Spinal Cord Injury Cervical[CNaTT]NCT04276181
Combined Nerve and Tendon Transfer for the Restoration of Hand Function in Individuals With Tetraplegia
An observational study of Spinal Cord Injury Cervical and Tendon Transfer, run by Göteborg University at 1 site in Sweden.
Trial summary
Tetraplegia after a cervical spinal cord injury (C-SCI) radically alters an individual's ability to perform normal activities of daily life due to paralysis in all extremities, resulting in lifelong dependence.[1] Traditional tendon transfer surgery has proven successful in restoring grip functions which greatly… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 15 to 55 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Spinal Cord Injury Cervical, Tendon Transfer, Nerve Transfer
- How many people
- 36 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSweden
- Study dates
- 26 Jan 2020to 30 Oct 2025
- How long will I take part?
- 1 Year
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 15 to 55 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Study population: Patients with tetraplegia due to a cervical spinal cord injury.
Who may be able to join
- Subjects must be between 15-55 years of age
- Subjects must be diagnosed with a spinal cord injury AIS level C5 to C7
- Time after injury ≤ 12 months
- The strength of the muscle supplied by the donor nerve (supinator) must be graded ≥ 4 according to Medical Research Council (MRC)
- The strength of musculus brachioradialis and wrist extensors must be graded ≥ 4 according to MRC (to be used in grip reconstruction)
Who cannot join
- Finger extensor strength ≤ MRC 1
- Evidence of lower motor neuron injury in muscles supplied by the donor nerve
- Subjects must not have any current serious or unstable illness that could interfere with the study
- Medically unstable to undergo surgery as determined by physician
- Spasticity in the forearm or hand graded > 1 according to Modified Ashworth Scale
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Sweden1 site
Center for Advanced Reconstruction of Extremities, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Mölndal
Mölndal
About this study
Tetraplegia after a cervical spinal cord injury (C-SCI) radically alters an individual's ability to perform normal activities of daily life due to paralysis in all extremities, resulting in lifelong dependence.[1] Traditional tendon transfer surgery has proven successful in restoring grip functions which greatly improves autonomy, but with a restricted passive opening of the hand. The number of transferrable muscles in the arm is however limited, why nerve transfer surgery is a new attractive option to further improve hand function by enabling active opening of the hand. Significant advantages of distal nerve transfers include less extensive surgical dissection, greatly reduced hospital stay, rehabilitation and restrictions, and thereby less health care use and costs. In an effort to further improve hand function and independence in patients with tetraplegia, hand surgeons at Centre for Advanced Reconstruction of Extremities (C.A.R.E.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SUH)/Mölndal have developed a strategy in which a nerve transfer procedure aiming to restore active opening of the hand is done prior to reconstruction of grip functions. To date, no study has compared the efficacy of this combined nerve and tendon transfer (CNaTT) procedure to traditional grip reconstruction by means of tendon transfer alone, thus constituting a major gap in the literature. The purpose of this study is therefore to fill that knowledge gap by comparing the clinical outcomes of a cohort of patients who undergo the CNaTT procedure to restore hand function, to those treated by means of tendon transfer alone.
Read the detailed description
Despite its incurability, surgical reconstruction of arm and hand function is a powerful tool to restore upper limb functions, as well as independence and control in individuals with tetraplegia. Patients with tetraplegia rank better use of the upper limb as their top functional priority, and surgical rehabilitation of the upper limb is proven highly rewarding. Starting in the 70s, pioneering work by dr. Moberg, and continued work by professor Fridén at SUH has guided the development of reconstructive surgical procedures in tetraplegia. As one of the leading units in the field C.A.R.E., SUH/Mölndal is responsible to continue the refinement of surgical treatment strategies. The center works in a value-based patient-oriented environment, with high demands on quality.
The traditional approach to surgical reconstruction of hand function in SCI uses tendon transfer, in which a functionally intact muscle is detached, rerouted and re-attached to a nonworking muscle to replace its original function. By this procedure, finger- and thumb flexion can be successfully and predictably restored, enabling strong active grip functions, but with passive and limited hand opening. Successful nerve transfer surgery in brachial plexus injuries has inspired interest in nerve transfers for patients with C-SCIs. Nerve transfers are conceptually quite similar to tendon transfers but are rarely applied in tetraplegia. To maximize outcome, nerve transfers must be done no later than 1 year after injury. In this procedure, a healthy nerve serving one function is cut and reconnected to a nonfunctional nerve (below the injury level), serving a more important function. Within 6-12 months, the recipient muscle has begun to receive nerve impulses. The preliminary results are very promising and show re-innervation of paralyzed muscles, enabling active opening of the hand. It is an attractive surgical procedure since it allows direct reanimation of the muscle, which is anatomically and mechanically designed to perform that function.
Further advantages of nerve transfers include less extensive surgical dissection, minimal hospital stay, rehabilitation and restrictions, and thereby less health care use and costs. Although the utility of nerve transfers in tetraplegia has yet to be fully determined, early results show promise.
The application of nerve transfer surgery to incomplete tetraplegia offers novel and exciting reconstructive possibilities when combined with tendon transfer techniques, especially in groups with very limited resources. Due to nerve regeneration factors, nerve transfers are not as reliable as tendon transfers, why restoring finger flexion in terms of strength is preferably performed with tendon transfers. It has been suggested that research should be directed at evaluating combined tendon and specific nerve transfer techniques, such as the Bertelli S-PIN (supinator to posterior interosseous nerve transfer) procedure. The S-PIN nerve transfer procedure can reanimate not only the finger extensors, but also allows independent thumb extension and abduction, and thereby enables active opening of the hand. Opening of the hand does not require much strength, and partial outcomes may work satisfactory. The S-PIN procedure combined with the tendon transfer technique has the unique potential to restore hand function to a level as near normal as possible in patients with tetraplegia. This strategy referred to as Combined Nerve and Tendon Transfer (CNaTT) procedure thus allows both opening and strong active closing of the hand, and most likely also result in fewer compensatory movements, which reduces the risk for shoulder pain that interfere with daily activities. At C.A.R.E. there is empirical evidence that support the potential of the combined procedure, such as patients' satisfaction and reporting of being able to better engage in activities in daily life that requires active opening of the hand.
The study has an observational controlled design to which the investigators plan to include 40 cases of CNaTT. As control, patients who undergo tendon transfer alone will be included (due to lack of the prerequisite for nerve transfer; >12 months since injury), in parallel with the cohort of patients who have undergone the traditional procedure in the past (20 prospective cases and 100 historical cases). The results at one year after the tendon transfer procedure will constitute the main outcome.
SURGICAL PROCEDURES
Nerve transfer to achieve opening of the hand by means of Bertelli S-PIN
In this procedure performed bilaterally, the supinator motor nerve gets transferred to the posterior interosseous nerve (S-PIN) according to the technique described by Bertelli. Preoperatively, both donor and recipients nerves and muscles are assessed with electromyography to make sure they are stimulatable on both sides. After a short immobilization period of 2 weeks in a hinged orthosis restricting full extension of the elbow, patients are free to move and train without restrictions. When the first evidence of re-innervation is noticed, patients are instructed to enhancing strength in extensor muscles. Initially, patients activate the donor nerve movement (supination) while the forearm is locked in pronation to facilitate thumb- and finger extension.
The traditional approach to surgical reconstruction of grip by means of tendon transfer
The so-called grip reconstruction is a combination of surgical procedures, customized according to the patient´s needs that can be done many years after a C-SCI. The procedure is developed at SUH by professor Fridén, and has been entitled the alphabet or ABCDEFG procedure, an abbreviation for Advanced Balanced Combined Digital Extensor Flexor Grip reconstruction. The procedure is a one-stage grip and release procedure, a result from several previous studies to improve strength of tendon attachments, early active mobilization etc. The active tendon transfers will typically include brachioradialis to flexor pollicis longus (BR-FPL) transfer and extensor carpi radialis longus to flexor digitorium profundus (ECRL-FDP) transfer. The balancing procedures differ depending on the muscle strength (MRC) after the nerve transfer procedure. A typical OCu 4 patient with some finger extension will undergo: split flexor pollicis longus (FPL)- extensor pollicis longus (EPL) tenodesis, passive reconstruction of the interossei, carpometacarpal (CMC) joint capsulodesis, EPL tenodesis and extensor digiti minimi (EDM)- abductor pollicis brevis (APB) transfer/tenodesis. Our specific and active rehabilitation protocol start within 24 hours after surgery and has previously been described in detail.
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Combined Nerve and Tendon Transfer (CNaTT) group | The surgical procedures are described in the section Detailed description | |
| Traditional transfer procedure group | The surgical procedures are described in the section Detailed description |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Cylinder test
This test is developed at SUH and currently under reliability testing. The cylinder test assesses the patients' ability to actively grasp and release glass cylinders of varying breadth, ranging from 10 to 150 mm.
Measured: 5 minutes
Secondary outcomes (6)
Grip ability as measured using the Grasp and Release Test (GRT)
GRT assesses the ability to pick up, move, and release six objects of varying sizes, weights and textures using a palmar or lateral grasp. Each object represents one or more objects routinely manipulated for activities of daily living (ADL) that represented a range of difficulties.
Measured: 20 minutes
Grip strength will be measured with JAMAR dynamometer
Measured: 2 minutes
Pinch grip strength will be assessed using the Pinch Gauge
Measured: 2 minutes
Activity and participation (goal achievement and quality of life) will be measured using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)
Measured: 10 minutes
Activity and participation will be measured using the Tetraplegic Upper Limb Activity Questionnaire (TUAQ).
Ranges between 13 to 130. Lower scores indicate a higher level of independence.
Measured: 10 minutes
Satisfaction with surgery will be measured using the Swedish tetraplegia surgery satisfaction questionnaire.
Ranges between 20 - 100. Higher scores indicate a higher level of satisfaction
Measured: 10 minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Feb 2020
- Study start26 Jan 2020
- Primary completion30 Oct 2025
- Study completion30 Oct 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (13)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Spinal Cord Injury CervicalStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Göteborg UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (actual)
- Target duration
- 1 Year
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Göteborg University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Lina Bunketorp Kall, Göteborg University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04276181
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2020-06208
- Other IDs
- 2020-06208, ALFGBG-918931, ALFGBG-774951
- Acronym
- [CNaTT]
- Status last verified
- Nov 2026
- First submitted
- 7 Feb 2020
- Last updated
- 4 Nov 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Friden J, Gohritz A. Tetraplegia Management Update. J Hand Surg Am. 2015 Dec;40(12):2489-500. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.06.003.
PubMed 26537454Bunketorp-Kall L, Wangdell J, Reinholdt C, Friden J. Satisfaction with upper limb reconstructive surgery in individuals with tetraplegia: the development and reliability of a Swedish self-reported satisfaction questionnaire. Spinal Cord. 2017 Jul;55(7):664-671. doi: 10.1038/sc.2017.12. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
PubMed 28220821Snoek GJ, IJzerman MJ, Hermens HJ, Maxwell D, Biering-Sorensen F. Survey of the needs of patients with spinal cord injury: impact and priority for improvement in hand function in tetraplegics. Spinal Cord. 2004 Sep;42(9):526-32. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101638.
PubMed 15224087Moberg E. The present state of surgical rehabilitation of the upper limb in tetraplegia. Paraplegia. 1987 Aug;25(4):351-6. doi: 10.1038/sc.1987.63. No abstract available.
PubMed 3627823Bossuyt FM, Arnet U, Brinkhof MWG, Eriks-Hoogland I, Lay V, Muller R, Sunnaker M, Hinrichs T; SwiSCI study group. Shoulder pain in the Swiss spinal cord injury community: prevalence and associated factors. Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Apr;40(7):798-805. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1276974. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
PubMed 28084832van Zyl N, Hahn JB, Cooper CA, Weymouth MD, Flood SJ, Galea MP. Upper limb reinnervation in C6 tetraplegia using a triple nerve transfer: case report. J Hand Surg Am. 2014 Sep;39(9):1779-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.06.017. Epub 2014 Jul 23.
PubMed 25063391O'Grady KM, Power HA, Olson JL, Morhart MJ, Harrop AR, Watt MJ, Chan KM. Comparing the Efficacy of Triple Nerve Transfers with Nerve Graft Reconstruction in Upper Trunk Obstetric Brachial Plexus Injury. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Oct;140(4):747-756. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003668.
PubMed 28609352Fox IK, Davidge KM, Novak CB, Hoben G, Kahn LC, Juknis N, Ruvinskaya R, Mackinnon SE. Use of peripheral nerve transfers in tetraplegia: evaluation of feasibility and morbidity. Hand (N Y). 2015 Mar;10(1):60-7. doi: 10.1007/s11552-014-9677-z.
PubMed 25767422Bertelli JA, Ghizoni MF. Nerve transfers for elbow and finger extension reconstruction in midcervical spinal cord injuries. J Neurosurg. 2015 Jan;122(1):121-7. doi: 10.3171/2014.8.JNS14277.
PubMed 25343189Friden J, Lieber RL. Reach out and grasp the opportunity: reconstructive hand surgery in tetraplegia. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2019 May;44(4):343-353. doi: 10.1177/1753193419827814. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
PubMed 30744461Bertelli JA, Tacca CP, Ghizoni MF, Kechele PR, Santos MA. Transfer of supinator motor branches to the posterior interosseous nerve to reconstruct thumb and finger extension in tetraplegia: case report. J Hand Surg Am. 2010 Oct;35(10):1647-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.07.012.
PubMed 20888500Friden J, Reinholdt C, Turcsanyii I, Gohritz A. A single-stage operation for reconstruction of hand flexion, extension, and intrinsic function in tetraplegia: the alphabet procedure. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2011 Dec;15(4):230-5. doi: 10.1097/BTH.0b013e31821b5896.
PubMed 22105635Wangdell J, Bunketorp-Kall L, Koch-Borner S, Friden J. Early Active Rehabilitation After Grip Reconstructive Surgery in Tetraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Jun;97(6 Suppl):S117-25. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.09.025.
PubMed 27233586
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Nov 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Combined Nerve and Tendon Transfer for the Restoration of Hand Function in Individuals With Tetraplegia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04276181
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- [CNaTT] / 2020-06208
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injury Cervical, Tendon Transfer, Nerve Transfer, Rehabilitation, Grip Function
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Göteborg UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital
- Study start
- 26 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Oct 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Oct 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Feb 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Tetraplegia after a cervical spinal cord injury (C-SCI) radically alters an individual's ability to perform normal activities of daily life due to paralysis in all extremities, resulting in lifelong dependence.[1] Traditional tendon transfer surgery has proven successful in restoring grip functions which greatly improves autonomy, but with a restricted passive opening of the hand. The number of transferrable muscles in the arm is however limited, why nerve transfer surgery is a new attractive option to further improve hand function by enabling active opening of the hand. Significant advantages of distal nerve transfers include less extensive surgical dissection, greatly reduced hospital stay, rehabilitation and restrictions, and thereby less health care use and costs. In an effort to further improve hand function and independence in patients with tetraplegia, hand surgeons at Centre for Advanced Reconstruction of Extremities (C.A.R.E.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SUH)/Mölndal have developed a strategy in which a nerve transfer procedure aiming to restore active opening of the hand is done prior to reconstruction of grip functions. To date, no study has compared the efficacy of this combined nerve and tendon transfer (CNaTT) procedure to traditional grip reconstruction by means of tendon transfer alone, thus constituting a major gap in the literature. The purpose of this study is therefore to fill that knowledge gap by comparing the clinical outcomes of a cohort of patients who undergo the CNaTT procedure to restore hand function, to those treated by means of tendon transfer alone.
Detailed description
Despite its incurability, surgical reconstruction of arm and hand function is a powerful tool to restore upper limb functions, as well as independence and control in individuals with tetraplegia. Patients with tetraplegia rank better use of the upper limb as their top functional priority, and surgical rehabilitation of the upper limb is proven highly rewarding. Starting in the 70s, pioneering work by dr. Moberg, and continued work by professor Fridén at SUH has guided the development of reconstructive surgical procedures in tetraplegia. As one of the leading units in the field C.A.R.E., SUH/Mölndal is responsible to continue the refinement of surgical treatment strategies. The center works in a value-based patient-oriented environment, with high demands on quality.
The traditional approach to surgical reconstruction of hand function in SCI uses tendon transfer, in which a functionally intact muscle is detached, rerouted and re-attached to a nonworking muscle to replace its original function. By this procedure, finger- and thumb flexion can be successfully and predictably restored, enabling strong active grip functions, but with passive and limited hand opening. Successful nerve transfer surgery in brachial plexus injuries has inspired interest in nerve transfers for patients with C-SCIs. Nerve transfers are conceptually quite similar to tendon transfers but are rarely applied in tetraplegia. To maximize outcome, nerve transfers must be done no later than 1 year after injury. In this procedure, a healthy nerve serving one function is cut and reconnected to a nonfunctional nerve (below the injury level), serving a more important function. Within 6-12 months, the recipient muscle has begun to receive nerve impulses. The preliminary results are very promising and show re-innervation of paralyzed muscles, enabling active opening of the hand. It is an attractive surgical procedure since it allows direct reanimation of the muscle, which is anatomically and mechanically designed to perform that function.
Further advantages of nerve transfers include less extensive surgical dissection, minimal hospital stay, rehabilitation and restrictions, and thereby less health care use and costs. Although the utility of nerve transfers in tetraplegia has yet to be fully determined, early results show promise.
The application of nerve transfer surgery to incomplete tetraplegia offers novel and exciting reconstructive possibilities when combined with tendon transfer techniques, especially in groups with very limited resources. Due to nerve regeneration factors, nerve transfers are not as reliable as tendon transfers, why restoring finger flexion in terms of strength is preferably performed with tendon transfers. It has been suggested that research should be directed at evaluating combined tendon and specific nerve transfer techniques, such as the Bertelli S-PIN (supinator to posterior interosseous nerve transfer) procedure. The S-PIN nerve transfer procedure can reanimate not only the finger extensors, but also allows independent thumb extension and abduction, and thereby enables active opening of the hand. Opening of the hand does not require much strength, and partial outcomes may work satisfactory. The S-PIN procedure combined with the tendon transfer technique has the unique potential to restore hand function to a level as near normal as possible in patients with tetraplegia. This strategy referred to as Combined Nerve and Tendon Transfer (CNaTT) procedure thus allows both opening and strong active closing of the hand, and most likely also result in fewer compensatory movements, which reduces the risk for shoulder pain that interfere with daily activities. At C.A.R.E. there is empirical evidence that support the potential of the combined procedure, such as patients' satisfaction and reporting of being able to better engage in activities in daily life that requires active opening of the hand.
The study has an observational controlled design to which the investigators plan to include 40 cases of CNaTT. As control, patients who undergo tendon transfer alone will be included (due to lack of the prerequisite for nerve transfer; >12 months since injury), in parallel with the cohort of patients who have undergone the traditional procedure in the past (20 prospective cases and 100 historical cases). The results at one year after the tendon transfer procedure will constitute the main outcome.
SURGICAL PROCEDURES
Nerve transfer to achieve opening of the hand by means of Bertelli S-PIN
In this procedure performed bilaterally, the supinator motor nerve gets transferred to the posterior interosseous nerve (S-PIN) according to the technique described by Bertelli. Preoperatively, both donor and recipients nerves and muscles are assessed with electromyography to make sure they are stimulatable on both sides. After a short immobilization period of 2 weeks in a hinged orthosis restricting full extension of the elbow, patients are free to move and train without restrictions. When the first evidence of re-innervation is noticed, patients are instructed to enhancing strength in extensor muscles. Initially, patients activate the donor nerve movement (supination) while the forearm is locked in pronation to facilitate thumb- and finger extension.
The traditional approach to surgical reconstruction of grip by means of tendon transfer
The so-called grip reconstruction is a combination of surgical procedures, customized according to the patient´s needs that can be done many years after a C-SCI. The procedure is developed at SUH by professor Fridén, and has been entitled the alphabet or ABCDEFG procedure, an abbreviation for Advanced Balanced Combined Digital Extensor Flexor Grip reconstruction. The procedure is a one-stage grip and release procedure, a result from several previous studies to improve strength of tendon attachments, early active mobilization etc. The active tendon transfers will typically include brachioradialis to flexor pollicis longus (BR-FPL) transfer and extensor carpi radialis longus to flexor digitorium profundus (ECRL-FDP) transfer. The balancing procedures differ depending on the muscle strength (MRC) after the nerve transfer procedure. A typical OCu 4 patient with some finger extension will undergo: split flexor pollicis longus (FPL)- extensor pollicis longus (EPL) tenodesis, passive reconstruction of the interossei, carpometacarpal (CMC) joint capsulodesis, EPL tenodesis and extensor digiti minimi (EDM)- abductor pollicis brevis (APB) transfer/tenodesis. Our specific and active rehabilitation protocol start within 24 hours after surgery and has previously been described in detail.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 1 Year
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Combined Nerve and Tendon Transfer (CNaTT) group | – | –The surgical procedures are described in the section Detailed description |
| Traditional transfer procedure group | – | –The surgical procedures are described in the section Detailed description |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 15 to 55 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
- Study population
- Patients with tetraplegia due to a cervical spinal cord injury.
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Subjects must be between 15-55 years of age
- Subjects must be diagnosed with a spinal cord injury AIS level C5 to C7
- Time after injury ≤ 12 months
- The strength of the muscle supplied by the donor nerve (supinator) must be graded ≥ 4 according to Medical Research Council (MRC)
- The strength of musculus brachioradialis and wrist extensors must be graded ≥ 4 according to MRC (to be used in grip reconstruction)
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Finger extensor strength ≤ MRC 1
- Evidence of lower motor neuron injury in muscles supplied by the donor nerve
- Subjects must not have any current serious or unstable illness that could interfere with the study
- Medically unstable to undergo surgery as determined by physician
- Spasticity in the forearm or hand graded > 1 according to Modified Ashworth Scale
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Cylinder test
Time frame: 5 minutes
This test is developed at SUH and currently under reliability testing. The cylinder test assesses the patients' ability to actively grasp and release glass cylinders of varying breadth, ranging from 10 to 150 mm.
6 secondary outcomes
Grip ability as measured using the Grasp and Release Test (GRT)
Time frame: 20 minutes
Grip strength will be measured with JAMAR dynamometer
Time frame: 2 minutes
Pinch grip strength will be assessed using the Pinch Gauge
Time frame: 2 minutes
Activity and participation (goal achievement and quality of life) will be measured using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)
Time frame: 10 minutes
Activity and participation will be measured using the Tetraplegic Upper Limb Activity Questionnaire (TUAQ).
Time frame: 10 minutes
Satisfaction with surgery will be measured using the Swedish tetraplegia surgery satisfaction questionnaire.
Time frame: 10 minutes
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Nov 2026.
- Background: PubMed 26537454Friden J, Gohritz A. Tetraplegia Management Update. J Hand Surg Am. 2015 Dec;40(12):2489-500. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.06.003.
- Background: PubMed 28220821Bunketorp-Kall L, Wangdell J, Reinholdt C, Friden J. Satisfaction with upper limb reconstructive surgery in individuals with tetraplegia: the development and reliability of a Swedish self-reported satisfaction questionnaire. Spinal Cord. 2017 Jul;55(7):664-671. doi: 10.1038/sc.2017.12. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
- Background: PubMed 15224087Snoek GJ, IJzerman MJ, Hermens HJ, Maxwell D, Biering-Sorensen F. Survey of the needs of patients with spinal cord injury: impact and priority for improvement in hand function in tetraplegics. Spinal Cord. 2004 Sep;42(9):526-32. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101638.
- Background: PubMed 3627823Moberg E. The present state of surgical rehabilitation of the upper limb in tetraplegia. Paraplegia. 1987 Aug;25(4):351-6. doi: 10.1038/sc.1987.63. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 28084832Bossuyt FM, Arnet U, Brinkhof MWG, Eriks-Hoogland I, Lay V, Muller R, Sunnaker M, Hinrichs T; SwiSCI study group. Shoulder pain in the Swiss spinal cord injury community: prevalence and associated factors. Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Apr;40(7):798-805. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1276974. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
- Background: PubMed 25063391van Zyl N, Hahn JB, Cooper CA, Weymouth MD, Flood SJ, Galea MP. Upper limb reinnervation in C6 tetraplegia using a triple nerve transfer: case report. J Hand Surg Am. 2014 Sep;39(9):1779-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.06.017. Epub 2014 Jul 23.
- Background: PubMed 28609352O'Grady KM, Power HA, Olson JL, Morhart MJ, Harrop AR, Watt MJ, Chan KM. Comparing the Efficacy of Triple Nerve Transfers with Nerve Graft Reconstruction in Upper Trunk Obstetric Brachial Plexus Injury. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Oct;140(4):747-756. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003668.
- Background: PubMed 25767422Fox IK, Davidge KM, Novak CB, Hoben G, Kahn LC, Juknis N, Ruvinskaya R, Mackinnon SE. Use of peripheral nerve transfers in tetraplegia: evaluation of feasibility and morbidity. Hand (N Y). 2015 Mar;10(1):60-7. doi: 10.1007/s11552-014-9677-z.
- Background: PubMed 25343189Bertelli JA, Ghizoni MF. Nerve transfers for elbow and finger extension reconstruction in midcervical spinal cord injuries. J Neurosurg. 2015 Jan;122(1):121-7. doi: 10.3171/2014.8.JNS14277.
- Background: PubMed 30744461Friden J, Lieber RL. Reach out and grasp the opportunity: reconstructive hand surgery in tetraplegia. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2019 May;44(4):343-353. doi: 10.1177/1753193419827814. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
- Background: PubMed 20888500Bertelli JA, Tacca CP, Ghizoni MF, Kechele PR, Santos MA. Transfer of supinator motor branches to the posterior interosseous nerve to reconstruct thumb and finger extension in tetraplegia: case report. J Hand Surg Am. 2010 Oct;35(10):1647-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.07.012.
- Background: PubMed 22105635Friden J, Reinholdt C, Turcsanyii I, Gohritz A. A single-stage operation for reconstruction of hand flexion, extension, and intrinsic function in tetraplegia: the alphabet procedure. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2011 Dec;15(4):230-5. doi: 10.1097/BTH.0b013e31821b5896.
Related trials for Spinal Cord Injury Cervical
RecruitingPhase 3
A Trial Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of NVG-291 in Subjects With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
Not yet recruiting
Influence of Transcranial Electrical Stimulation on Arm and Hand Function After Cervical Spinal Cord Injury
Spinal Cord Injury
Recruiting
Functional Electrical Stimulation vs Transcutaneous Stimulation in Patients With Subacute Spinal Cord Injury
Non Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury, Sub-Acute Rehabilitation
Recruiting
MindEx: A Novel, Multifocal, Cognitive Brain-Machine Interface System
Paralysis; Quadriplegic, Quadraplegia
Enrolling by invitation
NeuroSuitUp: Neurorehabilitation Through Synergistic Man-machine Interfaces
Spinal Cord Injuries
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Spinal Cord Injury Cervical and Tendon Transfer, run by Göteborg University at 1 site in Sweden.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Nov 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Cylinder test (time frame: 5 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04276181, which also lists 13 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Nov 2026.