AzTrials
AzTrials

Septic ShockSEPSIRNCT04281277

Relation Between Mean Arterial Pressure and Renal Resistive Index in the Early Phase of Septic Shock

A study testing increase of mean arterial pressure at 80-85 mmHg. and increase of mean arterial pressure at 65-70 mmHg. in people with Septic Shock, run by University Hospital, Angers at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study evaluates if improvement of renal resistive index when mean arterial pressure increase (at 65 mmHg to 85 mmHg) in early phase of septic shock is predictive of better renal survival. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Septic Shock
What is being tested?
increase of mean arterial pressure at 80-85 mmHg. and increase of mean arterial pressure at 65-70 mmHg.
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
80 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
6 Jun 2020to 4 Feb 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • adult patients (≥ 18 ans)
  • Admitted to the intensive care unit of Angers with
  • arterial hypotension requiring the etablishment of catecholamines
  • In a context of proven or suspected sepsis, whaterver the cause of this infection.
  • norepinephrine dose ⩾ 0.1µg/kg/min
  • After 2 hours of stabilization at 65 mmHg of mean arterial pressure

Who cannot join

  • Pre-existing chronic renal failure (glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min with MDRD)
  • Solitary kidney (anatomical or functional)
  • History of united or bilateral stenosis of the renal arteries
  • decision to stop or limit treatment
  • patient with an emergency indication of renal replacement therapy (severe hyperkalemia, severe metabolical acidosis with pH <7.15, acute pulmonary edema due to fluid overload resulting in severe hypoxemia, serum urea concentration > 40 mmol/l and oliguria/anuria > 72 h.)
  • pregnant, lactating or parturient woman
Show all 9Show fewer
  • patient deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision
  • patient with psychiatric compulsory care
  • patient subject to legal protection measures

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • CHU Angers. Médecine Intensive Réanimation et médecine hyperbare

    Angers, 49100

Other trials in France

About this study

This study evaluates if improvement of renal resistive index when mean arterial pressure increase (at 65 mmHg to 85 mmHg) in early phase of septic shock is predictive of better renal survival.

Read the detailed description

Learned societes (survival sepsis campaign and ESICM) are currently recommending a mean arterial pressure (MAP) target at 65 mmHg in septic shoc with a potential increase to 85 mmHg in patients with medical history of arterial hypertension.

A high renal resistive index on the first day of septic shock was associated with acute renal failure more frequently on the 5th day. A decrease in the renal resistance index was also objectified during the increase in MAP.

The main objective of this trial is to study the relationship between the improvement of the resistance index during a test of increase in average blood pressure during septic shock and the improvement of renal function

In this interventional monocenter trial, we will measure the renal resistive index after stabilization of the MAP at 65 mmHg for two hours, then after 2 hours of stabilization at 85 mmHg. This part allows us to define the patients "responding" to the renal resistive index (improvement of the resitive renal index when the MAP increases).

Then, patients will be randomized into two groups :

  • first group with a MAP target at 65 mmHg
  • second group with a MAP target at 85 mmHg. There will be a stratification on the responder character to the renal resistance index.

Finally, we will assess renal function on the 7th day (with the assessment of serum creatinine and the change of stage of the KDIGO classification)

Conditions
Septic Shock
Being tested
increase of mean arterial pressure at 80-85 mmHg., increase of mean arterial pressure at 65-70 mmHg.
Keywords
renal resistive index, mean arterial pressure
Medical subject headings
Shock, Septic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • increase of mean arterial pressure at 80-85 mmHg.Device

    increase of mean arterial pressure at 80-85 mmHg (with catecholamines or volemic expansion).

  • increase of mean arterial pressure at 65-70 mmHg.Device

    increase of mean arterial pressure at 65-70 mmHg (with catecholamines or volemic expansion).

Study groups in NCT04281277
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
low target groupActive comparatortarget of mean arterial pressure(MAP) at 65-70 mmHg. The therapeutic means used to obtain the MAP objectives within each group (increase in catecholamines and / or volume expansion) are left to the discretion of the clinician, in accordance with the recommendations.
Receives: Device: increase of mean arterial pressure at 65-70 mmHg.
high target groupExperimentaltarget of mean arterial pressure (MAP) at 80-85 mmHg. The therapeutic means used to obtain the MAP objectives within each group (increase in catecholamines and / or volume expansion) are left to the discretion of the clinician, in accordance with the recommendations.
Receives: Device: increase of mean arterial pressure at 80-85 mmHg.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. changes of KDIGO stage

    modification of the KDIGO classification stage (estimated based on serum creatinine and diuresis) between the group with low target of mean arterial pressure ( 65-70 mmHg) and high target MAP (80-85 mmHg)

    Measured: Inclusion and day 7

Secondary outcomes (16)
  1. Renal resistive index

    We will assess the evolution of the renal resistive index during an increase in the target of MAP in the early phase of septic shock . We will assess the evolution of renal resistive index according to the comorbidities, as a function of time in septic shock, according to the hemodynamic data, according to quantity of filling solution administered and catecholamine doses

    Measured: Inclusion, and 2 hours of mean arterial pressure stabilized at 85 mmHg and every day (day 1 to day 7)

  2. Collection of all adverse event

    Difference in sides effects between target at 65-70 mmHg of MAP and 80-85 mmHg.

    Measured: Day 1 to day 7

  3. amount of fluids (unit = L or L/day)

    Measured: Inclusion, day 1 to day 7

  4. catecholamines free days

    Measured: day 1 to day 7

  5. extra renal replacement free days

    Difference in need of renal replacement therapy between the group of 80-85mmHg and the groupe 65-70 mmHg, depending on the responder character

    Measured: Daily to day 1 to day 7, at day 28 and day 90

  6. Number of day with supportive care in intensive care unit (renal replacement therapy, mechanical ventilation, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation)

    Quantification of the number of days with supportive care (catecholamine,renal replacement therapy, mechanical ventilation, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation)

    Measured: Collection daily between Day 1 and Day 7, at Day 28.

  7. Number of day in intensive care unit

    Quantification of the number of days hospitalized in intensive care unit

    Measured: Collection at Day 28 and Day 90

  8. Number of day in hospital

    Quantification of the number of days hospitalized.

    Measured: Collection at Day 28 and Day 90

  9. hemodynamic data collected by swan ganz or PICCO catheter

    Measured: Inclusion and at 2 hours, daily between Day 1 and Day 7

  10. quantity of nephrotoxic drugs

    Measured: Inclusion and daily between Day 1 and Day 7.

  11. serum creatinine (unit = µmol/L)

    Measured: Inclusion and daily between Day 1 and Day 7

  12. Diuresis (unit = mL per day)

    Measured: Daily between day 1 and day 7

  13. Survival at day 28

    Measured: patient status (live or dead) at day 28

  14. Survival at day 90

    Measured: patient status (live or dead) at day 90

  15. Skin recoloration time evolution

    measurement onto the right index finger by a standardized method after 2 hours of stabilization at 65 mmHg and after 2 hours of stabilization at 85 mmHg.

    Measured: Inclusion and at 2 hours, daily between Day 1 and Day 7

  16. Skin recoloration time evolution

    measurement onto the right index fingerby a standardized method depending on the randomization group.

    Measured: Inclusion and at 2 hours, daily between Day 1 and Day 7

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Feb 2020
  2. Study start6 Jun 2020
  3. Primary completion29 Oct 2024
  4. Study completion4 Feb 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
80 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04281277
Sponsor's protocol ID
49RC19_0236
Acronym
SEPSIR
Status last verified
Oct 2022
First submitted
17 Feb 2020
Last updated
6 Mar 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Data will be shared upon reasonable request. Only de-identified data will be shared. Any data collected during the study may be shared. The protocol will be shared initially. Other documents may be shared at a later date upon request (e.g., the CRF to allow a collaborator to select the data they wish to access). The recipients of the data will be researchers. The data will be available for any purpose deemed relevant by the study investigator, based on a protocol provided by the requester, after verification of the obtaining of regulatory approvals, including the favorable opinion of an ethics committee.

Publications

  • Fage N, Bouizegarene M, Seegers V, Courtais A, Bordeau L, Ziriat I, Mercat A, Beloncle F, Lerolle N, Radermacher P, Demiselle J, Asfar P. Renal Resistive Index Responsiveness to a Mean Arterial Pressure Test As a Guide for Mean Arterial Pressure Target in the Early Phase of Septic Shock: A Physiological Study. Crit Care Med. 2026 Oct 1;54(10):2613-2624. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000007286. Epub 2026 Aug 3.

    PubMed 42545101

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing increase of mean arterial pressure at 80-85 mmHg. and increase of mean arterial pressure at 65-70 mmHg. in people with Septic Shock, run by University Hospital, Angers at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

changes of KDIGO stage (time frame: Inclusion and day 7). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04281277, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Mar 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in