if the investigators can improve the procedural pain of intradetrusor onabotulinum toxin A injections using a buffered solution compared to our standard solution.
After approval by the IRB, investigators will approach possible participants who are having intradetrussor botox injection for overactive bladder which is the standard of care for patients with refractory overactive bladder. If the patient meets eligibility criteria, consent forms will be signed and the patient will be randomized 1:1 to receive either our standard pretreatment regimen with 50 mL 1% lidocaine + 50ml of 0.9% normal saline or our buffered bicarbonate protocol with 50 mL 1% lidocaine + 45ml of 0.9% normal saline + 5 mL 8.4% sodium bicarbonate. The primary end point of this trial is to assess the pain scores measured on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) immediately following the procedure. Secondary end points include patient satisfaction, willingness to undergo repeat treatment and adverse events.
All subjects will be randomized 1:1 at the first intervention visit to one of the two protocols using a random block design . At the completion of the procedure, patients will be asked to complete a brief questionnaire about their experience. Patients will follow up in clinic for a post-void residual check two weeks after the procedure as is standard for our clinical practice.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- All subjects will be randomized 1:1 at the first intervention visit to one of the two protocols using a random block design
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Active treatment | Active comparator | Drug: Bicarbonate protocol50 mL 1% lidocaine + 45ml of 0.9% normal saline + 5 mL 8.4% sodium bicarbonate |
| Placebo treatment | Placebo comparator | Drug: Standard protocol50 mL 1% lidocaine + 50ml of 0.9% normal saline |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Female patient
- Primary diagnosis of overactive bladder
- Failed first and second line therapy for overactive bladder
- Planning to undergo bladder botox injections
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Neurogenic bladder
- Urinary retention
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Bicarbonate protocolIntradetrussor treatment with 50 mL 1% lidocaine + 45ml of 0.9% normal saline + 5 mL 8.4% sodium bicarbonate | Drug | Active treatment |
| Standard protocolIntradetrussor treatment with 50 mL 1% lidocaine + 50ml of 0.9% normal saline | Drug | Placebo treatment |
Primary outcome
Pain: VAS
Time frame: Immediately after the procedure
Pain on visual analog scale from 0-100 with higher scores worse
2 secondary outcomes
Satisfaction: Likert Scale
Time frame: Immediately after the procedure
Willingness to Undergo Repeat Procedure
Time frame: Immediately after the procedure
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Mar 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40025238Ward SA, Macharia A, Hacker MR, Elkadry EA, Winkelman WD. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Instillation Protocols Prior to Intradetrusor OnabotulinumtoxinA. Int Urogynecol J. 2025 Apr;36(4):849-855. doi: 10.1007/s00192-025-06080-7. Epub 2025 Mar 1.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Overactive Bladder
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Behavioral and/or Mirabegron to Treat Urinary Symptoms in Parkinson Disease
Overactive Bladder, Parkinson Disease
Recruiting
Ambulatory Long Length URodynamics Evaluation
Urology, Urinary Bladder, Overactive
Active, not recruiting
APPROVE Trial: Evaluating a Prescription Digital Therapeutic for Treatment of OAB in Women
Overactive Bladder (OAB), Urinary Urgency
Not yet recruiting
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Neurogenic Overactive Bladder Symptoms Among People With Stroke
Stroke, Neurogenic Overactive Bladder
RecruitingObservational study
Tensi+ European Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up
Overactive Bladder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Bicarbonate protocol and Standard protocol in people with Overactive Bladder and Overactive Detrusor, run by Boston Urogynecology Associates at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Mar 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain: VAS (time frame: Immediately after the procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04270526, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Mar 2025.