AzTrials
AzTrials

Bladder CancerPhase 2NCT04311580

Intravesical Electromotive Mitomycin After Bacillus Calmette-Guérin Failure

A Phase 2 study testing intravesical electromotive administration of mitomycin in people with Bladder Cancer, run by University of Rome Tor Vergata.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Patients with urothelial high risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer patients will be treated with intravesical electromotive drug administration/mitomycin (EMDA/MMC) after bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) failure. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 90 years
Conditions the study is for
Bladder Cancer
What is being tested?
intravesical electromotive administration of mitomycin
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
52 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Jan 2000to 10 Mar 2020
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with urothelial high risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (high grade stage Ta, T1 and/or carcinoma in situ) after intravesical BCG failure;
  • adequate bone marrow reserve;
  • normal renal function;
  • normal liver function;
  • Karnofsky performance score of 50 to 100;

Who cannot join

  • Non-urothelial carcinomas of the bladder;
  • known allergy to mitomicyn ;
  • previous or concomitant urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract and urethra, or both;
  • bladder capacity less than 200 mL;
  • untreated urinary-tract infection; severe systemic infection (ie, sepsis);
  • urethral strictures that would prevent endoscopic procedures and catheterisation;
Show all 10Show fewer
  • other concurrent chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and treatment with biological response modifiers;
  • other malignant diseases within 5 years of start of EMDA MMC (except for adequately treated basal-cell or squamous-cell skin cancer, in situ cervical cancer);
  • pregnancy;
  • psychological, familial, sociological, or geographical factors that would preclude study participation.

About this study

Official title: Intravesical Electromotive Mitomycin for High Risk Urothelial Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer After Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin Failure

Patients with urothelial high risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer patients will be treated with intravesical electromotive drug administration/mitomycin (EMDA/MMC) after bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) failure. Patients are scheduled for an initial 6 weekly treatments, a further 6 weekly treatments for non-responders and a followup 10 monthly treatments for responders. Complete response will be defined as histological disappearance of malignancy on bladder biopsy and resolution of abnormal cytological findings after treatment. Time to first recurrence, time to progression, overall survival, and disease-specific survival wil be estimated by use of the Kaplan-Meier method.

Read the detailed description

Partecipants

Inclusion criteria:

  • Patients with urothelial high risk NMIBC (high grade stage Ta, T1 and/or carcinoma in situ) after intravesical BCG failure;
  • adequate bone marrow reserve;
  • normal renal function;
  • normal liver function;
  • Karnofsky performance score of 50 to 100.

Exclusion criteria:

  • non-urothelial carcinomas of the bladder;
  • known allergy to MMC;
  • previous or concomitant urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract and urethra, or both;
  • bladder capacity less than 200 mL;
  • untreated urinary-tract infection;
  • severe systemic infection (ie, sepsis);
  • urethral strictures that would prevent endoscopic procedures and catheterisation;
  • other concurrent chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and treatment with biological response modifiers;
  • other malignant diseases within 5 years of start of EMDA MMC (except for adequately treated basal-cell or squamous-cell skin cancer, in situ cervical cancer);
  • pregnancy;
  • psychological, familial, sociological, or geographical factors that would preclude study participation.

The institutional review boards of each participating centre approved the study design. all enrolled patients will sign an informed consent form, approved by the institutional review boards, providing details of treatments.

BCG Failure

The definition of BCG failure in patients has been proposed as follows:

  1. BCG-refractory disease when there is failure to achieve a disease-free state at 6 months following initial BCG therapy with either maintenance or retreatment at 3 months because of persistent or rapidly recurrent tumor;
  2. BCG-resistant disease when there is recurrence or persistence at 3 months following an induction cycle;
  3. BCG-relapsing disease when the disease recurs after the patient is disease-free for 6 months;
  4. BCG-intolerant disease when the disease recurs following administration of a less than adequate course of therapy because of a serious adverse event or symptomatic intolerance that requires discontinuation of further BCG therapy.13 Study design Patients will underwent: upper urinary tract imaging, urinary cytology of the bladder and upper urinary tract; random cold-cup biopsies of the bladder and prostatic urethra-ie, sampling of seemingly healthy urothelium and of suspicious areas; and complete transurethral resection (TUR) of all bladder tumour visible on endoscopy, ensuring muscle was included in resected samples. All patients will underwent re-staging TUR 4-5 weeks later. All clinical assessors are adequately trained in the above procedures, and no methods are used to enhance the quality of measurements. All biopsy samples of tumour and bladder will be reviewed by a pathologist for stage and grade. Tumour stage are classified according to the 1997 TNM classification of the International Union Against Cancer, and tumour grade was defined in accordance with the 1973 WHO classification.

Treatment schedule All patients will start induction EMDA/MMC of 6 intravesical treatments at weekly intervals commencing 2-3 weeks after re-staging TUR. Intravesical EMDA MMC is given by a battery-powered generator delivering a controlled electric current that passes between the active intravesical electrode integrated into a specific transurethral catheter and dispersive ground electrodes on skin of the lower abdomen (Physion srl, Mirandola, Italy). Patients are placed on fluid restriction and 2 g ingested sodium bicarbonate the night before treatment, the morning of treatment, and 2 h before treatment with mitomycin. The bladder is emptied through the electrode-transurethral-catheter and 40 mg mitomycin dissolved in 100 mL water was infused intravesically by gravity and retained in the bladder for 30 min, while 20 mA for 30 min pulsed electric current was given externally. Two dispersive cathode electrodes were placed on lower abdominal skin that had been degreased with alcohol. The bladder was then emptied and the catheter removed.

Patients who were disease-free 3 months after treatment were scheduled to receive monthly infusions of BCG for 10 months. Maintenance treatment was given to the same dose and methods of infusion as initial allocated treatment. Response to treatment was assessed with abdominal ultrasonography, cystoscopy, and urinary cytology. In patients who were free of disease 3 months after treatment, these assessments were done every 3 months during the first 3 years and every 6 months thereafter. Patients with carcinoma in situ underwent abdominal ultrasonography, cystoscopy, urinary cytology, and random bladder biopsies at 3 months and 6 months. If bladder cytology was positive for cancer cells but no lesions were visible on cystoscopy, cytology of the upper urinary tract and random biopsies of the bladder and prostatic urethra were done. If, at 3 months' follow-up, carcinoma in situ persisted or a superficial tumour recurred (ie, stage pTa tumour confined to the urothelium or stage pT1 with invasion of the lamina propria), the patient underwent multiple, random biopsy sampling and TUR of all bladder tumour visible on endoscopy and received a second course of intervention treatment.

Cystoscopy, biopsies, and urinary cytology were repeated 3 months after the start of the second course. Patients who were disease-free after the second course of treatment received the full course of monthly maintenance instillations (ie, one infusion of electromotive mitomycin for 10).

Patients were suspended from the trial on a second recurrence, on persistence of carcinoma in situ, on development of carcinoma in the upper-urinary tract or prostatic urethra, on progression to muscle-invasive disease (ie, stage pT2 or more advanced), or on development of metastases. Further treatment was left to the discretion of the local investigator.

Toxicity Side effects were classified as local, systemic or allergic. Local toxicity was defined as culture proven bacterial cystitis, drug induced (chemical) cystitis and other localized effects. Systemic side effects were defined as fever exceeding 38C, general malaise and fatigue. Skin rash was regarded as allergic reaction. The severity of side effects were classified by the treating physician, with subsequent decision to continue, delay or abandon treatment.

Patient follow-up. Response to treatment was assessed with cystoscopy, urinary cytology and /or biopsy only if indicated by suspicious cytological findings or on cystoscopy. In disease-free cases, cystoscopy and urinary cytology were repeated at 3-month intervals for 2 years, 6-month intervals for 3 years and yearly thereafter.

Patient evaluation Patients with stage pTa and pT1 tumour without carcinoma in situ are classified as disease-free and therefore treated prophylactically; those with carcinoma in situ are treated therapeutically, and response is scored as no response or as complete response. Complete response is defined as complete disappearance of carcinoma in situ, as documented by a normal cytology, cystoscopy, and random bladder biopsies.

The primary endpoint is disease-free interval for patients without carcinoma in situ and for patients with carcinoma in situ who are disease-free after treatment-ie, time from enrollment to first cystoscopy noting recurrence. Patients with carcinoma in situ who did not have complete response after 3 months of treatment are regarded as having recurrence with no follow-up. The secondary endpoints are time to progression, overall survival, and disease specific survival. Time to progression is defined as time from randomisation until the onset of muscle invasive disease as recorded by pathological assessment of TUR samples or biopsy samples. Overall survival is defined as time from enrollment until death from any cause; disease specific survival as time from enrollment until death from bladder cancer. Patients without recurrence or progression are censored at the last cystoscopy, and those lost to follow-up were censored at the last known day of survival.

Statistical Analysis All analyses are done by intention to treat. Time to first recurrence, time to progression, overall survival, and disease-specific survival are estimated by use of the Kaplan-Meier method. Comparisons are estimated by use of log-rank test. All tests are two-sided, and p<0·05 was regarded as significant. The investigators will calculated hazard ratios with 95% CI by use of proportional-hazards regression.

Conditions
Bladder Cancer
Being tested
intravesical electromotive administration of mitomycin
Keywords
non-muscle invasive bladder cancer
Medical subject headings
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • intravesical electromotive administration of mitomycinCombination product

Study groups in NCT04311580
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
urothelial high risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancerExperimentalpatients with urothelial high risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer after failed intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin treatment.
Receives: Combination Product: intravesical electromotive administration of mitomycin

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Time to first recurrence

    Time from enrollment to first cystoscopy noting disease recurrence.

    Measured: Up to 100 monthss. Time from enrollment to first cystoscopy noting disease recurrence.

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Time to disease progression

    Time from randomisation until the onset of muscle invasive disease

    Measured: Up to 100 months. Time from randomisation until the onset of muscle invasive disease

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Mar 2020
  2. Study start1 Jan 2000
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2013
  4. Study completion10 Mar 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
52 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04311580
Sponsor's protocol ID
UTV/08-05-95
Status last verified
Jun 2023
First submitted
10 Mar 2020
Last updated
22 Jun 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: All of the individual participant data collected during the trial, after deidentification will be shared

Publications

  • Di Stasi SM, Vespasiani G, Giannantoni A, Massoud R, Dolci S, Micali F. Electromotive delivery of mitomycin C into human bladder wall. Cancer Res. 1997 Mar 1;57(5):875-80.

    PubMed 9041189
  • Di Stasi SM, Giannantoni A, Massoud R, Dolci S, Navarra P, Vespasiani G, Stephen RL. Electromotive versus passive diffusion of mitomycin C into human bladder wall: concentration-depth profiles studies. Cancer Res. 1999 Oct 1;59(19):4912-8.

    PubMed 10519404
  • Di Stasi SM, Giannantoni A, Stephen RL, Capelli G, Navarra P, Massoud R, Vespasiani G. Intravesical electromotive mitomycin C versus passive transport mitomycin C for high risk superficial bladder cancer: a prospective randomized study. J Urol. 2003 Sep;170(3):777-82. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000080568.91703.18.

    PubMed 12913696
  • Di Stasi SM, Giannantoni A, Giurioli A, Valenti M, Zampa G, Storti L, Attisani F, De Carolis A, Capelli G, Vespasiani G, Stephen RL. Sequential BCG and electromotive mitomycin versus BCG alone for high-risk superficial bladder cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2006 Jan;7(1):43-51. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70472-1.

    PubMed 16389183
  • Di Stasi SM, Valenti M, Verri C, Liberati E, Giurioli A, Leprini G, Masedu F, Ricci AR, Micali F, Vespasiani G. Electromotive instillation of mitomycin immediately before transurethral resection for patients with primary urothelial non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2011 Sep;12(9):871-9. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70190-5. Epub 2011 Aug 8.

    PubMed 21831711

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing intravesical electromotive administration of mitomycin in people with Bladder Cancer, run by University of Rome Tor Vergata.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jun 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Time to first recurrence (time frame: Up to 100 monthss. Time from enrollment to first cystoscopy noting disease recurrence.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04311580, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jun 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in