Adolescent BehaviorNCT04311996
Does Social Buffering Continue to be Effective Over the Peripubertal Period When Friends Share the Stressor Experience?
A study testing Friend and target, Friend support and unfamiliar peer and target in people with Adolescent Behavior and Social Stress, run by University of Minnesota at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this experiment is to determine whether social buffering by friends of stress physiology remains effective later in puberty when friends share the load versus when they provide support but are not undergoing the stressor with the target child. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 11 to 14 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Adolescent Behavior, Social Stress
- What is being tested?
- Friend and target, Friend support and unfamiliar peer and target
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 269 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 25 Oct 2021to 24 Jun 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 11 to 14 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- sufficient vision, hearing, and language skills to provide verbal and written assent
- ability to see and read stimuli presented on the computer screen
- ability to hear verbal instructions provided by the experimenter and judges
Who cannot join
- premature birth (less than 37 weeks)
- congenital and/or chromosomal disorders (e.g. cerebral palsy, FAS, mental retardation, Turner Syndrome, Down Syndrome, Fragile X)
- Autism Spectrum Disorders
- history of serious medical illness (e.g., cancer, organ transplant)
- serious psychiatric illness
- systemic glucocorticoids or beta-adrenergic medication use
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455
About this study
The purpose of this experiment is to determine whether social buffering by friends of stress physiology remains effective later in puberty when friends share the load versus when they provide support but are not undergoing the stressor with the target child. There are four conditions: (1) Friend and Target both undergo the stressor, (2) Friend provides support but does not undergo the stressor, (3) Unfamiliar Peer and Target undergo the stressor, and (4) Alone (no partner).
Read the detailed description
Adolescents experience social evaluation stress frequently. However, it is likely that often they are not alone, but with friends who are also going through the same experience. Thus, it is possible that under these conditions, social buffering by friends does not wane over the peripubertal period. Participants will be assigned to social conditions while engaging in an evaluative stressor task.
- Conditions
- Adolescent Behavior, Social Stress
- Being tested
- Friend and target, Friend support, unfamiliar peer and target, alone
- Medical subject headings
- Adolescent Behavior
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Friend and targetOther
random assignment to Friend and Target Both condition
Friend supportOther
random assignment to Friend Provides Support condition
unfamiliar peer and targetOther
random assignment to Unfamiliar Peer and Target condition
aloneOther
random assignment to Alone condition
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental: Friend and Target Both | Experimental | There are four conditions: (1) Friend and Target both undergo the stressor, (2) Friend provides support but does not undergo the stressor, (3) Unfamiliar Peer and Target undergo the stressor, and (4) Alone (no partner). Receives: Other: Friend and target |
| Experimental: Friend Provides Support | Experimental | There are four conditions: (1) Friend and Target both undergo the stressor, (2) Friend provides support but does not undergo the stressor, (3) Unfamiliar Peer and Target undergo the stressor, and (4) Alone (no partner). Receives: Other: Friend support |
| Experimental: Unfamiliar Peer and Target | Experimental | There are four conditions: (1) Friend and Target both undergo the stressor, (2) Friend provides support but does not undergo the stressor, (3) Unfamiliar Peer and Target undergo the stressor, and (4) Alone (no partner). Receives: Other: unfamiliar peer and target |
| Experimental: Alone | Experimental | There are four conditions: (1) Friend and Target both undergo the stressor, (2) Friend provides support but does not undergo the stressor, (3) Unfamiliar Peer and Target undergo the stressor, and (4) Alone (no partner). Receives: Other: alone |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Cortisol AUCi
Cortisol response to the TSST, measured as Area Under the Curve, increase from baseline. 7 Samples were taken during the course of the assessment, at (1) arrival for training purposes; (2) after the calming video, 30 minutes after arrival; (3) after 5 minutes of speech preparation; (4) after 10+minutes of speech and math performance; (5) 15 minutes after sample 4; (6) 10 minutes after sample 5; (7) 10 minutes after sample 6. Area under the curve at intercept (AUCi) is calculated using samples 2-7 with sample 2 as the intercept.
Measured: 2 hours
sAA AUCi
Salivary Alpha Amylase response to the TSST, measured as Area Under the Curve, increase from baseline. 7 Samples were taken during the course of the assessment, at (1) arrival for training purposes; (2) after the calming video, 30 minutes after arrival; (3) after 5 minutes of speech preparation; (4) after 10+minutes of speech and math performance; (5) 15 minutes after sample 4; (6) 10 minutes after sample 5; (7) 10 minutes after sample 6. Of those, samples (2, 4, 5) are assayed for salivary alpha amylase (sAA) in micrograms per milliliter. Area under the curve at intercept (AUCi) is calculated using samples 2, 4, 5 with sample 2 as the intercept.
Measured: 2 hours
Secondary outcomes (1)
Self Report of Stress
Self-report of stress using a Likert-type scale with 5 levels of stress felt: (1) Not At All, (2) A Little, (3) Some, (4) A Lot, (5) A Whole Lot. Level of stress was reported for at these points during the assessment: (1) How stressed did you feel when you first connected on the video call and saw the experimenter?, (2) How stressful was the period of time before we started the video?, (3) How stressful did you feel while watching the video?, (4) How stressful was the period of time when you were preparing your speech and thinking about what to say?, (5) How stressful was giving the speech?, (6) How stressful was the math portion?, (7) How stressed do you feel now, after the speech and math portions are done? Self reported stress was computed as the mean of items (4, 5, 6) - item 1.
Measured: 2 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Mar 2020
- Study start25 Oct 2021
- Primary completion24 Jun 2023
- Study completion24 Jun 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Adolescent BehaviorStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 269 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Minnesota
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Megan Gunnar, PhD, Principal investigator, University of MinnesotaKathleen Thomas, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Minnesota
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04311996
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STUDY00006378-3
- Status last verified
- Feb 2025
- First submitted
- 13 Mar 2020
- Last updated
- 24 Feb 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Feb 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Does Social Buffering Continue to be Effective Over the Peripubertal Period When Friends Share the Stressor Experience?
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04311996
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STUDY00006378-3
- Conditions
- Adolescent Behavior, Social Stress
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 269 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of MinnesotaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 25 Oct 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 24 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 24 Jun 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 24 Feb 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this experiment is to determine whether social buffering by friends of stress physiology remains effective later in puberty when friends share the load versus when they provide support but are not undergoing the stressor with the target child. There are four conditions: (1) Friend and Target both undergo the stressor, (2) Friend provides support but does not undergo the stressor, (3) Unfamiliar Peer and Target undergo the stressor, and (4) Alone (no partner).
Detailed description
Adolescents experience social evaluation stress frequently. However, it is likely that often they are not alone, but with friends who are also going through the same experience. Thus, it is possible that under these conditions, social buffering by friends does not wane over the peripubertal period. Participants will be assigned to social conditions while engaging in an evaluative stressor task.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental: Friend and Target Both | Experimental | Other: Friend and targetThere are four conditions: (1) Friend and Target both undergo the stressor, (2) Friend provides support but does not undergo the stressor, (3) Unfamiliar Peer and Target undergo the stressor, and (4) Alone (no partner). |
| Experimental: Friend Provides Support | Experimental | Other: Friend supportThere are four conditions: (1) Friend and Target both undergo the stressor, (2) Friend provides support but does not undergo the stressor, (3) Unfamiliar Peer and Target undergo the stressor, and (4) Alone (no partner). |
| Experimental: Unfamiliar Peer and Target | Experimental | Other: unfamiliar peer and targetThere are four conditions: (1) Friend and Target both undergo the stressor, (2) Friend provides support but does not undergo the stressor, (3) Unfamiliar Peer and Target undergo the stressor, and (4) Alone (no partner). |
| Experimental: Alone | Experimental | Other: aloneThere are four conditions: (1) Friend and Target both undergo the stressor, (2) Friend provides support but does not undergo the stressor, (3) Unfamiliar Peer and Target undergo the stressor, and (4) Alone (no partner). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 11 to 14 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- sufficient vision, hearing, and language skills to provide verbal and written assent
- ability to see and read stimuli presented on the computer screen
- ability to hear verbal instructions provided by the experimenter and judges
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- premature birth (less than 37 weeks)
- congenital and/or chromosomal disorders (e.g. cerebral palsy, FAS, mental retardation, Turner Syndrome, Down Syndrome, Fragile X)
- Autism Spectrum Disorders
- history of serious medical illness (e.g., cancer, organ transplant)
- serious psychiatric illness
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Friend and targetrandom assignment to Friend and Target Both condition | Other | Experimental: Friend and Target Both |
| Friend supportrandom assignment to Friend Provides Support condition | Other | Experimental: Friend Provides Support |
| unfamiliar peer and targetrandom assignment to Unfamiliar Peer and Target condition | Other | Experimental: Unfamiliar Peer and Target |
| alonerandom assignment to Alone condition | Other | Experimental: Alone |
Primary outcome
Cortisol AUCi
Time frame: 2 hours
Cortisol response to the TSST, measured as Area Under the Curve, increase from baseline. 7 Samples were taken during the course of the assessment, at (1) arrival for training purposes; (2) after the calming video, 30 minutes after arrival; (3) after 5 minutes of speech preparation; (4) after 10+minutes of speech and math performance; (5) 15 minutes after sample 4; (6) 10 minutes after sample 5; (7) 10 minutes after sample 6. Area under the curve at intercept (AUCi) is calculated using samples 2-7 with sample 2 as the intercept.
sAA AUCi
Time frame: 2 hours
Salivary Alpha Amylase response to the TSST, measured as Area Under the Curve, increase from baseline. 7 Samples were taken during the course of the assessment, at (1) arrival for training purposes; (2) after the calming video, 30 minutes after arrival; (3) after 5 minutes of speech preparation; (4) after 10+minutes of speech and math performance; (5) 15 minutes after sample 4; (6) 10 minutes after sample 5; (7) 10 minutes after sample 6. Of those, samples (2, 4, 5) are assayed for salivary alpha amylase (sAA) in micrograms per milliliter. Area under the curve at intercept (AUCi) is calculated using samples 2, 4, 5 with sample 2 as the intercept.
1 secondary outcome
Self Report of Stress
Time frame: 2 hours
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Feb 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Adolescent Behavior
RecruitingObservational study
Psychotherapy for Irritability in Youth: Comparing Active Treatment to Nonactive Psychoeducation Supportive Psychotherapy
Irritability, Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder
Not yet recruiting
Enlace Familiar: Supporting the Mental Health of Latino Adolescents
Mental Health
Not yet recruiting
Cognitive and Behavioral Approaches to Reduce Binge Eating and Excess Weight in Adolescents (Online)
Binge Eating, Overweight and Obesity
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
PREVENT HPV -Related Cancers Trial
HPV Vaccination, Uptake Vaccination
RecruitingObservational study
Pharmacogenomics of Stimulant Treatment Response
Attention-Deficit/ Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Megan Gunnar, PhD principal investigator
University of Minnesota
Kathleen Thomas, PhD principal investigator
University of Minnesota
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Friend and target, Friend support and unfamiliar peer and target in people with Adolescent Behavior and Social Stress, run by University of Minnesota at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 24 Feb 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Cortisol AUCi (time frame: 2 hours). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Feb 2025.