AzTrials
AzTrials

Child, HospitalizedNCT04275336

Pharmacological and Non-pharmacological Interventions in Management of Venipuncture Pain.

A study testing EMLA application, Distraction techniques and EMLA cream and distraction techniques in people with Child, Hospitalized, run by Children's Hospital of Fudan University at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To evaluate whether an integration of pharmacological and non- pharmacological interventions is more effective than either one of intervention in pain reduction during pediatric peripheral venipuncture. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 3 to 16 years
Conditions the study is for
Child, Hospitalized
What is being tested?
EMLA application, Distraction techniques and EMLA cream and distraction techniques
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
354 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Feb 2020to 12 May 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 3 to 16 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Children aged 3-16 years who receive first peripheral intravenous puncture during hospitalization.

Who cannot join

  • Emergency peripheral intravenous puncture.
  • Allergic history for lidocaine cream.
  • Presence of cognitive impairment, hearing impairment or visual impairment.
  • Children who were discharged from the hospital after participating in the experiment but were readmitted due to illness.
  • Refuse to participate in the study.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Children's Hospital of Fudan University

    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 201102

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Pharmacological and Non-pharmachological Interventions in Management of Peripheral Venipuncture Related Pain: a Randomized Clinical Trial

To evaluate whether an integration of pharmacological and non- pharmacological interventions is more effective than either one of intervention in pain reduction during pediatric peripheral venipuncture.

Read the detailed description

Intravenous infusion is a routing practice of drug administration for hospitalized children.However numerous studies have shown that venipuncture is a major source of pain of children during their hospitalization which can lead to moderate to severe pain and cause fear, stress and anxiety in children if there is no effective pain management.

The current pain relieving methods include pharmacological (i.e. topical anesthetic) and non-pharmnacological (i.e. distraction techniques) interventions. pharmacological There are scarce evidences supporting that a combination of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions can enhance children's abilities in coping with their pain and stress during the venipuncture. EMLA cream is a main pharmacological intervention in managing needle-related pain which can penetrate the cuticle and epidermal layer of intact skin, enter the dermis where nerve endings are located, and relieve pain. However pharmacological interventions have proven inadequate in mitigating pain and stress.The main non-pharmacological alternatives is distraction techniques. There are extremely limited data studies on merging pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions to compensate for each other's inadequacies. Hence, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of combining both topical anesthetic and distraction techniques in comparison with either of the interventions applied singly.

This study adopts a randomized, blind, controlled intervention trial. Participants will be randomly assigned to three groups: EMLA group, Distraction group and Combined group (EMLA cream plus distraction techniques). The outcomes will be measured by self-reported pain, parent-reported pain and observer-reported pain. Salivary cortisol level will be measured by the ultra sensitive Cortisol Saliva ELISA Assay Kit. Other physiological metrics like heart rate, SpO2, and other intravenous cannulation factors will be rated and recorded.

Being tested
EMLA application, Distraction techniques, EMLA cream and distraction techniques
Keywords
Children, venipuncture related pain and stress, EMLA, distraction techniques

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • EMLA applicationDrug

    Also called EMLA cream

    A thick layer of cream (lidocaine and propiocaine 2.5%/2.5%) will be applied on a 1x1 cm2 area of skin on the cannulation site. The transparent dressing will be left in place for 30 minutes, then remove and clean with a sterile cotton swab. Then nurse perform IV cannulation for them.

  • Distraction techniquesBehavioural

    Also called Distractions

    Multiple distractions including toy whistles, cartoon books, a TV showing cartoons, and various electronic products with video games will be provided for the children to choose and play with. They will also be taught breathing exercises (i.e. inhaling through the nose for 3 seconds and exhaling for 5 seconds, while they are counting) if they are willing. A play therapist play with the children for 5 min. prior to and throughout the venipuncture procedure.

  • EMLA cream and distraction techniquesOther

    Also called EMLA cream and distractions

    both EMLA cream and distraction techniques will be used. EMLA cream will be applied on the pre-puncture site for 30 minutes as the EMLA group, then 5 minutes before the venipuncture, the play therapist encourage them to choose their favorite toys to play with or to learn breathing exercises. During IV cannulation the play therapist will also continue distracting the child with toys.

Study groups in NCT04275336
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
EMLA groupExperimentalThe specialist nurse who is to perform IV cannulation determine the puncture site. A thick layer of cream (lidocaine and propiocaine 2.5%/2.5%) will be applied on a 1x1 cm2 area of skin on the cannulation site. The transparent dressing will be left in place for 30 minutes, then remove and clean with a sterile cotton swab. Then nurse performed IV cannulation for them.
Receives: Drug: EMLA application
Distraction groupExperimentalThe multiple distractions including toy whistles, cartoon books, a TV showing cartoons, and various electronic products with video games will be provided for the children to choose and play with. They are also taught breathing exercises (i.e. inhaling through the nose for 3 seconds and exhaling for 5 seconds, while they are counting) if they are willing. A play therapist play with the children for 5 min. prior to and throughout the venipuncture procedure.
Receives: Behavioral: Distraction techniques
Combined groupExperimentalboth EMLA cream and distraction techniques will be used. EMLA cream will be applied on the pre-puncture site for 30 minutes as the EMLA group, then 5 minutes before the venipuncture, the play therapist encourage them to choose their favorite toys to play with or to learn breathing exercises. During IV cannulation the play therapist will also continue distracting the child with toys.
Receives: Other: EMLA cream and distraction techniques

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Child Self-reported Pain: Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale

    Pain outcomes are assessed by child himself or herself using Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale. The scale includes 6 facial expressions with correlating numbers of 0(no hurt), 2(hurts little bit), 4(hurts little more), 6(hurts even more), 8(hurts whole lot), 10(hurts worst). Children pick a facial expression, that corresponds with their pain and see a number that matches it. The minimum value is 0 and the maximum value is 10, the higher score means a worse outcome (children having higher level of pain).

    Measured: Immediately after completing peripheral venipuncture.

  2. Parents Reported Pain (Outcomes Assessor ): Revised Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability Behavioral Pain Rating Scale (r-FLACC)

    The effectiveness is analyzed by outcomes assessors using r-FLACC via video taken during the procedure. The outcomes assessor is blind for the study design. The r-FLACC is a tool which evaluates pain-related behavior on facial expression, leg movement, activity, cry and consolability. Total score of the scale is summed in range 0 to 10. 0=relaxed and comfortable; 1-3=mild discomfort; 4-6=moderate pain; 7-10=severe pain.the higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Measured: Immediately after completing all participants' interventions.

  3. Observer Reported Pain (Parents): Revised Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability Behavioral Pain Rating Scale (r-FLACC)

    Pain outcomes are assessed by parents using the r-FLACC scale. The r-FLACC is a tool which evaluates pain-related behavior on facial expression, leg movement, activity, cry and consolability. Total score of the scale is summed in range 0 to 10. 0=relaxed and comfortable; 1-3=mild discomfort; 4-6=moderate pain; 7-10=severe pain. The higher scores means a worse outcome

    Measured: Immediately after completing peripheral venipuncture.

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Concentration of Salivary Cortisol

    Physiological stress levels are measured by means of salivary cortisol as an indicator. The salivary samples (1-2 milliliter) are taken with sterile collection devices immediately after children reporting pain score. The salivary samples are immediately stored at -20℃ freezer. Cortisol levels are determined by human salivary cortisol ELISA Kit (Jianglai, Shanghai, China). This si no cut-off score and the higher scores means a worse outcomes

    Measured: Immediately after children reporting pain score

  2. Heart Rate

    Evaluate the physiological response (heart rate) caused by peripheral intravenous puncture. A portable recording pulse oximeter is connected to children's index finger. Heart rate (beats per minute) is measured and recorded.

    Measured: During the peripheral intravenous insertion procedure.

  3. Pulse Oximetry Saturation

    Evaluate the physiological response (pulse oximetry saturation) secondary to peripheral intravenous puncture. A portable recording pulse oximeter is connected to children's index finger. Pulse oximetry saturation(percentage)is measured and recorded.

    Measured: During the peripheral intravenous insertion procedure.

  4. Retaining Time of Intravenous Cannula

    Time (hours) from needle insertion to remove.

    Measured: When the needle is removed.

  5. Venipuncture Duration

    record how long is children's first venipuncture duration

    Measured: During children's first venipuncture

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Feb 2020
  2. Study start1 Feb 2020
  3. Primary completion30 Apr 2020
  4. Study completion12 May 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
354 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04275336
Sponsor's protocol ID
FNF201829
Status last verified
Sep 2023
First submitted
6 Feb 2020
Last updated
21 Sep 2023
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Yu Z, Zhou Y, Xu X, Lin L, Le Q, Gu Y. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions in management of peripheral venipuncture-related pain: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Pediatr. 2023 Feb 3;23(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12887-023-03855-z.

    PubMed 36737707

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing EMLA application, Distraction techniques and EMLA cream and distraction techniques in people with Child, Hospitalized, run by Children's Hospital of Fudan University at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Sep 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Oct 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Child Self-reported Pain: Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (time frame: Immediately after completing peripheral venipuncture.). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04275336, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Sep 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in