AzTrials
AzTrials

X-linked HypophosphatemiaNCT04273490

Characterising Pain, QoL, Body Composition, Arterial Stiffness, Muscles and Bones in Adult Persons With XLH and Healthy Controls

An observational study of X-linked Hypophosphatemia and Hereditary Hypophosphatemia, run by University of Aarhus at 1 site in Denmark.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Hereditary hypophosphatemia (XLH) is a rare, inherited disease. Loss-of-function mutation in the phosphate regulating gene with homologies to endopeptidases on the X-chromosome (PHEX) results in excess fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) production and manifests as rickets in children and osteomalacia in adults. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
How many people
92 participants
Where
1 siteDenmark
Study dates
18 Feb 2020to 20 Dec 2022
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: 50 persons with hereditary hypophosphatemia and 50 control persons without disturbances in the calcium, vitamin D or phosphate homeostasis, matched by age (+/- 2 years) and gender. For women, matching will also be performed on menopausal status (pre-, peri-, and postmenopausal*). *Pre-menopausal = regular periods Peri-menopausal = irregular periods +/- hot flashes Post-menopausal = last period ≥1 year ago

Who may be able to join

  • Understand oral and written Danish
  • Able to consent
  • For XLH only:
  • genetically verified XLH by detection of a disease-causing mutation in PHEX or a positive family history of X-linked hypophosphatemia.
  • biochemically verified hereditary hypophosphatemia: serum PO4 below normal range and low TmPO4/GFR, and/or elevated serum FGF23 and a history of childhood rickets or spontaneous endodontic abscesses to exclude acquired hypophosphatemia, e.g., tumor-induced osteomalacia.

Who cannot join

  • P-25OHD < 25 mmol/L*
  • Severe co-morbidities, which in the opinion of the investigator may have major impact on study outcomes. This may include, but is not limited to o poorly controlled hyperthyroidism o Paget disease
  • o type 1 diabetes mellitus or poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus
  • o severe and chronic cardiac, liver, or renal disease
  • o Cushing syndrome
  • o Rheumatoid arthritis
Show all 17Show fewer
  • o Active pancreatitis
  • o Malnutrition
  • o Recent prolonged immobility
  • o Active malignancy (including myeloma)
  • Treatment with
  • o Burosumab
  • Beta-blockers
  • Oral steroids
  • For controls only:
  • disturbances in the calcium or phosphate homeostasis
  • participants with low 25OHD levels or recent immobility may be re-screened for participations 6 months after this has been corrected

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Denmark1 site
  • Dept. of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, The Osteoporosis Clinic

    Aarhus N, 8200

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

Official title: Characterising Pain, Quality of Life, Body Composition, Arterial Stiffness, Muscle Function, Bone Density and Geometry in Adult Persons With Hereditary Hypophosphatemia and Healthy Controls

Hereditary hypophosphatemia (XLH) is a rare, inherited disease. Loss-of-function mutation in the phosphate regulating gene with homologies to endopeptidases on the X-chromosome (PHEX) results in excess fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) production and manifests as rickets in children and osteomalacia in adults.

This study aims to characterize and measure pain, quality of life, muscle function, body composition, arterial stiffness, bone mineral density, geometry and microarchitecture in patients with XLH compared to age and gender-matched controls.

Read the detailed description

Hereditary hypophosphatemia (XLH) is a rare, inherited disease. Loss-of-function mutation in PHEX results in excess fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) production and manifests as rickets in children and osteomalacia in adults. FGF23 is a hormone that reduces renal phosphate reabsorption, decreases renal 1α-hydroxylase activity and increases renal 24-hydroxylase activity. As a consequence, individuals with XLH display hypophosphatemia and inadequate levels of 1,25(OH)2D (1). Therefore, conventional medical treatment of XLH aims to replace the loss with oral phosphate and activated vitamin D analogues.

The pain experienced by patients with hypophosphatemic rickets is not well characterized and needs to be addressed in order to establish the most optimal pain management in patients with XLH. The causes of pain experienced by patients with XLH are numerous: osteomalacia, enthesopathy, muscular pain, lower limb deformities, secondary arthrosis, nerve compression, and dental abscesses (3).

Quality of life (QoL) in patients with XLH is only briefly studied (4, 5). A French study found significantly decreased QoL among adult patients with XLH compared to patients with axial spondylarthritis. Especially enthesopathies were associated with a decreased QoL (4).

Increased blood levels of FGF23 are not associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease in itself (6-8). However, conventional therapy for patients with XLH may increase their cardiovascular risk since complications to the therapy such as nephrocalcinosis and hyperparathyroidism are associated with increased cardiovascular risk. Arterial stiffness may be a valuable marker of increased cardiovascular risk as it has been able to predict cardiovascular disease and mortality in different populations (10, 11). If conventional therapy increases the risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, arterial stiffness may be increased among patients with XLH which may depend on treatment status (i.e., currently treated, currently non-treated, accumulated (years of) treatment and treatment naïve).

Patients with XLH often complain about muscle fatigue and exhaustion. Muscle function in XLH is thought to be compromised by chronic hypophosphatemia, but the effect of XLH on muscle function has only been briefly evaluated (12, 13).

There are no available reports on body composition in XLH adults, but body mass index (BMI) in XLH is increased compared to controls (14).

In previous studies, examinations by high resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HRpQCT) have shown significantly larger total bone area in patients with XLH compared to individuals without XLH. However, patients with XLH have a reduced number of trabeculae and cortical thickness (15). These differences are seen regardless of treatment. When receiving conventional treatment, the cortical porosity is significantly elevated compared to patients with XLH who receive no treatment (17).

HYPOTHESES:

Primary null hypotheses:

  • There is no difference in pressure pain threshold between groups.
  • There is no difference in QoL between groups.
  • There is no difference in arterial stiffness assessed by tonometry between groups.
  • There is no difference in 24h blood pressure between groups.
  • There is no difference in muscle strength and function between groups.
  • There is no difference in body composition between groups.
  • There is no difference in bone mineral density, geometry, microarchitecture or estimated strength between groups.
  • There is no difference in presence of osteoid-volume, -surface or -thickness, osteoclast number, osteoblastic surface, osteoblast morphology or mineralization time between groups.
  • Osteomalacia is not more common in bone biopsies from patients with XLH compared to controls.

Secondary null hypotheses:

  • There is no difference in arterial stiffness within the XLH group when stratifying for treatment status.
  • There is no difference in 24h blood pressure within the XLH group when stratifying for treatment status.
  • There is no difference in bone mineral density, geometry, microarchitecture or estimated strength within the XLH group when stratifying for treatment status.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study design:

A cross-sectional study of adult persons with XLH and an age- and gender-matched control group.

Population:

The investigators plan to include 50 persons with XLH and 50 control persons without disturbances in the calcium, vitamin D or phosphate homeostasis, matched by age (+/- 2 years) and gender. For women, matching will also be performed on menopausal status.

EXAMINATIONS

Questionnaires:

Pain will be assessed by a bone-specific questionnaire (FACT-BP), a questionnaire for general pain (Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)), and one for assessment of neuropathic pain (painDETECT).

The participant's level of catastrophic thinking will be assessed with the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). Depression and anxiety will be assessed with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD-7).

Quality of Life will be measured by the SF-36 questionnaire (SF36v2).

Pressure algometry:

Mechanical pressure pain over the bone will be determined as force (N) per skin area (cm2) by a handhold pressure algometer with a 1 cm2 probe (Algometer II, Somedic SenseLab AB) (18). The 1 cm2 probe will be directed perpendicularly to the skin and pressure will be applied at a constant force increase rate until the participant identifies the pressure as pain and presses a button (pressure pain threshold (PPT)). PPT will be measured over the sternum and also corresponding to the tibia 5 cm below the patella. The skin between the thumb and the index finger of the non-dominant hand will be measured as a control site.

Biochemistry:

Blood samples will be collected in a fasting state. The investigators will measure ionized calcium, phosphate, magnesium, creatinine, parathyroid hormone (PTH), vitamin D metabolites (such as 25OHD; 1,25(OH)2D; 24,25(OH)2D; 1,24,25(OH)3D), vitamin D binding protein, FGF23, sclerostin, Klotho, osteopontin, and bone turnover markers (such as CTX, P1NP, osteocalcin and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase), and relevant genes for hereditary hypophosphatemia (if not previously genetically verified).

24 hour urine will be collected for measurement of calcium, phosphate, magnesium, creatinin, sodium and potassium.

Blood pressure and arterial stiffness 24-hour blood pressure will be measured using Arteriograph24. Arterial stiffness and pulse wave analysis (PWA) will be assessed by tonometry using the SphygmoCor system (Xcel; AtCor Medical, Sydney, NSW, Australia). Participants treated with betablockers will be excluded from blood pressure and arterial stiffness measurements.

Muscle function The investigators will assess upper and lower extremity strength by handgrip strength, elbow flexion and extension, and knee flexion and extension using the adjustable dynamometer chair (Good Strength; Metitur Ltd, Finland). To assess physical function, the investigators will use the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, repeated chair rising, repeated weight lifting and 6-minutes' walk test (6 MWT).

Physical examination In order to quantify the degree of malformation of the joints in the lower extremities, the smallest distance between knees and between ankles will be measured in standing, weight bearing position.

Joint mobility The investigators will assess joint function in enthesopathy-suspected joints (neck/back, hip, knee and ankle) as well as shoulder, elbow, wrist and knee in order to discriminate between pain originating from osteomalacia or from enthesopathies.

Body composition and VFA using DXA Body composition and bone mineral density (Forearm, hip, lumbar spine and whole body) will be assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) (Discovery A scanner; Hologic, USA). Obtaining vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) by DXA enables us to exclude reported back pain being due to vertebral compression fractures.

High-resolution peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography:

A HRpQCT bone scan of the dominant distal tibia and radius will be performed using an Xtreme CT-scanner (SCANCO Medical AG, Switzerland).

Bone biopsies:

Optional bone biopsies will be taken after assessment of pain characteristics. Participation in the overall study is allowed without participating in this examination.

One 7 mm biopsy marked with tetracyclin 14, 13, 4, and 3 days prior will be fixed in ethanol and analysed by HRpQCT, Nano-scale and histomorphometry.

Medical subject headings
Familial Hypophosphatemic Rickets

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT04273490
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Hereditary hypophosphatemiaAdult persons with genetically or biochemically verified hereditary hypophosphatemia.
ControlAdult control persons without disturbances in calcium, vitamin D or phosphate homeostasis matched on age, gender and menopausal status.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. PPT

    Pressure pain threshold assessed by pressure algometry

    Measured: Day 2

  2. Quality of life in patients with bone-specific pain

    Assessed by questionnaire (FACT-BP) on a scale from 0 to 4. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Measured: Day 1

  3. General pain: Brief Pain Inventory

    Assessed by questionnaire (Brief Pain Inventory) on a scale from 0 to 10. 0 meaning no pain, 10 meaning worst pain ever.

    Measured: Day 1

  4. Neuropathic pain: questionnaire (painDETECT)

    Assessed by questionnaire (painDETECT) on a scale from 0 to 10. 0 meaning no pain, 10 meaning worst pain ever.

    Measured: Day 1

  5. Health-related quality of life: SF36v2

    Assessed by questionnaire (SF36v2) on a scale from 1 to 5. Higher scores meaning a worse outcome.

    Measured: Day 1

  6. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure

    24 hour blood pressure of the upper right arm

    Measured: 24 hours

  7. Pulse wave velocity

    Assessed by tonometry using SphygmoCor system

    Measured: 45 minutes

  8. Arterial stiffness

    Assessed by tonometry using SphygmoCor system

    Measured: 45 minutes

  9. Arterial stiffness

    Assessed by tonometry using Arteriograph24

    Measured: 24 hours

  10. Maximum strength

    Handgrip strength, elbow and knee flexion and extension assessed by dynamometer chair (Good Strength; Metitur Ltd, Finland).

    Measured: Day 2

  11. Maximal force production

    Handgrip strength, elbow and knee flexion and extension assessed by dynamometer chair (Good Strength; Metitur Ltd, Finland).

    Measured: Day 2

  12. Timed Up and Go

    Measures the time to stand up, walk three metres in a straight line, and immediately return to the chair.

    Measured: Day 2

  13. Repeated chair rising

    Measures the time for ten consecutive chair rises.

    Measured: Day 2

  14. Repeated weight lifting

    Measures the time for ten consecutive weight lifts.

    Measured: Day 2

  15. 6-minutes' walk test

    Measures the distance walked in 6 minutes.

    Measured: Day 1

  16. Body composition

    Assessed by DXA

    Measured: Day 2

  17. Vertebral Fracture Assessment

    Assessed by DXA

    Measured: Day 2

  18. Volumetric bone mineral density

    Assessed by HRpQCT of distal tibia, distal radius, and bone biopsy

    Measured: Day 1

  19. Bone geometry

    Assessed by HRpQCT of distal tibia, distal radius, and bone biopsy

    Measured: Day 1

  20. Bone microarchitecture

    Assessed by HRpQCT of distal tibia, distal radius, and bone biopsy

    Measured: Day 1

  21. Estimated bone strength

    Assessed by HRpQCT of distal tibia, distal radius, and bone biopsy

    Measured: Day 1

  22. Mineralization rate

    Histomorphometry on bone biopsy

    Measured: 14 days

  23. Mineralization lag time

    Histomorphometry on bone biopsy

    Measured: 14 days

  24. Osteoid volume

    Osteoid volume in trabecular and compact bone assessed by histomorphometry on bone biopsy

    Measured: 14 days

  25. Osteoid thickness

    Osteoid thickness in trabecular and compact bone assessed by histomorphometry on bone biopsy

    Measured: 14 days

  26. Osteoid surface covering

    Osteoid surface covering in trabecular and compact bone assessed by histomorphometry on bone biopsy

    Measured: 14 days

  27. Percentage of surface covered by osteoblasts

    Assessed by histomorphometry on bone biopsy

    Measured: 14 days

  28. Percentage of surface covered by osteoclasts

    Assessed by histomorphometry on bone biopsy

    Measured: 14 days

  29. Lacunar concentration of mineralization inhibitors

    Assessed by nano-scale on bone biopsy

    Measured: 14 days

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Catastrophic thinking

    Assessed by questionnaire (Pain Catastrophizing Scale) on a scale from 0 to 4. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Measured: Day 1

  2. Depression

    Assessed by questionnaire (Patient Health Questionnaire) on a scale from 0 to 3. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Measured: Day 1

  3. Anxiety

    Assessed by questionnaire (Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7) on a scale from 0 to 3. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Measured: Day 1

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Feb 2020
  2. Study start18 Feb 2020
  3. Primary completion20 Dec 2022
  4. Study completion20 Dec 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
92 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04273490
Sponsor's protocol ID
1107214219
Status last verified
May 2023
First submitted
5 Nov 2019
Last updated
29 Nov 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of X-linked Hypophosphatemia and Hereditary Hypophosphatemia, run by University of Aarhus at 1 site in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Nov 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

PPT (time frame: Day 2). The study lists 29 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Nov 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in