Atrial FibrillationNCT04300270
Validation of a Novel Smartphone-based Method for Heart Rhythm Monitoring in the Home Environment
An observational study of Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter, run by Karolinska Institutet at 1 site in Sweden.
Trial summary
Atrial fibrillation is a heart rhythm disorder with increased risk of stroke, heart failure, dementia and death. The severity of symptoms in atrial fibrillation varies markedly, ranging from no symptoms to those with disabling symptoms. An ECG recording is currently mandatory for diagnosing atrial fibrillation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Flutter, Arrhythmia
- What is being tested?
- Smartphone PPG recordings and Smartphone ECG
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 480 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSweden
- Study dates
- 27 Nov 2018to 1 Apr 2025
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients undergoing direct current cardioversion for treatment of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter at Danderyd University Hospital.
Who may be able to join
- Patients undergoing direct current cardioversion successfully for treatment of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter and have a normal heart rhythm after the treatment.
- Patients planned for direct current cardioversion for treatment of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter.
Who cannot join
- Patients with implantable cardiac devices.
- Clinical implementation cohort:
- Patients with implantable cardiac devices.
- Patients with a spontaneous return to sinus rhythm diagnosed at a screening visit 2 to 4 weeks prior to the scheduled treatment with direct current cardioversion.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Validation of a Novel Smartphone-based Photoplethysmographic Method for Ambulatory Heart Rhythm Monitoring in Connection to Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation With Direct Current Cardioversion
Atrial fibrillation is a heart rhythm disorder with increased risk of stroke, heart failure, dementia and death. The severity of symptoms in atrial fibrillation varies markedly, ranging from no symptoms to those with disabling symptoms. An ECG recording is currently mandatory for diagnosing atrial fibrillation. A portable method for heart rhythm diagnostics that is readily available is currently missing in clinical practice. If a standard smartphone could be used for heart rhythm diagnostics, the availability could improve greatly.
Treatment with direct current cardioversion is a procedure in which the heart rhythm is normalized by an electrical shock through the chest. Patients with atrial fibrillation are in some cases recommended treatment with direct current cardioversion but the procedure is costly, has a high recurrence rate and includes an increased risk for stroke. In this study we will validate the use of a novel smartphone-based method for heart rhythm diagnostics when used by patients in their home environment. The novel method is using the smartphone camera as a sensor. Patients will be doing heart rhythm measurements with the novel smartphone-based method in their home environment for 30 days after successfully receiving treatment of atrial fibrillation with direct current cardioversion. The novel smartphone-based method will be validated against simultaneous recordings with mobile ECG.
We will also study the feasibility in using smartphone recordings and mobile ECG in the home environment the weeks before receiving treatment with direct current cardioversion, to study the possible benefit of detecting spontaneous conversions to normal heart rhythm and missed doses of treatment with blood thinning medication, both of which will lead to cancellation or detention of the cardioversion procedure.
Read the detailed description
Atrial fibrillation is a heart rhythm disorder with increased risk of stroke, heart failure, dementia and death. The severity of symptoms in atrial fibrillation varies markedly, ranging from no symptoms to those with disabling symptoms. An ECG recording is currently mandatory for diagnosing atrial fibrillation.
The availability of long-term ECG and portable ECG registration for heart rhythm diagnostics within the healthcare sector is severely limited by waiting time both for ECG recording and for analysis and reporting. A method for heart rhythm diagnostics that is readily available is currently lacking in clinical practice, except for hospitalization, which is very costly and has low availability.
The lack of a method for diagnosis of heart rhythm disorders and atrial fibrillation that is readily available, cost-effective and simple to use is a problem for both the patients and for the healthcare system as a whole. The limited availability of patient-related diagnostics thus means that many patients, even those with symptoms, remain undiagnosed and thus untreated, which in turn means that the missing diagnosis gives an increased risk of stroke. If a standard smartphone could be used for reliable heart rhythm diagnostics, the availability could improve greatly.
Treatment with direct current cardioversion is a procedure in which the heart rhythm is normalized by an electrical shock through the chest. Patients with atrial fibrillation could in some cases be treated with cardioversion but the procedure is costly, has a high recurrence rate and includes an increased risk for thromboembolism and stroke. The benefit of the treatment is mainly symptomatic, with no proven long-term effects of mortality or morbidity.
In this study we will validate the use of a novel smartphone-based method for heart rhythm diagnostics when used by patients in their home environment after receiving treatment with direct current cardioversion. The novel method is using the smartphone camera as a sensor and records photoplethysmographic (PPG) measurements. We will also study the feasibility in using smartphone and mobile ECG recordings peri-cardioversion, to study the possible benefit of detecting pre-cardioversion spontaneous conversions to sinus rhythm and non-adherence to treatment with oral anticoagulants, both of which will lead to cancellation or detention of the cardioversion procedure. We will also detect the timing of post-cardioversion early recurrences into atrial fibrillation, as well as the heart rate and symptoms associated to recurrence, if any.
The objective of this study is to:
- Validate heart rhythm measurements registered with a novel smartphone-based method using PPG-measurement technology compared to mobile ECG technology in patients with atrial fibrillation. The validation involves evaluating whether PPG-measurement technology using a novel smartphone-based method provides sufficient diagnostic performance in the home environment / outpatient environment compared to outpatient mobile ECG measurements.
- Study if pre-cardioversion heart rhythm recordings will reduce the number of same day cancellations of treatment of atrial fibrillation with planned direct current cardioversion.
For the validation part, patients who visit the cardiac day care department at the department of Cardiology, Danderyd University Hospital, for treatment with outpatient direct current cardioversion of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter are asked about participating by physicians or research nurses. Each patient will prior to inclusion in the study be given full and adequate verbal and written information regarding the objective and procedures of the study and possible risks involved. Written consent is obtained from the physician or research nurse.
A 60-second heart rhythm measurement using a smartphone is recorded before the patient receives treatment with direct current cardioversion. The smartphone used is the same device that the patient will be using in their home for 30 days after the treatment. The measurement includes PPG-measurement from the camera of the smartphone as well as a simultaneous one lead ECG-registration done with a small ECG-device attached to the back of the smartphone.
The patient is interviewed about their medical history and their current symptoms. If the treatment is successful and the patient's heart rhythm is converted back to normal sinus rhythm, the patient is included in the study. The patient's heart rhythm is verified with an ECG measurement recorded approximately one hour after the cardioversion treatment.
When the patients are discharged from the hospital they are given a smartphone that they will be recording simultaneous PPG- and ECG-recordings with, at least twice daily for a period of 30 days post-cardioversion in their home.
For the clinical implementation part, patients scheduled for direct current cardioversion at Danderyd University Hospital will be included at least 2 weeks prior to the scheduled treatment. Information regarding co-morbidities, echocardiographic parameters and current medication will be collected from interviews and medical records.
All individuals scheduled for direct current cardioversion will be invited to a screening visit and asked to sign a written consent form. After consent, their heart rhythm will be recorded and those with sinus rhythm will be excluded. Participants with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter will be randomized 1:1 to pre-cardioversion heart rhythm monitoring, or no monitoring pre-cardioversion.
Participants randomized to active pre-cardioversion rhythm monitoring (intervention group) will be instructed in the use of smartphone rhythm recordings (using simultaneous PPG and mobile ECG). They will be recording both their heart rhythm and oral anticoagulant treatment adherence with the same smartphone application. This information will give the investigators the possibility to cancel or postpone the scheduled cardioversion visit in advance for those with spontaneous rhythm conversion to sinus rhythm and for those with non-adherence to oral anticoagulant treatment.
Participants randomized to passive pre-cardioversion rhythm monitoring (control group) will be instructed in the use of smartphone rhythm recordings (using simultaneous PPG and mobile ECG). The control group will be recording only heart rhythm and not treatment adherence. The heart rhythm recordings made in the control group will be reviewed after the participants treatment with direct current cardioversion.
After the treatment with direct current cardioversion, all participants are followed up in one common cohort.
- Conditions
- Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Flutter, Arrhythmia
- Being tested
- Smartphone PPG recordings, Smartphone ECG
- Keywords
- Smartphone, Photoplethysmography, Cardioversion, Telemonitoring, Validation, Mobile ECG
- Medical subject headings
- Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Flutter, Arrhythmias, Cardiac
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Smartphone PPG recordingsDevice
Smartphone camera PPG recordings using a novel software application.
Smartphone ECGDevice
Also called Alivecor Kardia Mobile ECG
Smartphone connected one-lead ECG recordings.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Validation cohort | Participants in validation of the novel smartphone-based photoplethysmographic method for ambulatory heart rhythm diagnostics. Receives: Device: Smartphone PPG recordings; Device: Smartphone ECG | |
| Clinical implementation cohort | Participants in a clinical implementation of the novel smartphone-based photoplethysmographic method for ambulatory heart rhythm diagnostics. Receives: Device: Smartphone PPG recordings; Device: Smartphone ECG |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Performance of the novel smartphone-based photoplethysmographic method for heart rhythm diagnostics and discrimination of atrial fibrillation from normal heart rhythm.
Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.
Measured: Daily measurements during 30 days
Secondary outcomes (5)
Independent predictors for recurrence of atrial fibrillation within 30 days of treatment with direct current cardioversion.
Odds ratio
Measured: 30 days
Predictors for recurrence of atrial fibrillation within 30 days of treatment with direct current cardioversion using deep learning and machine learning techniques.
Measured: 30 days
Participant compliance for recording heart rhythm with the novel smartphone-based method twice daily for 30 days.
Actual compared to expected number of recordings. Proportion of recordings with interpretable signal quality.
Measured: 30 days
Correlation between patient self-reported symptoms and recorded heart rhythm.
Correlation between heart rhythm perceived by the participant (dichotomized into sinus rhythm or atrial fibrillation) and actual rhythm recorded on handheld ECG (dichotomized in the same way), expressed as correlation coefficient R and cohen´s kappa.
Measured: 30 days
Proportion of same day cancellations for planned treatment of atrial fibrillation with cardioversion for patients using the novel smartphone-based photoplethysmographic method for heart rhythm monitoring prior to the treatment compared to no monitoring.
Comparison of proportions
Measured: 2 to 4 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Mar 2020
- Study start27 Nov 2018
- Primary completion1 Apr 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Apr 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Atrial FibrillationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Karolinska InstitutetThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 480 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Karolinska Institutet
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Danderyd Hospital
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Johan Engdahl, Karolinska Institutet
- Investigators
- Johan Engdahl, Principal investigator, Karolinska Institutet
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04300270
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SmartBeats
- Status last verified
- Mar 2025
- First submitted
- 4 Mar 2020
- Last updated
- 5 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
Publications
Fernstad J, Svennberg E, Aberg P, Engdahl J. Precardioversion Heart Rhythm Monitoring Using Smartphone Photoplethysmography: The SMARTBEATS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2026 Jul 1;11(7):664-668. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2026.1269.
PubMed 42234449Fernstad J, Svennberg E, Aberg P, Kemp Gudmundsdottir K, Jansson A, Engdahl J. External validation of a machine learning-based classification algorithm for ambulatory heart rhythm diagnostics in pericardioversion atrial fibrillation patients using smartphone photoplethysmography: the SMARTBEATS-ALGO study. Europace. 2025 Mar 28;27(4):euaf031. doi: 10.1093/europace/euaf031.
PubMed 39960451
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Mar 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Validation of a Novel Smartphone-based Photoplethysmographic Method for Ambulatory Heart Rhythm Monitoring in Connection to Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation With Direct Current Cardioversion
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04300270
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SmartBeats
- Conditions
- Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Flutter, Arrhythmia
- Keywords
- Smartphone, Photoplethysmography, Cardioversion, Telemonitoring, Validation, Mobile ECG
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 480 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Karolinska InstitutetUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Danderyd Hospital
- Study start
- 27 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Apr 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Apr 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 9 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Atrial fibrillation is a heart rhythm disorder with increased risk of stroke, heart failure, dementia and death. The severity of symptoms in atrial fibrillation varies markedly, ranging from no symptoms to those with disabling symptoms. An ECG recording is currently mandatory for diagnosing atrial fibrillation. A portable method for heart rhythm diagnostics that is readily available is currently missing in clinical practice. If a standard smartphone could be used for heart rhythm diagnostics, the availability could improve greatly.
Treatment with direct current cardioversion is a procedure in which the heart rhythm is normalized by an electrical shock through the chest. Patients with atrial fibrillation are in some cases recommended treatment with direct current cardioversion but the procedure is costly, has a high recurrence rate and includes an increased risk for stroke. In this study we will validate the use of a novel smartphone-based method for heart rhythm diagnostics when used by patients in their home environment. The novel method is using the smartphone camera as a sensor. Patients will be doing heart rhythm measurements with the novel smartphone-based method in their home environment for 30 days after successfully receiving treatment of atrial fibrillation with direct current cardioversion. The novel smartphone-based method will be validated against simultaneous recordings with mobile ECG.
We will also study the feasibility in using smartphone recordings and mobile ECG in the home environment the weeks before receiving treatment with direct current cardioversion, to study the possible benefit of detecting spontaneous conversions to normal heart rhythm and missed doses of treatment with blood thinning medication, both of which will lead to cancellation or detention of the cardioversion procedure.
Detailed description
Atrial fibrillation is a heart rhythm disorder with increased risk of stroke, heart failure, dementia and death. The severity of symptoms in atrial fibrillation varies markedly, ranging from no symptoms to those with disabling symptoms. An ECG recording is currently mandatory for diagnosing atrial fibrillation.
The availability of long-term ECG and portable ECG registration for heart rhythm diagnostics within the healthcare sector is severely limited by waiting time both for ECG recording and for analysis and reporting. A method for heart rhythm diagnostics that is readily available is currently lacking in clinical practice, except for hospitalization, which is very costly and has low availability.
The lack of a method for diagnosis of heart rhythm disorders and atrial fibrillation that is readily available, cost-effective and simple to use is a problem for both the patients and for the healthcare system as a whole. The limited availability of patient-related diagnostics thus means that many patients, even those with symptoms, remain undiagnosed and thus untreated, which in turn means that the missing diagnosis gives an increased risk of stroke. If a standard smartphone could be used for reliable heart rhythm diagnostics, the availability could improve greatly.
Treatment with direct current cardioversion is a procedure in which the heart rhythm is normalized by an electrical shock through the chest. Patients with atrial fibrillation could in some cases be treated with cardioversion but the procedure is costly, has a high recurrence rate and includes an increased risk for thromboembolism and stroke. The benefit of the treatment is mainly symptomatic, with no proven long-term effects of mortality or morbidity.
In this study we will validate the use of a novel smartphone-based method for heart rhythm diagnostics when used by patients in their home environment after receiving treatment with direct current cardioversion. The novel method is using the smartphone camera as a sensor and records photoplethysmographic (PPG) measurements. We will also study the feasibility in using smartphone and mobile ECG recordings peri-cardioversion, to study the possible benefit of detecting pre-cardioversion spontaneous conversions to sinus rhythm and non-adherence to treatment with oral anticoagulants, both of which will lead to cancellation or detention of the cardioversion procedure. We will also detect the timing of post-cardioversion early recurrences into atrial fibrillation, as well as the heart rate and symptoms associated to recurrence, if any.
The objective of this study is to:
- Validate heart rhythm measurements registered with a novel smartphone-based method using PPG-measurement technology compared to mobile ECG technology in patients with atrial fibrillation. The validation involves evaluating whether PPG-measurement technology using a novel smartphone-based method provides sufficient diagnostic performance in the home environment / outpatient environment compared to outpatient mobile ECG measurements.
- Study if pre-cardioversion heart rhythm recordings will reduce the number of same day cancellations of treatment of atrial fibrillation with planned direct current cardioversion.
For the validation part, patients who visit the cardiac day care department at the department of Cardiology, Danderyd University Hospital, for treatment with outpatient direct current cardioversion of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter are asked about participating by physicians or research nurses. Each patient will prior to inclusion in the study be given full and adequate verbal and written information regarding the objective and procedures of the study and possible risks involved. Written consent is obtained from the physician or research nurse.
A 60-second heart rhythm measurement using a smartphone is recorded before the patient receives treatment with direct current cardioversion. The smartphone used is the same device that the patient will be using in their home for 30 days after the treatment. The measurement includes PPG-measurement from the camera of the smartphone as well as a simultaneous one lead ECG-registration done with a small ECG-device attached to the back of the smartphone.
The patient is interviewed about their medical history and their current symptoms. If the treatment is successful and the patient's heart rhythm is converted back to normal sinus rhythm, the patient is included in the study. The patient's heart rhythm is verified with an ECG measurement recorded approximately one hour after the cardioversion treatment.
When the patients are discharged from the hospital they are given a smartphone that they will be recording simultaneous PPG- and ECG-recordings with, at least twice daily for a period of 30 days post-cardioversion in their home.
For the clinical implementation part, patients scheduled for direct current cardioversion at Danderyd University Hospital will be included at least 2 weeks prior to the scheduled treatment. Information regarding co-morbidities, echocardiographic parameters and current medication will be collected from interviews and medical records.
All individuals scheduled for direct current cardioversion will be invited to a screening visit and asked to sign a written consent form. After consent, their heart rhythm will be recorded and those with sinus rhythm will be excluded. Participants with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter will be randomized 1:1 to pre-cardioversion heart rhythm monitoring, or no monitoring pre-cardioversion.
Participants randomized to active pre-cardioversion rhythm monitoring (intervention group) will be instructed in the use of smartphone rhythm recordings (using simultaneous PPG and mobile ECG). They will be recording both their heart rhythm and oral anticoagulant treatment adherence with the same smartphone application. This information will give the investigators the possibility to cancel or postpone the scheduled cardioversion visit in advance for those with spontaneous rhythm conversion to sinus rhythm and for those with non-adherence to oral anticoagulant treatment.
Participants randomized to passive pre-cardioversion rhythm monitoring (control group) will be instructed in the use of smartphone rhythm recordings (using simultaneous PPG and mobile ECG). The control group will be recording only heart rhythm and not treatment adherence. The heart rhythm recordings made in the control group will be reviewed after the participants treatment with direct current cardioversion.
After the treatment with direct current cardioversion, all participants are followed up in one common cohort.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Validation cohort | – | Device: Smartphone PPG recordings, Device: Smartphone ECGParticipants in validation of the novel smartphone-based photoplethysmographic method for ambulatory heart rhythm diagnostics. |
| Clinical implementation cohort | – | Device: Smartphone PPG recordings, Device: Smartphone ECGParticipants in a clinical implementation of the novel smartphone-based photoplethysmographic method for ambulatory heart rhythm diagnostics. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients undergoing direct current cardioversion for treatment of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter at Danderyd University Hospital.
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients undergoing direct current cardioversion successfully for treatment of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter and have a normal heart rhythm after the treatment.
- Patients planned for direct current cardioversion for treatment of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients with implantable cardiac devices.
- Patients with implantable cardiac devices.
- Patients with a spontaneous return to sinus rhythm diagnosed at a screening visit 2 to 4 weeks prior to the scheduled treatment with direct current cardioversion.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Smartphone PPG recordingsSmartphone camera PPG recordings using a novel software application. | Device | Clinical implementation cohort, Validation cohort |
| Smartphone ECGAlso: Alivecor Kardia Mobile ECGSmartphone connected one-lead ECG recordings. | Device | Clinical implementation cohort, Validation cohort |
Primary outcome
Performance of the novel smartphone-based photoplethysmographic method for heart rhythm diagnostics and discrimination of atrial fibrillation from normal heart rhythm.
Time frame: Daily measurements during 30 days
Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.
5 secondary outcomes
Independent predictors for recurrence of atrial fibrillation within 30 days of treatment with direct current cardioversion.
Time frame: 30 days
Predictors for recurrence of atrial fibrillation within 30 days of treatment with direct current cardioversion using deep learning and machine learning techniques.
Time frame: 30 days
Participant compliance for recording heart rhythm with the novel smartphone-based method twice daily for 30 days.
Time frame: 30 days
Correlation between patient self-reported symptoms and recorded heart rhythm.
Time frame: 30 days
Proportion of same day cancellations for planned treatment of atrial fibrillation with cardioversion for patients using the novel smartphone-based photoplethysmographic method for heart rhythm monitoring prior to the treatment compared to no monitoring.
Time frame: 2 to 4 weeks
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Mar 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42234449Fernstad J, Svennberg E, Aberg P, Engdahl J. Precardioversion Heart Rhythm Monitoring Using Smartphone Photoplethysmography: The SMARTBEATS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2026 Jul 1;11(7):664-668. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2026.1269.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39960451Fernstad J, Svennberg E, Aberg P, Kemp Gudmundsdottir K, Jansson A, Engdahl J. External validation of a machine learning-based classification algorithm for ambulatory heart rhythm diagnostics in pericardioversion atrial fibrillation patients using smartphone photoplethysmography: the SMARTBEATS-ALGO study. Europace. 2025 Mar 28;27(4):euaf031. doi: 10.1093/europace/euaf031.
Related trials for Atrial Fibrillation
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Resumption of Anticoagulation After Major Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
Atrial Fibrillation (AF), Major Gastrointestinal Bleeding (MGIB)
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
An Investigator-initiated, Prospective, Open-label, Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial, Comparing the Efficacy of Sacubitril/Valsartan and Standard Treatment on Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence After Catheter Ablation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Patients Without Hypertensive
Atrial Fibrillation (Persistent), Catheter Ablation
Recruiting
Structured Treatment and Resource Efficiency Assessment With Lean Six Sigma Integration for Pulmonary Vein Isolation
Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
Not yet recruiting
Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Repeat Ablation Strategies With Durably Isolated Pulmonary Veins
Ablation Techniques, Atrial Fibrillation (Paroxysmal)
Active, not recruiting
VOLT CE Mark Study
Atrial Arrhythmia, Atrial Fibrillation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Johan Engdahl principal investigator
Karolinska Institutet
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter, run by Karolinska Institutet at 1 site in Sweden.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Performance of the novel smartphone-based photoplethysmographic method for heart rhythm diagnostics and discrimination of atrial fibrillation from normal heart rhythm. (time frame: Daily measurements during 30 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04300270, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Mar 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 3 Nov 2026.