Tibial Meniscus InjuriesPhase 2NCT04274543
Ultrasound-Guided Injections for Meniscal Injuries in Active-Duty Military
A Phase 2 study testing Lipogems and Normal Saline in people with Tibial Meniscus Injuries and Knee Injuries, run by Kessler Foundation at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Knee injuries are common among active-duty military personnel. One of the most common knee injuries is a meniscus tear, which can have several consequences. Immediately, the soldier may be separated from the military for over one year or assigned a permanent activity limiting duty profile. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 45 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Tibial Meniscus Injuries, Knee Injuries, Knee Injuries and Disorders
- What is being tested?
- Lipogems and Normal Saline
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 3 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Jul 2019to 1 Dec 2024
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 45 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- 18-45 years old.
- At least one of the following symptoms consistent with torn meniscus: joint line pain, clicking, popping, pain with pivot or torque.
- Physical examination findings consistent with a meniscal tear: joint line tenderness; localized pain with flexion; and other provocative tests such as McMurray's and Thessaly test.
- MRI or arthroscopic evidence of meniscal tear without significant additional joint pathology.
- Failed conservative treatment for a minimum of 4 weeks, which has included rest, ice, anti-inflammatory or other medications for pain; physical therapy; with or without/ injections, including corticosteroid and/or hyaluronic acid injections.
- Additional criteria: Patients who have been told by an orthopedic surgeon that they would be a candidate for arthroscopic partial meniscectomy.
Who cannot join
- Chronically locked knee.
- Greater than Kellgren-Lawrence Grade II.
- Prior surgery performed on the effected knee.
- Assessment showing anything other than degenerative tears of the medial meniscus requiring surgical intervention.
- Recent (within 6 weeks) treatment with PRP, cortisone (oral or injection), or hyaluronic injection.
- Any disease or condition the investigator feels would hinder treatment.
Show all 10Show fewer
- Any contra-indication to lipoaspirate, including a bleeding disorder, infection, pregnancy, or allergy to anesthetic agents.
- Chronic inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis.
- Possible joint infection including Lyme disease of the joint.
- Malignancy within the last 5 years.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Use of Autologous, Micro-Fragmented Adipose Tissue to Treat Meniscal Injuries in Active Duty Military Personnel
Knee injuries are common among active-duty military personnel. One of the most common knee injuries is a meniscus tear, which can have several consequences. Immediately, the soldier may be separated from the military for over one year or assigned a permanent activity limiting duty profile. Over time, meniscal tears may also increase the risk of other knee injuries, such as osteoarthritis, which is one of the most common medical reasons for discharge from active duty service. The current standard of care includes conservative treatments, such as physical therapy and rest. Once conservative treatments fail, surgery is generally the next option. However, there is limited evidence that surgery is effective and some studies suggest it can accelerate the development of osteoarthritis. The goal of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a regenerative treatment for meniscal tears termed micro-fragmented adipose tissue in reducing pain and restoring activity levels. We will recruit active-duty military personnel and civilians with meniscal tears and provide them with either the adipose tissue treatment or a control treatment consisting of saline. We will then follow these individuals for up to one year and evaluate differences in pain and function between the two groups. The ultimate goal is to show that micro-fragmented adipose tissue is a viable alternative for the treatment of meniscal tears in active-duty military personnel.
Read the detailed description
This is randomized controlled trial to determine the efficacy of autologous, micro-fragmented adipose tissue (MFAT) injection under ultrasound guidance for meniscal injuries in active duty military personnel. The control for this study, to which MFAT will be compared, is trephination with saline injection into the meniscal tear. Eighty (80) healthy, phyisically-fit men and women with confirmed, acute meniscal tears will be recruited and placed into one of two treatment groups.
Percutaneous trephination with MFAT: Micro-fragmented adipose tissue will be obtained by using a minimal manipulation technique in a closed system (Lipogems®), without the addition of enzymes or any additives. The final product will consist of micronized fat tissue yielding fat clusters with preserved vascular stroma of about 500 microns with intact stromal vascular niches and harboring regenerative cellular elements. Approximately 1-2 mL of micro-fragmented adipose will be injected into the meniscus with an 18-gauge x 3.5 inch needle under continuous ultrasound guidance. An additional 4-5 mL will be injected into the knee joint. No other biological or pharmacological agents will be used in combination with the micro-fragmented adipose.
Percutaneous trephination with saline: In this group, the physician will identify the mensical lesion using ultrasound and will trephinate the torn meniscus with normal saline (0.9%) solution using an 18 guage x 3.5 inch needle. Approximately 1-2 mL will be injected into the meniscus and an additional 4-5 mL will be injected into the knee joint under ultrasound guidance.
Both Groups: Participants will be followed for adverse events and changes in shoulder pain intensity on an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS; 0-10, with anchors "no pain" and "pain as bad as you can imagine"); the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS); the PROMIS Physical Functioning short form; knee physical and ultrasound examinations; and a 5-point subject global impression of change (SGIC) scale. Subjects will be examined at 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after the treatment.
- Being tested
- Lipogems, Normal Saline
- Keywords
- Regenerative Medicine, Knee Pain, Meniscus Tear
- Medical subject headings
- Tibial Meniscus Injuries, Knee Injuries, Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
LipogemsDevice
Also called Micro-fragmented Adipose Tissue
The Lipogems system (Lipogems International SpA, Milan, Italy) is designed to isolate autologous, micro-fragmented adipose tissue without enzymes or other additives. It uses mild mechanical forces to break down adipose tissue that is extracted from the patient into a form that can be injected into the meniscal lesion and other degenerated tissues in a sterile and safe manner. The resulting product is rich in pericytes and mesenchymal stromal cells, retained within an intact stromal vascular niche, that is ready for use in clinical applications.
Normal SalineDrug
Also called Percutaneous Trephination with Saline
Normal Saline solution is a mixture of sodium chloride in water (9 g NaCl per liter water, 0.9% saline). Trephination allows for vascular growth and healing, especially in the inner avascular regions of the meniscus, by puncturing the meniscus. Small "tunnels" are created, which allow for healing factors to reach the avascular inner region of the meniscus from the vascular peripheral regions.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Micro-Fragmented Adipose Tissue | Experimental | Participants will receive a single injection of normal saline (0.9%) solution into the lesion (e.g. tear) and knee joint under ultrasound guidance using an 18 gauge x 3.5 inch needle. Receives: Device: Lipogems |
| Saline | Active comparator | Participants will receive a single injection of micro-fragmented adipose tissue into the lesion (e.g. tear) and knee joint under ultrasound guidance using an 18 gauge x 3.5 inch needle. Receives: Drug: Normal Saline |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Numerical Rating Scale
Knee pain intensity will be assessed using an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS; 0-10, ranging from 0 = "no pain" to a maximum of 10= "pain as bad as you can imagine". Pain intensity is the most common pain domain assessed in research and clinical settings. Although different rating scales have proven to be valid for assessing pain intensity, the 11-point NRS has the most strengths and fewest weaknesses of available measures. An 11-point NRS measure of pain intensity allows for comparison across clinical trials of chronic pain treatment and has been recommended by the IMMPACT consensus group for use in pain clinical trials and by the 2006 NIDRR SCI Pain outcome measures consensus group. We will evaluate changes in scores between baseline and 3 months.
Measured: 3 months
Secondary outcomes (11)
Patient Global Impression of Change
The subject will be asked to rate on a 7-point scale his or her overall impression following treatment as compared to the previous measurement interval. The 7-point PGIC scale (also referred to as the original Guy/Farrar-PGIC scale; anchored by "very much improved" and "very much worse") is used to measure global treatment effect and is recommended as a compliment to unidimensional pain intensity scales. Although other versions of the PGIC scale exist, the SCI Measures Pain Committee recommends using the original Guy/Farrar-PGIC scale in clinical trials since it has been used extensively and been shown to be sensitive to change. We will evaluate scores at 3 months.
Measured: 3 months
Patient Global Impression of Change
The subject will be asked to rate on a 7-point scale his or her overall impression following treatment as compared to the previous measurement interval. The 7-point PGIC scale (also referred to as the original Guy/Farrar-PGIC scale; anchored by "very much improved" and "very much worse") is used to measure global treatment effect and is recommended as a compliment to unidimensional pain intensity scales. Although other versions of the PGIC scale exist, the SCI Measures Pain Committee recommends using the original Guy/Farrar-PGIC scale in clinical trials since it has been used extensively and been shown to be sensitive to change. We will evaluate scores at 6 months.
Measured: 6 months
Patient Global Impression of Change
The subject will be asked to rate on a 7-point scale his or her overall impression following treatment as compared to the previous measurement interval. The 7-point PGIC scale (also referred to as the original Guy/Farrar-PGIC scale; anchored by "very much improved" and "very much worse") is used to measure global treatment effect and is recommended as a compliment to unidimensional pain intensity scales. Although other versions of the PGIC scale exist, the SCI Measures Pain Committee recommends using the original Guy/Farrar-PGIC scale in clinical trials since it has been used extensively and been shown to be sensitive to change. We will evaluate scores at 12 months.
Measured: 12 months
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
The KOOS is a disease-specific measure of knee injury-related sequelae. It includes five subscales meant to capture the complex nature of knee pain: pain, other symptoms, activities of daily living, sport and recreation function, and knee-related quality of life. The KOOS is the most widely used knee-related instrument, evidenced by its inclusion in large international patient datasets. It has strong psychometric properties, including test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and construct validity. Its wide use also allows for effect size comparisons to other treatments for knee conditions.
Measured: 3 months
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
The KOOS is a disease-specific measure of knee injury-related sequelae. It includes five subscales meant to capture the complex nature of knee pain: pain, other symptoms, activities of daily living, sport and recreation function, and knee-related quality of life. The KOOS is the most widely used knee-related instrument, evidenced by its inclusion in large international patient datasets. It has strong psychometric properties, including test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and construct validity. Its wide use also allows for effect size comparisons to other treatments for knee conditions.
Measured: 6 months
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
The KOOS is a disease-specific measure of knee injury-related sequelae. It includes five subscales meant to capture the complex nature of knee pain: pain, other symptoms, activities of daily living, sport and recreation function, and knee-related quality of life. The KOOS is the most widely used knee-related instrument, evidenced by its inclusion in large international patient datasets. It has strong psychometric properties, including test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and construct validity. Its wide use also allows for effect size comparisons to other treatments for knee conditions.
Measured: 12 months
Change in Numerical Rating Scale
Knee pain intensity will be assessed using an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS; 0-10, ranging from 0 = "no pain" to a maximum of 10= "pain as bad as you can imagine". Pain intensity is the most common pain domain assessed in research and clinical settings. Although different rating scales have proven to be valid for assessing pain intensity, the 11-point NRS has the most strengths and fewest weaknesses of available measures. An 11-point NRS measure of pain intensity allows for comparison across clinical trials of chronic pain treatment and has been recommended by the IMMPACT consensus group for use in pain clinical trials and by the 2006 NIDRR SCI Pain outcome measures consensus group. We will evaluate changes in scores between baseline and 6 months.
Measured: 6 months
Change in Numerical Rating Scale
Knee pain intensity will be assessed using an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS; 0-10, ranging from 0 = "no pain" to a maximum of 10= "pain as bad as you can imagine". Pain intensity is the most common pain domain assessed in research and clinical settings. Although different rating scales have proven to be valid for assessing pain intensity, the 11-point NRS has the most strengths and fewest weaknesses of available measures. An 11-point NRS measure of pain intensity allows for comparison across clinical trials of chronic pain treatment and has been recommended by the IMMPACT consensus group for use in pain clinical trials and by the 2006 NIDRR SCI Pain outcome measures consensus group. We will evaluate changes in scores between baseline and 12 months.
Measured: 12 months
PROMIS-Physical Functioning Short Form
The PROMIS-PF is one member of a number of patient reported outcomes, which measures self-reported capability rather than actual performance of physical activities. It utilizes a 5-point Likert scale ("Without any difficulty" to "Unable to do") to assess difficulty with 20 different activities, such as getting in and out of a car or performing vigorous activities. It has shown construct validity among patients with arthritis and to be highly responsive to change in patients with knee osteoarthritis.
Measured: 3 months
PROMIS-Physical Functioning Short Form
The PROMIS-PF is one member of a number of patient reported outcomes, which measures self-reported capability rather than actual performance of physical activities. It utilizes a 5-point Likert scale ("Without any difficulty" to "Unable to do") to assess difficulty with 20 different activities, such as getting in and out of a car or performing vigorous activities. It has shown construct validity among patients with arthritis and to be highly responsive to change in patients with knee osteoarthritis.
Measured: 6 months
PROMIS-Physical Functioning Short Form
The PROMIS-PF is one member of a number of patient reported outcomes, which measures self-reported capability rather than actual performance of physical activities. It utilizes a 5-point Likert scale ("Without any difficulty" to "Unable to do") to assess difficulty with 20 different activities, such as getting in and out of a car or performing vigorous activities. It has shown construct validity among patients with arthritis and to be highly responsive to change in patients with knee osteoarthritis.
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Feb 2020
- Study start1 Jul 2019
- Primary completion1 Dec 2024
- Study completion1 Dec 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Tibial Meniscus InjuriesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Kessler FoundationThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 3 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Kessler Foundation
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04274543
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- R-1065-19
- Status last verified
- Dec 2024
- First submitted
- 10 Jul 2019
- Last updated
- 18 Dec 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Dec 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Use of Autologous, Micro-Fragmented Adipose Tissue to Treat Meniscal Injuries in Active Duty Military Personnel
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04274543
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- R-1065-19
- Keywords
- Regenerative Medicine, Knee Pain, Meniscus Tear
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 3 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Kessler FoundationUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
- Study start
- 1 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Dec 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Dec 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Feb 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Knee injuries are common among active-duty military personnel. One of the most common knee injuries is a meniscus tear, which can have several consequences. Immediately, the soldier may be separated from the military for over one year or assigned a permanent activity limiting duty profile. Over time, meniscal tears may also increase the risk of other knee injuries, such as osteoarthritis, which is one of the most common medical reasons for discharge from active duty service. The current standard of care includes conservative treatments, such as physical therapy and rest. Once conservative treatments fail, surgery is generally the next option. However, there is limited evidence that surgery is effective and some studies suggest it can accelerate the development of osteoarthritis. The goal of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a regenerative treatment for meniscal tears termed micro-fragmented adipose tissue in reducing pain and restoring activity levels. We will recruit active-duty military personnel and civilians with meniscal tears and provide them with either the adipose tissue treatment or a control treatment consisting of saline. We will then follow these individuals for up to one year and evaluate differences in pain and function between the two groups. The ultimate goal is to show that micro-fragmented adipose tissue is a viable alternative for the treatment of meniscal tears in active-duty military personnel.
Detailed description
This is randomized controlled trial to determine the efficacy of autologous, micro-fragmented adipose tissue (MFAT) injection under ultrasound guidance for meniscal injuries in active duty military personnel. The control for this study, to which MFAT will be compared, is trephination with saline injection into the meniscal tear. Eighty (80) healthy, phyisically-fit men and women with confirmed, acute meniscal tears will be recruited and placed into one of two treatment groups.
Percutaneous trephination with MFAT: Micro-fragmented adipose tissue will be obtained by using a minimal manipulation technique in a closed system (Lipogems®), without the addition of enzymes or any additives. The final product will consist of micronized fat tissue yielding fat clusters with preserved vascular stroma of about 500 microns with intact stromal vascular niches and harboring regenerative cellular elements. Approximately 1-2 mL of micro-fragmented adipose will be injected into the meniscus with an 18-gauge x 3.5 inch needle under continuous ultrasound guidance. An additional 4-5 mL will be injected into the knee joint. No other biological or pharmacological agents will be used in combination with the micro-fragmented adipose.
Percutaneous trephination with saline: In this group, the physician will identify the mensical lesion using ultrasound and will trephinate the torn meniscus with normal saline (0.9%) solution using an 18 guage x 3.5 inch needle. Approximately 1-2 mL will be injected into the meniscus and an additional 4-5 mL will be injected into the knee joint under ultrasound guidance.
Both Groups: Participants will be followed for adverse events and changes in shoulder pain intensity on an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS; 0-10, with anchors "no pain" and "pain as bad as you can imagine"); the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS); the PROMIS Physical Functioning short form; knee physical and ultrasound examinations; and a 5-point subject global impression of change (SGIC) scale. Subjects will be examined at 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after the treatment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Micro-Fragmented Adipose Tissue | Experimental | Device: LipogemsParticipants will receive a single injection of normal saline (0.9%) solution into the lesion (e.g. tear) and knee joint under ultrasound guidance using an 18 gauge x 3.5 inch needle. |
| Saline | Active comparator | Drug: Normal SalineParticipants will receive a single injection of micro-fragmented adipose tissue into the lesion (e.g. tear) and knee joint under ultrasound guidance using an 18 gauge x 3.5 inch needle. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 45 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- 18-45 years old.
- At least one of the following symptoms consistent with torn meniscus: joint line pain, clicking, popping, pain with pivot or torque.
- Physical examination findings consistent with a meniscal tear: joint line tenderness; localized pain with flexion; and other provocative tests such as McMurray's and Thessaly test.
- MRI or arthroscopic evidence of meniscal tear without significant additional joint pathology.
- Failed conservative treatment for a minimum of 4 weeks, which has included rest, ice, anti-inflammatory or other medications for pain; physical therapy; with or without/ injections, including corticosteroid and/or hyaluronic acid injections.
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Chronically locked knee.
- Greater than Kellgren-Lawrence Grade II.
- Prior surgery performed on the effected knee.
- Assessment showing anything other than degenerative tears of the medial meniscus requiring surgical intervention.
- Recent (within 6 weeks) treatment with PRP, cortisone (oral or injection), or hyaluronic injection.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| LipogemsAlso: Micro-fragmented Adipose TissueThe Lipogems system (Lipogems International SpA, Milan, Italy) is designed to isolate autologous, micro-fragmented adipose tissue without enzymes or other additives. It uses mild mechanical forces to break down adipose tissue that is extracted from the patient into a form that can be injected into the meniscal lesion and other degenerated tissues in a sterile and safe manner. The resulting product is rich in pericytes and mesenchymal stromal cells, retained within an intact stromal vascular niche, that is ready for use in clinical applications. | Device | Micro-Fragmented Adipose Tissue |
| Normal SalineAlso: Percutaneous Trephination with SalineNormal Saline solution is a mixture of sodium chloride in water (9 g NaCl per liter water, 0.9% saline). Trephination allows for vascular growth and healing, especially in the inner avascular regions of the meniscus, by puncturing the meniscus. Small "tunnels" are created, which allow for healing factors to reach the avascular inner region of the meniscus from the vascular peripheral regions. | Drug | Saline |
Primary outcome
Change in Numerical Rating Scale
Time frame: 3 months
Knee pain intensity will be assessed using an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS; 0-10, ranging from 0 = "no pain" to a maximum of 10= "pain as bad as you can imagine". Pain intensity is the most common pain domain assessed in research and clinical settings. Although different rating scales have proven to be valid for assessing pain intensity, the 11-point NRS has the most strengths and fewest weaknesses of available measures. An 11-point NRS measure of pain intensity allows for comparison across clinical trials of chronic pain treatment and has been recommended by the IMMPACT consensus group for use in pain clinical trials and by the 2006 NIDRR SCI Pain outcome measures consensus group. We will evaluate changes in scores between baseline and 3 months.
11 secondary outcomes
Patient Global Impression of Change
Time frame: 3 months
Patient Global Impression of Change
Time frame: 6 months
Patient Global Impression of Change
Time frame: 12 months
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
Time frame: 3 months
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
Time frame: 6 months
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
Time frame: 12 months
Change in Numerical Rating Scale
Time frame: 6 months
Change in Numerical Rating Scale
Time frame: 12 months
PROMIS-Physical Functioning Short Form
Time frame: 3 months
PROMIS-Physical Functioning Short Form
Time frame: 6 months
PROMIS-Physical Functioning Short Form
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Dec 2024.
Related trials for Tibial Meniscus Injuries
Recruiting
Operative vs Non-operative Management of Posterior-medial Meniscal Root Tears: A Randomized Multicenter Trial (RCT)
Meniscus Tear, Tibial
Recruiting
Hemi-tibial Plateau Osteotomy Combined With Arthroscopic Repair for Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears in Varus Knees
Knee Osteoarthristis, Meniscus Injury
RecruitingObservational study
Clinical Outcomes of Arthroscopic Surgeries for Shoulder and Knee Sports Injuries
Athletic Injuries (C26.857.500.124), Rotator Cuff Injuries
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Lipogems and Normal Saline in people with Tibial Meniscus Injuries and Knee Injuries, run by Kessler Foundation at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Numerical Rating Scale (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Dec 2024.