PerformanceIMBNCT04275271
The Effect of Skill Centered Intervention Based on IMB Model on Promoting Teachers' Professional Competence in Teaching Sexuality Health.
A study testing Educational intervention in people with Performance, run by Tehran University of Medical Sciences.
Trial summary
Study aim is determining the impact of a skill based intervention based on IMB model on Promoting School Teachers' Professional Competence in Teaching Sexual Health. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 27 to 55 years, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Performance
- What is being tested?
- Educational intervention
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 56 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 3 Apr 2020to 20 Jun 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 27 to 55 years
- Men only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Having instructors' consent to enter the study, instructor approval for teaching in terms of education system
- Having at least 5 years of teaching experience.
Who cannot join
- Not participating in at least a third of the sessions
- Not willing to continue cooperation.
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Skill Centered Intervention Based on IMB Model on Promoting School Teachers' Professional Competence in Teaching Sexuality Health
Study aim is determining the impact of a skill based intervention based on IMB model on Promoting School Teachers' Professional Competence in Teaching Sexual Health.
Read the detailed description
This research is a randomized control field trial with two groups; intervention and control. Sampling will be conducted by block design (with block size of 4) random allocation.
Intervention group: Intervention group will be received sexuality teaching skills for promotion of professional competence based on information, motivation and behavioral skills model for adolescent sexuality after signing informed consent form and being informed about the goals and details of intervention for 6 sessions (one two hour session per week).
The control group will not receive any intervention until the end of the research. Then, based on the ethics of the research and their willingness can use the content of program.
- Conditions
- Performance
- Being tested
- Educational intervention
- Keywords
- skill based intervention,, IMB model,, Professional Competence,, Sexual Health.
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Educational interventionBehavioural
Skill centered Protocol Training based on IMB model
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | Intervention group will be received sexuality teaching skills for promotion of professional competence based on information, motivation and behavioral skills model for adolescent sexuality after signing informed consent form and being informed about the goals and details of intervention for 6 sessions (one two hour session per week). Receives: Behavioral: Educational intervention |
| Control group | No intervention | The control group will not receive any intervention until the end of the research. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Changes of mean difference score of professional competence.
To assess the professional competence of the participants (i.e., knowledge, attitude, skills) by a self-report researcher-made questionnaire.Knowledge and Attitude domain Score from 17 to 85 and Skill Score from 16 to 80. We convert each domain to 0 -100 and report each domain separately and higher scores mean a better outcome
Measured: Before intervention
Mean difference score
To assess the professional competence of the participants (i.e., knowledge, attitude, skills) by a self-report researcher-made questionnaire.Knowledge and Attitude domain Score from 17 to 85 and Skill Score from 16 to 80. We convert each domain to 0 -100 and report each domain separately and higher scores mean a better outcome
Measured: immediately after the intervention
Mean difference score
To assess the professional competence of the participants (i.e., knowledge, attitude, skills) by a self-report researcher-made questionnaire.Knowledge and Attitude domain Score from 17 to 85 and Skill Score from 16 to 80. We convert each domain to 0 -100 and report each domain separately and higher scores mean a better outcome
Measured: 6 weeks after the intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Feb 2020
- Study start3 Apr 2020 (estimated)
- Primary completion20 Jun 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion20 Jun 2020 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for PerformanceStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 56 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Tehran University of Medical Sciences
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Raziyeh Maasoumi, Assistant, Study chair, Tehran University of Medical Sciences
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04275271
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IR.TUMS.FNM.REC.1397.102
- Acronym
- IMB
- Status last verified
- Aug 2019
- First submitted
- 6 Jan 2020
- Last updated
- 21 Feb 2020
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: There is a plan to make this available
Publications
Griewatz J, Simon M, Lammerding-Koeppel M. Competency-based teacher training: A systematic revision of a proven programme in medical didactics. GMS J Med Educ. 2017 Oct 16;34(4):Doc44. doi: 10.3205/zma001121. eCollection 2017.
PubMed 29085888Defebvre MM, Pavageau M, Chretien A, Carron F, Vanlacken V. [Evaluation of health education training in a French region]. Sante Publique. 2007 Jan-Feb;19(1):39-51. doi: 10.3917/spub.071.0039. French.
PubMed 17665742
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Feb 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Skill Centered Intervention Based on IMB Model on Promoting School Teachers' Professional Competence in Teaching Sexuality Health
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04275271
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IMB / IR.TUMS.FNM.REC.1397.102
- Conditions
- Performance
- Keywords
- skill based intervention,, IMB model,, Professional Competence,, Sexual Health.
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 56 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Tehran University of Medical SciencesUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences
- Study start
- 3 Apr 2020 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 20 Jun 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 20 Jun 2020 (estimated)
- First posted
- 19 Feb 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Study aim is determining the impact of a skill based intervention based on IMB model on Promoting School Teachers' Professional Competence in Teaching Sexual Health.
Detailed description
This research is a randomized control field trial with two groups; intervention and control. Sampling will be conducted by block design (with block size of 4) random allocation.
Intervention group: Intervention group will be received sexuality teaching skills for promotion of professional competence based on information, motivation and behavioral skills model for adolescent sexuality after signing informed consent form and being informed about the goals and details of intervention for 6 sessions (one two hour session per week).
The control group will not receive any intervention until the end of the research. Then, based on the ethics of the research and their willingness can use the content of program.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | Behavioral: Educational interventionIntervention group will be received sexuality teaching skills for promotion of professional competence based on information, motivation and behavioral skills model for adolescent sexuality after signing informed consent form and being informed about the goals and details of intervention for 6 sessions (one two hour session per week). |
| Control group | No intervention | –The control group will not receive any intervention until the end of the research. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 27 to 55 years
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Having instructors' consent to enter the study, instructor approval for teaching in terms of education system
- Having at least 5 years of teaching experience.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Not participating in at least a third of the sessions
- Not willing to continue cooperation.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Educational interventionSkill centered Protocol Training based on IMB model | Behavioural | Intervention group |
Primary outcome
Changes of mean difference score of professional competence.
Time frame: Before intervention
To assess the professional competence of the participants (i.e., knowledge, attitude, skills) by a self-report researcher-made questionnaire.Knowledge and Attitude domain Score from 17 to 85 and Skill Score from 16 to 80. We convert each domain to 0 -100 and report each domain separately and higher scores mean a better outcome
Mean difference score
Time frame: immediately after the intervention
To assess the professional competence of the participants (i.e., knowledge, attitude, skills) by a self-report researcher-made questionnaire.Knowledge and Attitude domain Score from 17 to 85 and Skill Score from 16 to 80. We convert each domain to 0 -100 and report each domain separately and higher scores mean a better outcome
Mean difference score
Time frame: 6 weeks after the intervention
To assess the professional competence of the participants (i.e., knowledge, attitude, skills) by a self-report researcher-made questionnaire.Knowledge and Attitude domain Score from 17 to 85 and Skill Score from 16 to 80. We convert each domain to 0 -100 and report each domain separately and higher scores mean a better outcome
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Feb 2020.
- Results publication: PubMed 29085888Griewatz J, Simon M, Lammerding-Koeppel M. Competency-based teacher training: A systematic revision of a proven programme in medical didactics. GMS J Med Educ. 2017 Oct 16;34(4):Doc44. doi: 10.3205/zma001121. eCollection 2017.
- Results publication: PubMed 17665742Defebvre MM, Pavageau M, Chretien A, Carron F, Vanlacken V. [Evaluation of health education training in a French region]. Sante Publique. 2007 Jan-Feb;19(1):39-51. doi: 10.3917/spub.071.0039. French.
- JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. There is a plan to make this available
Related trials for Performance
Recruiting
Leg Heat Therapy in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
RecruitingObservational study
PRESERFLO™ MicroShunt XI Observational PMCF Study With no Control Group
Primary Open Angle Glaucoma
Not yet recruiting
Performance of the Basophil Activation Test in the Diagnosis of IgE-mediated Cow's Milk Allergy in Infants and Evaluation of Hydrolysate Allergenicity.
Milk Allergy
Recruiting
Vision-Language-Based Large-Scale Model for Emergency Screening
Acute Thoraco-Abdominal Emergency Lesions
Recruiting
Safety and Device Performance of the Uriprene® Degradable Temporary Ureteral Stent Following Uncomplicated Ureteroscopy
Ureteral Diseases
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Raziyeh Maasoumi, Assistant study chair
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Educational intervention in people with Performance, run by Tehran University of Medical Sciences.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Feb 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Raziyeh Maasoumi, Assistant (0917 705 8291, r_masoumi@sina.tums.ac.ir), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Changes of mean difference score of professional competence. (time frame: Before intervention). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04275271, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Feb 2020.