StrokeSUESIMNCT04295226
Structured Post-stroke Follow-up in Malmö, Sweden (SUESIM)
An observational study of Stroke, run by Region Skane at 1 site in Sweden.
Trial summary
Background Stroke-related medical complications and health problems are common among stroke survivors. Post-stroke Checklist (PSC), developed by an international expert group, and can be used as a clinical tool to identify common and treatable stroke-related health problems. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke
- What is being tested?
- Structured follow-up after stroke.
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSweden
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 2018to 28 Feb 2020
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: All patients with acute stroke, without dementia or other serious comorbidity, that can be discharged straight home. These patients have mild to moderate stroke and can be expected to be able to visit an out-patient clinic for follow-up and to benefit from a structured follow-up visit.
Who may be able to join
- Acute stroke (ICD-10: ischemic stroke I.63 and intracerebral hemorrhage I.61)
- Discharge to own home
Who cannot join
- Co-morbidity such as dialysis, active cancer, severe heart failure or severe psychiatric illness or dementia
- Patients with stroke, but who receive in-hospital treatment for another competing diagnosis
- Already included with previous stroke
- Does not want to participate
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Structured Post-stroke Follow-up at Skåne University Hospital in Malmö, Sweden - a Feasibility and Validation Study (SUESIM)
Background Stroke-related medical complications and health problems are common among stroke survivors. Post-stroke Checklist (PSC), developed by an international expert group, and can be used as a clinical tool to identify common and treatable stroke-related health problems. PSC has not been systematically tested in Sweden.
Aims To test the feasibility of a structured and multimodal follow-up model for stroke systematically, to test the validity of the PSC as a screening tool for stroke-related health problems and to study the prevalence of, and changes over time, of stroke-related health problems Study population We plan to include 200 consecutive patients with acute stroke, treated in-hospital at Skåne University Hospital in Malmö and discharged straight to own home.
Read more
Procedure The intervention consists of a structured follow-up visit, managed by a stroke nurse, 3 months after stroke followed by a multidisciplinary team rounds resulting in an individual treatment plan for stroke-related health problems, and a final follow-up at 12 months.
Feasibility will be evaluated, as well as burden of stroke-related health problems and interventions prompted by the visits.
Researchers responsible for the study:
Teresa Ullberg, MD, Ph (Postdoctoral researcher) and Hélène Pessah-Rasmussen, MD, PhD, associate professor (PI).
Read the detailed description
Background Approximately 600 patients with acute stroke are treated in-hospital at Skåne University Hospital in Malmö. Of those, approximately 450 patients can be discharged straight to their own home after hospital stay. Currently, there is no structured follow-up routine for patients with stroke discharged from Skåne University Hospital in Malmö, and Primary care health providers are managing most follow-ups for stroke depending on individual patient needs. Previous research has shown that one in four patients with stroke are not followed up within three months after hospital discharge in Skåne.
Stroke-related medical complications are common both in the acute phase after stroke and in the longer term. Acute medical complications comprise infections, falls and fractures, confusion, deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, and also epileptic seizures. The risk of medical complications increases with co-morbidity, but can also be a consequence of the stroke itself. Beyond the acute phase, other stroke-related health problems occur in the majority of patients. They comprise fatigue, impaired cognition, low mood, incontinence, sexual impairment, post-stroke pain, spasticity, relational problems, isolation, inadequate secondary preventive treatment and impaired mobility and daily activities. Previous studies have shown that these problems are common and can persist for years post-stroke. Knowledge of how to best organize and manage stroke and stroke-related health problems in the long-term is sparse, even though there are guidelines on some general principles for secondary prevention and rehabilitation.
Post-stroke Checklist (PSC) was developed by an international stroke expert group. It is a simple checklist collecting eleven common stroke-related health problems, and can be used as a clinical tool to identify common and treatable complications to stroke. The feasibility of the 11-items PSC as a screening tool for stroke-related health problems has been tested systematically and it has been considered implementable. Modified versions of PSC are being implemented in different countries.
PSC can be used both by nurses, physicians and other health professions. The National Guidelines for Stroke Care in Sweden from 2018 recommend the use of PSC for stroke follow-up. PSCs use has not been systematically tested in Sweden though and PSC is not yet routinely used. A modified 14-item PSC is recommended by Region Skåne (the county council of Southern Sweden).
Aims The aims of this study are to test the feasibility of a structured and multimodal follow-up model for stroke systematically, as well as to test the validity of the PSC as a screening tool for stroke-related health problems. The study aims further at studying the prevalence, and changes over time, of stroke-related health problems as well as survival, functional outcome following stroke, and patient satisfaction.
Working plan Study design The study design is longitudinal and explorative. This is a feasibility and validation study where the intervention consists of a structured follow-up visit, a multidisciplinary team rounds resulting in an individual treatment plan for stroke-related health problems, and a final follow-up at 12 months. Individual items in PSC will be validated towards routinely used validated tools. The prevalence, and changes over time, of stroke-related health problems will be investigated, as well as survival, functional outcome following stroke, and patient satisfaction. The study takes place in the clinical setting at the stroke unit, using clinical stroke team professional to mimic the normal clinical situation.
Study population We plan to include 200 consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke or intracerebral hemorrhage, treated in-hospital at Skåne University Hospital in Malmö and discharged straight to own home. The estimated inclusion rate is 3- 5 patients per week, and the estimated time for including 200 patients is one year. Two hundred patients represent 40% of the total population of the 500 patients who can be discharged straight to own home, and are expected to be representable of the population with respect to age, sex, vascular risk and stroke severity. The generalizability of the population will be assessed through comparison to the Swedish Stroke Register.
Procedure for inclusion Eligible patients are identified daily in the stroke ward and included by written informed consent.
Follow-up procedure The three-months visit is managed by a stroke nurse and include the semi-structured PSC interview, additional validated diagnostic tools, secondary prevention status, comorbidity, and functional outcome.
The three-months visit is followed by a multidisciplinary team rounds with stroke physician, stroke nurse, occupational therapist and if needed physiotherapist, speech therapist, dietician, psychologist and/or social worker. The rounds result in an individual treatment recommendation plan that is sent to the family doctor and other relevant instances. The amount and type of referrals and other interventions warranted by the results of the follow-up visits and rounds are recorded.
The 12-months visit is managed by a stroke nurse and include a new semi-structured PSC interview, secondary prevention status, comorbidity, and a met needs assessment. The 12-month visit is followed by a multidisciplinary team rounds leading to referrals and other interventions are if warranted.
Use of other register data Patient baseline characteristics and three- and 12-month data on living conditions and functional level will be obtained from the Swedish Stroke Register (Riksstroke). Mortality at 12 and 18 months will be obtained by linkage to the Swedish Causes of Death register.
Data management, statistical analyses and ethical considerations The database will be built and managed in close cooperation with Clinical Studies Sweden, Forum South. Analyses will be performed on de-identified data after the dataset has been closed.
All statistical analyses will be performed in SPSS. Data will be presented using descriptive statistics and graphs, as well as linear models. Power calculations are not relevant for this study type.
The local Ethics approval committee has approved of the project (Dnr 2017/1028)
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Being tested
- Structured follow-up after stroke.
- Keywords
- follow-up, post stroke checklist, complications
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Structured follow-up after stroke.Other
Stroke-nurse managed follow-up 3 and 12 months after stroke and multidisciplinary rounds resulting in individual treatment plans for stroke-related health problems.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Participants in Structured post-stroke follow-up in Malmö | Consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke or intracerebral hemorrhage, treated in-hospital at Skåne University Hospital in Malmö and discharged straight to own home.
The intervention consists of a structured follow-up visit, managed by a stroke nurse, 3 months after stroke followed by a multidisciplinary team rounds resulting in an individual treatment plan for stroke-related health problems, and a final follow-up at 12 months Receives: Other: Structured follow-up after stroke. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of stroke-related health problems
14-item Post-stroke Checklist, PSC, captures 14 stroke-related health problems. Scale ranges from 0-14 problems. We aim to analyse burden of problems as well as individual items.
Measured: 1 year
Number of interventions
Number of new interventions for stroke-related health problems identified with PSC. No scale used, we calculate the number of interventions done.
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (3)
Time to perform and record the semi-structured Post-Stroke Checklist (PSC) interview (minutes).
Feasibility of the post-stroke checklist-based follow-up. No scale used, only time in minutes.
Measured: 1 year
Ability to complete all Post-Stroke Checklist (PSC) items (yes/no)
Feasibility of the post-stroke checklist-based follow-up. No scale used. Dichotomous variable (yes/no)
Measured: 1 year
Patient satisfaction assessment
Questionnaire on met needs and satisfaction with follow-up. Five dichotomous questions on met needs and satisfaction with follow-up.
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Mar 2020
- Study start1 Feb 2018
- Primary completion28 Feb 2020
- Study completion28 Feb 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (11)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Region SkaneThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Ecologic or community
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Region Skane
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- The Kamprad Family Foundation for Entrepreneurship, Research & Charity, Clinical Studies Sweden, Lund University
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04295226
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2017/1028
- Acronym
- SUESIM
- Status last verified
- Mar 2020
- First submitted
- 28 Apr 2019
- Last updated
- 6 Mar 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Ullberg T, Zia E, Petersson J, Norrving B. Doctor's follow-up after stroke in the south of Sweden: An observational study from the Swedish stroke register (Riksstroke). Eur Stroke J. 2016 Jun;1(2):114-121. doi: 10.1177/2396987316650597. Epub 2016 May 19.
PubMed 31008273Kumar S, Selim MH, Caplan LR. Medical complications after stroke. Lancet Neurol. 2010 Jan;9(1):105-18. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70266-2.
PubMed 20083041Langhorne P, Stott DJ, Robertson L, MacDonald J, Jones L, McAlpine C, Dick F, Taylor GS, Murray G. Medical complications after stroke: a multicenter study. Stroke. 2000 Jun;31(6):1223-9. doi: 10.1161/01.str.31.6.1223.
PubMed 10835436Ullberg T, Zia E, Petersson J, Norrving B. Perceived Unmet Rehabilitation Needs 1 Year After Stroke: An Observational Study From the Swedish Stroke Register. Stroke. 2016 Feb;47(2):539-41. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.011670. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
PubMed 26732564McKevitt C, Fudge N, Redfern J, Sheldenkar A, Crichton S, Rudd AR, Forster A, Young J, Nazareth I, Silver LE, Rothwell PM, Wolfe CD. Self-reported long-term needs after stroke. Stroke. 2011 May;42(5):1398-403. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.598839. Epub 2011 Mar 24.
PubMed 21441153von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP; STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007 Oct 20;370(9596):1453-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X.
PubMed 18064739Winstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R, Bates B, Cherney LR, Cramer SC, Deruyter F, Eng JJ, Fisher B, Harvey RL, Lang CE, MacKay-Lyons M, Ottenbacher KJ, Pugh S, Reeves MJ, Richards LG, Stiers W, Zorowitz RD; American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research. Guidelines for Adult Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2016 Jun;47(6):e98-e169. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000098. Epub 2016 May 4.
PubMed 27145936Murray J, Young J, Forster A, Ashworth R. Developing a primary care-based stroke model: the prevalence of longer-term problems experienced by patients and carers. Br J Gen Pract. 2003 Oct;53(495):803-7.
PubMed 14601359Philp I, Brainin M, Walker MF, Ward AB, Gillard P, Shields AL, Norrving B; Global Stroke Community Advisory Panel. Development of a poststroke checklist to standardize follow-up care for stroke survivors. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013 Oct;22(7):e173-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2012.10.016. Epub 2012 Dec 21.
PubMed 23265778Ward AB, Chen C, Norrving B, Gillard P, Walker MF, Blackburn S, Holloway L, Brainin M, Philp I; Global Stroke Community Advisory Panel (GSCAP). Evaluation of the Post Stroke Checklist: a pilot study in the United Kingdom and Singapore. Int J Stroke. 2014 Oct;9 Suppl A100:76-84. doi: 10.1111/ijs.12291. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
PubMed 25088427Mansson K, Soderholm M, Berhin I, Pessah-Rasmussen H, Ullberg T. The Post-Stroke Checklist: longitudinal use in routine clinical practice during first year after stroke. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Oct 29;24(1):601. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-04239-6.
PubMed 39468444
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Mar 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Structured Post-stroke Follow-up at Skåne University Hospital in Malmö, Sweden - a Feasibility and Validation Study (SUESIM)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04295226
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SUESIM / 2017/1028
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Keywords
- follow-up, post stroke checklist, complications
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Region SkaneUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- The Kamprad Family Foundation for Entrepreneurship, Research & Charity, Clinical Studies Sweden, Lund University
- Study start
- 1 Feb 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Feb 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Feb 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background Stroke-related medical complications and health problems are common among stroke survivors. Post-stroke Checklist (PSC), developed by an international expert group, and can be used as a clinical tool to identify common and treatable stroke-related health problems. PSC has not been systematically tested in Sweden.
Aims To test the feasibility of a structured and multimodal follow-up model for stroke systematically, to test the validity of the PSC as a screening tool for stroke-related health problems and to study the prevalence of, and changes over time, of stroke-related health problems Study population We plan to include 200 consecutive patients with acute stroke, treated in-hospital at Skåne University Hospital in Malmö and discharged straight to own home.
Procedure The intervention consists of a structured follow-up visit, managed by a stroke nurse, 3 months after stroke followed by a multidisciplinary team rounds resulting in an individual treatment plan for stroke-related health problems, and a final follow-up at 12 months.
Feasibility will be evaluated, as well as burden of stroke-related health problems and interventions prompted by the visits.
Researchers responsible for the study:
Teresa Ullberg, MD, Ph (Postdoctoral researcher) and Hélène Pessah-Rasmussen, MD, PhD, associate professor (PI).
Detailed description
Background Approximately 600 patients with acute stroke are treated in-hospital at Skåne University Hospital in Malmö. Of those, approximately 450 patients can be discharged straight to their own home after hospital stay. Currently, there is no structured follow-up routine for patients with stroke discharged from Skåne University Hospital in Malmö, and Primary care health providers are managing most follow-ups for stroke depending on individual patient needs. Previous research has shown that one in four patients with stroke are not followed up within three months after hospital discharge in Skåne.
Stroke-related medical complications are common both in the acute phase after stroke and in the longer term. Acute medical complications comprise infections, falls and fractures, confusion, deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, and also epileptic seizures. The risk of medical complications increases with co-morbidity, but can also be a consequence of the stroke itself. Beyond the acute phase, other stroke-related health problems occur in the majority of patients. They comprise fatigue, impaired cognition, low mood, incontinence, sexual impairment, post-stroke pain, spasticity, relational problems, isolation, inadequate secondary preventive treatment and impaired mobility and daily activities. Previous studies have shown that these problems are common and can persist for years post-stroke. Knowledge of how to best organize and manage stroke and stroke-related health problems in the long-term is sparse, even though there are guidelines on some general principles for secondary prevention and rehabilitation.
Post-stroke Checklist (PSC) was developed by an international stroke expert group. It is a simple checklist collecting eleven common stroke-related health problems, and can be used as a clinical tool to identify common and treatable complications to stroke. The feasibility of the 11-items PSC as a screening tool for stroke-related health problems has been tested systematically and it has been considered implementable. Modified versions of PSC are being implemented in different countries.
PSC can be used both by nurses, physicians and other health professions. The National Guidelines for Stroke Care in Sweden from 2018 recommend the use of PSC for stroke follow-up. PSCs use has not been systematically tested in Sweden though and PSC is not yet routinely used. A modified 14-item PSC is recommended by Region Skåne (the county council of Southern Sweden).
Aims The aims of this study are to test the feasibility of a structured and multimodal follow-up model for stroke systematically, as well as to test the validity of the PSC as a screening tool for stroke-related health problems. The study aims further at studying the prevalence, and changes over time, of stroke-related health problems as well as survival, functional outcome following stroke, and patient satisfaction.
Working plan Study design The study design is longitudinal and explorative. This is a feasibility and validation study where the intervention consists of a structured follow-up visit, a multidisciplinary team rounds resulting in an individual treatment plan for stroke-related health problems, and a final follow-up at 12 months. Individual items in PSC will be validated towards routinely used validated tools. The prevalence, and changes over time, of stroke-related health problems will be investigated, as well as survival, functional outcome following stroke, and patient satisfaction. The study takes place in the clinical setting at the stroke unit, using clinical stroke team professional to mimic the normal clinical situation.
Study population We plan to include 200 consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke or intracerebral hemorrhage, treated in-hospital at Skåne University Hospital in Malmö and discharged straight to own home. The estimated inclusion rate is 3- 5 patients per week, and the estimated time for including 200 patients is one year. Two hundred patients represent 40% of the total population of the 500 patients who can be discharged straight to own home, and are expected to be representable of the population with respect to age, sex, vascular risk and stroke severity. The generalizability of the population will be assessed through comparison to the Swedish Stroke Register.
Procedure for inclusion Eligible patients are identified daily in the stroke ward and included by written informed consent.
Follow-up procedure The three-months visit is managed by a stroke nurse and include the semi-structured PSC interview, additional validated diagnostic tools, secondary prevention status, comorbidity, and functional outcome.
The three-months visit is followed by a multidisciplinary team rounds with stroke physician, stroke nurse, occupational therapist and if needed physiotherapist, speech therapist, dietician, psychologist and/or social worker. The rounds result in an individual treatment recommendation plan that is sent to the family doctor and other relevant instances. The amount and type of referrals and other interventions warranted by the results of the follow-up visits and rounds are recorded.
The 12-months visit is managed by a stroke nurse and include a new semi-structured PSC interview, secondary prevention status, comorbidity, and a met needs assessment. The 12-month visit is followed by a multidisciplinary team rounds leading to referrals and other interventions are if warranted.
Use of other register data Patient baseline characteristics and three- and 12-month data on living conditions and functional level will be obtained from the Swedish Stroke Register (Riksstroke). Mortality at 12 and 18 months will be obtained by linkage to the Swedish Causes of Death register.
Data management, statistical analyses and ethical considerations The database will be built and managed in close cooperation with Clinical Studies Sweden, Forum South. Analyses will be performed on de-identified data after the dataset has been closed.
All statistical analyses will be performed in SPSS. Data will be presented using descriptive statistics and graphs, as well as linear models. Power calculations are not relevant for this study type.
The local Ethics approval committee has approved of the project (Dnr 2017/1028)
Study design
- Observational model
- Ecologic or community
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Participants in Structured post-stroke follow-up in Malmö | – | Other: Structured follow-up after stroke.Consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke or intracerebral hemorrhage, treated in-hospital at Skåne University Hospital in Malmö and discharged straight to own home. The intervention consists of a structured follow-up visit, managed by a stroke nurse, 3 months after stroke followed by a multidisciplinary team rounds resulting in an individual treatment plan for stroke-related health problems, and a final follow-up at 12 months |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- All patients with acute stroke, without dementia or other serious comorbidity, that can be discharged straight home. These patients have mild to moderate stroke and can be expected to be able to visit an out-patient clinic for follow-up and to benefit from a structured follow-up visit.
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Acute stroke (ICD-10: ischemic stroke I.63 and intracerebral hemorrhage I.61)
- Discharge to own home
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Co-morbidity such as dialysis, active cancer, severe heart failure or severe psychiatric illness or dementia
- Patients with stroke, but who receive in-hospital treatment for another competing diagnosis
- Already included with previous stroke
- Does not want to participate
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Structured follow-up after stroke.Stroke-nurse managed follow-up 3 and 12 months after stroke and multidisciplinary rounds resulting in individual treatment plans for stroke-related health problems. | Other | Participants in Structured post-stroke follow-up in Malmö |
Primary outcome
Number of stroke-related health problems
Time frame: 1 year
14-item Post-stroke Checklist, PSC, captures 14 stroke-related health problems. Scale ranges from 0-14 problems. We aim to analyse burden of problems as well as individual items.
Number of interventions
Time frame: 1 year
Number of new interventions for stroke-related health problems identified with PSC. No scale used, we calculate the number of interventions done.
3 secondary outcomes
Time to perform and record the semi-structured Post-Stroke Checklist (PSC) interview (minutes).
Time frame: 1 year
Ability to complete all Post-Stroke Checklist (PSC) items (yes/no)
Time frame: 1 year
Patient satisfaction assessment
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Mar 2020.
- Background: PubMed 31008273Ullberg T, Zia E, Petersson J, Norrving B. Doctor's follow-up after stroke in the south of Sweden: An observational study from the Swedish stroke register (Riksstroke). Eur Stroke J. 2016 Jun;1(2):114-121. doi: 10.1177/2396987316650597. Epub 2016 May 19.
- Background: PubMed 20083041Kumar S, Selim MH, Caplan LR. Medical complications after stroke. Lancet Neurol. 2010 Jan;9(1):105-18. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70266-2.
- Background: PubMed 10835436Langhorne P, Stott DJ, Robertson L, MacDonald J, Jones L, McAlpine C, Dick F, Taylor GS, Murray G. Medical complications after stroke: a multicenter study. Stroke. 2000 Jun;31(6):1223-9. doi: 10.1161/01.str.31.6.1223.
- Background: PubMed 26732564Ullberg T, Zia E, Petersson J, Norrving B. Perceived Unmet Rehabilitation Needs 1 Year After Stroke: An Observational Study From the Swedish Stroke Register. Stroke. 2016 Feb;47(2):539-41. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.011670. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
- Background: PubMed 21441153McKevitt C, Fudge N, Redfern J, Sheldenkar A, Crichton S, Rudd AR, Forster A, Young J, Nazareth I, Silver LE, Rothwell PM, Wolfe CD. Self-reported long-term needs after stroke. Stroke. 2011 May;42(5):1398-403. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.598839. Epub 2011 Mar 24.
- Background: PubMed 18064739von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP; STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007 Oct 20;370(9596):1453-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X.
- Background: PubMed 27145936Winstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R, Bates B, Cherney LR, Cramer SC, Deruyter F, Eng JJ, Fisher B, Harvey RL, Lang CE, MacKay-Lyons M, Ottenbacher KJ, Pugh S, Reeves MJ, Richards LG, Stiers W, Zorowitz RD; American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research. Guidelines for Adult Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2016 Jun;47(6):e98-e169. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000098. Epub 2016 May 4.
- Background: PubMed 14601359Murray J, Young J, Forster A, Ashworth R. Developing a primary care-based stroke model: the prevalence of longer-term problems experienced by patients and carers. Br J Gen Pract. 2003 Oct;53(495):803-7.
- Background: PubMed 23265778Philp I, Brainin M, Walker MF, Ward AB, Gillard P, Shields AL, Norrving B; Global Stroke Community Advisory Panel. Development of a poststroke checklist to standardize follow-up care for stroke survivors. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013 Oct;22(7):e173-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2012.10.016. Epub 2012 Dec 21.
- Background: PubMed 25088427Ward AB, Chen C, Norrving B, Gillard P, Walker MF, Blackburn S, Holloway L, Brainin M, Philp I; Global Stroke Community Advisory Panel (GSCAP). Evaluation of the Post Stroke Checklist: a pilot study in the United Kingdom and Singapore. Int J Stroke. 2014 Oct;9 Suppl A100:76-84. doi: 10.1111/ijs.12291. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39468444Mansson K, Soderholm M, Berhin I, Pessah-Rasmussen H, Ullberg T. The Post-Stroke Checklist: longitudinal use in routine clinical practice during first year after stroke. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Oct 29;24(1):601. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-04239-6.
- Quality registerLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Brain-Machine Interface With Virtual Reality and Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation for Upper Limb Rehabilitation After Stroke
Ischemic Stroke
Recruiting
Understanding and Enhancing Human Health and Movement
Spinal Cord Injury, Stroke (CVA) or Transient Ischemic Attack
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Detecting and Predicting Post-stroke Cognitive Impairment Using the Oxford Cognitive Screen
Stroke, Ischemic Stroke
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Integrating Wearable Monitoring and Clinical Data for Stroke Early Warning
Stroke, Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
Stroke Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain: Ultrasound Findings and VAS (Cross-Sectional)
Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain, Stroke
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Stroke, run by Region Skane at 1 site in Sweden.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Mar 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of stroke-related health problems (time frame: 1 year). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04295226, which also lists 11 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Mar 2020.