Systemic Lupus ErythematosusPhase 3PHOENYCS GONCT04294667
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Dapirolizumab Pegol in Study Participants With Moderately to Severely Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
A Phase 3 study testing DZP in people with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, run by UCB Biopharma SRL at 177 sites in 25 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the ability of dapirolizumab pegol (DZP) as an add-on treatment to standard of care (SOC) medication to achieve clinically relevant long term improvement of moderate to severe disease activity. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
- What is being tested?
- DZP
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 321 participants
- Where
- 177 sitesin 25 countries
- Study dates
- 12 Aug 2020to 4 Jun 2024
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Rescreening will be allowed once during the study in case there is new evidence for an inclusion criterion that was not fulfilled at the first screening or in case a study participant no longer meets an exclusion criterion or screening period exceeded the maximum duration due to delays in screening processes
- Study participant must be ≥16 years of age, unless restricted by local regulation, at the time of signing the Informed Consent form (ICF)
- Study participants who have moderate to severe disease activity due to either persisting active SLE or due to an acute worsening of SLE in the scope of frequent flaring/relapsing-remitting systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) despite stable standard of care (SOC) medication defined as:
- Diagnosed with SLE at least 24 weeks before the Screening Visit (Visit 1) study entry by a qualified physician b. Classified by 2019 SLE European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology (EULAR/ACR) classification criteria for SLE c. With serological evidence for SLE at Screening as demonstrated by at least 1 of the following: i) Evidence for anti-dsDNA (in central laboratory at Screening) ii) Either complement C3 < lower limit of normal (LLN) OR complement C4 <LLN OR elevated erythrocyte-bound complement C4d (where available) as measured by central laboratory iii) Antinuclear antibodies with a titer of at least 1:80 confirmed by central laboratory in combination with evidence of at least 1 of the following SLE typical autoantibodies:
- 1. Anti-Smith (anti-Sm) antibodies (central laboratory) 2. Anti-Sjögren's syndrome antibody A (Anti-SSA) (Ro)/Anti-Sjögren's syndrome antibody B (anti-SSB) (La) autoantibodies (central laboratory) 3. Historic evidence for anti-dsDNA antibodies
- Moderately to severely active defined as
Show all 11Show fewer
- British Isles Lupus Assessment Group Disease Activity Index 2004 (BILAG 2004) Grade B in ≥2 organ systems and/or a BILAG 2004 Grade A in ≥1 organ systems at Screening and Baseline Visit AND
- Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) ≥6 at Screening Visit AND
- SLEDAI-2K without labs ≥4 at Baseline Visit
- Receiving the following SOC medication at stable dose:
- Antimalarial treatment in combination with corticosteroids and/or immunosuppressants or as stand-alone treatment if justified OR Treatment with corticosteroids and/or immunosuppressants if anti-malarial treatment is not possible
Who cannot join
- Study participant has any medical or psychiatric condition (including conditions due to neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)) that, in the opinion of the Investigator, could jeopardize or would compromise the study participant's ability to participate in this study. This includes study participants with a life threatening condition
- Study participant has a history of an anaphylactic reaction to parenteral administration of contrast agents, human or murine proteins, or monoclonal antibodies
- Study participant has a history of malignancy, except the following treated cancers: cervical carcinoma in situ, basal cell carcinoma, or dermatological squamous cell carcinoma
- Study participant has an increased risk for thromboembolic events due to an ongoing heart disease or due to a medical device, including but not limited to vascular graft, valvular heart disease, atrial fibrillation, or a heart rhythm disorder
- Study participant has evidence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, agammaglobulinemias, T-cell deficiencies, or human T-cell lymphotropic virus-1 infection
- Study participant had a reactivated latent infection (example, cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex virus, or herpes zoster infection) or opportunistic infection (including but not limited to, pneumocystis, cytomegalovirus, or severe herpes zoster infection) within 12 weeks prior to the first study medication infusion (Visit 2), or is currently receiving suppressive therapy for an opportunistic infection
Show all 13Show fewer
- Study participants who have received live/live attenuated vaccines within 6 weeks prior to the first study medication infusion
- Study participant has clinically significant active or latent infection
- Study participant has a mixed connective tissue disease, scleroderma, and/or overlap syndrome of these diseases with SLE
- Study participant takes any protocol defined prohibited concomitant medication
- Study participant has previously been randomized within this study or participant has previously been assigned to treatment with dapirolizumab pegol (DZP) in a study evaluating DZP
- Study participant has participated in another study of an IMP within the previous 12 weeks or 5 half-lives of the investigational medicinal product (IMP) whatever is longer or is currently participating in another study of an IMP
- Study participant has chronic kidney failure stage 4, manifested by estimated glomerular filtration rate <30mL/min/1.73m^2, or serum creatinine >2.5 mg/dL, or participant has proteinuria >3 g/day, or protein: creatinine ratio >340 mg/mmol at the Screening Visit
Trial locations and contacts
177 sites in 25 countries.
177 sites in 25 countries
United States60 sites
Sl0043 50263
Amarillo, Texas, 79124
Sl0043 50368
Atlanta, Georgia, 30303
Sl0043 50382
Atlanta, Georgia, 30309
Sl0043 50050
Beckley, West Virginia, 25801
Sl0043 50338
Bellaire, Texas, 77401
Sl0043 50383
Beverly Hills, California, 90211
Sl0043 50140
Birmingham, Alabama, 35205
Sl0043 50239
Brandon, Florida, 33511
Sl0043 50010
Brooklyn, New York, 11201
Sl0043 50366
Canton, New York, 13617
Sl0043 50238
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28211
Sl0043 50310
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
Sl0043 50330
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45242
Sl0043 50418
Colleyville, Texas, 76034
Sl0043 50288
Cumberland, Maryland, 21502
Sl0043 50057
Dallas, Texas, 75231
Sl0043 50304
Dallas, Texas, 75390
Sl0043 50339
Denver, Colorado, 80230
Sl0043 50219
Detroit, Michigan, 48201
Sl0043 50020
Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635
Sl0043 50362
Gainesville, Florida, 32610
Sl0043 50333
Grand Blanc, Michigan, 48439
Sl0043 50266
Great Neck, New York, 11021
Sl0043 50015
Hagerstown, Maryland, 21740
Sl0043 50147
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033
Sl0043 50474
Hopkinsville, Kentucky, 42240-1746
Sl0043 50240
Idaho Falls, Idaho, 83404
Sl0043 50001
Jackson, Tennessee, 38305
Sl0043 50257
La Jolla, California, 92037
Sl0043 50275
La Palma, California, 90623-1730
Sl0043 50285
Lake Charles, Louisiana, 70605
Sl0043 50273
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89128
Sl0043 50378
Loma Linda, California, 92354
Sl0043 50258
Los Angeles, California, 90022
Sl0043 50264
Manhasset, New York, 11030
Sl0043 50036
Mesquite, Texas, 75150
Sl0043 50122
Miami, Florida, 33136
Sl0043 50321
Morgantown, West Virginia, 26505
Sl0043 50367
New Haven, Connecticut, 06519
Sl0043 50077
New York, New York, 10021
Sl0043 50334
New York, New York, 10032
Sl0043 50262
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104
Sl0043 50340
Orange, California, 92868
Sl0043 50059
Ormond Beach, Florida, 32174
Sl0043 50364
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107
Sl0043 50052
Phoenix, Arizona, 85032
Sl0043 50365
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15232
Sl0043 50324
Plantation, Florida, 33324
Sl0043 50331
Poway, California, 92064
Sl0043 50377
San Diego, California, 92108
Sl0043 50316
San Leandro, California, 94578
Sl0043 50267
Seattle, Washington, 98195
Sl0043 50360
Skokie, Illinois, 60076
Sl0043 50061
Spokane, Washington, 99204
Sl0043 50241
Syracuse, New York, 13210
Sl0043 50329
Tampa, Florida, 33606
Sl0043 50283
Tampa, Florida, 33613
Sl0043 50328
Tucson, Arizona, 85704
Sl0043 50341
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20060
Sl0043 50179
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157-1010
Poland15 sites
Sl0043 40482
Bialystok
Sl0043 40119
Bydgoszcz
Sl0043 40398
Katowice
Sl0043 40490
Krakow
Sl0043 40502
Krakow
Sl0043 40037
Lublin
Sl0043 40151
Lublin
Sl0043 40483
Nadarzyn
Sl0043 40044
Poznan
Sl0043 40090
Poznan
Sl0043 40097
Warsaw
Sl0043 40098
Warsaw
Sl0043 40394
Warsaw
Sl0043 40397
Wroclaw
Sl0043 40481
Wroclaw
Italy9 sites
Sl0043 40084
Catania
Sl0043 40472
Ferrara
Sl0043 40514
Genova
Sl0043 40291
Milan
Sl0043 40448
Milan
Sl0043 40471
Milan
Sl0043 40509
Padova
Sl0043 40148
Roma
Sl0043 40492
Rozzano
Colombia8 sites
Sl0043 60013
Barranquilla
Sl0043 60019
Barranquilla
Sl0043 60006
Bogotá
Sl0043 60027
Bogotá
Sl0043 60016
Bucaramanga
Sl0043 60007
Chía
Sl0043 60028
Medellín
Sl0043 60031
Montería
Germany8 sites
Sl0043 40386
Cologne
Sl0043 40322
Dessau
Sl0043 40356
Dresden
Sl0043 40072
Freiburg im Breisgau
Sl0043 40024
Hanover
Sl0043 40027
Herne
Sl0043 40078
Leipzig
Sl0043 40402
Tübingen
Argentina7 sites
Sl0043 60002
Capital Federal
Sl0043 60001
Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos AIRE
Sl0043 60029
Mendoza
Sl0043 60003
Quilmes
Sl0043 60022
Quilmes
Sl0043 60011
San Juan
Sl0043 60014
San Miguel de Tucumán
Spain7 sites
Sl0043 40045
A Coruña
Sl0043 40160
Barcelona
Sl0043 40341
Málaga
Sl0043 40521
Mérida
Sl0043 40101
Sabadell
Sl0043 40400
Seville
Sl0043 40099
Vigo
Mexico6 sites
Sl0043 50317
Chihuahua City
Sl0043 50250
Cuernavaca
Sl0043 50249
Guadalajara
Sl0043 50271
León
Sl0043 50252
Mérida
Sl0043 50251
Monterrey
Canada5 sites
Sl0043 50374
Calgary
Sl0043 50337
Edmonton
Sl0043 50259
Rimouski
Sl0043 50045
Toronto
Sl0043 50044
Trois-Rivières
Greece5 sites
Sl0043 40378
Athens
Sl0043 40377
Crete
Sl0043 40501
Haidari - Athens
Sl0043 40507
Larissa
Sl0043 40375
Thessaloniki
Hungary5 sites
Sl0043 40412
Budapest
Sl0043 40411
Debrecen
Sl0043 40413
Gyula
Sl0043 40031
Szeged
Sl0043 40499
Székesfehérvár
Taiwan5 sites
Sl0043 20113
Taichung
Sl0043 20142
Taichung
Sl0043 20095
Taipei
Sl0043 20099
Taipei
Sl0043 20082
Taoyuan City
Bulgaria4 sites
Sl0043 40006
Plovdiv
Sl0043 40189
Plovdiv
Sl0043 40522
Plovdiv
Sl0043 40380
Sofia
Chile4 sites
Sl0043 60021
Providencia, Santiago
Sl0043 60015
Santiago
Sl0043 60018
Santiago
Sl0043 60030
Santiago
Peru4 sites
Sl0043 60026
Arequipa
Sl0043 60008
Lima
Sl0043 60009
Lima
Sl0043 60023
Lima
Philippines4 sites
Sl0043 20110
Angeles
Sl0043 20182
Davao City
Sl0043 20181
Makati
Sl0043 20111
Manila
Serbia4 sites
Sl0043 40393
Belgrade
Sl0043 40461
Belgrade
Sl0043 40466
Kragujevac
Sl0043 40392
Novi Sad
South Korea4 sites
Sl0043 20141
Busan
Sl0043 20106
Daejeon
Sl0043 20108
Incheon
Sl0043 20104
Seoul
Romania3 sites
Sl0043 40383
Bucharest
Sl0043 40464
Bucharest
Sl0043 40382
Galati
About this study
Official title: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Dapirolizumab Pegol in Study Participants With Moderately to Severely Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the ability of dapirolizumab pegol (DZP) as an add-on treatment to standard of care (SOC) medication to achieve clinically relevant long term improvement of moderate to severe disease activity.
- Conditions
- Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
- Being tested
- DZP, Placebo
- Keywords
- Systemic lupus erythematosus, Dapirolizumab pegol, SLE, DZP
- Medical subject headings
- Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
DZPDrug
Also called CDP7657
Subjects will receive dapirolizumab pegol at prespecified time-points.
PlaceboOther
Also called PBO
Subjects will receive placebo at prespecified time-points.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Dapirolizumab pegol | Experimental | Subjects will receive dapriolizumab pegol througout the Treatment Period. Receives: Drug: DZP |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Subjects will receive placebo througout the Treatment Period. Receives: Other: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants With Achievement of BILAG 2004-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) Response at Week 48
Study participants were considered to be a BILAG 2004-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) responder if all of the following were fulfilled:
- British Isles Lupus Assessment Group Disease Activity Index 2004 (BILAG 2004) improvement without worsening (A scores at Baseline improved to B, C or D; B scores improved to C or D; no new A scores and less than or equal to [≤] 1 new B.); Here, score A ("Active"): Severely active disease; score B ("Beware"): Moderately active disease; score C ("Contentment"): Mild stable disease; score D ("Discount"): Inactive now but previously active; and
- No worsening in the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) total score compared to Baseline Visit (defined as no increase in SLEDAI-2K total score); and
- No worsening in the Physician's Global Assessment of Disease (PGA) compared to Baseline Visit defined as [≤] 10 millimeter (mm) increase on a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS).
Measured: Week 48
Secondary outcomes (15)
Percentage of Participants With Achievement of BICLA Response at Week 24
Study participants were considered to be a BICLA responder if all of the following were fulfilled:
- BILAG 2004 improvement without worsening (A scores at Baseline improved to B, C or D; B scores improved to C or D; no new A scores and ≤ 1 new B.); Here, score A ("Active"): Severely active disease; score B ("Beware"): Moderately active disease; score C ("Contentment"): Mild stable disease; score D ("Discount"): Inactive now but previously active; and
- No worsening in the SLEDAI-2K total score compared to Baseline Visit (defined as no increase in SLEDAI-2K total score); and
- No worsening in the PGA compared to Baseline Visit defined as ≤ 10 mm increase on a 100 mm VAS.
Measured: Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Achievement of BICLA Response at Week 12
Study participants were considered to be a BICLA responder if all of the following were fulfilled:
- BILAG 2004 improvement without worsening (A scores at Baseline improved to B, C or D; B scores improved to C or D; no new A scores and ≤ 1 new B.); Here, score A ("Active"): Severely active disease; score B ("Beware"): Moderately active disease; score C ("Contentment"): Mild stable disease; score D ("Discount"): Inactive now but previously active and
- No worsening in the SLEDAI-2K total score compared to Baseline Visit (defined as no increase in SLEDAI-2K total score); and
- No worsening in the PGA compared to Baseline Visit defined as ≤ 10 mm increase on a 100 mm VAS.
Measured: Week 12
Percentage of Participants With Achievement of Prevention of Severe British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) Flares (Severe BILAG Flare-free) Through Week 48
A severe BILAG flare was defined as a british isles lupus assessment group disease activity index 2004 (BILAG 2004) Grade A in any system due to individual items that were new or worse qualifying for the Grade A. Determination of items that were new or worse and were qualifying for the Grade A were according to the supplementary information for the numerical scoring of the BILAG-2004 index. Here, Grade A ("Active"): Severely active disease (sufficient to require systemic immunosuppressant or anticoagulant therapy.
Measured: During Treatment Period up to Week 48
Percentage of Participants With Achievement of Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) in ≥50% of Post-Baseline Visits Through Week 48
The LLDAS includes domains that capture the absence of organ-threatening disease activity and harmful treatment burden. The LLDAS is defined as:
- SLEDAI-2K score was ≤4 with no activity in major organ systems.
- No new and/or worsening disease activity defined as no SLEDAI-2K component documented as present that was not documented present at the previous visit.
- PGA ≤ 33 mm.
- Prednisone equivalent systemic dose for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) indication ≤ 7.5 mg per day.
- Stable standard maintenance doses of immunosuppressive drugs as allowed by protocol, defined as no increase in dose in the past 12 weeks and no dose higher than allowed as per protocol.
Measured: During Treatment Period up to Week 48
Change From Baseline in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) at Week 48
The SLEDAI-2K is a global index which includes 24 clinical and laboratory variables such as antibodies, renal, and hematological components measured 30 days before, and at the timepoint of assessment. The variables were weighted by the type of manifestation, but not by severity or dynamic of the individual item. The SLEDAI-2K includes scoring for antibodies (anti-dsDNA positive or negative) and low complement, as well as some renal and hematologic parameters. The total score falls between 0 and 105, with higher scores representing increased disease activity. Mixed effects models for repeated measurements (MMRM).
Measured: From Baseline (Day 1) to Week 48
Percentage of Participants With Achievement of BILAG Improvement Without Worsening at Week 48
The BILAG improvement without worsening defined as A scores at Baseline improved to B, C or D; B scores improved to C or D; no new A scores and ≤1 new B Score. Here, score A ("Active"): Severely active disease (sufficient to require systemic immunosuppressant or anticoagulant therapy; score B ("Beware"): Moderately active disease (requires low dose or local immunosuppressant therapy or symptomatic therapy; score C ("Contentment"): Mild stable disease (no indication for changes in treatment); score D ("Discount"): Inactive now but previously active.
Measured: Week 48
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) at Week 48
The PGA is a measure of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) signs and symptoms by the physician using a visual analog scale of 0 to 100mm, Where 0 indicate "very good", asymptomatic, and no limitation of normal activity and 100 indicate "severe disease".
Measured: From Baseline (Day 1) to Week 48
Percentage of Participants With Achievement of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index Response - 4 (SRI-4) Response at Week 48
The SRI-4 define responders as meeting all of the following criteria:
- Reduction in SLEDAI-2K score of ≥ 4.
- No shift from BILAG 2004 Grade B, C, D, or E to A post-Baseline. Here, Grade A ("Active"): Severely active disease; Grade B ("Beware"): Moderately active disease; Grade C ("Contentment"): Mild stable disease; Grade D ("Discount"): Inactive now but previously active; Grade E ("Excluded"): Never affected.
- No more than 1 shift from BILAG 2004 Grade C, D, or E to B post-Baseline.
- No worsening in the PGA compared to study entry defined as ≤ 10 mm increase on a 100 mm visual analog scale, equivalent to less than a 10 mm increase in the PGA compared to study entry score.
Measured: Week 48
Percentage of Participants With Achievement of Prevention of Moderate/Severe BILAG Flares (Moderate/Severe BILAG Flare-free) Through Week 48
Achievement of prevention of moderate/severe BILAG flares through Week 48 was defined as the percentage of participants with no moderate or severe flare through Week 48. A severe BILAG flare was defined as a BILAG 2004 Grade A in any system due to individual items that were new or worse qualifying for the Grade A. Determination of items that were new or worse and were qualifying for the Grade A, according to the supplementary information for the numerical scoring of the BILAG-2004 index. A moderate BILAG flare was defined as 2 or more BILAG 2004 Grade B due to individual items that were new or worse and were qualifying for the Grade B in any system. Determination of items that were new or worse qualifying for the Grade B, according to the supplementary information for the numerical scoring of the BILAG- 2004 index. Here, Grade A ("Active"): Severely active disease; Grade B ("Beware"): Moderately active disease.
Measured: During Treatment Period up to Week 48
Time to Severe BILAG Flare Through Week 48
Time to severe BILAG flare (the event) through Week 48 was defined as the time from randomization until the start of the event. A severe BILAG flare was defined as a BILAG 2004 Grade A in any system due to individual items that were new or worse qualifying for the Grade A. Determination of items that were new or worse and were qualifying for the Grade A, according to the supplementary information for the numerical scoring of the BILAG-2004 index. Here, Grade A ("Active"): Severely active disease.
Measured: During Treatment Period up to Week 48
Time to Moderate/Severe BILAG Flare Through Week 48
Time to moderate/severe BILAG flare (the event) through Week 48 was defined as the time from randomization until the start of the event. Moderate BILAG flare was defined as 2 or more BILAG 2004 Grade B due to individual items that were new or worse and were qualifying for the Grade B in any system. Determination of items that were new or worse qualifying for the Grade B, according to the supplementary information for the numerical scoring of the BILAG-2004 index. Severe BILAG flare was defined as a BILAG 2004 Grade A in any system due to individual items that were new or worse qualifying for the Grade A. Determination of items that were new or worse and are qualifying for the Grade A, according to the supplementary information for the numerical scoring of the BILAG-2004 index. Here, Grade A ("Active"): Severely active disease; Grade B ("Beware"): Moderately active disease.
Measured: During Treatment Period up to Week 48
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Study
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of investigational medicinal product (IMP), whether or not considered related to the IMP. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of IMP. Treatment-emergent AEs were those with onset date on or after the first administration of study drug, and up to 60 days after last dose.
Measured: From Baseline (Day 1) until Safety Follow-Up (up to Week 54)
Percentage of Participants With Serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events During the Study
A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: Results in death; Is life-threatening, Requires in patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; Results in persistent disability/incapacity; Is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; and Other important medical events which based on medical or scientific judgement may jeopardize the patients, or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the above. Treatment-emergent AEs were those with onset date on or after the first administration of study drug, and up to 60 days after last dose.
Measured: From Baseline (Day 1) until Safety Follow-Up (up to Week 54)
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest During the Study
An adverse event of special interest (AESIs) is any AE that a regulatory authority has mandated be reported on an expedited basis, regardless of the seriousness, expectedness, or relatedness of the AE to the administration of a product/compound.
Measured: From Baseline (Day 1) until Safety Follow-Up (up to Week 54)
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events of Special Monitoring During the Study
An AE of special monitoring is a product-specific AEs, adverse reactions, or safety topics considered as requiring special monitoring by UCB.
Measured: From Baseline (Day 1) until Safety Follow-Up (up to Week 54)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Mar 2020
- Study start12 Aug 2020
- Primary completion22 May 2024
- Study completion4 Jun 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Systemic Lupus ErythematosusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by UCB Biopharma SRLThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 321 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- UCB Biopharma SRL
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- UCB Cares, Study director, 001 844 599 2273 (UCB)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04294667
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SL0043
- Other IDs
- 2019-003406-27, 2019
- Acronym
- PHOENYCS GO
- Status last verified
- Apr 2025
- First submitted
- 27 Feb 2020
- Last updated
- 4 May 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Data from this trial may be requested by qualified researchers six months after product approval in the US and/or Europe, or global development is discontinued, and 18 months after trial completion. Investigators may request access to anonymized individual patient-level data and redacted trial documents which may include: analysis-ready datasets, study protocol, annotated case report form, statistical analysis plan, dataset specifications, and clinical study report. Prior to use of the data, proposals need to be approved by an independent review panel at www.Vivli.org and a signed data sharing agreement will need to be executed. All documents are available in English only, for a prespecified time, typically 12 months, on a password protected portal. This plan may change if the risk of re-identifying trial participants is determined to be too high after the trial is completed; in this case and to protect participants, individual patient-level data would not be made available.
Publications
Clowse MEB, Isenberg DA, Merrill JT, Dorner T, Petri M, Vital EM, Morand EF, Touma Z, Askanase AD, Ioannou Y, Brookes S, Gaiha-Rohrbach J, Koch ED, Zibian N, Martin C, Jimenez T, Nelde A, Stach C; PHOENYCS GO Study Investigators' Group. Efficacy and safety of the CD40 ligand inhibitor dapirolizumab pegol in systemic lupus erythematosus (PHOENYCS GO): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2026 Jun 6;407(10545):2291-2304. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(26)00691-4. Epub 2026 May 29.
PubMed 42214397
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 May 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Dapirolizumab Pegol in Study Participants With Moderately to Severely Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04294667
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PHOENYCS GO / SL0043
- Conditions
- Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
- Keywords
- Systemic lupus erythematosus, Dapirolizumab pegol, SLE, DZP
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 321 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- UCB Biopharma SRLIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 12 Aug 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 22 May 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 4 Jun 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 24 Apr 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the ability of dapirolizumab pegol (DZP) as an add-on treatment to standard of care (SOC) medication to achieve clinically relevant long term improvement of moderate to severe disease activity.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Dapirolizumab pegol | Experimental | Drug: DZPSubjects will receive dapriolizumab pegol througout the Treatment Period. |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Other: PlaceboSubjects will receive placebo througout the Treatment Period. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Rescreening will be allowed once during the study in case there is new evidence for an inclusion criterion that was not fulfilled at the first screening or in case a study participant no longer meets an exclusion criterion or screening period exceeded the maximum duration due to delays in screening processes
- Study participant must be ≥16 years of age, unless restricted by local regulation, at the time of signing the Informed Consent form (ICF)
- Study participants who have moderate to severe disease activity due to either persisting active SLE or due to an acute worsening of SLE in the scope of frequent flaring/relapsing-remitting systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) despite stable standard of care (SOC) medication defined as:
- 1. Anti-Smith (anti-Sm) antibodies (central laboratory) 2. Anti-Sjögren's syndrome antibody A (Anti-SSA) (Ro)/Anti-Sjögren's syndrome antibody B (anti-SSB) (La) autoantibodies (central laboratory) 3. Historic evidence for anti-dsDNA antibodies
- British Isles Lupus Assessment Group Disease Activity Index 2004 (BILAG 2004) Grade B in ≥2 organ systems and/or a BILAG 2004 Grade A in ≥1 organ systems at Screening and Baseline Visit AND
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Study participant has any medical or psychiatric condition (including conditions due to neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)) that, in the opinion of the Investigator, could jeopardize or would compromise the study participant's ability to participate in this study. This includes study participants with a life threatening condition
- Study participant has a history of an anaphylactic reaction to parenteral administration of contrast agents, human or murine proteins, or monoclonal antibodies
- Study participant has a history of malignancy, except the following treated cancers: cervical carcinoma in situ, basal cell carcinoma, or dermatological squamous cell carcinoma
- Study participant has an increased risk for thromboembolic events due to an ongoing heart disease or due to a medical device, including but not limited to vascular graft, valvular heart disease, atrial fibrillation, or a heart rhythm disorder
- Study participant has evidence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, agammaglobulinemias, T-cell deficiencies, or human T-cell lymphotropic virus-1 infection
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| DZPAlso: CDP7657Subjects will receive dapirolizumab pegol at prespecified time-points. | Drug | Dapirolizumab pegol |
| PlaceboAlso: PBOSubjects will receive placebo at prespecified time-points. | Other | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants With Achievement of BILAG 2004-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) Response at Week 48
Time frame: Week 48
Study participants were considered to be a BILAG 2004-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) responder if all of the following were fulfilled: * British Isles Lupus Assessment Group Disease Activity Index 2004 (BILAG 2004) improvement without worsening (A scores at Baseline improved to B, C or D; B scores improved to C or D; no new A scores and less than or equal to [≤] 1 new B.); Here, score A ("Active"): Severely active disease; score B ("Beware"): Moderately active disease; score C ("Contentment"): Mild stable disease; score D ("Discount"): Inactive now but previously active; and * No worsening in the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) total score compared to Baseline Visit (defined as no increase in SLEDAI-2K total score); and * No worsening in the Physician's Global Assessment of Disease (PGA) compared to Baseline Visit defined as [≤] 10 millimeter (mm) increase on a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS).
15 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With Achievement of BICLA Response at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Achievement of BICLA Response at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Percentage of Participants With Achievement of Prevention of Severe British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) Flares (Severe BILAG Flare-free) Through Week 48
Time frame: During Treatment Period up to Week 48
Percentage of Participants With Achievement of Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) in ≥50% of Post-Baseline Visits Through Week 48
Time frame: During Treatment Period up to Week 48
Change From Baseline in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) at Week 48
Time frame: From Baseline (Day 1) to Week 48
Percentage of Participants With Achievement of BILAG Improvement Without Worsening at Week 48
Time frame: Week 48
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) at Week 48
Time frame: From Baseline (Day 1) to Week 48
Percentage of Participants With Achievement of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index Response - 4 (SRI-4) Response at Week 48
Time frame: Week 48
Percentage of Participants With Achievement of Prevention of Moderate/Severe BILAG Flares (Moderate/Severe BILAG Flare-free) Through Week 48
Time frame: During Treatment Period up to Week 48
Time to Severe BILAG Flare Through Week 48
Time frame: During Treatment Period up to Week 48
Time to Moderate/Severe BILAG Flare Through Week 48
Time frame: During Treatment Period up to Week 48
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Study
Time frame: From Baseline (Day 1) until Safety Follow-Up (up to Week 54)
Percentage of Participants With Serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events During the Study
Time frame: From Baseline (Day 1) until Safety Follow-Up (up to Week 54)
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest During the Study
Time frame: From Baseline (Day 1) until Safety Follow-Up (up to Week 54)
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events of Special Monitoring During the Study
Time frame: From Baseline (Day 1) until Safety Follow-Up (up to Week 54)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 May 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42214397Clowse MEB, Isenberg DA, Merrill JT, Dorner T, Petri M, Vital EM, Morand EF, Touma Z, Askanase AD, Ioannou Y, Brookes S, Gaiha-Rohrbach J, Koch ED, Zibian N, Martin C, Jimenez T, Nelde A, Stach C; PHOENYCS GO Study Investigators' Group. Efficacy and safety of the CD40 ligand inhibitor dapirolizumab pegol in systemic lupus erythematosus (PHOENYCS GO): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2026 Jun 6;407(10545):2291-2304. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(26)00691-4. Epub 2026 May 29.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Data from this trial may be requested by qualified researchers six months after product approval in the US and/or Europe, or global development is discontinued, and 18 months after trial completion. Investigators may request access to anonymized individual patient-level data and redacted trial documents which may include: analysis-ready datasets, study protocol, annotated case report form, statistical analysis plan, dataset specifications, and clinical study report. Prior to use of the data, proposals need to be approved by an independent review panel at www.Vivli.org and a signed data sharing agreement will need to be executed. All documents are available in English only, for a prespecified time, typically 12 months, on a password protected portal. This plan may change if the risk of re-identifying trial participants is determined to be too high after the trial is completed; in this case and to protect participants, individual patient-level data would not be made available.
Related trials for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Ascending Dose Study of DKB903 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
RecruitingPhase 4
Dapagliflozin in Active Lupus Nephritis
Lupus Nephritis (LN)
RecruitingObservational study
Electroencephalogram Recording in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
RecruitingObservational study
Deciphering the Genetic Architecture of Autoimmune Diseases
Autoimmune Diseases
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
UCB Cares study director
001 844 599 2273 (UCB)
177 sites in 25 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing DZP in people with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, run by UCB Biopharma SRL at 177 sites in 25 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 May 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 177 sites in United States, Poland, Italy, Colombia, Germany and 20 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 24 Apr 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants With Achievement of BILAG 2004-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) Response at Week 48 (time frame: Week 48). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04294667, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 May 2025.