Best Regional Nerve Block for Creation of Surgical Brachiobasilic FistulaPhase 3NCT04311255
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Ultrasound Guided Supraclavicular Block Combined With Either Intercostobrachialor Pec 11for Creation of Surgical Brachio-basilic Fistula in Chronic Renal Failure Patients on Hemodialysis
A Phase 3 study testing regional anesthesia for the upper limb in people with Best Regional Nerve Block for Creation of Surgical Brachiobasilic Fistula, run by Ain Shams University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
In our study we are trying to reach to the more efficient us guided peripheral nerve block either intercosto-brachial or PPEC 11 that can be combined with us guided supraclavicular block to effectively anesthetise the surgical site for creation of brachio-basilic fistula as regarding onset of surgical anesthesia… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Best Regional Nerve Block for Creation of Surgical Brachiobasilic Fistula
- What is being tested?
- regional anesthesia for the upper limb
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 4 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 13 Apr 2019to 3 May 2020
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- American Society of Anesthesiologists Grade III, age 25-75 years who are scheduled for brachio-basilic AVF.
Who cannot join
- Patients will be excluded if they have infection at the injection site, allergy to local anesthetics, chronic use of opioids, a history of neurological neuromuscular, or severe hepatic or cardiopulmonary disease, a contraindication to regional anesthesia or patient /guardian refusal.
- -
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Ultrasound Guided Supraclavicular Block Combined With Either Intercosto-brachial Nerve Block or pec11block for Creation of Surgical Brachio-basilic Fistula in Chronic Renal Failure Patients on Hemodialysis
In our study we are trying to reach to the more efficient us guided peripheral nerve block either intercosto-brachial or PPEC 11 that can be combined with us guided supraclavicular block to effectively anesthetise the surgical site for creation of brachio-basilic fistula as regarding onset of surgical anesthesia, adequacy of intra-operative anesthesia, the need for surgical wound infiltration, duration of postoperative analgesia and the failure rate of the fistulae.
Read the detailed description
- Type of Study: Randomized Prospective trail
- Study Setting: Ain Shams University Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt
- Study Period: 6 months.
Sampling Method: Patients will be subdivided randomly into two groups :
Group (SI) : 25 ml of bupivacaine 0.5 % for us guided supraclavicular block plus 10 ml of lidocaine 2% for us guided intercostobrachial nerve block.
Group(SP) : 25 ml of bupivacaine 0.5 % for us guided supraclavicular block plus10 ml of lidocaine 2% for us guided PECll block.
Study Procedures:
Following local university ethical committee approval, informed consent will be obtained. Details of the anesthetic technique and the study protocol will be fully explained at the preoperative visit, and written consent will be obtained from each patient before inclusion in the study. The patients has to have normal prothrombin (PT) and partial thromboplastin (PTT) times before the procedure.
In the pre-induction room the patients will be taught how to assess their own pain score using the numerical rating scale (NRS) (0-10; 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain) .
On arrival at the operating room, standard monitoring will be established with five lead electrocardiogram, non-invasive blood pressure measurement and pulse oximeter. After insertion of a 20-gauge intravenous cannula in the non operated arm, an intravenous crystalloid solution will be administered. Supplemental oxygen will be supplied through nasal cannula. The oxygen flow will be set at 3 L/ min.
Patients will receive 1-2 md midazolam intravenous as premedication before the block. All blocks will be performed by one of the authors, The patients will be randomly allocated to one of the two groups, either supraclavicular-intercostobrachial group(SI Group) ,or the supraclavicular-Pec 11 group(SP Group) .
The patient in SI Group is placed in a semi-sitting position by elevating the head of bed 45 degrees with the patients head turned to the opposite site to be blocked. The skin of the neck and the upper chest and axilla and medial upper arm will be prepared in an aseptic fashion. Ultrasound examination of the supraclavicular area will be performed using a 38-mm high frequency (9-12 MHz) linear array transducer with the in-plane approach, will receive 25 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine in the supraclavicular area ,then the operated arm will be abducted and externally rotated, and the elbow flexed to 90°. Ultrasound examination of the medial upper arm will be performed using a 38-mm high frequency (9-12 MHz) linear array transducer and the intercosto-brachial nerve is identified and blocked using 10 ml of lidocaine 2% . The patient in SP Group will also have supraclavicular block that will be performed in the same way as the previous group and then patient is placed in the supine position with the arm abducted 90 degrees position to receive Peg 11 lock by injecting 10ml of lidocaine 2% between pectoralis minor and serratus anterior at 3rd rib level using a 38-mm high frequency (9-12 MHz) linear array transducer with the in-plane approach. The sensory and motor blocks will be evaluated every 5 min for 30 min or until blocks will be complete. An adequate surgical anesthesia will be defined as a motor score of ≥1 , with an absence of pinprick sensations in the area of all the four terminal nerves.
The zero time for onset of sensory and motor blocks will be the completion of the LA injection. Sensory block assessment (0, no block 1, loss of sensation of pinprick 2, loss of sensation of touch) will be performed in the innervations of the four nerve areas, radial (radial dorsum of the hand), median (thenar eminence), ulnar (hypothenar eminence),and intercostobrachial (medial upper arm) corresponding to the nerve distributions in the forearm and hand using the pinprick test, and will be compared with the same stimulation on the contra-lateral arm. The degree of motor block will be evaluated by thumb abduction (radial nerve), thumb adduction (ulnar nerve), and thumb opposition (median nerve), using a 3-point scale (0 =normal motor function, 1 = decreased motor strength, 2 = complete motor block). The onset times of the sensory block (the time between the end of the LA injection and the total abolition of the pinprick response) and motor block (time between the end of the LA injection and complete motor block) will be recorded for each nerve. Patients who will not achieve satisfactory levels of anesthesia and will need intraoperative local infiltration will be recorded .Patient in whom the block failed and local infiltration is not enough will receive general anesthesia (propofol 2mg/kg plus fentanyl 1ug/kg and atracurium 0.5mg/kg ) with laryngeal mask airway inserted for mechanical ventilation .
Postoperative pain will be assessed by one of the authors using a visual analog scale (0, no pain; 10, worst pain imaginable). Analgesic for the first complain of pain will be standardized and consisted of 500 mg of oral or intravenous paracetamol given for a pain score of 4 of visual analog scale.The time to first analgesic requirement will be also recorded by the same author.
Heart rate, peripheral oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, and blood pressure will be measured before the supraclavicular block and 5, 10, 20, 30, 45, and 60 min after the block and thereafter every 60 min for 2 h postoperatively. University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS) (1, awake and alert; 2, sedated, responding to verbal stimulus; 3, sedated, responding to strong physical stimulus; 4, not arousable) will be measured first as baseline before the block then at the same time points for measuring vital signs post-block .
- Being tested
- regional anesthesia for the upper limb
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
regional anesthesia for the upper limbProcedure or surgery
pecs-II block and intercostal nerve block
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| intercostal group | Active comparator | group of patient receiving inrercostal nerve block as analgesia Receives: Procedure: regional anesthesia for the upper limb |
| pecs group | Active comparator | group of patient receiving pectoralis nerve block as analgesia Receives: Procedure: regional anesthesia for the upper limb |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
the proportion of patients with adequate block (no need for intraoperative local infiltration),
ratio
Measured: "through study completion ,an average of one year"
Secondary outcomes (3)
onset of surgical anesthesia
time
Measured: "through study completion ,an average of one year"
duration of postoperative analgesia
time
Measured: "through study completion ,an average of one year"
the failure rate of the fistulae.
Ratio
Measured: "through study completion ,an average of one year"
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Mar 2020
- Study start13 Apr 2019
- Primary completion3 May 2020
- Study completion3 May 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Best Regional Nerve Block for Creation of Surgical Brachiobasilic FistulaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Ain Shams UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 4 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ain Shams University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Amira Fathy Hefni,MD-EDIC, Ain Shams University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04311255
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- FMASU R 25/2019
- Status last verified
- May 2020
- First submitted
- 9 Mar 2020
- Last updated
- 15 May 2020
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 May 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Ultrasound Guided Supraclavicular Block Combined With Either Intercosto-brachial Nerve Block or pec11block for Creation of Surgical Brachio-basilic Fistula in Chronic Renal Failure Patients on Hemodialysis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04311255
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FMASU R 25/2019
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 4 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Ain Shams UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 13 Apr 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 3 May 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 3 May 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In our study we are trying to reach to the more efficient us guided peripheral nerve block either intercosto-brachial or PPEC 11 that can be combined with us guided supraclavicular block to effectively anesthetise the surgical site for creation of brachio-basilic fistula as regarding onset of surgical anesthesia, adequacy of intra-operative anesthesia, the need for surgical wound infiltration, duration of postoperative analgesia and the failure rate of the fistulae.
Detailed description
- Type of Study: Randomized Prospective trail
- Study Setting: Ain Shams University Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt
- Study Period: 6 months.
Sampling Method: Patients will be subdivided randomly into two groups :
Group (SI) : 25 ml of bupivacaine 0.5 % for us guided supraclavicular block plus 10 ml of lidocaine 2% for us guided intercostobrachial nerve block.
Group(SP) : 25 ml of bupivacaine 0.5 % for us guided supraclavicular block plus10 ml of lidocaine 2% for us guided PECll block.
Study Procedures:
Following local university ethical committee approval, informed consent will be obtained. Details of the anesthetic technique and the study protocol will be fully explained at the preoperative visit, and written consent will be obtained from each patient before inclusion in the study. The patients has to have normal prothrombin (PT) and partial thromboplastin (PTT) times before the procedure.
In the pre-induction room the patients will be taught how to assess their own pain score using the numerical rating scale (NRS) (0-10; 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain) .
On arrival at the operating room, standard monitoring will be established with five lead electrocardiogram, non-invasive blood pressure measurement and pulse oximeter. After insertion of a 20-gauge intravenous cannula in the non operated arm, an intravenous crystalloid solution will be administered. Supplemental oxygen will be supplied through nasal cannula. The oxygen flow will be set at 3 L/ min.
Patients will receive 1-2 md midazolam intravenous as premedication before the block. All blocks will be performed by one of the authors, The patients will be randomly allocated to one of the two groups, either supraclavicular-intercostobrachial group(SI Group) ,or the supraclavicular-Pec 11 group(SP Group) .
The patient in SI Group is placed in a semi-sitting position by elevating the head of bed 45 degrees with the patients head turned to the opposite site to be blocked. The skin of the neck and the upper chest and axilla and medial upper arm will be prepared in an aseptic fashion. Ultrasound examination of the supraclavicular area will be performed using a 38-mm high frequency (9-12 MHz) linear array transducer with the in-plane approach, will receive 25 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine in the supraclavicular area ,then the operated arm will be abducted and externally rotated, and the elbow flexed to 90°. Ultrasound examination of the medial upper arm will be performed using a 38-mm high frequency (9-12 MHz) linear array transducer and the intercosto-brachial nerve is identified and blocked using 10 ml of lidocaine 2% . The patient in SP Group will also have supraclavicular block that will be performed in the same way as the previous group and then patient is placed in the supine position with the arm abducted 90 degrees position to receive Peg 11 lock by injecting 10ml of lidocaine 2% between pectoralis minor and serratus anterior at 3rd rib level using a 38-mm high frequency (9-12 MHz) linear array transducer with the in-plane approach. The sensory and motor blocks will be evaluated every 5 min for 30 min or until blocks will be complete. An adequate surgical anesthesia will be defined as a motor score of ≥1 , with an absence of pinprick sensations in the area of all the four terminal nerves.
The zero time for onset of sensory and motor blocks will be the completion of the LA injection. Sensory block assessment (0, no block 1, loss of sensation of pinprick 2, loss of sensation of touch) will be performed in the innervations of the four nerve areas, radial (radial dorsum of the hand), median (thenar eminence), ulnar (hypothenar eminence),and intercostobrachial (medial upper arm) corresponding to the nerve distributions in the forearm and hand using the pinprick test, and will be compared with the same stimulation on the contra-lateral arm. The degree of motor block will be evaluated by thumb abduction (radial nerve), thumb adduction (ulnar nerve), and thumb opposition (median nerve), using a 3-point scale (0 =normal motor function, 1 = decreased motor strength, 2 = complete motor block). The onset times of the sensory block (the time between the end of the LA injection and the total abolition of the pinprick response) and motor block (time between the end of the LA injection and complete motor block) will be recorded for each nerve. Patients who will not achieve satisfactory levels of anesthesia and will need intraoperative local infiltration will be recorded .Patient in whom the block failed and local infiltration is not enough will receive general anesthesia (propofol 2mg/kg plus fentanyl 1ug/kg and atracurium 0.5mg/kg ) with laryngeal mask airway inserted for mechanical ventilation .
Postoperative pain will be assessed by one of the authors using a visual analog scale (0, no pain; 10, worst pain imaginable). Analgesic for the first complain of pain will be standardized and consisted of 500 mg of oral or intravenous paracetamol given for a pain score of 4 of visual analog scale.The time to first analgesic requirement will be also recorded by the same author.
Heart rate, peripheral oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, and blood pressure will be measured before the supraclavicular block and 5, 10, 20, 30, 45, and 60 min after the block and thereafter every 60 min for 2 h postoperatively. University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS) (1, awake and alert; 2, sedated, responding to verbal stimulus; 3, sedated, responding to strong physical stimulus; 4, not arousable) will be measured first as baseline before the block then at the same time points for measuring vital signs post-block .
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| intercostal group | Active comparator | Procedure: regional anesthesia for the upper limbgroup of patient receiving inrercostal nerve block as analgesia |
| pecs group | Active comparator | Procedure: regional anesthesia for the upper limbgroup of patient receiving pectoralis nerve block as analgesia |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- American Society of Anesthesiologists Grade III, age 25-75 years who are scheduled for brachio-basilic AVF.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients will be excluded if they have infection at the injection site, allergy to local anesthetics, chronic use of opioids, a history of neurological neuromuscular, or severe hepatic or cardiopulmonary disease, a contraindication to regional anesthesia or patient /guardian refusal.
- -
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| regional anesthesia for the upper limbpecs-II block and intercostal nerve block | Procedure or surgery | intercostal group, pecs group |
Primary outcome
the proportion of patients with adequate block (no need for intraoperative local infiltration),
Time frame: "through study completion ,an average of one year"
ratio
3 secondary outcomes
onset of surgical anesthesia
Time frame: "through study completion ,an average of one year"
duration of postoperative analgesia
Time frame: "through study completion ,an average of one year"
the failure rate of the fistulae.
Time frame: "through study completion ,an average of one year"
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 May 2020.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing regional anesthesia for the upper limb in people with Best Regional Nerve Block for Creation of Surgical Brachiobasilic Fistula, run by Ain Shams University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 May 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
the proportion of patients with adequate block (no need for intraoperative local infiltration), (time frame: "through study completion ,an average of one year"). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 May 2020.