Head and Neck CancerNCT04308525
Optimising Microsurgical Reconstruction After Advanced Head and Neck Cancers
An observational study of Head and Neck Cancer, run by Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
This study aims to improve the peri- and postoperative care regimen for patients undergoing microvascular reconstruction after head and neck cancer by introducing an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programme. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Head and Neck Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Early ambulation, Early oral feeding and Multimodal opioid-sparing analgesia
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Surgery or procedure, Lifestyle or therapy programme
- How many people
- 25 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2019to 31 Mar 2021
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: All patients undergoing surgery and microvascular reconstruction for head and neck cancers. Procedures may be "primary" or for recurrent disease. Patients often suffer from several comorbidities. Most patients have a history of tobacco use. Prognosis is poor and five-year rate of survival is 35-37%.
Who may be able to join
- Patients eligible for ablative surgery for head and neck cancer with primary microvascular reconstruction.
Who cannot join
- Patients with conditions leading to increased risk of thromboembolic events
- Patients pre-operatively admitted to the ICU
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Denmark1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen, København Ø, 2100
Jens H Hojvig, Md, +45 27267199, jens.hjermind.hoejvig@regionh.dk
Christian T Bonde, MD, PhD, +45 35458701, bonde@rh.dk
About this study
Official title: Optimising Microsurgical Reconstruction After Advanced Head and Neck Cancers - Enhanced Recovery and Improved Clinical Pathway
This study aims to improve the peri- and postoperative care regimen for patients undergoing microvascular reconstruction after head and neck cancer by introducing an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programme.
Read the detailed description
Advanced stage head and neck cancers have a poor prognosis and a 5-year survival rate of as low as 35-37%. The treatment is complex and often requires a multidisciplinary approach including surgery. The goal besides removal of the cancer is to restore function and appearance. If possible, both resection as well as immediate reconstruction will be performed during the same surgical procedure. Due to the large bone- and soft tissue loss following the ablative procedure, local solutions are often inadequate for reconstruction. In addition, many patients require post-operative radiotherapy, which may result in tightness of scar tissue and impaired function. In these cases it is necessary to perform the reconstruction using a free flap.
Free flap reconstruction involves tissue taken from other parts of the body, that is transplanted along with the associated blood vessels to the reconstruction site. The vessels of the flap are usually anastomosed to the vessels of the neck (microvascular reconstruction) and the transplanted tissue thereby obtains a blood supply at its new location. Head and neck cancer patients are usually reconstructed using the free fibular flap, the latissimus dorsi flap, the radial forearm flap or the anterolateral thigh flap.
The combination of complicated surgery and often malnourished patients with a low body mass index (BMI), that typically suffer from tobacco and alcohol abuse, commonly lead to postoperative ICU treatment and complications. The most common are infections, re-operations, delayed wound healing and refeeding syndrome, which is reported in up to 35% of patients undergoing major surgery for head and neck cancer.
Even with successful reconstruction, many patients suffer from drooling, lack of adequate clenching, permanent gastric tube feeding, insufficient wound healing and a high recurrence rate. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a peri- and postoperative care concept designed to accelerate recovery and improve convalescence. It has previously been established as superior to conventional care for a wide variety of procedures. As one of the first departments in the world our department has successfully implemented an ERAS program for microsurgical patients that undergo breast reconstruction using autologous tissue. By utilizing our experience with ERAS and combining it with a review of our own patient data we have developed an ERAS protocol for microvascular reconstruction after ablative surgery for head and neck cancer.
- Conditions
- Head and Neck Cancer
- Being tested
- Early ambulation, Early oral feeding, Multimodal opioid-sparing analgesia, Goal-directed fluid therapy, CAD/CAM system for reconstructive plates
- Keywords
- free flap, microsurgery, microvascular reconstruction, Enhanced recovery after surgery, ERAS
- Medical subject headings
- Head and Neck Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Early ambulationBehavioural
Early ambulation will help prevent postoperative infections, especially pneumonia and urinary tract infections. Additionally it will prevent constipation by promotion of bowel-movement and function and prevent thromboembolic complications. Patients undergoing surgery with a free fibula flap are currently unable to ambulate for 6 to 7 days while a split-thickness skin-graft is healing. We will apply a pressure dressing to the wound which makes ambulation possible immediately after surgery (or after return from the ICU). Likewise, all other patient groups will be encouraged to fully ambulate on POD (post-operative day) 1 or POD 2.
Early oral feedingBehavioural
Also called Focus on nutritional status
To monitor the patients' nutritional status, blood samples will be taken to identify risk of refeeding syndrome and patients will be evaluated according to the current guidelines from the ENT (ear-, nose-, throat-) department. We wil use the ESPEN guidelines for nutritional risk screening (NRS-2002), which have been validated for head and neck cancer patients to perform a risk assessment for malnutrition. A consultation with a clinical dietician will be arranged in order to calculate the required daily nutritional intake. Patients in risk of refeeding syndrome will be closely monitored in the outpatient clinic during the time from the MDT(Multi Disciplinary Team) conference to the day of surgery. Patients in need of additional nutritional support will be provided with supplementary energy/protein drinks. Some patients may need closer monitoring, guidance regarding extra meals and to have a nasogastric tube placed to get used to the tube and optimize pre-operative nutritional status.
Multimodal opioid-sparing analgesiaOther
On-label use of already approved drugs including perioperative dexamethasone, administered with the aim of reducing opioid intake.
Pre-operatively the patients are given 400 mg of Celebra. During surgery 24 mg of dexamethasone is administered. The post-operative regimen consists of 12 mg of Dexamethasone 48 and 96 hours post-operatively, 200 mg of Celebra morning and evening (maximum 14 days) and 1g of paracetamol times four times daily. Morphine will only be administered when assessed necessary with a dose of 10 mg p.n. maximum six times a day.
Goal-directed fluid therapyProcedure or surgery
Focus on avoidance of over-hydration. Aim for fluid-load after surgery: max: +1000-1500 ml
CAD/CAM system for reconstructive platesProcedure or surgery
Also called Minimally invasive surgery
Computer-assisted design and modelling (CAD/CAM) are a system for pre-operative planning and construction of reconstructive plates used for mandibular reconstruction. This will help reduce the operating-time, as the maxillofacial surgeon will bring a pre-bent reconstructive plate to the procedure instead of manually forming it during surgery. Already implemented for several procedures in the department.
Functional discharge criteriaOther
Introduction of a number of functional discharge criteria to avoid prolonged postoperative hospitalisation
Standard/historical postoperative regimenOther
Non-formalised historical peri- and postoperative regimen.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ERAS Group | Prospectively included patients after introduction of an ERAS programme Receives: Behavioral: Early ambulation; Behavioral: Early oral feeding; Other: Multimodal opioid-sparing analgesia; Procedure: Goal-directed fluid therapy; Procedure: CAD/CAM system for reconstructive plates; Other: Functional discharge criteria | |
| Control group | We retrospectively evaluated our procedures for the period 2014-2016 Receives: Other: Standard/historical postoperative regimen |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Length of stay (LOS)
Time from surgery to discharge
Measured: 1 to 4 weeks
Secondary outcomes (5)
ICU LOS
Time spent in the ICU (intensive care unit) post-operatively
Measured: 1-2 days
Time to ambulation
Days from surgery until full ambulation (walking)
Measured: 1-7 days
Incidence of infections
Number of postoperative infections
Measured: 30 days
Incidence of re-operations
Number of return-to-theatre events
Measured: 30 days
Complication-rate
Number of surgical related complications
Measured: 30 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Mar 2020
- Study start1 Jun 2019
- Primary completion31 Jan 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Mar 2021 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Head and Neck CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Copenhagen University Hospital, RigshospitaletThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 25 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jens Hjermind Højvig, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
- Investigators
- Jens H Hojvig, Md, Principal investigator, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04308525
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ERAS Free FLAP for H&N Cancer
- Status last verified
- Mar 2020
- First submitted
- 11 Mar 2020
- Last updated
- 24 Mar 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Hanasono MM, Friel MT, Klem C, Hsu PW, Robb GL, Weber RS, Roberts DB, Chang DW. Impact of reconstructive microsurgery in patients with advanced oral cavity cancers. Head Neck. 2009 Oct;31(10):1289-96. doi: 10.1002/hed.21100.
PubMed 19373778Montero PH, Patel SG. Cancer of the oral cavity. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2015 Jul;24(3):491-508. doi: 10.1016/j.soc.2015.03.006. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
PubMed 25979396Bak M, Jacobson AS, Buchbinder D, Urken ML. Contemporary reconstruction of the mandible. Oral Oncol. 2010 Feb;46(2):71-6. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2009.11.006. Epub 2009 Dec 29.
PubMed 20036611Wei FC, Chen HC, Chuang CC, Noordhoff MS. Fibular osteoseptocutaneous flap: anatomic study and clinical application. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986 Aug;78(2):191-200. doi: 10.1097/00006534-198608000-00008.
PubMed 3523559Omura K. Current status of oral cancer treatment strategies: surgical treatments for oral squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Clin Oncol. 2014;19(3):423-30. doi: 10.1007/s10147-014-0689-z. Epub 2014 Apr 1.
PubMed 24682763Rasmussen SO, Kristensen MB, Wessel I, Andersen JR. Incidence and Risk Factors of Refeeding Syndrome in Head and Neck Cancer Patients-An Observational Study. Nutr Cancer. 2016 Nov-Dec;68(8):1320-1329. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2016.1225103. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
PubMed 27682582Kehlet H. Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth. 1997 May;78(5):606-17. doi: 10.1093/bja/78.5.606.
PubMed 9175983Bonde CT, Khorasani H, Elberg J, Kehlet H. Perioperative Optimization of Autologous Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Feb;137(2):411-414. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000475749.40838.85.
PubMed 26818274
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Mar 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Optimising Microsurgical Reconstruction After Advanced Head and Neck Cancers - Enhanced Recovery and Improved Clinical Pathway
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04308525
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ERAS Free FLAP for H&N Cancer
- Conditions
- Head and Neck Cancer
- Keywords
- free flap, microsurgery, microvascular reconstruction, Enhanced recovery after surgery, ERAS
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 25 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Copenhagen University Hospital, RigshospitaletUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jan 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Mar 2021 (estimated)
- First posted
- 16 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to improve the peri- and postoperative care regimen for patients undergoing microvascular reconstruction after head and neck cancer by introducing an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programme.
Detailed description
Advanced stage head and neck cancers have a poor prognosis and a 5-year survival rate of as low as 35-37%. The treatment is complex and often requires a multidisciplinary approach including surgery. The goal besides removal of the cancer is to restore function and appearance. If possible, both resection as well as immediate reconstruction will be performed during the same surgical procedure. Due to the large bone- and soft tissue loss following the ablative procedure, local solutions are often inadequate for reconstruction. In addition, many patients require post-operative radiotherapy, which may result in tightness of scar tissue and impaired function. In these cases it is necessary to perform the reconstruction using a free flap.
Free flap reconstruction involves tissue taken from other parts of the body, that is transplanted along with the associated blood vessels to the reconstruction site. The vessels of the flap are usually anastomosed to the vessels of the neck (microvascular reconstruction) and the transplanted tissue thereby obtains a blood supply at its new location. Head and neck cancer patients are usually reconstructed using the free fibular flap, the latissimus dorsi flap, the radial forearm flap or the anterolateral thigh flap.
The combination of complicated surgery and often malnourished patients with a low body mass index (BMI), that typically suffer from tobacco and alcohol abuse, commonly lead to postoperative ICU treatment and complications. The most common are infections, re-operations, delayed wound healing and refeeding syndrome, which is reported in up to 35% of patients undergoing major surgery for head and neck cancer.
Even with successful reconstruction, many patients suffer from drooling, lack of adequate clenching, permanent gastric tube feeding, insufficient wound healing and a high recurrence rate. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a peri- and postoperative care concept designed to accelerate recovery and improve convalescence. It has previously been established as superior to conventional care for a wide variety of procedures. As one of the first departments in the world our department has successfully implemented an ERAS program for microsurgical patients that undergo breast reconstruction using autologous tissue. By utilizing our experience with ERAS and combining it with a review of our own patient data we have developed an ERAS protocol for microvascular reconstruction after ablative surgery for head and neck cancer.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ERAS Group | – | Behavioral: Early ambulation, Behavioral: Early oral feeding, Other: Multimodal opioid-sparing analgesia, Procedure: Goal-directed fluid therapy, Procedure: CAD/CAM system for reconstructive plates, Other: Functional discharge criteriaProspectively included patients after introduction of an ERAS programme |
| Control group | – | Other: Standard/historical postoperative regimenWe retrospectively evaluated our procedures for the period 2014-2016 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- All patients undergoing surgery and microvascular reconstruction for head and neck cancers. Procedures may be "primary" or for recurrent disease. Patients often suffer from several comorbidities. Most patients have a history of tobacco use. Prognosis is poor and five-year rate of survival is 35-37%.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients eligible for ablative surgery for head and neck cancer with primary microvascular reconstruction.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients with conditions leading to increased risk of thromboembolic events
- Patients pre-operatively admitted to the ICU
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Early ambulationEarly ambulation will help prevent postoperative infections, especially pneumonia and urinary tract infections. Additionally it will prevent constipation by promotion of bowel-movement and function and prevent thromboembolic complications. Patients undergoing surgery with a free fibula flap are currently unable to ambulate for 6 to 7 days while a split-thickness skin-graft is healing. We will apply a pressure dressing to the wound which makes ambulation possible immediately after surgery (or after return from the ICU). Likewise, all other patient groups will be encouraged to fully ambulate on POD (post-operative day) 1 or POD 2. | Behavioural | ERAS Group |
| Early oral feedingAlso: Focus on nutritional statusTo monitor the patients' nutritional status, blood samples will be taken to identify risk of refeeding syndrome and patients will be evaluated according to the current guidelines from the ENT (ear-, nose-, throat-) department. We wil use the ESPEN guidelines for nutritional risk screening (NRS-2002), which have been validated for head and neck cancer patients to perform a risk assessment for malnutrition. A consultation with a clinical dietician will be arranged in order to calculate the required daily nutritional intake. Patients in risk of refeeding syndrome will be closely monitored in the outpatient clinic during the time from the MDT(Multi Disciplinary Team) conference to the day of surgery. Patients in need of additional nutritional support will be provided with supplementary energy/protein drinks. Some patients may need closer monitoring, guidance regarding extra meals and to have a nasogastric tube placed to get used to the tube and optimize pre-operative nutritional status. | Behavioural | ERAS Group |
| Multimodal opioid-sparing analgesiaOn-label use of already approved drugs including perioperative dexamethasone, administered with the aim of reducing opioid intake. Pre-operatively the patients are given 400 mg of Celebra. During surgery 24 mg of dexamethasone is administered. The post-operative regimen consists of 12 mg of Dexamethasone 48 and 96 hours post-operatively, 200 mg of Celebra morning and evening (maximum 14 days) and 1g of paracetamol times four times daily. Morphine will only be administered when assessed necessary with a dose of 10 mg p.n. maximum six times a day. | Other | ERAS Group |
| Goal-directed fluid therapyFocus on avoidance of over-hydration. Aim for fluid-load after surgery: max: +1000-1500 ml | Procedure or surgery | ERAS Group |
| CAD/CAM system for reconstructive platesAlso: Minimally invasive surgeryComputer-assisted design and modelling (CAD/CAM) are a system for pre-operative planning and construction of reconstructive plates used for mandibular reconstruction. This will help reduce the operating-time, as the maxillofacial surgeon will bring a pre-bent reconstructive plate to the procedure instead of manually forming it during surgery. Already implemented for several procedures in the department. | Procedure or surgery | ERAS Group |
| Functional discharge criteriaIntroduction of a number of functional discharge criteria to avoid prolonged postoperative hospitalisation | Other | ERAS Group |
| Standard/historical postoperative regimenNon-formalised historical peri- and postoperative regimen. | Other | Control group |
Primary outcome
Length of stay (LOS)
Time frame: 1 to 4 weeks
Time from surgery to discharge
5 secondary outcomes
ICU LOS
Time frame: 1-2 days
Time to ambulation
Time frame: 1-7 days
Incidence of infections
Time frame: 30 days
Incidence of re-operations
Time frame: 30 days
Complication-rate
Time frame: 30 days
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Mar 2020.
- Background: PubMed 19373778Hanasono MM, Friel MT, Klem C, Hsu PW, Robb GL, Weber RS, Roberts DB, Chang DW. Impact of reconstructive microsurgery in patients with advanced oral cavity cancers. Head Neck. 2009 Oct;31(10):1289-96. doi: 10.1002/hed.21100.
- Background: PubMed 25979396Montero PH, Patel SG. Cancer of the oral cavity. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2015 Jul;24(3):491-508. doi: 10.1016/j.soc.2015.03.006. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
- Background: PubMed 20036611Bak M, Jacobson AS, Buchbinder D, Urken ML. Contemporary reconstruction of the mandible. Oral Oncol. 2010 Feb;46(2):71-6. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2009.11.006. Epub 2009 Dec 29.
- Background: PubMed 3523559Wei FC, Chen HC, Chuang CC, Noordhoff MS. Fibular osteoseptocutaneous flap: anatomic study and clinical application. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986 Aug;78(2):191-200. doi: 10.1097/00006534-198608000-00008.
- Background: PubMed 24682763Omura K. Current status of oral cancer treatment strategies: surgical treatments for oral squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Clin Oncol. 2014;19(3):423-30. doi: 10.1007/s10147-014-0689-z. Epub 2014 Apr 1.
- Background: PubMed 27682582Rasmussen SO, Kristensen MB, Wessel I, Andersen JR. Incidence and Risk Factors of Refeeding Syndrome in Head and Neck Cancer Patients-An Observational Study. Nutr Cancer. 2016 Nov-Dec;68(8):1320-1329. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2016.1225103. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
- Background: PubMed 9175983Kehlet H. Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth. 1997 May;78(5):606-17. doi: 10.1093/bja/78.5.606.
- Background: PubMed 26818274Bonde CT, Khorasani H, Elberg J, Kehlet H. Perioperative Optimization of Autologous Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Feb;137(2):411-414. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000475749.40838.85.
Related trials for Head and Neck Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
177Lu-DOTA-EB-TATE in Adult Patients With Metastatic, Radioactive Iodine Non-Responsive Oncocytic (Hurthle-Cell) Thyroid Cancer
Thyroid Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Beta-only IL-2 ImmunoTherapY Study
Advanced Solid Tumor, Unresectable Solid Tumor
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Docetaxel and SX-682 in Recurrent/Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Salivary Gland Carcinoma, and Advanced Prostate Cancer
Head and Neck Cancer, Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of MGC030 in Participants With Advanced Solid Tumors
Urothelial Cancer, GastroEsophageal Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Serum Treg/Th17-Related Cytokines and Systemic Inflammatory Indices in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer
Differentiated Thyroid Cancer (DTC), Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jens H Hojvig, Md principal investigator
Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Head and Neck Cancer, run by Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Mar 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Jens H Hojvig, MD (+45 27267199, jens.hjermind.hoejvig@regionh.dk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Length of stay (LOS) (time frame: 1 to 4 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04308525, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Mar 2020.