AzTrials
AzTrials

StrokeAFEPFONCT04290052

Atrial Fibrillation After PFO Closure

An observational study of Stroke, run by University Hospital, Montpellier at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

An increased risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) after patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure was observed in randomized trials but systematic screening of AF was not performed in these studies. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 60 years
Conditions the study is for
Stroke
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
1 Mar 2020to 1 Jan 2022
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Study population: Patient at least 18 years old, benefiting from percutaneous closure of the FOP after a cryptogenic stroke (indication validated during a multidisciplinary meeting with neurologists and cardiologists)

Who may be able to join

  • Men or women over the age of 18 to 60
  • Benefiting from the closure of the FOP percutaneously after a cryptogenic ischemic stroke or a TIA (indication validated during a multidisciplinary meeting with neurologists and cardiologists)

Who cannot join

  • Inability to perform a 24h ECG Holter
  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Vulnerable people

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Uhmontpellier

    Montpellier, 34295

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Atrial Fibrillation on Holter Monitoring After Percutaneous Patent Foramen Ovale Closure : a Prospective Observational Study

An increased risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) after patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure was observed in randomized trials but systematic screening of AF was not performed in these studies. Purpose: The objective of this study was to evaluate incidence of AF in patients who underwent percutaneous PFO closure with serial 24-hours ambulatory ECG (AECG) monitoring during 6 months follow-up. Primary endpoint was incidence of AF on ECG monitoring. Secondary endpoints were clinical outcomes (symptoms, hospitalization from cardiovascular causes, ischemic stroke, or bleeding) up to 6 month follow-up.

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective, bicentric, observational cohort study which will be performed in University hospital center of Montpellier and Nîmes The study will include all consecutive patients, admitted for a percutaneous PFO closure after an ischemic stroke (IS) or a transient ischemic attack (TIA) of cryptogenic origin, or after the occurrence of a decompression illness during scuba diving. Patients eligible for the closure of a FOP in prevention of the recurrence of stroke or TIA of cryptogenic origin, was systematically evaluated for exclusion of supraventricular arrhythmia in accordance with international recommendations. This evaluation included a 12-lead ECG as well as an extended electrocardiographic monitoring lasting more than or equal to 24 hours (most frequently, performing a 72-hour ECG Holter). All patients previously has a transesophageal ultrasound (TEE) allowing to retain the diagnosis of PFO, to assess the presence or not of an atrial septum aneurysm (ASA) associated with PFO and to quantify the right to left shunt thanks to a contrast test potentiated by a Valsalva maneuver. Exclusion criteria included interatrial defect with left to right and others indications for PFO closure that cryptogenic stroke or decompression illness. Indication of PFO closure is always validated by a cardio neurological team.

The primary objective of the study was incidence of AF defined as an irregular rhythm without discernible P waves lasting at least 30 seconds on ECG monitoring during the 6-month follow-up. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the characteristics of the supra-ventricular arrhythmias (delay in onset, duration, recurrent nature), incidence of others arrhythmia, symptoms, and prognostic implications of AF (hospitalization , need of curative anticoagulation, need for cardioversion and occurrence of neurological accident documented by imagery (ischemic stroke or TIA). The investigators also evaluated risk factors for occurrence of arrhythmia.

A total of 100 patients included during 1 year is expected

Conditions
Stroke
Keywords
Cryptogenic
Medical subject headings
Stroke

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. occurrence of sustained supra-ventricular arrhythmia

    occurrence of sustained supra-ventricular arrhythmia (AF, atrial flutter) during the analysis the 24-hour Holter ECG performed post-intervention

    Measured: the 24-hour post-intervention

  2. occurrence of sustained supra-ventricular arrhythmia

    occurrence of sustained supra-ventricular arrhythmia (AF, atrial flutter) during the analysis at 1 month (Holter ECG)

    Measured: at 1 month

  3. occurrence of sustained supra-ventricular arrhythmia

    occurrence of sustained supra-ventricular arrhythmia (AF, atrial flutter) during the analysis at 6 month (Holter ECG)

    Measured: at 6 month

  4. occurrence of sustained supra-ventricular arrhythmia

    occurrence of sustained supra-ventricular arrhythmia (AF, atrial flutter) during the analysis at 12 month (Holter ECG)

    Measured: at 12 month

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. characteristics of these detected arrhythmias

    characteristics of these detected arrhythmias : time to onset

    Measured: 24 hours post-intervention to 12 months

  2. characteristics of these detected arrhythmias

    characteristics of these detected arrhythmias : duration

    Measured: 24 hours post-intervention to 12 months

  3. characteristics of these detected arrhythmias

    characteristics of these detected arrhythmias : recurrence

    Measured: 24 hours post-intervention to 12 months

  4. symptoms related to the arrhythmia episode

    symptoms related to the arrhythmia episode

    Measured: 24 hours post-intervention to 12 months

  5. hospitalization related to arrhythmia

    hospitalization related to arrhythmia

    Measured: 24 hours post-intervention to 12 months

  6. occurrence of a neurological accident.

    occurrence of a neurological accident.

    Measured: 24 hours post-intervention to 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Feb 2020
  2. Study start1 Mar 2020
  3. Primary completion1 Mar 2021
  4. Study completion1 Jan 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
100 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04290052
Sponsor's protocol ID
RECHMPL19_0517
Acronym
AFEPFO
Status last verified
Apr 2022
First submitted
11 Feb 2020
Last updated
14 Apr 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: NC

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Stroke, run by University Hospital, Montpellier at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Apr 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

occurrence of sustained supra-ventricular arrhythmia (time frame: the 24-hour post-intervention). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Apr 2022.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in