AzTrials
AzTrials

Healthcare Practitioner StressNCT04282733

Mindfulness Rounds Initiative - A Short Mindfulness-Based Program for A Busy Workplace

A study testing Mindfulness Rounds in people with Healthcare Practitioner Stress and Patient Satisfaction, run by Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai at 1 site in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

An 8 week course of mindfulness education and practices will be presented to all staff, patients, and visitors voluntarily attending the thrice weekly presentations. The goal is to reduce staff stress, improve communication, enhance patient satisfaction, and improve quality of care. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Mindfulness Rounds
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
34 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
18 Mar 2021to 12 May 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Employees on the Units

Who cannot join

  • none

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Mount Sinai Hospital

    New York, New York, 10029

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Mindfulness Rounds Initiative - An 8-Week, Short Session, Mindfulness Based Protocol for On-Site Delivery of Stress Reduction Practices

An 8 week course of mindfulness education and practices will be presented to all staff, patients, and visitors voluntarily attending the thrice weekly presentations. The goal is to reduce staff stress, improve communication, enhance patient satisfaction, and improve quality of care.

Read the detailed description

"Mindfulness Rounds" Care-giver well-being is recognized as an important goal in decreasing burnout, increasing job satisfaction, and may have implications in improving quality of care and patient satisfaction. Mindfulness training is a well-studied tool used to enhance care-giver well-being. The impact of a Mindfulness training experience for caregivers, support staff, and patients and their families working together in a hospital unit on patient satisfaction has not been well studied, if at all. The researchers propose instituting a pilot program of Mindfulness Rounds on a given hospital unit and assessing the effect on employee well-being, patient satisfaction, and quality of care.

Introduction:

The physical and mental health of healthcare practitioners (HCPs) has become an area of attention and research in recent years as HCP burnout and suicide are now openly discussed concerns in medicine. Well-being education is now a required curricula component by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). Mindfulness is a technique and philosophical concept which has received significant attention in the medical literature as a tool for increasing HCP well-being.

Mindfulness describes the idea of maintaining a conscious presence in the present, of avoiding obsessing about the past or the future, and of continuously being aware of, and grateful for, the things we have in life as opposed to the things we don't. Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) is one particular system, developed by Jon Kabat-Zinn over 30 years ago, which has been built into a well-structured certified training program for teaching mindfulness. Numerous studies have used MBSR or similar techniques to advance HCP psychologic well-being, and while some have investigated a variety of HCP training techniques to improve the patient experience, few have sought to explore a relationship between the impact of mindfulness training for HCP on patient satisfaction, quality of care outcomes, and HCP overall health. To the investigators' knowledge, no one has sought to bring mindfulness education to an entire hospital unit - physicians, nurses, support staff, as well as patients and their families wherever possible - with the goal of improving both HCP and the overall patient experience.

The researchers propose instituting a pilot program of Mindfulness Rounds on a given hospital unit and assessing the effect on employee well-being, patient satisfaction, and quality of care.

Being tested
Mindfulness Rounds
Keywords
Mindfulness, Stress, pain scores, patient satisfaction, Perceived Stress Scale, MBSR
Medical subject headings
Patient Satisfaction

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Mindfulness RoundsBehavioural

    Throughout the 8-week study period, a different mindfulness practice will be introduced weekly in 3 separate 15-minute live sessions. Posters describing the particular "practice of the week" will be placed around the Unit as visual reminders to encourage actual practice.

Study groups in NCT04282733
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Mindfulness RoundsExperimentalParticipants will be exposed to thrice weekly Mindfulness Rounds education on the Unit; participation in the actual sessions is voluntary.
Receives: Behavioral: Mindfulness Rounds
ControlNo interventionNo intervention will take place on this Unit

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Pain scores

    Patient pain scores are routinely collected by Nursing and entered into the electronic medical record (EMR). Full pain scale from 0-10, higher score indicates more pain.

    Measured: 1-3 months pre-intervention, 1-3 months post-intervention

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Discharge time

    Duration from discharge order to discharge time.

    Measured: 1-3 months pre-intervention, 1-3 months post-intervention

  2. Change in Narcotic usage

    Aggregate total narcotics administered/patient hours on unit.

    Measured: 1-3 months pre-intervention, 1-3 months post-intervention

  3. Change in Patient Satisfaction survey

    Pres-Ganey survey to assess patient satisfaction. Pres-Ganey Survey: 24 item instrument, each item scored: very poor (score = 0), poor (25), fair (50), good (75) and very good (100). Full scale from 0 - 100, higher score indicates more satisfaction.

    Measured: 1-3 months pre-intervention, 1-3 months post-intervention

  4. Change in Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) survey

    This is a validated survey tool to assess an individual's perceived stress. Full scale range from 0 to 40, higher score indicates higher perceived stress.

    Measured: Within 1 month prior to intervention, within one month post the intervention.

  5. Change in number of Staff sick days

    Number of total staff sick days.

    Measured: 1-3 months pre-intervention, 1-3 months post-intervention

  6. Change in number of staff injuries

    Number of total staff injuries

    Measured: 1-3 months pre-intervention, 1-3 months post-intervention

  7. Change in number of workers compensation claims

    Number of total workers compensation claims

    Measured: 1-3 months pre-intervention, 1-3 months post-intervention

  8. Change in number of discharges before noon

    Number of discharges before noon as a hospital metric tracked for efficiency.

    Measured: 1-3 months pre-intervention, 1-3 months post-intervention

  9. Change in Staff handwashing rates

    Routinely tracked by anonymous observers

    Measured: 1-3 months pre-intervention, 1-3 months post-intervention

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Feb 2020
  2. Study start18 Mar 2021
  3. Primary completion12 May 2021
  4. Study completion12 May 2021

Why it stopped: No post-intervention survey completed

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
The participants are staff on two hospital units tending to the same patient population with the same policies and protocols - postpartum patients. One unit will have the Mindfulness Rounds Initiative as the intervention, the other will not. Both units will be evaluated against each other, and against themselves in a pre-/post- design.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
34 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04282733
Sponsor's protocol ID
GCO 19-1849
Status last verified
Jan 2024
First submitted
21 Feb 2020
Last updated
1 Feb 2024
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Mindfulness Rounds in people with Healthcare Practitioner Stress and Patient Satisfaction, run by Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Feb 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: No post-intervention survey completed). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Pain scores (time frame: 1-3 months pre-intervention, 1-3 months post-intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Feb 2024.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in