OsteoporosisBLASTOFFNCT04283786
Exploring Efficacy, Cost Effectiveness and Experiences Related to Adherence of Different Bisphosphonate Regimens for the Prevention of Osteoporotic Fragility Fractures.
An observational study of Osteoporosis, run by Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
Osteoporosis is a condition where bones become weak and fragile and can easily break. Suffering from one fragility fracture doubles your chance of having another. These fractures can affect a person's life significantly and contribute to significant costs to the UK (United Kingdom) health service. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Osteoporosis
- What is being tested?
- Qualitative Interview
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 6 Mar 2020to 31 May 2022
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients and stakeholders in receipt of or involved in the delivery of bisphosphonate treatment for the prevention of fragility fractures.
Who may be able to join
- Adults over the age of 18 with the ability to give informed consent and represent one of the following stakeholder groups:
- GPs
- Patients who started on oral bisphosphonates within the last 24 months for prevention of fragility fractures
- Secondary care specialist clinicians (nurses, consultants) involved in the treatment of osteoporosis.
- Patients receiving hospital based (intravenous) bisphosphonate treatments for prevention of fragility fractures who began treatment within the last 24 months
- Clinical academics involved in osteoporosis research
Show all 9Show fewer
- Specialist clinicians (nurses, consultants) from the osteoporosis service in Nottingham and Sheffield with insight into alternate bisphosphonate treatments
- Patients receiving alternate bisphosphonate treatments for prevention of fragility fractures who began treatment within the last 24 months
- Commissioners involved in osteoporosis services
Who cannot join
- Patients who take bisphosphonate medicines for reasons other than osteoporosis or osteopenia, including patients with an active cancer, primary hyperparathyroidism and Paget's disease.
- Are unable to give informed consent
- Considered to be near to end of life.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United Kingdom1 site
Nottingham University Hospitals Trust, Queens Medical Centre
Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG7 2UH
About this study
Official title: The BLAST OFF (Bisphosphonate aLternAtive regimenS for the prevenTion of Osteoporotic Fragility Fractures) Study
Osteoporosis is a condition where bones become weak and fragile and can easily break. Suffering from one fragility fracture doubles your chance of having another. These fractures can affect a person's life significantly and contribute to significant costs to the UK (United Kingdom) health service.
Bisphosphonates are used to treat osteoporosis and help prevent fractures. The most commonly used bisphosphonate treatment is Alendronate, but taking it correctly is complicated and side-effects are common. Therefore only 1 in 4 people continue with Alendronate beyond 2 years. There are different forms of bisphosphonates that can be given in different ways and frequencies and may be more acceptable and tolerated by patients.
Read more
The study will look at how effective different bisphosphonate regimens are compared to Alendronate at preventing fractures, whether the reduction in fracture risk can be achieved at reasonable financial cost and establish acceptability of different approaches to patients.
The study will be completed in 2 stages, Stage 1A and Stage 1B in parallel, followed by Stage 2.
Stage 1A will update a systematic review to inform which regimens are most effective at reducing fractures and provide the best value for money.
Stage 1B will consist of qualitative, semi-structured interviews from a sample of stakeholders in receipt of or involved in the delivery of different bisphosphonate regimens, in order to identify which bisphosphonate regimens are most acceptable to patients and the barriers to effective compliance and adherence.
Stage 2 will use focus groups and workshops with stakeholders and commissioners to discuss uncertainties from Stage 1 and identify the most important outstanding questions for future research.
Read the detailed description
This information provided relates to Stage 1B. Stage 1A does not involve participants. Stage 2 will be conducted by the Royal Osteoporosis Society. Participants will not be invited via NHS (National Health Service) organisations and no identifiable information will be collected.
Participants are only involved in Stage 1B of the study, which consists of qualitative interviews only. Participants will be drawn from several different areas of healthcare, in order to ensure a best range of relevant patients', clinicians', commissioners', service managers' and researchers' experiences. Patient participants will be identified as potentially eligible by their healthcare providers, either via their GP (General Practitioner) surgery or secondary care clinician.
Patients will receive a Study Information Pack via the post, containing an Invitation (Patient) Letter from their GP or responsible secondary care doctor, a Participant (Patient) Information Sheet, a reply slip and a freepost envelope with the Research Team's return address. This information pack will also include the Research Team's contact details in order that potential participants have an opportunity to ask questions before indicating an interest in taking part in the study. Patients may also contact the Research Team to express interest by response to a Patient Information Poster in certain service areas, and they will be supplied with the same Study Information Pack. Patients who return a reply slip will be contacted by a member of the Research Team to arrange a convenient time and location in which to obtain written informed consent and undertake the semi-structured interview, which is likely to be immediately after written consent is obtained.
Non-patient participants will be identified as potentially eligible via their General Practice Managers or via snowball sampling from their Service Lead in secondary care services. They will be provided with an Invitation (Clinician) Letter/Email and Participant (Clinician) Information Sheet. The information pack will also include the Research Team's contact details in order that potential participants have an opportunity to ask questions before indicating an interest in taking part in the study. If they indicate to the Research Team they would like to participate in the study, a member of the Research Team will contact the participant to obtain written informed consent, before arranging a convenient time and location to undertake the semi-structured interview, which may be immediately after written consent is obtained.
The semi-structured interviews will be conducted face-to-face or by telephone and are expected to take 40-50 minutes to complete. Face-to-face interviews will be conducted in a private setting either within the site of treatment or at their home in the case of a patient participant, or within the place of work for non-patient participants.
The interview guide will be developed iteratively throughout the study to cover issues as identified from the scoping review of published studies assessing experiences of bisphosphonate regimens, as well as wider experiences of service quality and delivery. This will include questions around patient factors (such as values and health beliefs), service factors (location, accessibility, assurance, and empathy), relational factors (provider patient relations) and medication factors (dosing complexity, frequency, side effects). Clinician interviews will also include barriers to maintain a service around alternative bisphosphonates regimens, as well as changes in service over time.
Interviews will be undertaken by qualitative researchers (employed by University of Nottingham). Interviews will be audio-recorded and then transcribed by Clayton Research Support, a Nottingham University Hospitals and University of Nottingham approved transcription service.
There is no intervention involved in this study. Once the interview is completed, a participant's involvement in the study is ended. There is no further follow-up.
Thematic analysis of interview data will be conducted. This will involve familiarisation, identification of a framework, and interpretation, paying particular attention to themes clustered around service variables. The analysis will involve a preliminary phase of more general qualitative data analysis (close reading of transcripts, open coding, identification of themes). Analysis will be undertaken in the first instance by the Research Fellow alongside and overseen by the Stage 1B Lead. Emerging themes (with all identifying information removed) will be discussed at appropriate intervals with the wider study management group. The approach will allow for both a-priori and emergent codes to be identified. NVivo software will be used to develop an appropriate coding strategy and framework.
Due to the Covid-19 pandemic and the need for a contingency recruitment plan, Non-substantial Amendment 02 was submitted and approved on 15th May 2020 to facilitate patient recruitment from the Royal Osteoporosis Society members via newsletter article, allowing interviews to be conducted by telephone rather than face-to-face at a specific location.
- Conditions
- Osteoporosis
- Being tested
- Qualitative Interview
- Keywords
- bisphosphonates, systematic review, qualitative interviews, osteoporosis
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoporosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Qualitative InterviewOther
A single qualitative interview about experiences of bisphosphonate regimens, as well as wider experiences of service quality and delivery.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| General Practitioner | General Practitioners working within primary care in the UK Receives: Other: Qualitative Interview | |
| Primary Care Patients | Patients cared for in primary care who started on oral bisphosphonates within the last 24 months for prevention of fragility fractures Receives: Other: Qualitative Interview | |
| Secondary Care Clinicians | Clinicians working in secondary care as specialists (e.g. nurses, consultants) involved in the treatment of osteoporosis Receives: Other: Qualitative Interview | |
| Secondary Care Patients | Patients cared for in secondary care receiving hospital based (intravenous) bisphosphonate treatments for prevention of fragility fractures who began treatment within the last 24 months Receives: Other: Qualitative Interview | |
| Clinical Academics | Clinical academics involved in osteoporosis research Receives: Other: Qualitative Interview | |
| Secondary Care Clinicians - Novel Care | Clinicians working in secondary care as specialists (e.g. nurses, consultants) from the osteoporosis service in Nottingham and Sheffield with insight into alternate bisphosphonate treatments Receives: Other: Qualitative Interview | |
| Secondary Care Patients - Novel Care | Patients cared for in secondary care receiving alternative bisphosphonate treatments for prevention of fragility fractures who began treatment within the last 24 months at the osteoporosis service in Nottingham or Sheffield Receives: Other: Qualitative Interview | |
| Commissioners | Commissioners involved in osteoporosis services Receives: Other: Qualitative Interview |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Views, experiences and preferences of patients, clinicians and researchers regarding different bisphosphonate treatment regimens.
Collected through conduction and analysis of semi-structured interviews.
Measured: 40-50 minutes
Secondary outcomes (3)
Effectiveness of different bisphosphonate regimens in preventing fragility fractures in adults.
By analysis of published literature by systematic review.
Measured: 24 months
Cost-effectiveness of different bisphosphonate regimens in preventing fragility fractures in adults.
Using a health economic model on data of published literature identified by systematic review
Measured: 24 months
Prioritised future research questions regarding the effectiveness and adherence profile of different bisphosphonate regimens in preventing fragility fractures in adults.
By stakeholder engagement workshops using the James Lind methodology.
Measured: 2-3 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Feb 2020
- Study start6 Mar 2020
- Primary completion30 Jun 2021
- Study completion31 May 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for OsteoporosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Nottingham
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Opinder Sahota, Professor, Principal investigator, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04283786
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 43961
- Acronym
- BLASTOFF
- Status last verified
- Apr 2023
- First submitted
- 18 Feb 2020
- Last updated
- 25 Apr 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: The datasets (whole transcripts) generated during and/or analysed during the current study are not expected to be made available due to participant confidentiality. Some anonymised statements may be available within the published results.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Apr 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The BLAST OFF (Bisphosphonate aLternAtive regimenS for the prevenTion of Osteoporotic Fragility Fractures) Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04283786
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BLASTOFF / 43961
- Conditions
- Osteoporosis
- Keywords
- bisphosphonates, systematic review, qualitative interviews, osteoporosis
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Nottingham
- Study start
- 6 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 May 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Feb 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Osteoporosis is a condition where bones become weak and fragile and can easily break. Suffering from one fragility fracture doubles your chance of having another. These fractures can affect a person's life significantly and contribute to significant costs to the UK (United Kingdom) health service.
Bisphosphonates are used to treat osteoporosis and help prevent fractures. The most commonly used bisphosphonate treatment is Alendronate, but taking it correctly is complicated and side-effects are common. Therefore only 1 in 4 people continue with Alendronate beyond 2 years. There are different forms of bisphosphonates that can be given in different ways and frequencies and may be more acceptable and tolerated by patients.
The study will look at how effective different bisphosphonate regimens are compared to Alendronate at preventing fractures, whether the reduction in fracture risk can be achieved at reasonable financial cost and establish acceptability of different approaches to patients.
The study will be completed in 2 stages, Stage 1A and Stage 1B in parallel, followed by Stage 2.
Stage 1A will update a systematic review to inform which regimens are most effective at reducing fractures and provide the best value for money.
Stage 1B will consist of qualitative, semi-structured interviews from a sample of stakeholders in receipt of or involved in the delivery of different bisphosphonate regimens, in order to identify which bisphosphonate regimens are most acceptable to patients and the barriers to effective compliance and adherence.
Stage 2 will use focus groups and workshops with stakeholders and commissioners to discuss uncertainties from Stage 1 and identify the most important outstanding questions for future research.
Detailed description
This information provided relates to Stage 1B. Stage 1A does not involve participants. Stage 2 will be conducted by the Royal Osteoporosis Society. Participants will not be invited via NHS (National Health Service) organisations and no identifiable information will be collected.
Participants are only involved in Stage 1B of the study, which consists of qualitative interviews only. Participants will be drawn from several different areas of healthcare, in order to ensure a best range of relevant patients', clinicians', commissioners', service managers' and researchers' experiences. Patient participants will be identified as potentially eligible by their healthcare providers, either via their GP (General Practitioner) surgery or secondary care clinician.
Patients will receive a Study Information Pack via the post, containing an Invitation (Patient) Letter from their GP or responsible secondary care doctor, a Participant (Patient) Information Sheet, a reply slip and a freepost envelope with the Research Team's return address. This information pack will also include the Research Team's contact details in order that potential participants have an opportunity to ask questions before indicating an interest in taking part in the study. Patients may also contact the Research Team to express interest by response to a Patient Information Poster in certain service areas, and they will be supplied with the same Study Information Pack. Patients who return a reply slip will be contacted by a member of the Research Team to arrange a convenient time and location in which to obtain written informed consent and undertake the semi-structured interview, which is likely to be immediately after written consent is obtained.
Non-patient participants will be identified as potentially eligible via their General Practice Managers or via snowball sampling from their Service Lead in secondary care services. They will be provided with an Invitation (Clinician) Letter/Email and Participant (Clinician) Information Sheet. The information pack will also include the Research Team's contact details in order that potential participants have an opportunity to ask questions before indicating an interest in taking part in the study. If they indicate to the Research Team they would like to participate in the study, a member of the Research Team will contact the participant to obtain written informed consent, before arranging a convenient time and location to undertake the semi-structured interview, which may be immediately after written consent is obtained.
The semi-structured interviews will be conducted face-to-face or by telephone and are expected to take 40-50 minutes to complete. Face-to-face interviews will be conducted in a private setting either within the site of treatment or at their home in the case of a patient participant, or within the place of work for non-patient participants.
The interview guide will be developed iteratively throughout the study to cover issues as identified from the scoping review of published studies assessing experiences of bisphosphonate regimens, as well as wider experiences of service quality and delivery. This will include questions around patient factors (such as values and health beliefs), service factors (location, accessibility, assurance, and empathy), relational factors (provider patient relations) and medication factors (dosing complexity, frequency, side effects). Clinician interviews will also include barriers to maintain a service around alternative bisphosphonates regimens, as well as changes in service over time.
Interviews will be undertaken by qualitative researchers (employed by University of Nottingham). Interviews will be audio-recorded and then transcribed by Clayton Research Support, a Nottingham University Hospitals and University of Nottingham approved transcription service.
There is no intervention involved in this study. Once the interview is completed, a participant's involvement in the study is ended. There is no further follow-up.
Thematic analysis of interview data will be conducted. This will involve familiarisation, identification of a framework, and interpretation, paying particular attention to themes clustered around service variables. The analysis will involve a preliminary phase of more general qualitative data analysis (close reading of transcripts, open coding, identification of themes). Analysis will be undertaken in the first instance by the Research Fellow alongside and overseen by the Stage 1B Lead. Emerging themes (with all identifying information removed) will be discussed at appropriate intervals with the wider study management group. The approach will allow for both a-priori and emergent codes to be identified. NVivo software will be used to develop an appropriate coding strategy and framework.
Due to the Covid-19 pandemic and the need for a contingency recruitment plan, Non-substantial Amendment 02 was submitted and approved on 15th May 2020 to facilitate patient recruitment from the Royal Osteoporosis Society members via newsletter article, allowing interviews to be conducted by telephone rather than face-to-face at a specific location.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Number of arms
- 8
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| General Practitioner | – | Other: Qualitative InterviewGeneral Practitioners working within primary care in the UK |
| Primary Care Patients | – | Other: Qualitative InterviewPatients cared for in primary care who started on oral bisphosphonates within the last 24 months for prevention of fragility fractures |
| Secondary Care Clinicians | – | Other: Qualitative InterviewClinicians working in secondary care as specialists (e.g. nurses, consultants) involved in the treatment of osteoporosis |
| Secondary Care Patients | – | Other: Qualitative InterviewPatients cared for in secondary care receiving hospital based (intravenous) bisphosphonate treatments for prevention of fragility fractures who began treatment within the last 24 months |
| Clinical Academics | – | Other: Qualitative InterviewClinical academics involved in osteoporosis research |
| Secondary Care Clinicians - Novel Care | – | Other: Qualitative InterviewClinicians working in secondary care as specialists (e.g. nurses, consultants) from the osteoporosis service in Nottingham and Sheffield with insight into alternate bisphosphonate treatments |
| Secondary Care Patients - Novel Care | – | Other: Qualitative InterviewPatients cared for in secondary care receiving alternative bisphosphonate treatments for prevention of fragility fractures who began treatment within the last 24 months at the osteoporosis service in Nottingham or Sheffield |
| Commissioners | – | Other: Qualitative InterviewCommissioners involved in osteoporosis services |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients and stakeholders in receipt of or involved in the delivery of bisphosphonate treatment for the prevention of fragility fractures.
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Adults over the age of 18 with the ability to give informed consent and represent one of the following stakeholder groups:
- GPs
- Patients who started on oral bisphosphonates within the last 24 months for prevention of fragility fractures
- Secondary care specialist clinicians (nurses, consultants) involved in the treatment of osteoporosis.
- Patients receiving hospital based (intravenous) bisphosphonate treatments for prevention of fragility fractures who began treatment within the last 24 months
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients who take bisphosphonate medicines for reasons other than osteoporosis or osteopenia, including patients with an active cancer, primary hyperparathyroidism and Paget's disease.
- Are unable to give informed consent
- Considered to be near to end of life.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Qualitative InterviewA single qualitative interview about experiences of bisphosphonate regimens, as well as wider experiences of service quality and delivery. | Other | Clinical Academics, Commissioners, General Practitioner, Primary Care Patients, Secondary Care Clinicians, Secondary Care Clinicians - Novel Care, Secondary Care Patients, Secondary Care Patients - Novel Care |
Primary outcome
Views, experiences and preferences of patients, clinicians and researchers regarding different bisphosphonate treatment regimens.
Time frame: 40-50 minutes
Collected through conduction and analysis of semi-structured interviews.
3 secondary outcomes
Effectiveness of different bisphosphonate regimens in preventing fragility fractures in adults.
Time frame: 24 months
Cost-effectiveness of different bisphosphonate regimens in preventing fragility fractures in adults.
Time frame: 24 months
Prioritised future research questions regarding the effectiveness and adherence profile of different bisphosphonate regimens in preventing fragility fractures in adults.
Time frame: 2-3 hours
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Apr 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. The datasets (whole transcripts) generated during and/or analysed during the current study are not expected to be made available due to participant confidentiality. Some anonymised statements may be available within the published results.
Related trials for Osteoporosis
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
GRACE II (General Retrospective Analysis of Commercial Experience With AGN1 LOEP)
Osteoporosis
RecruitingObservational study
Glucocorticoid-induced Osteoporosis in Patients With Chronic Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases or Psoriasis
Osteoporosis, Inflammatory Rheumatism
Not yet recruiting
Exercise and Fall Prevention for Fracture Reduction
Osteopenia, Osteoporosis
Active, not recruiting
Impact of Screening and Multicomponent Exercise on Fall Rates, Fractures, and Cardiovascular Health in Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes, Osteoporosis
Recruiting
Surgeon-Initiated Bone Health Referral Pathway in Patients Undergoing Lower Extremity Arthroplasty
Osteoporosis, Arthroplasty Complications
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Opinder Sahota, Professor principal investigator
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Osteoporosis, run by Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Apr 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Views, experiences and preferences of patients, clinicians and researchers regarding different bisphosphonate treatment regimens. (time frame: 40-50 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Apr 2023.