ParkinsonNCT04300348
Improving Walking With Heel-To-Toe Device
A study testing Heel2Toe in people with Parkinson, run by McGill University at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Introduction: The purpose of this study is to test the efficacy potential of using real-time positive auditory feedback to improve gait pattern in people with Parkinson's Disease (PD). The components of walking are commonly affected in patients with PD. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Parkinson
- What is being tested?
- Heel2Toe
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 27 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 15 Apr 2021to 30 Oct 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of Parkinson Disease and be independent in ambulation without use of walking aid
Who cannot join
- exercising three or more time per week;
- Had any additional illness that restricted their function
- Showing difficulty reading, understanding or speaking either French or English
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Real-time Auditory Feedback for Improving Gait and Walking in People With Parkinson's Disease
Introduction: The purpose of this study is to test the efficacy potential of using real-time positive auditory feedback to improve gait pattern in people with Parkinson's Disease (PD). The components of walking are commonly affected in patients with PD. Gait training for PD is usually based on verbal cues from the therapist that are only moderately effective. Based on good principals of gait and neuroplasticity, the Heel-To-Toe (Heel2Toe) sensor was developed to provide real-time auditory feedback during walking training. Methods: A two-group, randomized feasibility trial is planned with repeated measures of gait parameters and walking outcomes. Participants will be assessed at baseline, 3 and 6 months. Outcomes after the 5 training days will be obtained directly from the Hee2Toe device for both groups (with and without auditory feedback). The primary outcome is walking capacity measured by the Six-Minute Walk Test and the Standardized Walking Obstacle Course. Gait parameters will be captured by the Heel2Toe device Expected Contributions: Gait training using the Heel2Toe sensor will be potentially effective for improving walking pattern in people with PD.
Read the detailed description
As this is a feasibility study, the main analysis will focus on within-group change over the intervention period of 3 months using indices of reliable change(36). This method assesses the number of people who changed in each of the groups based on the magnitude of change relative to pre-post variability and correlation. We will estimate the proportion of people with reliable change. Estimates from the pilot study will be used to plan the main trial if the pilot demonstrates feasibility. For the maintenance period, reliable change from baseline will also be estimated and used to identify the proportion of people who maintained reliable change or who gained/lost this status.
The study is designed to detect a minimal important within-group change of moderate magnitude or greater (effect size ½ standard deviation) with adequate precision. A sample size of 20 in the intervention with completed follow-up will provide a 95% confidence interval with precision that excludes an effect size of 0.03.
- Conditions
- Parkinson
- Being tested
- Heel2Toe, No-feedback control group
- Keywords
- gait, walking capacity, neuroplasticity, motor learning, quality of life
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Heel2ToeDevice
Heel to Toe (Heel2Toe) is a device that clips on the shoe and provides an instant auditory feedback (a beep) for each correct step characterized by putting the heel first and it provides data on gait parameters
No-feedback control groupOther
The control group will follow the same protocol as the Heel2Toe group but the device will not be in feedback mode just in data acquisition mode.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Heel2Toe Group | Active comparator | The Heel2Toe group will have 5 therapy sessions to learn to trigger the sensor with a strong heel strike and how to use device for home practice for 3 months. During the home practice, participants will be instructed to walk with the device for a minimum of 10 minutes per day in feedback mode. They will be provided with a workbook outlining simple exercises targeting functions needed to walk well (Walk-BEST Workbook) in paper and as a mobile app. Receives: Device: Heel2Toe |
| No-feedback Control Group (Control group) | Other | The Control group will do the same 5 sessions of training and 3 months of practice but without the Heel2Toe device in feedback mode, just in data acquisition mode. They will be provided with a workbook outlining simple exercises targeting functions needed to walk well (Walk-BEST Workbook) in paper and as a mobile app. Receives: Other: No-feedback control group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Reliable Change in Six-Minute Walk Test
Performance-rated outcome
Measured: Baseline, 3 months (Change from Baseline to 3 months; maintenance to 6 months)
Change in Standardized Walking Obstacle Course (SWOC)
Performance-rated outcome of challenges experienced with starting, stopping, turning, making motor decisions. The metric is the time to complete a 12.2-m long, 0.92-m wide curved pathway, with obstacles commonly encountered in daily life.
Measured: Baseline, 3 months (Change from Baseline to 3 months; maintenance to 6 months)
Secondary outcomes (9)
Safety (Falls)
Self-reported number of falls during study period
Measured: Baseline to 3 months.
Technology acceptability (System Usability Scale)
Patient-reported outcome on satisfaction and intent-to-use
Measured: 3 months (1 time point)
Change in Gait Quality (Data capture from Heel2Toe sensor)
Technologically-reported outcome
Measured: Baseline, 3 months (Change from Baseline to 3 months; maintenance to 6 months)]
Change in Lower Extremity Function (Neuroqol)
Patient-reported outcome on degree of difficulty with activities related lower extremity function
Measured: Baseline, 3 months (Change from Baseline to 3 months; maintenance to 6 months)
Change in Postural Instability and Gait Dysfunction (UPDRS)
Self-reported outcome of limitations
Measured: Baseline, 3 months (Change from Baseline to 3 months; maintenance to 6 months)
Change in health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-3L)
Patient-reported outcome (EQ-5D-3L)
Measured: Baseline, 3 months (Change from Baseline to 3 months; maintenance to 6 months)
Change in motivation (Starkstein Apathy Scale, Activity Effort Inventory)
Patient-reported outcome
Measured: Baseline, 3 months (Change from Baseline to 3 months; maintenance to 6 months)
Change in health states (Visual Analogue Health States)
Patient reported outcome of 8 health states measured on 0 to 10 scale
Measured: Baseline, 3 months (Change from Baseline to 3 months; maintenance to 6 months)
Cognitive performance (Symbol Digit Modality Test)
Performance-rated outcome
Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Mar 2020
- Study start15 Apr 2021
- Primary completion30 Oct 2022
- Study completion30 Oct 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for ParkinsonStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Standard two-group, sequential design, with 2:1 randomization (intervention:control) and only a within-group analysis.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 27 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- McGill University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Nancy Mayo, PhD, Principal investigator, Research Institute - MUHC
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04300348
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2020-5842
- Status last verified
- Mar 2023
- First submitted
- 4 Mar 2020
- Last updated
- 15 Mar 2023
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Mate KKV, Abou-Sharkh A, Morais JA, Mayo NE. Putting the best foot forward: Relationships between indicators of step quality and cadence in three gait vulnerable populations. NeuroRehabilitation. 2019;44(2):295-301. doi: 10.3233/NRE-182595.
PubMed 30856128Mate KK, Abou-Sharkh A, Morais JA, Mayo NE. Real-Time Auditory Feedback-Induced Adaptation to Walking Among Seniors Using the Heel2Toe Sensor: Proof-of-Concept Study. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019 Dec 11;6(2):e13889. doi: 10.2196/13889.
PubMed 31825320Carvalho LP, Mate KKV, Cinar E, Abou-Sharkh A, Lafontaine AL, Mayo NE. A new approach toward gait training in patients with Parkinson's Disease. Gait Posture. 2020 Sep;81:14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.06.031. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
PubMed 32650238
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Mar 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Real-time Auditory Feedback for Improving Gait and Walking in People With Parkinson's Disease
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04300348
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2020-5842
- Conditions
- Parkinson
- Keywords
- gait, walking capacity, neuroplasticity, motor learning, quality of life
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 27 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- McGill UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Apr 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Oct 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Oct 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Introduction: The purpose of this study is to test the efficacy potential of using real-time positive auditory feedback to improve gait pattern in people with Parkinson's Disease (PD). The components of walking are commonly affected in patients with PD. Gait training for PD is usually based on verbal cues from the therapist that are only moderately effective. Based on good principals of gait and neuroplasticity, the Heel-To-Toe (Heel2Toe) sensor was developed to provide real-time auditory feedback during walking training. Methods: A two-group, randomized feasibility trial is planned with repeated measures of gait parameters and walking outcomes. Participants will be assessed at baseline, 3 and 6 months. Outcomes after the 5 training days will be obtained directly from the Hee2Toe device for both groups (with and without auditory feedback). The primary outcome is walking capacity measured by the Six-Minute Walk Test and the Standardized Walking Obstacle Course. Gait parameters will be captured by the Heel2Toe device Expected Contributions: Gait training using the Heel2Toe sensor will be potentially effective for improving walking pattern in people with PD.
Detailed description
As this is a feasibility study, the main analysis will focus on within-group change over the intervention period of 3 months using indices of reliable change(36). This method assesses the number of people who changed in each of the groups based on the magnitude of change relative to pre-post variability and correlation. We will estimate the proportion of people with reliable change. Estimates from the pilot study will be used to plan the main trial if the pilot demonstrates feasibility. For the maintenance period, reliable change from baseline will also be estimated and used to identify the proportion of people who maintained reliable change or who gained/lost this status.
The study is designed to detect a minimal important within-group change of moderate magnitude or greater (effect size ½ standard deviation) with adequate precision. A sample size of 20 in the intervention with completed follow-up will provide a 95% confidence interval with precision that excludes an effect size of 0.03.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Standard two-group, sequential design, with 2:1 randomization (intervention:control) and only a within-group analysis.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Heel2Toe Group | Active comparator | Device: Heel2ToeThe Heel2Toe group will have 5 therapy sessions to learn to trigger the sensor with a strong heel strike and how to use device for home practice for 3 months. During the home practice, participants will be instructed to walk with the device for a minimum of 10 minutes per day in feedback mode. They will be provided with a workbook outlining simple exercises targeting functions needed to walk well (Walk-BEST Workbook) in paper and as a mobile app. |
| No-feedback Control Group (Control group) | Other | Other: No-feedback control groupThe Control group will do the same 5 sessions of training and 3 months of practice but without the Heel2Toe device in feedback mode, just in data acquisition mode. They will be provided with a workbook outlining simple exercises targeting functions needed to walk well (Walk-BEST Workbook) in paper and as a mobile app. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Diagnosis of Parkinson Disease and be independent in ambulation without use of walking aid
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- exercising three or more time per week;
- Had any additional illness that restricted their function
- Showing difficulty reading, understanding or speaking either French or English
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Heel2ToeHeel to Toe (Heel2Toe) is a device that clips on the shoe and provides an instant auditory feedback (a beep) for each correct step characterized by putting the heel first and it provides data on gait parameters | Device | Heel2Toe Group |
| No-feedback control groupThe control group will follow the same protocol as the Heel2Toe group but the device will not be in feedback mode just in data acquisition mode. | Other | No-feedback Control Group (Control group) |
Primary outcome
Reliable Change in Six-Minute Walk Test
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months (Change from Baseline to 3 months; maintenance to 6 months)
Performance-rated outcome
Change in Standardized Walking Obstacle Course (SWOC)
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months (Change from Baseline to 3 months; maintenance to 6 months)
Performance-rated outcome of challenges experienced with starting, stopping, turning, making motor decisions. The metric is the time to complete a 12.2-m long, 0.92-m wide curved pathway, with obstacles commonly encountered in daily life.
9 secondary outcomes
Safety (Falls)
Time frame: Baseline to 3 months.
Technology acceptability (System Usability Scale)
Time frame: 3 months (1 time point)
Change in Gait Quality (Data capture from Heel2Toe sensor)
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months (Change from Baseline to 3 months; maintenance to 6 months)]
Change in Lower Extremity Function (Neuroqol)
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months (Change from Baseline to 3 months; maintenance to 6 months)
Change in Postural Instability and Gait Dysfunction (UPDRS)
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months (Change from Baseline to 3 months; maintenance to 6 months)
Change in health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-3L)
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months (Change from Baseline to 3 months; maintenance to 6 months)
Change in motivation (Starkstein Apathy Scale, Activity Effort Inventory)
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months (Change from Baseline to 3 months; maintenance to 6 months)
Change in health states (Visual Analogue Health States)
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months (Change from Baseline to 3 months; maintenance to 6 months)
Cognitive performance (Symbol Digit Modality Test)
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Mar 2023.
- Background: PubMed 30856128Mate KKV, Abou-Sharkh A, Morais JA, Mayo NE. Putting the best foot forward: Relationships between indicators of step quality and cadence in three gait vulnerable populations. NeuroRehabilitation. 2019;44(2):295-301. doi: 10.3233/NRE-182595.
- Background: PubMed 31825320Mate KK, Abou-Sharkh A, Morais JA, Mayo NE. Real-Time Auditory Feedback-Induced Adaptation to Walking Among Seniors Using the Heel2Toe Sensor: Proof-of-Concept Study. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019 Dec 11;6(2):e13889. doi: 10.2196/13889.
- Background: PubMed 32650238Carvalho LP, Mate KKV, Cinar E, Abou-Sharkh A, Lafontaine AL, Mayo NE. A new approach toward gait training in patients with Parkinson's Disease. Gait Posture. 2020 Sep;81:14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.06.031. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
- Website for the company that produces Heel2Toe(TM)Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Parkinson
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Longitudinal Natural History Protocol for PRKN- and PINK1-Linked PD
PARKINSON DIS
Not yet recruiting
Non-invasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease
Idiopathic Parkinson Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Bemdaneprocel in Adults Who Have Parkinson's Disease
Parkinsons Disease (PD)
RecruitingPhase 1
PET Imaging of Cyclooxygenases in Neurodegenerative Brain Disease
Parkinson's Disease, Dementia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Nancy Mayo, PhD principal investigator
Research Institute - MUHC
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Heel2Toe in people with Parkinson, run by McGill University at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Mar 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Reliable Change in Six-Minute Walk Test (time frame: Baseline, 3 months (Change from Baseline to 3 months; maintenance to 6 months)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04300348, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Mar 2023.