COPD ExacerbationNCT04295655
Physiotherapy in Hypoxic AECOPD Patients
A study testing Global Exercise intervention, Functional Electrostimulation Group and Standard treatment in people with COPD Exacerbation, run by Universidad de Granada at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
Hypoxia is considered a key player in many of the comorbidities that characterize COPD, such as pulmonary hypertension, skeletal muscle dysfunction, and systemic inflammation. These comorbidities are worsened during an exacerbation due to prolonged bed rest and treatment with steroids, showing a reduction in the… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- COPD Exacerbation
- What is being tested?
- Global Exercise intervention, Functional Electrostimulation Group and Standard treatment
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 36 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 1 Dec 2019to 1 Apr 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients of both sexes
- A diagnosis of COPD made according to the criteria of the American Thoracic Society (ATS)
- With hypoxemia at rest defined as mean arterial oxygen saturation below 90%
- Agreed to participate
Who cannot join
- Unstable cardiovascular disease
- Orthopedic diseases in the upper and lower limbs
- Being in ICU or use of mechanical ventilation
- Motor sequelae from a neurological or cognitive impairment that interfere with the evaluation and the treatment
- Contraindications of electrotherapy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Spain1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Faculty of Health Sciences. University of Granada.
Granada, Granada, 18071
Marie Carmen Valenza, PT, 958 248035, cvalenza@ugr.es
Marie Carmen Valenza, PT, PhD
About this study
Official title: Feasibility and Efficacy of Physiotherapy in Hypoxic AECOPD Patients
Hypoxia is considered a key player in many of the comorbidities that characterize COPD, such as pulmonary hypertension, skeletal muscle dysfunction, and systemic inflammation. These comorbidities are worsened during an exacerbation due to prolonged bed rest and treatment with steroids, showing a reduction in the quality of life, exercise tolerance, and a greater risk of death in these patients. Therefore, a better understanding of the safety and effectiveness of exercise training for AECOPD patients with resting hypoxemia is needed.
- Conditions
- COPD Exacerbation
- Being tested
- Global Exercise intervention, Functional Electrostimulation Group, Standard treatment
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Global Exercise interventionOther
The program included 15 minutes of deep breathing exercises and 20-30 minutes of limb exercises. The exercises included global active range of motion (ROM) exercises and muscle strengthening like upper and lower limbs flexion-extension do single-leg stance, and sit to stand exercises
Functional Electrostimulation GroupOther
The program included a neuromuscular stimulation therapy on quadriceps accompanied by lower limb exercises. The intervention was performed following the protocol described by Valenza et al (2017).
Valenza MC, Torres-Sánchez I, López-López L, Cabrera-Martos I, Ortiz-Rubio A, Valenza-Demet G. Effects of home-based neuromuscular electrical stimulation in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2018 Jun;54(3):323-332. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04745-1. Epub 2017 Nov 16. PubMed PMID: 29144103.
Standard treatmentOther
Patients received standard medical and pharmacological care that consisted in systemic steroids, inhaled bronchodilators, oxygen, and a regimen of oral prednisone or its equivalent in doses of 40 to 60 mg per day for the duration of therapy as well as anti-biotic therapy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Global Exercise Group | Experimental | all patients received the Control Group treatment added to global exercise treatment. The program included 15 minutes of deep breathing exercises and 20-30 minutes of limb exercises. The exercises included global active range of motion (ROM) exercises and muscle strengthening like upper and lower limbs flexion-extension do single-leg stance, and sit to stand exercises. The number of repetitions was adapted to the subject's response taken into account the perceived dyspnea and fatigue during the exercise performance. Receives: Other: Global Exercise intervention |
| Functional Electrostimulation Group | Experimental | all patients received the Control Group treatment plus neuromuscular stimulation therapy (SEFAR Rehab X2, DJO France S.A.S., France) on quadriceps accompanied by lower limb exercises. The intervention was performed following the protocol described by Valenza et al (2017).
Valenza MC, Torres-Sánchez I, López-López L, Cabrera-Martos I, Ortiz-Rubio A, Valenza-Demet G. Effects of home-based neuromuscular electrical stimulation in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2018 Jun;54(3):323-332. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04745-1. Epub 2017 Nov 16. PubMed PMID: 29144103. Receives: Other: Functional Electrostimulation Group |
| Standard treatment | Active comparator | Patients received standard medical and pharmacological care that consisted in systemic steroids, inhaled bronchodilators, oxygen, and a regimen of oral prednisone or its equivalent in doses of 40 to 60 mg per day for the duration of therapy as well as anti-biotic therapy. Receives: Other: Standard treatment |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Lower limb strength
Quadriceps strength was assessed with a portable hand-held dynamometer (Lafayette Manual Muscle Testing System, model 01163, Lafayette, IN, USA). The test was performed with the patient seated with his/her knees and hips flexed at 90°. Resistance was applied to the anterior tibia during 5 seconds of maximal muscle contraction. The test was repeated alternatively 3 times on the leg, allowing participants to rest between measurements. The highest value in Newton was selected for the analysis.
Measured: Baseline
Lower limb strength
Quadriceps strength was assessed with a portable hand-held dynamometer (Lafayette Manual Muscle Testing System, model 01163, Lafayette, IN, USA). The test was performed with the patient seated with his/her knees and hips flexed at 90°. Resistance was applied to the anterior tibia during 5 seconds of maximal muscle contraction. The test was repeated alternatively 3 times on the leg, allowing participants to rest between measurements. The highest value in Newton was selected for the analysis.
Measured: Up to 9 days
Balance
Balance was evaluated by the one-leg standing balance test (OLS), that measured the time that the patient balances on one leg as long as possible. The patient choose a leg to stand on (whichever he felt more comfortable with), flex the opposite knee allowing the foot to clear the floor, and balance on one leg. Higher values mean better balance.
Measured: Baseline
Balance
Balance was evaluated by the one-leg standing balance test (OLS), that measured the time that the patient balances on one leg as long as possible. The patient choose a leg to stand on (whichever he felt more comfortable with), flex the opposite knee allowing the foot to clear the floor, and balance on one leg. Higher values mean better balance.
Measured: Up to 9 days
Dyspnea
Dyspnea was assessed at rest using the modified Borg scale. Patients classified their breathlessness from 0 (no dyspnea) to10 (maximal dyspnea)
Measured: Baseline
Dyspnea
Dyspnea was assessed at rest using the modified Borg scale. Patients classified their breathlessness from 0 (no dyspnea) to10 (maximal dyspnea)
Measured: Up to 9 days
Fatigue
Fatigue was evaluated using the Piper Fatigue Scale (PFS) that consists of 22 numerical items which assess multidimensional aspects of fatigue. The scale measures four dimensions of subjective fatigue: "behavioral/severity", relating to the severity, distress, and degree of disruption in activity of daily living; "affective meaning", relating to the emotional meaning attributed to fatigue; "sensory", relating to the physical symptoms of fatigue; and "cognitive/mood", relating to mental and mood states
Measured: Baseline
Fatigue
Fatigue was evaluated using the Piper Fatigue Scale (PFS) that consists of 22 numerical items which assess multidimensional aspects of fatigue. The scale measures four dimensions of subjective fatigue: "behavioral/severity", relating to the severity, distress, and degree of disruption in activity of daily living; "affective meaning", relating to the emotional meaning attributed to fatigue; "sensory", relating to the physical symptoms of fatigue; and "cognitive/mood", relating to mental and mood states
Measured: Up to 9 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Mar 2020
- Study start1 Dec 2019
- Primary completion1 Jan 2020
- Study completion1 Apr 2020 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for COPD ExacerbationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universidad de Granada
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Marie Carmen Valenza, Universidad de Granada
- Investigators
- Marie Carmen Valenza, PhD, Principal investigator, Universidad de Granada
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04295655
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DF0089UG
- Status last verified
- Mar 2020
- First submitted
- 17 Feb 2020
- Last updated
- 4 Mar 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Mar 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Feasibility and Efficacy of Physiotherapy in Hypoxic AECOPD Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04295655
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DF0089UG
- Conditions
- COPD Exacerbation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Universidad de GranadaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Dec 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Apr 2020 (estimated)
- First posted
- 4 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Hypoxia is considered a key player in many of the comorbidities that characterize COPD, such as pulmonary hypertension, skeletal muscle dysfunction, and systemic inflammation. These comorbidities are worsened during an exacerbation due to prolonged bed rest and treatment with steroids, showing a reduction in the quality of life, exercise tolerance, and a greater risk of death in these patients. Therefore, a better understanding of the safety and effectiveness of exercise training for AECOPD patients with resting hypoxemia is needed.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Global Exercise Group | Experimental | Other: Global Exercise interventionall patients received the Control Group treatment added to global exercise treatment. The program included 15 minutes of deep breathing exercises and 20-30 minutes of limb exercises. The exercises included global active range of motion (ROM) exercises and muscle strengthening like upper and lower limbs flexion-extension do single-leg stance, and sit to stand exercises. The number of repetitions was adapted to the subject's response taken into account the perceived dyspnea and fatigue during the exercise performance. |
| Functional Electrostimulation Group | Experimental | Other: Functional Electrostimulation Groupall patients received the Control Group treatment plus neuromuscular stimulation therapy (SEFAR Rehab X2, DJO France S.A.S., France) on quadriceps accompanied by lower limb exercises. The intervention was performed following the protocol described by Valenza et al (2017). Valenza MC, Torres-Sánchez I, López-López L, Cabrera-Martos I, Ortiz-Rubio A, Valenza-Demet G. Effects of home-based neuromuscular electrical stimulation in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2018 Jun;54(3):323-332. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04745-1. Epub 2017 Nov 16. PubMed PMID: 29144103. |
| Standard treatment | Active comparator | Other: Standard treatmentPatients received standard medical and pharmacological care that consisted in systemic steroids, inhaled bronchodilators, oxygen, and a regimen of oral prednisone or its equivalent in doses of 40 to 60 mg per day for the duration of therapy as well as anti-biotic therapy. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients of both sexes
- A diagnosis of COPD made according to the criteria of the American Thoracic Society (ATS)
- With hypoxemia at rest defined as mean arterial oxygen saturation below 90%
- Agreed to participate
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Unstable cardiovascular disease
- Orthopedic diseases in the upper and lower limbs
- Being in ICU or use of mechanical ventilation
- Motor sequelae from a neurological or cognitive impairment that interfere with the evaluation and the treatment
- Contraindications of electrotherapy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Global Exercise interventionThe program included 15 minutes of deep breathing exercises and 20-30 minutes of limb exercises. The exercises included global active range of motion (ROM) exercises and muscle strengthening like upper and lower limbs flexion-extension do single-leg stance, and sit to stand exercises | Other | Global Exercise Group |
| Functional Electrostimulation GroupThe program included a neuromuscular stimulation therapy on quadriceps accompanied by lower limb exercises. The intervention was performed following the protocol described by Valenza et al (2017). Valenza MC, Torres-Sánchez I, López-López L, Cabrera-Martos I, Ortiz-Rubio A, Valenza-Demet G. Effects of home-based neuromuscular electrical stimulation in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2018 Jun;54(3):323-332. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04745-1. Epub 2017 Nov 16. PubMed PMID: 29144103. | Other | Functional Electrostimulation Group |
| Standard treatmentPatients received standard medical and pharmacological care that consisted in systemic steroids, inhaled bronchodilators, oxygen, and a regimen of oral prednisone or its equivalent in doses of 40 to 60 mg per day for the duration of therapy as well as anti-biotic therapy | Other | Standard treatment |
Primary outcome
Lower limb strength
Time frame: Baseline
Quadriceps strength was assessed with a portable hand-held dynamometer (Lafayette Manual Muscle Testing System, model 01163, Lafayette, IN, USA). The test was performed with the patient seated with his/her knees and hips flexed at 90°. Resistance was applied to the anterior tibia during 5 seconds of maximal muscle contraction. The test was repeated alternatively 3 times on the leg, allowing participants to rest between measurements. The highest value in Newton was selected for the analysis.
Lower limb strength
Time frame: Up to 9 days
Quadriceps strength was assessed with a portable hand-held dynamometer (Lafayette Manual Muscle Testing System, model 01163, Lafayette, IN, USA). The test was performed with the patient seated with his/her knees and hips flexed at 90°. Resistance was applied to the anterior tibia during 5 seconds of maximal muscle contraction. The test was repeated alternatively 3 times on the leg, allowing participants to rest between measurements. The highest value in Newton was selected for the analysis.
Balance
Time frame: Baseline
Balance was evaluated by the one-leg standing balance test (OLS), that measured the time that the patient balances on one leg as long as possible. The patient choose a leg to stand on (whichever he felt more comfortable with), flex the opposite knee allowing the foot to clear the floor, and balance on one leg. Higher values mean better balance.
Balance
Time frame: Up to 9 days
Balance was evaluated by the one-leg standing balance test (OLS), that measured the time that the patient balances on one leg as long as possible. The patient choose a leg to stand on (whichever he felt more comfortable with), flex the opposite knee allowing the foot to clear the floor, and balance on one leg. Higher values mean better balance.
Dyspnea
Time frame: Baseline
Dyspnea was assessed at rest using the modified Borg scale. Patients classified their breathlessness from 0 (no dyspnea) to10 (maximal dyspnea)
Dyspnea
Time frame: Up to 9 days
Dyspnea was assessed at rest using the modified Borg scale. Patients classified their breathlessness from 0 (no dyspnea) to10 (maximal dyspnea)
Fatigue
Time frame: Baseline
Fatigue was evaluated using the Piper Fatigue Scale (PFS) that consists of 22 numerical items which assess multidimensional aspects of fatigue. The scale measures four dimensions of subjective fatigue: "behavioral/severity", relating to the severity, distress, and degree of disruption in activity of daily living; "affective meaning", relating to the emotional meaning attributed to fatigue; "sensory", relating to the physical symptoms of fatigue; and "cognitive/mood", relating to mental and mood states
Fatigue
Time frame: Up to 9 days
Fatigue was evaluated using the Piper Fatigue Scale (PFS) that consists of 22 numerical items which assess multidimensional aspects of fatigue. The scale measures four dimensions of subjective fatigue: "behavioral/severity", relating to the severity, distress, and degree of disruption in activity of daily living; "affective meaning", relating to the emotional meaning attributed to fatigue; "sensory", relating to the physical symptoms of fatigue; and "cognitive/mood", relating to mental and mood states
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Mar 2020.
Related trials for COPD Exacerbation
RecruitingPhase 2
Rademikibart IV for Acute Asthma and COPD Exacerbation
Asthma Acute, COPD Exacerbation Acute
RecruitingObservational study
Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Admitted to ICU for a Severe Acute Exacerbation of COPD.
COPD Exacerbation, ICU
Recruiting
A Prospective Study of Cardiovascular Risk of Patients Admitted for Acute Exacerbation of COPD
COPD
Active, not recruitingObservational study
CareCOPD - COPD Home Monitoring Study
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Efficacy of Nebulized Long-Acting Bronchodilators (Formoterol and Revefenacin) vs. Short-Acting Bronchodilators (Albuterol and Ipratropium) in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department With Acute Exacerbation of COPD (ECOPD)
COPD Exacerbation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Marie Carmen Valenza, PhD principal investigator
Universidad de Granada
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Global Exercise intervention, Functional Electrostimulation Group and Standard treatment in people with COPD Exacerbation, run by Universidad de Granada at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Mar 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Marie Carmen valenza, PhD (958 248035, cvalenza@ugr.es), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Lower limb strength (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 8 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Mar 2020.