Ovarian CancerPhase 2INTENS-IPNCT04282356
Intensive Intraperitoneal Therapy in Advanced Ovarian Cancer
A Phase 2 study testing Intraperitoneal chemotherapy during surgery in people with Ovarian Cancer and Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy, run by Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'Aurelle at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Clinicians postulate that it may be interesting to combine the two IntraPeritoneal (IP) treatments associated with a significant improvement of OC overall survival i.e. cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC) as an " intensive… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Ovarian Cancer, Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy
- What is being tested?
- Intraperitoneal chemotherapy during surgery
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 55 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 15 Sep 2020to Dec 2030
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients aged 18 to 75 years,
- Patients with high-grade serous (high grade according to MD Anderson, grade II and III according to Silverman) ovarian or tubal or primitive peritoneal histologically proven cancer,
- Initial laparoscopy confirming the histological type, evaluating the extent of the disease by PCI score and confirming the initial non-resectability,
- Stage III B-C (FIGO 2014) or stage IVA with minimal or moderate pleural effusion (measured on a thoracic CT scanner, the largest thickness of which is less than 3 cm),
- Complete interval cytoreduction surgery,
- Indication of 3 to 4 cures of neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on the Carboplatin-Paclitaxel (carbo-taxol) combination,
Show all 12Show fewer
- The delay between the last course of NAT and the surgery must be between 4 and 8 weeks,
- Hematologic function, hemoglobin ≥ 10 g / dl; PNN ≥ 1 x 109 / L, platelets ≥ 100 x 109 / L,
- Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 LSN, ALT or AST ≤ 3 ULN,
- Absence of renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance ≤ 70 ml / min) according to the MDRD method,
- Informed consent signed before any specific procedure under consideration,
- Patients affiliated to the French social security scheme or equivalent.
Who cannot join
- Performance Index (WHO) ≥ 2,
- Stage IV B or IV A with significant pleural effusion (measured on a thoracic CT scanner, the largest thickness of which is more than 3 cm),
- Renal impairment (clearance <70 ml / min) according to the MDRD method,
- General contraindication to the realization of a tumor reduction surgery or HIPEC (contraindication or history allergic reaction to any treatments components),
- Hepatic insufficiency (bilirubin > 1.5 x normal, ASAT \& ALAT > 3 x upper limit of normal),
- Serious life-threatening co-existing condition at stake,
Show all 14Show fewer
- Cardio-respiratory pathology indicating hyper hydration, to be implemented for HIPEC,
- Patient who has already been treated with chemo-hyperthermia for ovarian cancer,
- History of cancer, except basal cell carcinoma of the skin or carcinoma in situ of cervix having recurred within five years prior to entry into this trial,
- Any severe untreated infectious disease,
- Peripheral sensory neuropathy ≥ grade 2 at the inclusion time,
- Patients whose regular follow-up is a priori impossible for psychological, family, social or geographical reasons,
- Pregnant and / or nursing women,
- Subjects under tutelage, curatorship or safeguard of justice.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
France1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'Aurelle
Montpellier, 34298
Marc YCHOU, MD, PhD, +33467613102, marc.ychou@icm.unicancer.fr
About this study
Official title: Intensive Intraperitoneal Therapy in Advanced Ovarian Cancer Combining Cytoreductive Surgery With Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) and Postoperative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (IPC)
Clinicians postulate that it may be interesting to combine the two IntraPeritoneal (IP) treatments associated with a significant improvement of OC overall survival i.e. cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC) as an " intensive peritoneal " regimen in the initial management of stages III-IVA ovarian cancers. Performing a postoperative IPC may allow completing and extending the duration of the effect of HIPEC in decreasing the risk of peritoneal recurrence. HIPEC may also allow administering an early IP treatment on the residual microscopic disease during initial or interval surgery with an optimal access to the intraperitoneal cavity. Postoperative IPC will extend the HIPEC effect on unsterilized peritoneal microscopic residues with the aim of decreasing the risk of local recurrence. Performing HIPEC before IPC could allow limiting the number of postoperative IP courses needed. Nevertheless, this association questions its feasibility and tolerance, which should both be assessed in a phase II trial. Clinicians propose to conduct this feasibility study combining for the first time HIPEC with IPC as first-line treatment of ovarian cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis to perform a peritoneal intensification.
Read the detailed description
Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the main cause of gynecological cancer death in developed countries, reflecting a clinical diagnosis possible at an advanced-stage of the disease and an early propensity for peritoneal dissemination. The treatment of these advanced stages combines optimal cytoreductive surgery and a platinum and taxan-based systemic chemotherapy. Despite a very high initial chemosensitivity and frequent clinical complete responses, the majority of patients relapses after a mean period of 18 months and progressively develops resistance to the various chemotherapeutic treatments. Nevertheless, recurrences remain frequently located in the peritoneal cavity.
Intraperitoneal administration of chemotherapeutic agents (intraperitoneal chemotherapy, IPC) is adapted to OC natural history. IPC has shown its clinical efficacy compared with intravenous (IV) chemotherapy in three randomized clinical trials. Recently, an unexpected median overall survival of 110 months was reported after complete surgery followed with IPC. Nevertheless, IPC repetitions are still strongly limited due to the high local toxicities and the difficult access to the peritoneal cavity leading to an important morbidity of the IP catheters. In the GOG-172 trial, half of the patients of the IPC arm did not receive the complete planned IP treatment. Long-term results of both the GOG-172 and GOG-114 trials showed that treatment efficacy is correlated with the numbers of IPC courses administered and with a significant long-term effect for patients receiving 3 or more IPC courses. For patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and optimal debulking surgery, the OV21 study recently showed that IP carboplatin-based chemotherapy was well tolerated and associated with an improved disease-free survival rate at 9 months after surgery compared with that of the IV chemotherapy group.
At the same time, complete cytoreductive surgery associated with perioperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (i.e. HIPEC) is the second promising IP treatment that is currently evaluated in advanced OC. HIPEC allows an early IP treatment enhanced by hyperthermia while limiting the diffusion problem of the IP drugs and the difficult access to the peritoneal cavity. Nevertheless, despite this promising concept, HIPEC with a unique and limited IP cisplatin dose remains discussed in the management of OC. A phase 3 trial (OVHIPEC study), recently published in the New England Journal of Medicine, emphasized the therapeutic interest of a cisplatin-based HIPEC procedure at the time of interval surgery for patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A significant improvement of overall survival (12 months gain: OS 33.9 months vs 45.7 months for IDS with HIPEC HR = 0.67 (0,48-0,94) p=0,02) was demonstrated for patients receiving HIPEC with a favorable tolerance profile and no additional morbidity.
Clinicians postulate that it may be interesting to combine the two IP treatments associated with a significant improvement of OC overall survival i.e. cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC and postoperative IPC as an " intensive peritoneal " regimen in the initial management of stages III-IVA ovarian cancers. Performing a postoperative IPC may allow completing and extending the duration of the effect of HIPEC in decreasing the risk of peritoneal recurrence. HIPEC may also allow administering an early IP treatment on the residual microscopic disease during initial or interval surgery with an optimal access to the intraperitoneal cavity. Postoperative IPC will extend the HIPEC effect on unsterilized peritoneal microscopic residues with the aim of decreasing the risk of local recurrence. Performing HIPEC before IPC could allow limiting the number of postoperative IP courses needed. Nevertheless, this association questions its feasibility and tolerance, which should both be assessed in a phase II trial. Clinicians propose to conduct this feasibility study combining for the first time HIPEC with IPC as first-line treatment of ovarian cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis to perform a peritoneal intensification.
Design:
After written informed consent, patients presenting with suspected advanced OC will undergo an exploratory laparoscopy with biopsies and evaluation of the disease extent (Sugarbaker PCI score). Only patients with histologically-proven high-grade serous OC with extended disease (stages III B-C and IV-A with minimal pleural effusion (FIGO 2014) will be included in the study. Patients with stage IV-A cancer with major pleural effusion and stage IV-B patients will be excluded. Patients with extended peritoneal carcinomatosis considered unresectable at exploratory laparoscopy will undergo classical 3-4 courses neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval surgery and will be selected to participate to the INTENSIP study.
During interval surgery, patients who will have undergone complete surgery (no macroscopic residue) and who gave their written consent will be included and will undergo HIPEC (Cisplatin 100mg/m2, 1h 30 infusions with sodium thiosulfate renal protection).
They will then receive postoperative IPC i.e intravenous and intraperitoneal administration (IV Paclitaxel, 135mg/m2 on D1, IP Carboplatin, AUC 6 on D1, and IP Paclitaxel, 60mg/m2 on D8) with at least 3 courses performed (up to 4-6 allowed, depending on the classical therapeutic strategy of each participating center). In case of toxicity or inability to administer the treatment in an IP manner, it will be given intravenously.
- Conditions
- Ovarian Cancer, Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy
- Being tested
- Intraperitoneal chemotherapy during surgery
- Keywords
- ovarian cancer, intraperitoneal, chemotherapy, surgery, HIPEC
- Medical subject headings
- Ovarian Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Intraperitoneal chemotherapy during surgeryDrug
Also called Intraperitoneal chemotherapy after surgery
During interval surgery the patient will undergo HIPEC (Cisplatin 100mg/m2, 1h 30 infusions with sodium thiosulfate renal protection). They will then receive postoperative IPC i.e intravenous and intraperitoneal administration (IV Paclitaxel, 135mg/m2 on D1, IP Carboplatin, AUC 6 on D1, and IP Paclitaxel, 60mg/m2 on D8) with at least 3 courses performed (up to 4-6 allowed).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intraperitoneal chemotherapy | Experimental | Cisplatin 100mg/m2 during surgery IV Paclitaxel, 135mg/m2 on D1, IP Carboplatin, AUC 6 on D1, and IP Paclitaxel, 60mg/m2 on D8 after surgery with at least 3 courses performed (up to 4-6 allowed) Receives: Drug: Intraperitoneal chemotherapy during surgery |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The success of the combination of HIPEC and IPC assessed by chemotherapy administration after surgery
Number of administred courses of intraperitoneal chemotherapy during the 6 months following complete interval cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC.
Measured: Until the chemotherapy courses completion: 6 months after interval surgery
The success of HIPEC and IPC combination assessed by surveillance safety
Rate of HIPEC tolerance (deterioration of the renal function and morbidity of HIVEC) and CIP tolerance (abdomibal pain and complications of the IP treatment)
Measured: Until the chemotherapy courses completion: 6 months after interval surgery
Secondary outcomes (5)
Morbidity rate of reductive surgery combined with HIPEC according to the CLAVIEN and DINDO score
Morbidity rate according to the CLAVIEN and DINDO score
Measured: Up to 60 postoperative days
HIPEC toxicities
according to the CTC-AE v5.0 scale
Measured: 2 months after interval surgery
IPC toxicities
according to the CTC-AE v5.0 scale
Measured: Until the chemotherapy courses completion: 6 months after interval surgery
Complications
Complications due to intraperitoneal catheters
Measured: after interval surgery with HIPE: 2 months
Relapse-Free survival
Relapse Free Survival is defined as the time from the date of inclusion to first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to progression
Measured: Until study completion: 5 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Feb 2020
- Study start15 Sep 2020
- Primary completionDec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2030 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Ovarian CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'AurelleThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 55 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Direction Générale de l'Offre de Soins
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Philippe ROUANET, MD, Study chair, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04282356
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PROICM 2019-08 INT
- Acronym
- INTENS-IP
- Status last verified
- Feb 2025
- First submitted
- 8 Jan 2020
- Last updated
- 12 Feb 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Cannistra SA. Cancer of the ovary. N Engl J Med. 2004 Dec 9;351(24):2519-29. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra041842. No abstract available.
PubMed 15590954Colombo PE, Mourregot A, Fabbro M, Gutowski M, Saint-Aubert B, Quenet F, Gourgou S, Rouanet P. Aggressive surgical strategies in advanced ovarian cancer: a monocentric study of 203 stage IIIC and IV patients. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009 Feb;35(2):135-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2008.01.005. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
PubMed 18289825Armstrong DK, Bundy B, Wenzel L, Huang HQ, Baergen R, Lele S, Copeland LJ, Walker JL, Burger RA; Gynecologic Oncology Group. Intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel in ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006 Jan 5;354(1):34-43. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa052985.
PubMed 16394300van Driel WJ, Koole SN, Sikorska K, Schagen van Leeuwen JH, Schreuder HWR, Hermans RHM, de Hingh IHJT, van der Velden J, Arts HJ, Massuger LFAG, Aalbers AGJ, Verwaal VJ, Kieffer JM, Van de Vijver KK, van Tinteren H, Aaronson NK, Sonke GS. Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Ovarian Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 18;378(3):230-240. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1708618.
PubMed 29342393
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Feb 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Intensive Intraperitoneal Therapy in Advanced Ovarian Cancer Combining Cytoreductive Surgery With Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) and Postoperative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (IPC)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04282356
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- INTENS-IP / PROICM 2019-08 INT
- Conditions
- Ovarian Cancer, Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy
- Keywords
- ovarian cancer, intraperitoneal, chemotherapy, surgery, HIPEC
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 55 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'AurelleUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Direction Générale de l'Offre de Soins
- Study start
- 15 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2030 (estimated)
- First posted
- 24 Feb 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Clinicians postulate that it may be interesting to combine the two IntraPeritoneal (IP) treatments associated with a significant improvement of OC overall survival i.e. cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC) as an " intensive peritoneal " regimen in the initial management of stages III-IVA ovarian cancers. Performing a postoperative IPC may allow completing and extending the duration of the effect of HIPEC in decreasing the risk of peritoneal recurrence. HIPEC may also allow administering an early IP treatment on the residual microscopic disease during initial or interval surgery with an optimal access to the intraperitoneal cavity. Postoperative IPC will extend the HIPEC effect on unsterilized peritoneal microscopic residues with the aim of decreasing the risk of local recurrence. Performing HIPEC before IPC could allow limiting the number of postoperative IP courses needed. Nevertheless, this association questions its feasibility and tolerance, which should both be assessed in a phase II trial. Clinicians propose to conduct this feasibility study combining for the first time HIPEC with IPC as first-line treatment of ovarian cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis to perform a peritoneal intensification.
Detailed description
Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the main cause of gynecological cancer death in developed countries, reflecting a clinical diagnosis possible at an advanced-stage of the disease and an early propensity for peritoneal dissemination. The treatment of these advanced stages combines optimal cytoreductive surgery and a platinum and taxan-based systemic chemotherapy. Despite a very high initial chemosensitivity and frequent clinical complete responses, the majority of patients relapses after a mean period of 18 months and progressively develops resistance to the various chemotherapeutic treatments. Nevertheless, recurrences remain frequently located in the peritoneal cavity.
Intraperitoneal administration of chemotherapeutic agents (intraperitoneal chemotherapy, IPC) is adapted to OC natural history. IPC has shown its clinical efficacy compared with intravenous (IV) chemotherapy in three randomized clinical trials. Recently, an unexpected median overall survival of 110 months was reported after complete surgery followed with IPC. Nevertheless, IPC repetitions are still strongly limited due to the high local toxicities and the difficult access to the peritoneal cavity leading to an important morbidity of the IP catheters. In the GOG-172 trial, half of the patients of the IPC arm did not receive the complete planned IP treatment. Long-term results of both the GOG-172 and GOG-114 trials showed that treatment efficacy is correlated with the numbers of IPC courses administered and with a significant long-term effect for patients receiving 3 or more IPC courses. For patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and optimal debulking surgery, the OV21 study recently showed that IP carboplatin-based chemotherapy was well tolerated and associated with an improved disease-free survival rate at 9 months after surgery compared with that of the IV chemotherapy group.
At the same time, complete cytoreductive surgery associated with perioperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (i.e. HIPEC) is the second promising IP treatment that is currently evaluated in advanced OC. HIPEC allows an early IP treatment enhanced by hyperthermia while limiting the diffusion problem of the IP drugs and the difficult access to the peritoneal cavity. Nevertheless, despite this promising concept, HIPEC with a unique and limited IP cisplatin dose remains discussed in the management of OC. A phase 3 trial (OVHIPEC study), recently published in the New England Journal of Medicine, emphasized the therapeutic interest of a cisplatin-based HIPEC procedure at the time of interval surgery for patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A significant improvement of overall survival (12 months gain: OS 33.9 months vs 45.7 months for IDS with HIPEC HR = 0.67 (0,48-0,94) p=0,02) was demonstrated for patients receiving HIPEC with a favorable tolerance profile and no additional morbidity.
Clinicians postulate that it may be interesting to combine the two IP treatments associated with a significant improvement of OC overall survival i.e. cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC and postoperative IPC as an " intensive peritoneal " regimen in the initial management of stages III-IVA ovarian cancers. Performing a postoperative IPC may allow completing and extending the duration of the effect of HIPEC in decreasing the risk of peritoneal recurrence. HIPEC may also allow administering an early IP treatment on the residual microscopic disease during initial or interval surgery with an optimal access to the intraperitoneal cavity. Postoperative IPC will extend the HIPEC effect on unsterilized peritoneal microscopic residues with the aim of decreasing the risk of local recurrence. Performing HIPEC before IPC could allow limiting the number of postoperative IP courses needed. Nevertheless, this association questions its feasibility and tolerance, which should both be assessed in a phase II trial. Clinicians propose to conduct this feasibility study combining for the first time HIPEC with IPC as first-line treatment of ovarian cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis to perform a peritoneal intensification.
Design:
After written informed consent, patients presenting with suspected advanced OC will undergo an exploratory laparoscopy with biopsies and evaluation of the disease extent (Sugarbaker PCI score). Only patients with histologically-proven high-grade serous OC with extended disease (stages III B-C and IV-A with minimal pleural effusion (FIGO 2014) will be included in the study. Patients with stage IV-A cancer with major pleural effusion and stage IV-B patients will be excluded. Patients with extended peritoneal carcinomatosis considered unresectable at exploratory laparoscopy will undergo classical 3-4 courses neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval surgery and will be selected to participate to the INTENSIP study.
During interval surgery, patients who will have undergone complete surgery (no macroscopic residue) and who gave their written consent will be included and will undergo HIPEC (Cisplatin 100mg/m2, 1h 30 infusions with sodium thiosulfate renal protection).
They will then receive postoperative IPC i.e intravenous and intraperitoneal administration (IV Paclitaxel, 135mg/m2 on D1, IP Carboplatin, AUC 6 on D1, and IP Paclitaxel, 60mg/m2 on D8) with at least 3 courses performed (up to 4-6 allowed, depending on the classical therapeutic strategy of each participating center). In case of toxicity or inability to administer the treatment in an IP manner, it will be given intravenously.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intraperitoneal chemotherapy | Experimental | Drug: Intraperitoneal chemotherapy during surgeryCisplatin 100mg/m2 during surgery IV Paclitaxel, 135mg/m2 on D1, IP Carboplatin, AUC 6 on D1, and IP Paclitaxel, 60mg/m2 on D8 after surgery with at least 3 courses performed (up to 4-6 allowed) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Patients aged 18 to 75 years,
- Patients with high-grade serous (high grade according to MD Anderson, grade II and III according to Silverman) ovarian or tubal or primitive peritoneal histologically proven cancer,
- Initial laparoscopy confirming the histological type, evaluating the extent of the disease by PCI score and confirming the initial non-resectability,
- Stage III B-C (FIGO 2014) or stage IVA with minimal or moderate pleural effusion (measured on a thoracic CT scanner, the largest thickness of which is less than 3 cm),
- Complete interval cytoreduction surgery,
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Performance Index (WHO) ≥ 2,
- Stage IV B or IV A with significant pleural effusion (measured on a thoracic CT scanner, the largest thickness of which is more than 3 cm),
- Renal impairment (clearance <70 ml / min) according to the MDRD method,
- General contraindication to the realization of a tumor reduction surgery or HIPEC (contraindication or history allergic reaction to any treatments components),
- Hepatic insufficiency (bilirubin > 1.5 x normal, ASAT \& ALAT > 3 x upper limit of normal),
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Intraperitoneal chemotherapy during surgeryAlso: Intraperitoneal chemotherapy after surgeryDuring interval surgery the patient will undergo HIPEC (Cisplatin 100mg/m2, 1h 30 infusions with sodium thiosulfate renal protection). They will then receive postoperative IPC i.e intravenous and intraperitoneal administration (IV Paclitaxel, 135mg/m2 on D1, IP Carboplatin, AUC 6 on D1, and IP Paclitaxel, 60mg/m2 on D8) with at least 3 courses performed (up to 4-6 allowed). | Drug | Intraperitoneal chemotherapy |
Primary outcome
The success of the combination of HIPEC and IPC assessed by chemotherapy administration after surgery
Time frame: Until the chemotherapy courses completion: 6 months after interval surgery
Number of administred courses of intraperitoneal chemotherapy during the 6 months following complete interval cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC.
The success of HIPEC and IPC combination assessed by surveillance safety
Time frame: Until the chemotherapy courses completion: 6 months after interval surgery
Rate of HIPEC tolerance (deterioration of the renal function and morbidity of HIVEC) and CIP tolerance (abdomibal pain and complications of the IP treatment)
5 secondary outcomes
Morbidity rate of reductive surgery combined with HIPEC according to the CLAVIEN and DINDO score
Time frame: Up to 60 postoperative days
HIPEC toxicities
Time frame: 2 months after interval surgery
IPC toxicities
Time frame: Until the chemotherapy courses completion: 6 months after interval surgery
Complications
Time frame: after interval surgery with HIPE: 2 months
Relapse-Free survival
Time frame: Until study completion: 5 years
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Feb 2025.
- Background: PubMed 15590954Cannistra SA. Cancer of the ovary. N Engl J Med. 2004 Dec 9;351(24):2519-29. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra041842. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 18289825Colombo PE, Mourregot A, Fabbro M, Gutowski M, Saint-Aubert B, Quenet F, Gourgou S, Rouanet P. Aggressive surgical strategies in advanced ovarian cancer: a monocentric study of 203 stage IIIC and IV patients. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009 Feb;35(2):135-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2008.01.005. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
- Background: PubMed 16394300Armstrong DK, Bundy B, Wenzel L, Huang HQ, Baergen R, Lele S, Copeland LJ, Walker JL, Burger RA; Gynecologic Oncology Group. Intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel in ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006 Jan 5;354(1):34-43. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa052985.
- Background: PubMed 29342393van Driel WJ, Koole SN, Sikorska K, Schagen van Leeuwen JH, Schreuder HWR, Hermans RHM, de Hingh IHJT, van der Velden J, Arts HJ, Massuger LFAG, Aalbers AGJ, Verwaal VJ, Kieffer JM, Van de Vijver KK, van Tinteren H, Aaronson NK, Sonke GS. Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Ovarian Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 18;378(3):230-240. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1708618.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Ovarian Cancer
Recruiting
Methylation Profiling in Self-Samples for Identification of (Epi)Genetic Biomarkers for Gynecological Cancers
Gynaecological Cancers, Ovarian Cancer
Recruiting
A Study to Compare Two Surgical Procedures in Individuals With BRCA1 Mutations to Assess Reduced Risk of Ovarian Cancer
Ovarian Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Investigation of Ubamatamab Combination Therapy in Adult Participants With Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer
Ovarian Cancer, Fallopian Tube Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Phase I/II Study of the Anti-Programmed Death Ligand-1 Durvalumab Antibody (MEDI4736) in Combination With Olaparib and/or Cediranib for Advanced Solid Tumors and Advanced or Recurrent Ovarian, Triple Negative Breast, Lung, Prostate and Colorectal Can...
Colorectal Neoplasms, Breast Neoplasms
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Philippe ROUANET, MD study chair
Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM)
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Intraperitoneal chemotherapy during surgery in people with Ovarian Cancer and Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy, run by Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'Aurelle at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Aurore MOUSSION (0467613102 ext. +33, DRCI-icm105@icm.unicancer.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The success of the combination of HIPEC and IPC assessed by chemotherapy administration after surgery (time frame: Until the chemotherapy courses completion: 6 months after interval surgery). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04282356, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Feb 2025.