Osteo Arthritis KneeNCT04312035
Effect of Combined Interventions on Pressure Pain Threshold
A study testing end-range mobilization and Non end-range mobilization in people with Osteo Arthritis Knee, run by University of Pecs at 1 site in Hungary.
Trial summary
The effect of mobilizations on decrease of peripheral and central sensitivity has been proven in KOA. Furthermore, the effect of conservative therapy has also been proven in the increase of pain threshold in KOA. However, no study has investigated the effect of these interventions combined till date in KOA. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 60 to 80 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Osteo Arthritis Knee
- What is being tested?
- end-range mobilization and Non end-range mobilization
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteHungary
- Study dates
- 4 Mar 2020to 4 Mar 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 60 to 80 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- clinical classification criteria of knee osteoarthritis according to the American College of Rheumatology
- categorization as End of Range Problem based on Maitland manual therapy
- unilateral/bilateral moderate-to-severe symptomatic tibiofemoral KOA with radiographic evidence of Kellgren-Lawrence scale 2 or 3
- pain during weight-bearing activities at least within 6 months
- at least 90° knee flexion
- sufficient mental status
Who cannot join
- acute inflammation of the knee
- total knee replacement in the opposite side
- class II. obesity (body mass index>35kg/m2)
- severe degenerative lumbar spine disease (e.g. spondylolisthesis)
- systemic inflammatory arthritic or neurological condition
- physiotherapy/balneotherapy attendance or manual therapy within 3 months
Show all 11Show fewer
- intraarticular injections in the prior 12 months
- use of walking aid
- contraindication for manual therapy
- complex regional pain syndrome
- cognitive impairment
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Effect of End-range Mobilization in Addition to Conservative Therapy on Decrease of Pressure Pain Threshold
The effect of mobilizations on decrease of peripheral and central sensitivity has been proven in KOA. Furthermore, the effect of conservative therapy has also been proven in the increase of pain threshold in KOA. However, no study has investigated the effect of these interventions combined till date in KOA.
The aim of the present study is to investigate the short-term and long-term effect of end-range mobilization in addition to conservative therapy on decrease of pressure pain threshold in KOA.
Read the detailed description
The positive effect of different manual mobilizations have been proven in the management of knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Pressure pain threshold, as a measure of somatosensory function, is a well-applied measurement technique for the pain perception in KOA. The effect of mobilizations on decrease of peripheral and central sensitivity has been proven in KOA. Furthermore, few studies has revealed the effect of conservative therapy as an effective intervention in the increase of pain threshold. However, no study has investigated the effect of these interventions combined till date in KOA, which could give a long-lasting effect in the decrease of sensitization in KOA.
Therefore, the aim of the present study is to investigate the short-term and long-term effect of end-range mobilization in addition to conservative therapy on decrease of pressure pain threshold in KOA.
- Conditions
- Osteo Arthritis Knee
- Being tested
- end-range mobilization, Non end-range mobilization, Control
- Keywords
- Musculoskeletal Manipulations, Osteoarthritis, Knee, Pain Threshold, Conservative Treatment
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoarthritis, Knee
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
end-range mobilizationProcedure or surgery
accessory technique applied on the tibiofemoral joint with the aim of increasing extensibility of the periarticular tissues
Non end-range mobilizationProcedure or surgery
accessory technique applied on the tibiofemoral joint with the aim of alleviating pain
ControlProcedure or surgery
hands-on cutaneous technique
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| End-range mobilization | Experimental | End-range mobilization performed in end-position of the knee joint Receives: Procedure: end-range mobilization |
| Non end-range mobilization | Experimental | Non end-range mobilization performed in loose-packed position of the knee joint Receives: Procedure: Non end-range mobilization |
| Control | Placebo comparator | Sham technique performed in loose-packed position of the knee joint Receives: Procedure: Control |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
change of peripheral sensitivity
peripheral sensitivity (pressure pain threshold) assessed at the local knee
Measured: following 3-week rehabilitation
change of peripheral sensitivity
peripheral sensitivity (pressure pain threshold) assessed at the local knee
Measured: following 3-month
Secondary outcomes (12)
change of central sensitivity
central sensitivity (pressure pain threshold) assessed at the ipsilateral m. extensor carpi radialis longus
Measured: following 3-week rehabilitation
change of central sensitivity
central sensitivity (pressure pain threshold) assessed at the ipsilateral m. extensor carpi radialis longus
Measured: following 3-month
change of general pain intensity
general pain intensity from the previous week using the Visual Analogue Scale
Measured: following 3-week rehabilitation
change of general pain intensity
general pain intensity from the previous week using the Visual Analogue Scale
Measured: following 3-month
change of Timed Up and Go test
short test for measuring physical performance
Measured: following 3-week rehabilitation
change of Timed Up and Go test
short test for measuring physical performance
Measured: following 3-month
change of pain intensity during physical performance
pain intensity measured during the previously mentioned physical performance test using the 0-10 Numerating Pain Rating Scale, where 0 indicate no pain and 10 indicate worst imaginable pain
Measured: following 3-week rehabilitation
change of pain during physical performance
pain intensity measured during the previously mentioned physical performance test using the 0-10 Numerating Pain Rating Scale, where 0 indicate no pain and 10 indicate worst imaginable pain
Measured: following 3-month
degree of knee flexion during passive movement at the onset of knee pain
measurement of degree of knee flexion during passive movement at the onset of knee pain
Measured: following 3-week rehabilitation
degree of knee flexion during passive movement at the onset of knee pain
measurement of degree of knee flexion during passive movement at the onset of knee pain
Measured: following 3-month
strength of resistance of passive knee flexion at the onset of knee pain
measurement of strength of resistance arising from the anterior located tissues around the knee during passive knee flexion at the onset of pain
Measured: following 3-week rehabilitation
strength of resistance of passive knee flexion at the onset of knee pain
measurement of strength of resistance arising from the anterior located tissues around the knee during passive knee flexion at the onset of pain
Measured: following 3-month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Mar 2020
- Study start4 Mar 2020
- Primary completion4 Mar 2020
- Study completion4 Mar 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Osteo Arthritis KneeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Pecs
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Miklós Pozsgai, MSc, Principal investigator, Zsigmondy Vilmos Spa and Balneological Hospital of Harkány
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04312035
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ML_PPT_PhysTher
- Status last verified
- Mar 2020
- First submitted
- 4 Mar 2020
- Last updated
- 17 Mar 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
McAlindon TE, Bannuru RR, Sullivan MC, Arden NK, Berenbaum F, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Hawker GA, Henrotin Y, Hunter DJ, Kawaguchi H, Kwoh K, Lohmander S, Rannou F, Roos EM, Underwood M. OARSI guidelines for the non-surgical management of knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2014 Mar;22(3):363-88. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2014.01.003. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
PubMed 24462672Bajaj P, Bajaj P, Graven-Nielsen T, Arendt-Nielsen L. Osteoarthritis and its association with muscle hyperalgesia: an experimental controlled study. Pain. 2001 Aug;93(2):107-114. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00300-1.
PubMed 11427321Imamura M, Imamura ST, Kaziyama HH, Targino RA, Hsing WT, de Souza LP, Cutait MM, Fregni F, Camanho GL. Impact of nervous system hyperalgesia on pain, disability, and quality of life in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a controlled analysis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Oct 15;59(10):1424-31. doi: 10.1002/art.24120.
PubMed 18821657Moss P, Sluka K, Wright A. The initial effects of knee joint mobilization on osteoarthritic hyperalgesia. Man Ther. 2007 May;12(2):109-18. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2006.02.009. Epub 2006 Jun 13.
PubMed 16777467
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Mar 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of End-range Mobilization in Addition to Conservative Therapy on Decrease of Pressure Pain Threshold
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04312035
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ML_PPT_PhysTher
- Conditions
- Osteo Arthritis Knee
- Keywords
- Musculoskeletal Manipulations, Osteoarthritis, Knee, Pain Threshold, Conservative Treatment
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of PecsUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 4 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 4 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 4 Mar 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The effect of mobilizations on decrease of peripheral and central sensitivity has been proven in KOA. Furthermore, the effect of conservative therapy has also been proven in the increase of pain threshold in KOA. However, no study has investigated the effect of these interventions combined till date in KOA.
The aim of the present study is to investigate the short-term and long-term effect of end-range mobilization in addition to conservative therapy on decrease of pressure pain threshold in KOA.
Detailed description
The positive effect of different manual mobilizations have been proven in the management of knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Pressure pain threshold, as a measure of somatosensory function, is a well-applied measurement technique for the pain perception in KOA. The effect of mobilizations on decrease of peripheral and central sensitivity has been proven in KOA. Furthermore, few studies has revealed the effect of conservative therapy as an effective intervention in the increase of pain threshold. However, no study has investigated the effect of these interventions combined till date in KOA, which could give a long-lasting effect in the decrease of sensitization in KOA.
Therefore, the aim of the present study is to investigate the short-term and long-term effect of end-range mobilization in addition to conservative therapy on decrease of pressure pain threshold in KOA.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| End-range mobilization | Experimental | Procedure: end-range mobilizationEnd-range mobilization performed in end-position of the knee joint |
| Non end-range mobilization | Experimental | Procedure: Non end-range mobilizationNon end-range mobilization performed in loose-packed position of the knee joint |
| Control | Placebo comparator | Procedure: ControlSham technique performed in loose-packed position of the knee joint |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 60 to 80 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- clinical classification criteria of knee osteoarthritis according to the American College of Rheumatology
- categorization as End of Range Problem based on Maitland manual therapy
- unilateral/bilateral moderate-to-severe symptomatic tibiofemoral KOA with radiographic evidence of Kellgren-Lawrence scale 2 or 3
- pain during weight-bearing activities at least within 6 months
- at least 90° knee flexion
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- acute inflammation of the knee
- total knee replacement in the opposite side
- class II. obesity (body mass index>35kg/m2)
- severe degenerative lumbar spine disease (e.g. spondylolisthesis)
- systemic inflammatory arthritic or neurological condition
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| end-range mobilizationaccessory technique applied on the tibiofemoral joint with the aim of increasing extensibility of the periarticular tissues | Procedure or surgery | End-range mobilization |
| Non end-range mobilizationaccessory technique applied on the tibiofemoral joint with the aim of alleviating pain | Procedure or surgery | Non end-range mobilization |
| Controlhands-on cutaneous technique | Procedure or surgery | Control |
Primary outcome
change of peripheral sensitivity
Time frame: following 3-week rehabilitation
peripheral sensitivity (pressure pain threshold) assessed at the local knee
change of peripheral sensitivity
Time frame: following 3-month
peripheral sensitivity (pressure pain threshold) assessed at the local knee
12 secondary outcomes
change of central sensitivity
Time frame: following 3-week rehabilitation
change of central sensitivity
Time frame: following 3-month
change of general pain intensity
Time frame: following 3-week rehabilitation
change of general pain intensity
Time frame: following 3-month
change of Timed Up and Go test
Time frame: following 3-week rehabilitation
change of Timed Up and Go test
Time frame: following 3-month
change of pain intensity during physical performance
Time frame: following 3-week rehabilitation
change of pain during physical performance
Time frame: following 3-month
degree of knee flexion during passive movement at the onset of knee pain
Time frame: following 3-week rehabilitation
degree of knee flexion during passive movement at the onset of knee pain
Time frame: following 3-month
strength of resistance of passive knee flexion at the onset of knee pain
Time frame: following 3-week rehabilitation
strength of resistance of passive knee flexion at the onset of knee pain
Time frame: following 3-month
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Mar 2020.
- Background: PubMed 24462672McAlindon TE, Bannuru RR, Sullivan MC, Arden NK, Berenbaum F, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Hawker GA, Henrotin Y, Hunter DJ, Kawaguchi H, Kwoh K, Lohmander S, Rannou F, Roos EM, Underwood M. OARSI guidelines for the non-surgical management of knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2014 Mar;22(3):363-88. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2014.01.003. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
- Background: PubMed 11427321Bajaj P, Bajaj P, Graven-Nielsen T, Arendt-Nielsen L. Osteoarthritis and its association with muscle hyperalgesia: an experimental controlled study. Pain. 2001 Aug;93(2):107-114. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00300-1.
- Background: PubMed 18821657Imamura M, Imamura ST, Kaziyama HH, Targino RA, Hsing WT, de Souza LP, Cutait MM, Fregni F, Camanho GL. Impact of nervous system hyperalgesia on pain, disability, and quality of life in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a controlled analysis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Oct 15;59(10):1424-31. doi: 10.1002/art.24120.
- Background: PubMed 16777467Moss P, Sluka K, Wright A. The initial effects of knee joint mobilization on osteoarthritic hyperalgesia. Man Ther. 2007 May;12(2):109-18. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2006.02.009. Epub 2006 Jun 13.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Osteo Arthritis Knee
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Persona SoluTion PPS Femur PMCF
Rhematoid Arthritis, Osteo Arthritis of the Knee
Not yet recruiting
Total Hip Replacement: an Investigation of Robotic-assisted Versus conVentional Surgery and Patient-centred outcomEs
Osteo Arthritis Knee and Hip
Active, not recruiting
SakuraBead Used as Resorbable Embolic for Genicular Artery Embolization
Osteo Arthritis Knee, Joint Diseases
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of a Single Intra-Articular Injection of HL-01 in the Treatment of Pain in Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis
Osteo Arthritis of the Knee
Recruiting
Total Versus Robotic Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Replacement
Osteo Arthritis Knee, Arthritis Knee
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Miklós Pozsgai, MSc principal investigator
Zsigmondy Vilmos Spa and Balneological Hospital of Harkány
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing end-range mobilization and Non end-range mobilization in people with Osteo Arthritis Knee, run by University of Pecs at 1 site in Hungary.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Mar 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Hungary. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
change of peripheral sensitivity (time frame: following 3-week rehabilitation). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04312035, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Mar 2020.