AzTrials
AzTrials

Psychiatric DiseaseNCT04291586

Comparing the Impact of Virtual Reality and Paper and Pencil on Psychosocial Rehabilitation

A study testing Virtual reality and Paper and Pencil in people with Psychiatric Disease, run by Instituto Irmãs Hospitaleiras Sagrado Coração de Jesus at 1 site in Portugal.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Virtual Reality allows the integration of cognitive rehabilitation in a more ecologically valid context. The purpose of this study is to determine whether this methodology has more impact on psychosocial rehabilitation than a paper and pencil personalized program. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age, women only
Conditions the study is for
Psychiatric Disease
What is being tested?
Virtual reality and Paper and Pencil
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
29 participants
Where
1 sitePortugal
Study dates
3 Jun 2019to 31 Mar 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Inpatients of psychosocial rehabilitation unit;
  • Cognitive deficit but with enough capacity to understand the task and follow instructions;
  • Able to read and write.

Who cannot join

  • Patients experiencing an acute psychiatric episode.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Portugal1 site
  • Instituto das Irmãs Hospitaleiras do Sagrado Coração de Jesus - Casa de Saúde Câmara Pestana

    Funchal, Funchal-Madeira, 9060-021

Other trials in Portugal

About this study

Official title: The Impact of Using an Interactive System and a Paper and Pencil Program in Psychosocial Rehabilitation of Psychiatric Patients

Virtual Reality allows the integration of cognitive rehabilitation in a more ecologically valid context.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether this methodology has more impact on psychosocial rehabilitation than a paper and pencil personalized program.

Read the detailed description

Cognitive impairments are frequently present on many psychiatric diseases, such as schizophrenia, depression, etc. and are not always given sufficient attention despite its limitations in activities of daily living (ADL's). Current cognitive rehabilitation methods mostly rely on paper-and-pencil tasks targeting isolated domains, which is not consistent with everyday life, and have limited ecological validity.

Virtual Reality (VR) has shown to be a solution for the development of accessible and ecologically valid systems but, does it have more impact than a paper and pencil personalized intervention?

Through a participatory design approach, with health professionals, the investigators have developed:

a motor-accessible and cognitive-personalized VR-based system, where conventional cognitive tasks were operationalized in meaningful simulations of ADL's (Reh@City) and; a web tool which generates personalized paper and pencil tasks (Task Generator).

The investigators goal is to have a sample of 30 inpatients from a psychosocial rehabilitation unit, with no age limit, randomly allocated in two groups: 1) the experimental group, where participants will perform 30 minutes of the VR training with Reh@City; and 2) the control group, where participants will perform 30 minutes of the paper and pencil training with the Task Generator.

Being tested
Virtual reality, Paper and Pencil
Keywords
Virtual Reality, Cognitive Rehabilitation, Psychosocial Rehabilitation, Ecological validity, Personalization
Medical subject headings
Mental Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Virtual realityOther

    Virtual Reality Intervention of 30 minutes, 3 times a week until reaching 24 sessions.

  • Paper and PencilOther

    Paper and Pencil Intervention of 30 minutes, 3 times a week until reaching 24 sessions.

Study groups in NCT04291586
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Virtual RealityExperimentalThe Virtual Reality group will perform personalized activities of daily living in the context of a simulated city (Reh@City). The interaction with the virtual environment will be through a natural user interface.
Receives: Other: Virtual reality
Paper and PencilActive comparatorThe paper and pencil group will perform a set of cognitive paper and pencil tasks personalized to their deficits and generated automatically through a Task Generator.
Receives: Other: Paper and Pencil

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Montreal Cognitive Assessment (Cognitive Screening)

    Change from baseline in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. Higher values represent better outcomes.

    Measured: Baseline, End (8 weeks) and 8-weeks follow-up

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Toulouse-Pieron (Attention)

    Change from baseline in the Toulouse-Pieron Cancellation Test.

    Measured: Baseline, End (8 weeks) and 8-weeks follow-up

  2. Semantic Fluency and Phonemic Fluency Tests

    Change from baseline in the Semantic Fluency and Phonemic Fluency Tests

    Measured: Baseline, End (8 weeks) and 8-weeks follow-up

  3. Verbal Paired Associates (WMS-III) (Memory)

    Change from baseline in the Verbal Paired Associates (WMS-III)

    Measured: Baseline, End (8 weeks) and 8-weeks follow-up

  4. Rey Complex Figure

    Change from baseline in the Rey Complex Figure

    Measured: Baseline, End (8 weeks) and 8-weeks follow-up

  5. Symbol Search and Coding (WAIS III)

    Change from baseline in the Symbol Search and Coding (WAIS III)

    Measured: Baseline, End (8 weeks) and 8-weeks follow-up

  6. Rey 15-Item Memory Test

    Change from baseline in the Rey 15-Item Memory Test

    Measured: Baseline, End (8 weeks) and 8-weeks follow-up

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Mar 2020
  2. Study start3 Jun 2019
  3. Primary completion7 Feb 2020
  4. Study completion31 Mar 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
29 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04291586
Sponsor's protocol ID
Casa de Saúde Câmara Pestana
Status last verified
Jan 2021
First submitted
24 May 2019
Last updated
6 Jan 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Virtual reality and Paper and Pencil in people with Psychiatric Disease, run by Instituto Irmãs Hospitaleiras Sagrado Coração de Jesus at 1 site in Portugal.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jan 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Portugal. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Montreal Cognitive Assessment (Cognitive Screening) (time frame: Baseline, End (8 weeks) and 8-weeks follow-up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jan 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in