ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI)FARADMINCT04300582
Fast Radial Pharmaco-invasive Strategy In ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Trial
A study testing Cardiac catheterization standard strategy and Cardiac catheterization fast strategy in people with ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI), run by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital at 1 site in Brazil.
Trial summary
INTRODUCTION: The pharmaco-invasive strategy is a safe alternative to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with ST elevation acute myocardial infarction, who cannot be in the cathlab in less than 120 minutes. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI)
- What is being tested?
- Cardiac catheterization standard strategy and Cardiac catheterization fast strategy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBrazil
- Study dates
- 13 Dec 2019to 31 Aug 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- ST elevation myocardial infarction
- Submitted to thrombolysis
- Interventional Cardiology Department arrival less than 3 hours after the end of thrombolytic
Who cannot join
- Fibrinolytic therapy contraindication: active internal bleeding, clinical signs of acute aortic dissection, traumatic or prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation (> 10 minutes), head trauma in the last four weeks, history of intracranial neoplasia, ischemic stroke in the past year or previous haemorrhagic stroke, pregnancy, sustained severe hypertension (≥180 mmmHg systolic pressure and / or ≥110 mmHg diastolic pressure), trauma or major surgery in the last four weeks, use of oral anticoagulants, history of liver or kidney failure
- No reperfusion criteria when arriving at the Interventional Cardiology Department: no improvement in chest pain or reduction in ST-segment elevation below 50% after thrombolytic administration
- Femoral approach as the first choice for invasive stratification
- Bleeding complications before cardiac catheterization such as important hematoma and stroke
- Acute pulmonary edema: dyspnea of cardiac etiology with increased respiratory effort, hypoxemia and / or desaturation
- Cardiogenic shock: systolic blood pressure below 90 mmHg associated with signs of tissue hypoperfusion, such as oliguria, altered level of consciousness, cyanosis, cold and wet extremities, or vasopressor drug use
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Brazil1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Sancta Maggiore Hospital
São Paulo, 04506000
Carlos Campos, MD, PhD, +5511995006665, carlosacampos1@gmail.com
Rodrigo Esper, MD, PhD, +5511999869306, dresper@hotmail.com
About this study
Official title: Comparison Of The Fast Pharmaco-invasive Strategy With The Standard Pharmaco-invasive Strategy In Patients With ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Stratified By The Forearm Approach: Randomized Clinical Trial
INTRODUCTION: The pharmaco-invasive strategy is a safe alternative to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with ST elevation acute myocardial infarction, who cannot be in the cathlab in less than 120 minutes. However, previous studies of this strategy used the femoral artery as the main vascular access. Current studies show that the use of the radial artery in cases of acute myocardial infarction minimizes the risk of bleeding and mortality. Therefore, in the scenario where vascular access through the forearm vessels is recommended, the best timing to perform cardiac catheterization in the pharmaco-invasive strategy is not known.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the 24-hour hemoglobin drop (acute anemia) between the fast pharmaco-invasive strategy (within 3 hours) and the standard pharmaco-invasive strategy (3 to 24 hours) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) by coronary occlusion treated in Sancta Maggiore hospitals in São Paulo and underwent to cardiac catheterization through the forearm vessels.
METHOD: A prospective, randomized, multicenter study will be conducted in which 120 subjects will be randomly divided for fast and standard cardiac catheterization (1: 1). Stent implantation in the culprit vessel will be performed. The primary objective is to assess whether the fast cardiac catheterization is non-inferior to the standard strategy for a hemoglobin (Hb) drop within 24 hours. Considering in the control group an average drop of Hb 0.6 ± 1g / dl and that a drop greater than 3 g/dL of Hb is related to unfavorable clinical outcome, using a two-tailed alpha of 0.05 and a power of 90% to test the non-inferiority of the fast strategy with respect to standard strategy, each group will require 60 patients, totaling 120 individuals to include. However, if Hb fall in the fast strategy is greater than 3 g/dL and this result does not reproduce in the standard strategy, the study will allow us to show the superiority of the standard approach (between 3 and 24 hours).
Read the detailed description
The FARAD MI will be a randomized, multicenter prospective study will be conducted. Patients with the diagnosis of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction treated at the Sancta Maggiore Emergency Departments who have been thrombolyzed and aged up to 80 years will be included. After thrombolysis, patients will be immediately transferred to the Sancta Maggiore Hospital Itaim Unit and should arrive less than 3 hours after thrombolytic completion. When they arrive at the Interventional Cardiology Department, they will be explained about the study and offered to participate in the trial with consequent signature of the informed consent form. Thereafter, electrocardiogram and blood collection will be performed for laboratory tests, including hemoglobin, and patients will be randomized (1:1) to fast pharmaco-invasive strategy (within 3 hours of thrombolytic completion) and standard pharmaco-invasive strategy (3-24 hours). They will stay in the Interventional Cardiology Department until the procedure is performed and then the in-hospital care will be continued. Twenty-four hours after admission to the Interventional Cardiology Department, a new hemoglobin collection will be performed. Patients who refuse to participate in the trial will not have any harm in the treatment of acute coronary syndrome. Patients will receive standard clinical therapy, including dual antiplatelet therapy. Stent implantation will be performed in the culprit vessel by AMI. The treatment of residual coronary artery disease (coronary lesions with obstruction greater than 70% or with evidence of ischemia) will be discussed with the Clinical Cardiology team during hospitalization.
The following data will be collected: gender, age, ST-segment elevation location on the electrocardiogram (ECG), symptoms duration, time from first evaluation to ECG (door-to-ECG), time from first evaluation until thrombolytic administration (door-to-needle), thrombolytic used, medications administered at the origin unit, time between the end of thrombolytic and the beginning of cardiac catheterization, type of procedure (diagnosis and / or intervention), date and time of procedure, access site, radiation dose, contrast volume, associated comorbidities, laboratory, weight, height, BMI, coronary artery disease pattern (Syntax Score), vessel culprit for AMI, type and size of stent used, successful intervention, coronary flow at the end of the procedure (TIMI), angioplasty technique, residual coronary artery disease approach, bleeding (BARC), major cardiovascular adverse events (MACE), any cause and cardiovascular death. The hemoglobin of the patient's admission to the Interventional Cardiology Department and its variation after 24 hours will be evaluated. If red blood cell transfusion is required, pre-transfusion hemoglobin will be considered for evaluation.
Data from each patient will be registered in the REDCap platform in a electronic case report form (CRF) and will be submitted to statistical analysis using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 24 program. The REDCap has some important characteristics such as role-based authentication and security; real-time data validation and integrity checking; data assignment and audit capability; storage and sharing of protocols; central storage and backup of data and data export in formats compatible with known analysis programs as Excel, SPSS, Statistical Analysis System (SAS), Stata, R software, among others. Data will be audited by an independent team from Prevent Senior's Institute of Education and Research.
Patients who have the following characteristics will not be included in this trial: contraindications to fibrinolytic therapy, such as active internal bleeding, clinical signs of acute aortic dissection, traumatic or prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation (> 10 minutes), head trauma in the last four weeks, history of intracranial neoplasia, ischemic stroke in the past year or previous haemorrhagic stroke, pregnancy, sustained severe hypertension (≥180 mmHg systolic pressure and / or ≥110 mmHg diastolic pressure), trauma or major surgery in the last four weeks, use of oral anticoagulants, history of liver or kidney failure; did not meet reperfusion criteria upon arrival at the Interventional Cardiology Service of the Sancta Maggiore Hospital Itaim Unit (no improvement in chest pain or reduction in ST-segment elevation below 50% after thrombolytic administration); having femoral access as the first choice for invasive stratification; bleeding complications prior to cardiac catheterization, such as important hematoma and stroke; acute pulmonary edema (dyspnea of cardiac etiology with increased respiratory effort, hypoxemia and / or desaturation); cardiogenic shock (systolic blood pressure below 90 mmHg associated with signs of tissue hypoperfusion, such as oliguria, altered level of consciousness, cyanosis, cold and wet extremities, or vasopressor drug use); do not accept to sign the consent form.
Patients will be studied according to the precepts of the Helsinki Declaration and the Nuremberg Code, respecting the Research Norms Involving Human Beings (National Health Council resolution: 466/12) of the National Health Council. The study will be explained to patients when they are admitted to the Interventional Cardiology Department of the Sancta Maggiore Itaim Hospital and will be required to sign the Informed Consent Form (ICF) before any invasive procedure is performed. Randomization will be performed through a specific site after signing the consent form. The project was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Prevent Senior Research Institute.
To perform the sample calculation, the study of Bertrand OF et al (2010) was used to evaluate the variation of hemoglobin (Hb) in 24 hours after coronary angioplasty by radial approach. The control group had a mean hemoglobin drop of 0.6 ± 1g / dL and there were worse outcomes in patients with a hemoglobin drop greater than 3g / dL. (22) Therefore, considering in the control group a mean Hb fall of 0.6 ± 1g / dl and a fall greater than 3 g/dL of Hb is related to an unfavorable clinical outcome, using a two-tailed alpha of 0.05 and a power of 90% to test the non-inferiority of the fast strategy over the standard strategy, each group will require 60 patients, totaling 120 individuals to be included. However, if the Hb drop in the fast strategy is greater than 3 g/dL and this result does not reproduce in the standard strategy, the study will allow us to show the superiority of the strategy between 3 and 24 hours.
An intention-to-treat assessment will be performed. Categorical variables will be presented as absolute numbers and percentages. Continuous variables will be presented as mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile range) according to their distribution. The distribution evaluation of continuous variables will be tested with Shapiro-Wilk. For continuous variables, the Student's t-test (normal distribution) or Wilcoxon-rank (non-normal distribution) will be used according to their distribution. For categorical variables the Chi-square test will be used.
- Being tested
- Cardiac catheterization standard strategy, Cardiac catheterization fast strategy
- Keywords
- stemi, thrombolysis, radial approach, acute coronary syndrome, pharmaco-invasive therapy, percutaneous coronary intervention
- Medical subject headings
- ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction, Acute Coronary Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cardiac catheterization standard strategyProcedure or surgery
Cardiac catheterization by forearm approach 3 to 24 hours after thrombolytic completion in STEMI patients
Cardiac catheterization fast strategyProcedure or surgery
Cardiac catheterization by forearm approach within 3 hours after thrombolytic completion in STEMI patients
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Standard pharmaco-invasive strategy | Active comparator | Cardiac catheterization 3 to 24 hours after thrombolytic completion in STEMI patients. Receives: Procedure: Cardiac catheterization standard strategy |
| Fast pharmaco-invasive strategy | Experimental | Cardiac catheterization less than 3 hours after thrombolytic completion in STEMI patients. Receives: Procedure: Cardiac catheterization fast strategy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Hemoglobin change
Mean Hemoglobin change 24 hours after the cardiac catheterization
Measured: 24 hours after cardiac catheterization
Secondary outcomes (18)
Number of participants with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention failure
Patients with Final coronary minimum luminal diameter greater than 30% and / or final coronary flow TIMI 0 or 1 after percutaneous coronary intervention
Measured: Immediately after percutaneous coronary intervention
Number of participants with net adverse clinical events (NACE)
Composite of death from all cause, and major bleeding (BARC 3 or 5) during hospitalization
Measured: Until hospital discharge, an average of 4 days
Number of participants with hemoglobin change over 3 g/dL
Number of participants with hemoglobin change over 3 g/dL
Measured: 24 hours after cardiac catheterization
Target vessel quantitative flow ratio (QFR) before the percutaneous coronary intervention
Target vessel quantitative flow ratio (QFR) before the percutaneous coronary intervention. This software measures the coronary flow after the procedure.
Measured: Immediately before the percutaneous coronary
Target vessel quantitative flow ratio (QFR) after the percutaneous coronary intervention
Target vessel quantitative flow ratio (QFR) after the percutaneous coronary intervention. This software measures the coronary flow after the procedure.
Measured: Immediately after percutaneous coronary intervention
Number of participants with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke
Patients with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke during hospitalization: loss of neurological function caused by an ischemic or hemorrhagic event with residual symptoms lasting at least 24 hours after onset or leading to death
Measured: Until hospital discharge, an average of 4 days
All-cause death
All cause death during hospitalization
Measured: Until hospital discharge, an average of 4 days
Number of participants with moderate bleeding: BARC 3a
Patients with overt bleeding plus hemoglobin drop of 3 to < 5 g/dL (provided hemoglobin drop is related to bleed); transfusion with overt bleeding
Measured: Until hospital discharge, an average of 4 days
Number of participants with moderate bleeding: BARC 3b
Patients with overt bleeding plus hemoglobin drop > 5 g/dL (provided hemoglobin drop is related to bleed); cardiac tamponade; bleeding requiring surgical intervention for control; bleeding requiring IV vasoactive agents
Measured: Until hospital discharge, an average of 4 days
Number of participants with moderate bleeding: BARC 3c
Patients with intracranial hemorrhage confirmed by autopsy, imaging, or lumbar puncture; intraocular bleed compromising vision
Measured: Until hospital discharge, an average of 4 days
Number of participants with severe bleeding: BARC 5a
Patients probable fatal bleeding
Measured: Until hospital discharge, an average of 4 days
Number of participants with severe bleeding: BARC 5b
Definite fatal bleeding (overt or autopsy or imaging confirmation)
Measured: Until hospital discharge, an average of 4 days
Number of participants with reinfarction
New myocardial infarction during hospitalization: following the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) criteria
Measured: Until hospital discharge, an average of 4 days
Number of participants with recurrent angina
Recurrent angina during hospitalization: new angina after 6 hours of pci until discharge
Measured: Until hospital discharge, an average of 4 days
Number of participants with heart failure
Number of participants with new or worsening heart failure during hospitalization: unusual dyspnea on light exertion, recurrent dyspnea occurring in the supine position, fluid retention; or the description of rales, jugular venous distension, pulmonary edema on physical exam, or pulmonary edema on chest x-ray
Measured: Until hospital discharge, an average of 4 days
Number of participants with cardiogenic shock
Number of participants with cardiogenic shock during hospitalization: episode of systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg, and/or cardiac index <2.2 L/min/m2 determined to be secondary to cardiac dysfunction for at least 30 minutes, and/or the requirement for parenteral inotropic or vasopressor agents or mechanical support (e.g., Intra aortic balloon pump (IABP), extracorporeal circulation, ventricular assist devices) to maintain blood pressure and cardiac index above those specified levels.
Measured: Until hospital discharge, an average of 4 days
Number of participants with readmission
Number of participants with readmission after 30 days of index event
Measured: 30 days
Number of participants with new revascularization of the target vessel
Number of participants with new revascularization of the target vessel during hospitalization
Measured: Until hospital discharge, an average of 4 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Mar 2020
- Study start13 Dec 2019
- Primary completion31 Jul 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Aug 2021 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Sao Paulo General HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Comparison of the fast pharmaco-invasive strategy with the standard pharmaco-invasive strategy in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction stratified by the forearm approach
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Bruno Faillace, MD, Principal investigator, University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04300582
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 001
- Acronym
- FARADMI
- Status last verified
- Dec 2019
- First submitted
- 6 Jan 2020
- Last updated
- 31 Mar 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Mar 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison Of The Fast Pharmaco-invasive Strategy With The Standard Pharmaco-invasive Strategy In Patients With ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Stratified By The Forearm Approach: Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04300582
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FARADMI / 001
- Keywords
- stemi, thrombolysis, radial approach, acute coronary syndrome, pharmaco-invasive therapy, percutaneous coronary intervention
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Sao Paulo General HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 13 Dec 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jul 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Aug 2021 (estimated)
- First posted
- 9 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
INTRODUCTION: The pharmaco-invasive strategy is a safe alternative to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with ST elevation acute myocardial infarction, who cannot be in the cathlab in less than 120 minutes. However, previous studies of this strategy used the femoral artery as the main vascular access. Current studies show that the use of the radial artery in cases of acute myocardial infarction minimizes the risk of bleeding and mortality. Therefore, in the scenario where vascular access through the forearm vessels is recommended, the best timing to perform cardiac catheterization in the pharmaco-invasive strategy is not known.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the 24-hour hemoglobin drop (acute anemia) between the fast pharmaco-invasive strategy (within 3 hours) and the standard pharmaco-invasive strategy (3 to 24 hours) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) by coronary occlusion treated in Sancta Maggiore hospitals in São Paulo and underwent to cardiac catheterization through the forearm vessels.
METHOD: A prospective, randomized, multicenter study will be conducted in which 120 subjects will be randomly divided for fast and standard cardiac catheterization (1: 1). Stent implantation in the culprit vessel will be performed. The primary objective is to assess whether the fast cardiac catheterization is non-inferior to the standard strategy for a hemoglobin (Hb) drop within 24 hours. Considering in the control group an average drop of Hb 0.6 ± 1g / dl and that a drop greater than 3 g/dL of Hb is related to unfavorable clinical outcome, using a two-tailed alpha of 0.05 and a power of 90% to test the non-inferiority of the fast strategy with respect to standard strategy, each group will require 60 patients, totaling 120 individuals to include. However, if Hb fall in the fast strategy is greater than 3 g/dL and this result does not reproduce in the standard strategy, the study will allow us to show the superiority of the standard approach (between 3 and 24 hours).
Detailed description
The FARAD MI will be a randomized, multicenter prospective study will be conducted. Patients with the diagnosis of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction treated at the Sancta Maggiore Emergency Departments who have been thrombolyzed and aged up to 80 years will be included. After thrombolysis, patients will be immediately transferred to the Sancta Maggiore Hospital Itaim Unit and should arrive less than 3 hours after thrombolytic completion. When they arrive at the Interventional Cardiology Department, they will be explained about the study and offered to participate in the trial with consequent signature of the informed consent form. Thereafter, electrocardiogram and blood collection will be performed for laboratory tests, including hemoglobin, and patients will be randomized (1:1) to fast pharmaco-invasive strategy (within 3 hours of thrombolytic completion) and standard pharmaco-invasive strategy (3-24 hours). They will stay in the Interventional Cardiology Department until the procedure is performed and then the in-hospital care will be continued. Twenty-four hours after admission to the Interventional Cardiology Department, a new hemoglobin collection will be performed. Patients who refuse to participate in the trial will not have any harm in the treatment of acute coronary syndrome. Patients will receive standard clinical therapy, including dual antiplatelet therapy. Stent implantation will be performed in the culprit vessel by AMI. The treatment of residual coronary artery disease (coronary lesions with obstruction greater than 70% or with evidence of ischemia) will be discussed with the Clinical Cardiology team during hospitalization.
The following data will be collected: gender, age, ST-segment elevation location on the electrocardiogram (ECG), symptoms duration, time from first evaluation to ECG (door-to-ECG), time from first evaluation until thrombolytic administration (door-to-needle), thrombolytic used, medications administered at the origin unit, time between the end of thrombolytic and the beginning of cardiac catheterization, type of procedure (diagnosis and / or intervention), date and time of procedure, access site, radiation dose, contrast volume, associated comorbidities, laboratory, weight, height, BMI, coronary artery disease pattern (Syntax Score), vessel culprit for AMI, type and size of stent used, successful intervention, coronary flow at the end of the procedure (TIMI), angioplasty technique, residual coronary artery disease approach, bleeding (BARC), major cardiovascular adverse events (MACE), any cause and cardiovascular death. The hemoglobin of the patient's admission to the Interventional Cardiology Department and its variation after 24 hours will be evaluated. If red blood cell transfusion is required, pre-transfusion hemoglobin will be considered for evaluation.
Data from each patient will be registered in the REDCap platform in a electronic case report form (CRF) and will be submitted to statistical analysis using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 24 program. The REDCap has some important characteristics such as role-based authentication and security; real-time data validation and integrity checking; data assignment and audit capability; storage and sharing of protocols; central storage and backup of data and data export in formats compatible with known analysis programs as Excel, SPSS, Statistical Analysis System (SAS), Stata, R software, among others. Data will be audited by an independent team from Prevent Senior's Institute of Education and Research.
Patients who have the following characteristics will not be included in this trial: contraindications to fibrinolytic therapy, such as active internal bleeding, clinical signs of acute aortic dissection, traumatic or prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation (> 10 minutes), head trauma in the last four weeks, history of intracranial neoplasia, ischemic stroke in the past year or previous haemorrhagic stroke, pregnancy, sustained severe hypertension (≥180 mmHg systolic pressure and / or ≥110 mmHg diastolic pressure), trauma or major surgery in the last four weeks, use of oral anticoagulants, history of liver or kidney failure; did not meet reperfusion criteria upon arrival at the Interventional Cardiology Service of the Sancta Maggiore Hospital Itaim Unit (no improvement in chest pain or reduction in ST-segment elevation below 50% after thrombolytic administration); having femoral access as the first choice for invasive stratification; bleeding complications prior to cardiac catheterization, such as important hematoma and stroke; acute pulmonary edema (dyspnea of cardiac etiology with increased respiratory effort, hypoxemia and / or desaturation); cardiogenic shock (systolic blood pressure below 90 mmHg associated with signs of tissue hypoperfusion, such as oliguria, altered level of consciousness, cyanosis, cold and wet extremities, or vasopressor drug use); do not accept to sign the consent form.
Patients will be studied according to the precepts of the Helsinki Declaration and the Nuremberg Code, respecting the Research Norms Involving Human Beings (National Health Council resolution: 466/12) of the National Health Council. The study will be explained to patients when they are admitted to the Interventional Cardiology Department of the Sancta Maggiore Itaim Hospital and will be required to sign the Informed Consent Form (ICF) before any invasive procedure is performed. Randomization will be performed through a specific site after signing the consent form. The project was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Prevent Senior Research Institute.
To perform the sample calculation, the study of Bertrand OF et al (2010) was used to evaluate the variation of hemoglobin (Hb) in 24 hours after coronary angioplasty by radial approach. The control group had a mean hemoglobin drop of 0.6 ± 1g / dL and there were worse outcomes in patients with a hemoglobin drop greater than 3g / dL. (22) Therefore, considering in the control group a mean Hb fall of 0.6 ± 1g / dl and a fall greater than 3 g/dL of Hb is related to an unfavorable clinical outcome, using a two-tailed alpha of 0.05 and a power of 90% to test the non-inferiority of the fast strategy over the standard strategy, each group will require 60 patients, totaling 120 individuals to be included. However, if the Hb drop in the fast strategy is greater than 3 g/dL and this result does not reproduce in the standard strategy, the study will allow us to show the superiority of the strategy between 3 and 24 hours.
An intention-to-treat assessment will be performed. Categorical variables will be presented as absolute numbers and percentages. Continuous variables will be presented as mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile range) according to their distribution. The distribution evaluation of continuous variables will be tested with Shapiro-Wilk. For continuous variables, the Student's t-test (normal distribution) or Wilcoxon-rank (non-normal distribution) will be used according to their distribution. For categorical variables the Chi-square test will be used.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Comparison of the fast pharmaco-invasive strategy with the standard pharmaco-invasive strategy in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction stratified by the forearm approach
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Standard pharmaco-invasive strategy | Active comparator | Procedure: Cardiac catheterization standard strategyCardiac catheterization 3 to 24 hours after thrombolytic completion in STEMI patients. |
| Fast pharmaco-invasive strategy | Experimental | Procedure: Cardiac catheterization fast strategyCardiac catheterization less than 3 hours after thrombolytic completion in STEMI patients. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- ST elevation myocardial infarction
- Submitted to thrombolysis
- Interventional Cardiology Department arrival less than 3 hours after the end of thrombolytic
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Fibrinolytic therapy contraindication: active internal bleeding, clinical signs of acute aortic dissection, traumatic or prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation (> 10 minutes), head trauma in the last four weeks, history of intracranial neoplasia, ischemic stroke in the past year or previous haemorrhagic stroke, pregnancy, sustained severe hypertension (≥180 mmmHg systolic pressure and / or ≥110 mmHg diastolic pressure), trauma or major surgery in the last four weeks, use of oral anticoagulants, history of liver or kidney failure
- No reperfusion criteria when arriving at the Interventional Cardiology Department: no improvement in chest pain or reduction in ST-segment elevation below 50% after thrombolytic administration
- Femoral approach as the first choice for invasive stratification
- Bleeding complications before cardiac catheterization such as important hematoma and stroke
- Acute pulmonary edema: dyspnea of cardiac etiology with increased respiratory effort, hypoxemia and / or desaturation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cardiac catheterization standard strategyCardiac catheterization by forearm approach 3 to 24 hours after thrombolytic completion in STEMI patients | Procedure or surgery | Standard pharmaco-invasive strategy |
| Cardiac catheterization fast strategyCardiac catheterization by forearm approach within 3 hours after thrombolytic completion in STEMI patients | Procedure or surgery | Fast pharmaco-invasive strategy |
Primary outcome
Hemoglobin change
Time frame: 24 hours after cardiac catheterization
Mean Hemoglobin change 24 hours after the cardiac catheterization
18 secondary outcomes
Number of participants with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention failure
Time frame: Immediately after percutaneous coronary intervention
Number of participants with net adverse clinical events (NACE)
Time frame: Until hospital discharge, an average of 4 days
Number of participants with hemoglobin change over 3 g/dL
Time frame: 24 hours after cardiac catheterization
Target vessel quantitative flow ratio (QFR) before the percutaneous coronary intervention
Time frame: Immediately before the percutaneous coronary
Target vessel quantitative flow ratio (QFR) after the percutaneous coronary intervention
Time frame: Immediately after percutaneous coronary intervention
Number of participants with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke
Time frame: Until hospital discharge, an average of 4 days
All-cause death
Time frame: Until hospital discharge, an average of 4 days
Number of participants with moderate bleeding: BARC 3a
Time frame: Until hospital discharge, an average of 4 days
Number of participants with moderate bleeding: BARC 3b
Time frame: Until hospital discharge, an average of 4 days
Number of participants with moderate bleeding: BARC 3c
Time frame: Until hospital discharge, an average of 4 days
Number of participants with severe bleeding: BARC 5a
Time frame: Until hospital discharge, an average of 4 days
Number of participants with severe bleeding: BARC 5b
Time frame: Until hospital discharge, an average of 4 days
Number of participants with reinfarction
Time frame: Until hospital discharge, an average of 4 days
Number of participants with recurrent angina
Time frame: Until hospital discharge, an average of 4 days
Number of participants with heart failure
Time frame: Until hospital discharge, an average of 4 days
Number of participants with cardiogenic shock
Time frame: Until hospital discharge, an average of 4 days
Number of participants with readmission
Time frame: 30 days
Number of participants with new revascularization of the target vessel
Time frame: Until hospital discharge, an average of 4 days
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Mar 2020.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI)
RecruitingPhase 4
Early Single Antiplatelet Therapy After IVUS-Guided PCI in Acute Coronary Syndrome
Acute Coronary Syndromes, STEMI
RecruitingPhase 2
Prevention of Reperfusion Injury Outcomes Through Effective Cardioprotection Targeting Myocardial Infarction
Myocardial Infarction, Reperfusion Injury
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Incremental Prognostic Utility of CBC-derived Inflammatory Indices After Incomplete Coronary Revascularization: Association With 12-months Cardiovascular Outcomes
STEMI, High Risk NSTEMI
RecruitingObservational study
SuperSaturated Oxygen Comprehensive Observational Registry
STEMI - ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction, AMI
RecruitingPhase 4
Efficacy and Safety of a Half-dose Bolus of r-SAK Prior to Primary PCI in ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction
ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bruno Faillace, MD principal investigator
University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Cardiac catheterization standard strategy and Cardiac catheterization fast strategy in people with ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI), run by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital at 1 site in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Mar 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Carlos Campos, MD, PhD (+5511995006665, carlosacampos1@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Hemoglobin change (time frame: 24 hours after cardiac catheterization). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Mar 2020.