Bladder CancerPhase 2NCT04311580
Intravesical Electromotive Mitomycin After Bacillus Calmette-Guérin Failure
A Phase 2 study testing intravesical electromotive administration of mitomycin in people with Bladder Cancer, run by University of Rome Tor Vergata.
Trial summary
Patients with urothelial high risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer patients will be treated with intravesical electromotive drug administration/mitomycin (EMDA/MMC) after bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) failure. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Bladder Cancer
- What is being tested?
- intravesical electromotive administration of mitomycin
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 52 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2000to 10 Mar 2020
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with urothelial high risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (high grade stage Ta, T1 and/or carcinoma in situ) after intravesical BCG failure;
- adequate bone marrow reserve;
- normal renal function;
- normal liver function;
- Karnofsky performance score of 50 to 100;
Who cannot join
- Non-urothelial carcinomas of the bladder;
- known allergy to mitomicyn ;
- previous or concomitant urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract and urethra, or both;
- bladder capacity less than 200 mL;
- untreated urinary-tract infection; severe systemic infection (ie, sepsis);
- urethral strictures that would prevent endoscopic procedures and catheterisation;
Show all 10Show fewer
- other concurrent chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and treatment with biological response modifiers;
- other malignant diseases within 5 years of start of EMDA MMC (except for adequately treated basal-cell or squamous-cell skin cancer, in situ cervical cancer);
- pregnancy;
- psychological, familial, sociological, or geographical factors that would preclude study participation.
About this study
Official title: Intravesical Electromotive Mitomycin for High Risk Urothelial Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer After Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin Failure
Patients with urothelial high risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer patients will be treated with intravesical electromotive drug administration/mitomycin (EMDA/MMC) after bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) failure. Patients are scheduled for an initial 6 weekly treatments, a further 6 weekly treatments for non-responders and a followup 10 monthly treatments for responders. Complete response will be defined as histological disappearance of malignancy on bladder biopsy and resolution of abnormal cytological findings after treatment. Time to first recurrence, time to progression, overall survival, and disease-specific survival wil be estimated by use of the Kaplan-Meier method.
Read the detailed description
Partecipants
Inclusion criteria:
- Patients with urothelial high risk NMIBC (high grade stage Ta, T1 and/or carcinoma in situ) after intravesical BCG failure;
- adequate bone marrow reserve;
- normal renal function;
- normal liver function;
- Karnofsky performance score of 50 to 100.
Exclusion criteria:
- non-urothelial carcinomas of the bladder;
- known allergy to MMC;
- previous or concomitant urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract and urethra, or both;
- bladder capacity less than 200 mL;
- untreated urinary-tract infection;
- severe systemic infection (ie, sepsis);
- urethral strictures that would prevent endoscopic procedures and catheterisation;
- other concurrent chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and treatment with biological response modifiers;
- other malignant diseases within 5 years of start of EMDA MMC (except for adequately treated basal-cell or squamous-cell skin cancer, in situ cervical cancer);
- pregnancy;
- psychological, familial, sociological, or geographical factors that would preclude study participation.
The institutional review boards of each participating centre approved the study design. all enrolled patients will sign an informed consent form, approved by the institutional review boards, providing details of treatments.
BCG Failure
The definition of BCG failure in patients has been proposed as follows:
- BCG-refractory disease when there is failure to achieve a disease-free state at 6 months following initial BCG therapy with either maintenance or retreatment at 3 months because of persistent or rapidly recurrent tumor;
- BCG-resistant disease when there is recurrence or persistence at 3 months following an induction cycle;
- BCG-relapsing disease when the disease recurs after the patient is disease-free for 6 months;
- BCG-intolerant disease when the disease recurs following administration of a less than adequate course of therapy because of a serious adverse event or symptomatic intolerance that requires discontinuation of further BCG therapy.13 Study design Patients will underwent: upper urinary tract imaging, urinary cytology of the bladder and upper urinary tract; random cold-cup biopsies of the bladder and prostatic urethra-ie, sampling of seemingly healthy urothelium and of suspicious areas; and complete transurethral resection (TUR) of all bladder tumour visible on endoscopy, ensuring muscle was included in resected samples. All patients will underwent re-staging TUR 4-5 weeks later. All clinical assessors are adequately trained in the above procedures, and no methods are used to enhance the quality of measurements. All biopsy samples of tumour and bladder will be reviewed by a pathologist for stage and grade. Tumour stage are classified according to the 1997 TNM classification of the International Union Against Cancer, and tumour grade was defined in accordance with the 1973 WHO classification.
Treatment schedule All patients will start induction EMDA/MMC of 6 intravesical treatments at weekly intervals commencing 2-3 weeks after re-staging TUR. Intravesical EMDA MMC is given by a battery-powered generator delivering a controlled electric current that passes between the active intravesical electrode integrated into a specific transurethral catheter and dispersive ground electrodes on skin of the lower abdomen (Physion srl, Mirandola, Italy). Patients are placed on fluid restriction and 2 g ingested sodium bicarbonate the night before treatment, the morning of treatment, and 2 h before treatment with mitomycin. The bladder is emptied through the electrode-transurethral-catheter and 40 mg mitomycin dissolved in 100 mL water was infused intravesically by gravity and retained in the bladder for 30 min, while 20 mA for 30 min pulsed electric current was given externally. Two dispersive cathode electrodes were placed on lower abdominal skin that had been degreased with alcohol. The bladder was then emptied and the catheter removed.
Patients who were disease-free 3 months after treatment were scheduled to receive monthly infusions of BCG for 10 months. Maintenance treatment was given to the same dose and methods of infusion as initial allocated treatment. Response to treatment was assessed with abdominal ultrasonography, cystoscopy, and urinary cytology. In patients who were free of disease 3 months after treatment, these assessments were done every 3 months during the first 3 years and every 6 months thereafter. Patients with carcinoma in situ underwent abdominal ultrasonography, cystoscopy, urinary cytology, and random bladder biopsies at 3 months and 6 months. If bladder cytology was positive for cancer cells but no lesions were visible on cystoscopy, cytology of the upper urinary tract and random biopsies of the bladder and prostatic urethra were done. If, at 3 months' follow-up, carcinoma in situ persisted or a superficial tumour recurred (ie, stage pTa tumour confined to the urothelium or stage pT1 with invasion of the lamina propria), the patient underwent multiple, random biopsy sampling and TUR of all bladder tumour visible on endoscopy and received a second course of intervention treatment.
Cystoscopy, biopsies, and urinary cytology were repeated 3 months after the start of the second course. Patients who were disease-free after the second course of treatment received the full course of monthly maintenance instillations (ie, one infusion of electromotive mitomycin for 10).
Patients were suspended from the trial on a second recurrence, on persistence of carcinoma in situ, on development of carcinoma in the upper-urinary tract or prostatic urethra, on progression to muscle-invasive disease (ie, stage pT2 or more advanced), or on development of metastases. Further treatment was left to the discretion of the local investigator.
Toxicity Side effects were classified as local, systemic or allergic. Local toxicity was defined as culture proven bacterial cystitis, drug induced (chemical) cystitis and other localized effects. Systemic side effects were defined as fever exceeding 38C, general malaise and fatigue. Skin rash was regarded as allergic reaction. The severity of side effects were classified by the treating physician, with subsequent decision to continue, delay or abandon treatment.
Patient follow-up. Response to treatment was assessed with cystoscopy, urinary cytology and /or biopsy only if indicated by suspicious cytological findings or on cystoscopy. In disease-free cases, cystoscopy and urinary cytology were repeated at 3-month intervals for 2 years, 6-month intervals for 3 years and yearly thereafter.
Patient evaluation Patients with stage pTa and pT1 tumour without carcinoma in situ are classified as disease-free and therefore treated prophylactically; those with carcinoma in situ are treated therapeutically, and response is scored as no response or as complete response. Complete response is defined as complete disappearance of carcinoma in situ, as documented by a normal cytology, cystoscopy, and random bladder biopsies.
The primary endpoint is disease-free interval for patients without carcinoma in situ and for patients with carcinoma in situ who are disease-free after treatment-ie, time from enrollment to first cystoscopy noting recurrence. Patients with carcinoma in situ who did not have complete response after 3 months of treatment are regarded as having recurrence with no follow-up. The secondary endpoints are time to progression, overall survival, and disease specific survival. Time to progression is defined as time from randomisation until the onset of muscle invasive disease as recorded by pathological assessment of TUR samples or biopsy samples. Overall survival is defined as time from enrollment until death from any cause; disease specific survival as time from enrollment until death from bladder cancer. Patients without recurrence or progression are censored at the last cystoscopy, and those lost to follow-up were censored at the last known day of survival.
Statistical Analysis All analyses are done by intention to treat. Time to first recurrence, time to progression, overall survival, and disease-specific survival are estimated by use of the Kaplan-Meier method. Comparisons are estimated by use of log-rank test. All tests are two-sided, and p<0·05 was regarded as significant. The investigators will calculated hazard ratios with 95% CI by use of proportional-hazards regression.
- Conditions
- Bladder Cancer
- Being tested
- intravesical electromotive administration of mitomycin
- Keywords
- non-muscle invasive bladder cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Urinary Bladder Neoplasms, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
intravesical electromotive administration of mitomycinCombination product
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| urothelial high risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer | Experimental | patients with urothelial high risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer after failed intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin treatment. Receives: Combination Product: intravesical electromotive administration of mitomycin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time to first recurrence
Time from enrollment to first cystoscopy noting disease recurrence.
Measured: Up to 100 monthss. Time from enrollment to first cystoscopy noting disease recurrence.
Secondary outcomes (1)
Time to disease progression
Time from randomisation until the onset of muscle invasive disease
Measured: Up to 100 months. Time from randomisation until the onset of muscle invasive disease
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Mar 2020
- Study start1 Jan 2000
- Primary completion31 Dec 2013
- Study completion10 Mar 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Bladder CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 52 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Rome Tor Vergata
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Bari
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Savino Mauro Di Stasi, University of Rome Tor Vergata
- Investigators
- SAVINO M DI STASI, Principal investigator, TOR VERGATA UNIVERSITY OF ROME
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04311580
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- UTV/08-05-95
- Status last verified
- Jun 2023
- First submitted
- 10 Mar 2020
- Last updated
- 22 Jun 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: All of the individual participant data collected during the trial, after deidentification will be shared
Publications
Di Stasi SM, Vespasiani G, Giannantoni A, Massoud R, Dolci S, Micali F. Electromotive delivery of mitomycin C into human bladder wall. Cancer Res. 1997 Mar 1;57(5):875-80.
PubMed 9041189Di Stasi SM, Giannantoni A, Massoud R, Dolci S, Navarra P, Vespasiani G, Stephen RL. Electromotive versus passive diffusion of mitomycin C into human bladder wall: concentration-depth profiles studies. Cancer Res. 1999 Oct 1;59(19):4912-8.
PubMed 10519404Di Stasi SM, Giannantoni A, Stephen RL, Capelli G, Navarra P, Massoud R, Vespasiani G. Intravesical electromotive mitomycin C versus passive transport mitomycin C for high risk superficial bladder cancer: a prospective randomized study. J Urol. 2003 Sep;170(3):777-82. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000080568.91703.18.
PubMed 12913696Di Stasi SM, Giannantoni A, Giurioli A, Valenti M, Zampa G, Storti L, Attisani F, De Carolis A, Capelli G, Vespasiani G, Stephen RL. Sequential BCG and electromotive mitomycin versus BCG alone for high-risk superficial bladder cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2006 Jan;7(1):43-51. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70472-1.
PubMed 16389183Di Stasi SM, Valenti M, Verri C, Liberati E, Giurioli A, Leprini G, Masedu F, Ricci AR, Micali F, Vespasiani G. Electromotive instillation of mitomycin immediately before transurethral resection for patients with primary urothelial non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2011 Sep;12(9):871-9. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70190-5. Epub 2011 Aug 8.
PubMed 21831711
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Jun 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Intravesical Electromotive Mitomycin for High Risk Urothelial Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer After Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin Failure
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04311580
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- UTV/08-05-95
- Conditions
- Bladder Cancer
- Keywords
- non-muscle invasive bladder cancer
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 52 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Rome Tor VergataUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Bari
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2000 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- 10 Mar 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Patients with urothelial high risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer patients will be treated with intravesical electromotive drug administration/mitomycin (EMDA/MMC) after bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) failure. Patients are scheduled for an initial 6 weekly treatments, a further 6 weekly treatments for non-responders and a followup 10 monthly treatments for responders. Complete response will be defined as histological disappearance of malignancy on bladder biopsy and resolution of abnormal cytological findings after treatment. Time to first recurrence, time to progression, overall survival, and disease-specific survival wil be estimated by use of the Kaplan-Meier method.
Detailed description
Partecipants
Inclusion criteria:
- Patients with urothelial high risk NMIBC (high grade stage Ta, T1 and/or carcinoma in situ) after intravesical BCG failure;
- adequate bone marrow reserve;
- normal renal function;
- normal liver function;
- Karnofsky performance score of 50 to 100.
Exclusion criteria:
- non-urothelial carcinomas of the bladder;
- known allergy to MMC;
- previous or concomitant urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract and urethra, or both;
- bladder capacity less than 200 mL;
- untreated urinary-tract infection;
- severe systemic infection (ie, sepsis);
- urethral strictures that would prevent endoscopic procedures and catheterisation;
- other concurrent chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and treatment with biological response modifiers;
- other malignant diseases within 5 years of start of EMDA MMC (except for adequately treated basal-cell or squamous-cell skin cancer, in situ cervical cancer);
- pregnancy;
- psychological, familial, sociological, or geographical factors that would preclude study participation.
The institutional review boards of each participating centre approved the study design. all enrolled patients will sign an informed consent form, approved by the institutional review boards, providing details of treatments.
BCG Failure
The definition of BCG failure in patients has been proposed as follows:
- BCG-refractory disease when there is failure to achieve a disease-free state at 6 months following initial BCG therapy with either maintenance or retreatment at 3 months because of persistent or rapidly recurrent tumor;
- BCG-resistant disease when there is recurrence or persistence at 3 months following an induction cycle;
- BCG-relapsing disease when the disease recurs after the patient is disease-free for 6 months;
- BCG-intolerant disease when the disease recurs following administration of a less than adequate course of therapy because of a serious adverse event or symptomatic intolerance that requires discontinuation of further BCG therapy.13 Study design Patients will underwent: upper urinary tract imaging, urinary cytology of the bladder and upper urinary tract; random cold-cup biopsies of the bladder and prostatic urethra-ie, sampling of seemingly healthy urothelium and of suspicious areas; and complete transurethral resection (TUR) of all bladder tumour visible on endoscopy, ensuring muscle was included in resected samples. All patients will underwent re-staging TUR 4-5 weeks later. All clinical assessors are adequately trained in the above procedures, and no methods are used to enhance the quality of measurements. All biopsy samples of tumour and bladder will be reviewed by a pathologist for stage and grade. Tumour stage are classified according to the 1997 TNM classification of the International Union Against Cancer, and tumour grade was defined in accordance with the 1973 WHO classification.
Treatment schedule All patients will start induction EMDA/MMC of 6 intravesical treatments at weekly intervals commencing 2-3 weeks after re-staging TUR. Intravesical EMDA MMC is given by a battery-powered generator delivering a controlled electric current that passes between the active intravesical electrode integrated into a specific transurethral catheter and dispersive ground electrodes on skin of the lower abdomen (Physion srl, Mirandola, Italy). Patients are placed on fluid restriction and 2 g ingested sodium bicarbonate the night before treatment, the morning of treatment, and 2 h before treatment with mitomycin. The bladder is emptied through the electrode-transurethral-catheter and 40 mg mitomycin dissolved in 100 mL water was infused intravesically by gravity and retained in the bladder for 30 min, while 20 mA for 30 min pulsed electric current was given externally. Two dispersive cathode electrodes were placed on lower abdominal skin that had been degreased with alcohol. The bladder was then emptied and the catheter removed.
Patients who were disease-free 3 months after treatment were scheduled to receive monthly infusions of BCG for 10 months. Maintenance treatment was given to the same dose and methods of infusion as initial allocated treatment. Response to treatment was assessed with abdominal ultrasonography, cystoscopy, and urinary cytology. In patients who were free of disease 3 months after treatment, these assessments were done every 3 months during the first 3 years and every 6 months thereafter. Patients with carcinoma in situ underwent abdominal ultrasonography, cystoscopy, urinary cytology, and random bladder biopsies at 3 months and 6 months. If bladder cytology was positive for cancer cells but no lesions were visible on cystoscopy, cytology of the upper urinary tract and random biopsies of the bladder and prostatic urethra were done. If, at 3 months' follow-up, carcinoma in situ persisted or a superficial tumour recurred (ie, stage pTa tumour confined to the urothelium or stage pT1 with invasion of the lamina propria), the patient underwent multiple, random biopsy sampling and TUR of all bladder tumour visible on endoscopy and received a second course of intervention treatment.
Cystoscopy, biopsies, and urinary cytology were repeated 3 months after the start of the second course. Patients who were disease-free after the second course of treatment received the full course of monthly maintenance instillations (ie, one infusion of electromotive mitomycin for 10).
Patients were suspended from the trial on a second recurrence, on persistence of carcinoma in situ, on development of carcinoma in the upper-urinary tract or prostatic urethra, on progression to muscle-invasive disease (ie, stage pT2 or more advanced), or on development of metastases. Further treatment was left to the discretion of the local investigator.
Toxicity Side effects were classified as local, systemic or allergic. Local toxicity was defined as culture proven bacterial cystitis, drug induced (chemical) cystitis and other localized effects. Systemic side effects were defined as fever exceeding 38C, general malaise and fatigue. Skin rash was regarded as allergic reaction. The severity of side effects were classified by the treating physician, with subsequent decision to continue, delay or abandon treatment.
Patient follow-up. Response to treatment was assessed with cystoscopy, urinary cytology and /or biopsy only if indicated by suspicious cytological findings or on cystoscopy. In disease-free cases, cystoscopy and urinary cytology were repeated at 3-month intervals for 2 years, 6-month intervals for 3 years and yearly thereafter.
Patient evaluation Patients with stage pTa and pT1 tumour without carcinoma in situ are classified as disease-free and therefore treated prophylactically; those with carcinoma in situ are treated therapeutically, and response is scored as no response or as complete response. Complete response is defined as complete disappearance of carcinoma in situ, as documented by a normal cytology, cystoscopy, and random bladder biopsies.
The primary endpoint is disease-free interval for patients without carcinoma in situ and for patients with carcinoma in situ who are disease-free after treatment-ie, time from enrollment to first cystoscopy noting recurrence. Patients with carcinoma in situ who did not have complete response after 3 months of treatment are regarded as having recurrence with no follow-up. The secondary endpoints are time to progression, overall survival, and disease specific survival. Time to progression is defined as time from randomisation until the onset of muscle invasive disease as recorded by pathological assessment of TUR samples or biopsy samples. Overall survival is defined as time from enrollment until death from any cause; disease specific survival as time from enrollment until death from bladder cancer. Patients without recurrence or progression are censored at the last cystoscopy, and those lost to follow-up were censored at the last known day of survival.
Statistical Analysis All analyses are done by intention to treat. Time to first recurrence, time to progression, overall survival, and disease-specific survival are estimated by use of the Kaplan-Meier method. Comparisons are estimated by use of log-rank test. All tests are two-sided, and p<0·05 was regarded as significant. The investigators will calculated hazard ratios with 95% CI by use of proportional-hazards regression.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| urothelial high risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer | Experimental | Combination Product: intravesical electromotive administration of mitomycinpatients with urothelial high risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer after failed intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin treatment. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients with urothelial high risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (high grade stage Ta, T1 and/or carcinoma in situ) after intravesical BCG failure;
- adequate bone marrow reserve;
- normal renal function;
- normal liver function;
- Karnofsky performance score of 50 to 100;
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Non-urothelial carcinomas of the bladder;
- known allergy to mitomicyn ;
- previous or concomitant urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract and urethra, or both;
- bladder capacity less than 200 mL;
- untreated urinary-tract infection; severe systemic infection (ie, sepsis);
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| intravesical electromotive administration of mitomycin | Combination product | urothelial high risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer |
Primary outcome
Time to first recurrence
Time frame: Up to 100 monthss. Time from enrollment to first cystoscopy noting disease recurrence.
Time from enrollment to first cystoscopy noting disease recurrence.
1 secondary outcome
Time to disease progression
Time frame: Up to 100 months. Time from randomisation until the onset of muscle invasive disease
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Jun 2023.
- Results publication: PubMed 9041189Di Stasi SM, Vespasiani G, Giannantoni A, Massoud R, Dolci S, Micali F. Electromotive delivery of mitomycin C into human bladder wall. Cancer Res. 1997 Mar 1;57(5):875-80.
- Results publication: PubMed 10519404Di Stasi SM, Giannantoni A, Massoud R, Dolci S, Navarra P, Vespasiani G, Stephen RL. Electromotive versus passive diffusion of mitomycin C into human bladder wall: concentration-depth profiles studies. Cancer Res. 1999 Oct 1;59(19):4912-8.
- Results publication: PubMed 12913696Di Stasi SM, Giannantoni A, Stephen RL, Capelli G, Navarra P, Massoud R, Vespasiani G. Intravesical electromotive mitomycin C versus passive transport mitomycin C for high risk superficial bladder cancer: a prospective randomized study. J Urol. 2003 Sep;170(3):777-82. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000080568.91703.18.
- Results publication: PubMed 16389183Di Stasi SM, Giannantoni A, Giurioli A, Valenti M, Zampa G, Storti L, Attisani F, De Carolis A, Capelli G, Vespasiani G, Stephen RL. Sequential BCG and electromotive mitomycin versus BCG alone for high-risk superficial bladder cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2006 Jan;7(1):43-51. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70472-1.
- Results publication: PubMed 21831711Di Stasi SM, Valenti M, Verri C, Liberati E, Giurioli A, Leprini G, Masedu F, Ricci AR, Micali F, Vespasiani G. Electromotive instillation of mitomycin immediately before transurethral resection for patients with primary urothelial non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2011 Sep;12(9):871-9. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70190-5. Epub 2011 Aug 8.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. All of the individual participant data collected during the trial, after deidentification will be shared
Related trials for Bladder Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Testing the Role of DNA Released From Tumor Cells Into the Blood in Guiding the Use of Immunotherapy After Surgical Removal of the Bladder, Kidney, Ureter, and Urethra for Urothelial Cancer Treatment, MODERN Study
Muscle Invasive Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma, Muscle Invasive Renal Pelvis Urothelial Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 3
A Clinical Trial of Sacituzumab Tirumotecan (Sac-TMT, MK-2870) and Pembrolizumab (MK-3475A) in Participants With Bladder Cancer (MK-2870-055)
Bladder Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
A Study of CTX-009 in Combination With Paclitaxel in Adult Patients With Unresectable Advanced, Metastatic or Recurrent Biliary Tract Cancers (COMPANION-002)
Biliary Tract Cancer, Cholangiocarcinoma
Recruiting
Effect of Cyclic Sighing Breathing Exercise on CRBD, Pain, and Sleep Quality in Patients Undergoing TUR
Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor, Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP)
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
SAVINO M DI STASI principal investigator
TOR VERGATA UNIVERSITY OF ROME
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing intravesical electromotive administration of mitomycin in people with Bladder Cancer, run by University of Rome Tor Vergata.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jun 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time to first recurrence (time frame: Up to 100 monthss. Time from enrollment to first cystoscopy noting disease recurrence.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04311580, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jun 2023.