Cesarean Section ComplicationsNCT04313218
Carbetocin Versus Misoprostol. A Retrospective Comparative Study
An observational study of Cesarean Section Complications, run by Port Said University hospital at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
Cesarean section is one of the most common surgeries practiced for save delivery of the fetus, however it is not a safe route of delivery its incidence is rising especially in high and middle income countries. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Cesarean Section Complications
- What is being tested?
- Carbetocin
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- How many people
- 300 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2018to 28 Feb 2020
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: women who underwent CS and were considered at low risk for postpartum including 1- singleton pregnancy, 2- less than previous four deliveries, 3- elective lower segment C.S, 4- C.S was done under general anesthesia 5- No medical disorders complicating pregnancy, 6- Placenta neither previa nor morbidly adherent, 7- Average amount of amniotic fluid, 8- No past history of postpartum hemorrhage and 9- No contraindications to Misopristol or Carbetocin
Who may be able to join
- parity less than 4
- unscarred uterus or previous one cesarean section
- elective C.S
- general anesthesia
Who cannot join
- medical disorders complicating pregnancy
- more than one C.S
- selective C.S
- Risk factors for Postpartum hemorrhage
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Carbetocin Versus Misoprostol in Reducing Blood Loss During Cesarean Section in Low Risk Patients. A Retrospective Comparative Study
Cesarean section is one of the most common surgeries practiced for save delivery of the fetus, however it is not a safe route of delivery its incidence is rising especially in high and middle income countries. The major concern is that the average blood loss during cesarean delivery is 487 ml, this amount is too close to the definition of postpartum hemorrhage by WHO as loss of 500 cc of blood in the first 24 hours after delivery making control of blood loss during cesarean delivery crucial to decrease maternal morbidities.This study aim to compare the use of misoprostol to carbetocin in reducing blood loss during cesarean section in low risk patients
Read the detailed description
Cesarean section is one of the most common surgeries practiced for save delivery of the fetus, however it is not a safe route of delivery its incidence is rising especially in high and middle income countries. Although the WHO recommended cesarean section rate between 10 to 15% to decline the maternal mortality ratio and Neonatal mortality ratio, the incidence show sharp increase especially in Egypt to reach 52% of all deliveries. The major concern is that the average blood loss during cesarean delivery is 487 ml, this amount is too close to the definition of postpartum hemorrhage by WHO as loss of 500 cc of blood in the first 24 hours after delivery making control of blood loss during cesarean delivery crucial to decrease maternal morbidities. Many medications used to decrease blood loss especially placental site bleeding during cesarean section including oxytocin, ergometrine, synthetic prostaglandins and recently carbetocin.
Carbetocin is an oxytocin analogue containing eight amino acids .It binds to oxytocin receptors expressed on uterine muscles of pregnant women inducing tetanic uterine contractions for about 11 minutes after administration of 8-30ug intravenous followed by rhythmic uterine contractions that last for 60 to 120 minutes. Also it has a longer half life time than oxytocin and the recommended dose is 100ug IV.
Misoprostol is synthetic analogue to prostaglandin which is cheap heat stable uterotonic making it the alternative of choice to intravenous oxytocin in low resources countries. The recommended dose for prophylaxis against postpartum hemorrhage is 600μg while 800μg is used as a treatment.
In the lack of sufficient studies comparing the use of carbetocin to misoprostol to decrease blood loss during cesarean section we perform this study to compare the use of misoprostol to carbetocin in reducing blood loss during cesarean section.
Patients and Methods This was a retrospective comparative study conducted in Port Said General Hospital And Private practice in Port Said Egypt. Following approval of the study protocol by the ethical committee in Faculty of medicine Port Said University. The medical records of patients in the period from January 2018 to February 2019 were searched; women who underwent CS and were considered at low risk for postpartum including 1- singleton pregnancy, 2- less than previous four deliveries, 3- elective lower segment C.S, 4- C.S was done under general anesthesia 5- No medical disorders complicating pregnancy, 6- Placenta neither previa nor morbidly adherent, 7- Average amount of amniotic fluid, 8- No past history of postpartum hemorrhage and 9- No contraindications to Misopristol or Carbetocin 300 patients were eligible and were enrolled in this study. Women who received Carbetocin 100ug i.v (PABAL 100 micrograms/ml solution for injection, Ferring Pharmaceuticals Ltd) intra operative immediately after extraction of the fetus, were enrolled into group A and women who received misoprostol 600ug (cytotec 200ug tablet, Pfizer G.D. Searle LLC) rectally immediately before sterilization during caesarean section were enrolled into group B.
Maternal data (demographic and clinical), ultrasound findings, operative details, and postoperative characteristics were recorded in a database. The outcome measures of this study were the need for blood products transfusion, the amount of blood products transfusion, the operative time, operative complications uterine atony the need for surgical interventions to stop bleeding as uterine artery ligation and uterine compression sutures and the deficit in hemoglobin level.
- Conditions
- Cesarean Section Complications
- Being tested
- Carbetocin
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CarbetocinDrug
Also called misoprostol
iv infusion of 100ug carbetocin after extraction of the fetus during cesarean section
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| A | recieved carbetocin 100ug iv after immediately after extraction of the fetus during cesarean section Receives: Drug: Carbetocin | |
| B | women who received misoprostol 600ug rectally immediately before sterilization during cesarean section |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
blood loss
reduction of blood loss during cesarean section operation
Measured: during operation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Mar 2020
- Study start1 Jan 2018
- Primary completion1 Feb 2020
- Study completion28 Feb 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Cesarean Section ComplicationsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Port Said University hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, waleed elsayed elrefaie, Port Said University hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04313218
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- OBSGYN 1
- Status last verified
- Mar 2020
- First submitted
- 15 Mar 2020
- Last updated
- 18 Mar 2020
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Mar 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Carbetocin Versus Misoprostol in Reducing Blood Loss During Cesarean Section in Low Risk Patients. A Retrospective Comparative Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04313218
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- OBSGYN 1
- Conditions
- Cesarean Section Complications
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Port Said University hospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Feb 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Feb 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Cesarean section is one of the most common surgeries practiced for save delivery of the fetus, however it is not a safe route of delivery its incidence is rising especially in high and middle income countries. The major concern is that the average blood loss during cesarean delivery is 487 ml, this amount is too close to the definition of postpartum hemorrhage by WHO as loss of 500 cc of blood in the first 24 hours after delivery making control of blood loss during cesarean delivery crucial to decrease maternal morbidities.This study aim to compare the use of misoprostol to carbetocin in reducing blood loss during cesarean section in low risk patients
Detailed description
Cesarean section is one of the most common surgeries practiced for save delivery of the fetus, however it is not a safe route of delivery its incidence is rising especially in high and middle income countries. Although the WHO recommended cesarean section rate between 10 to 15% to decline the maternal mortality ratio and Neonatal mortality ratio, the incidence show sharp increase especially in Egypt to reach 52% of all deliveries. The major concern is that the average blood loss during cesarean delivery is 487 ml, this amount is too close to the definition of postpartum hemorrhage by WHO as loss of 500 cc of blood in the first 24 hours after delivery making control of blood loss during cesarean delivery crucial to decrease maternal morbidities. Many medications used to decrease blood loss especially placental site bleeding during cesarean section including oxytocin, ergometrine, synthetic prostaglandins and recently carbetocin.
Carbetocin is an oxytocin analogue containing eight amino acids .It binds to oxytocin receptors expressed on uterine muscles of pregnant women inducing tetanic uterine contractions for about 11 minutes after administration of 8-30ug intravenous followed by rhythmic uterine contractions that last for 60 to 120 minutes. Also it has a longer half life time than oxytocin and the recommended dose is 100ug IV.
Misoprostol is synthetic analogue to prostaglandin which is cheap heat stable uterotonic making it the alternative of choice to intravenous oxytocin in low resources countries. The recommended dose for prophylaxis against postpartum hemorrhage is 600μg while 800μg is used as a treatment.
In the lack of sufficient studies comparing the use of carbetocin to misoprostol to decrease blood loss during cesarean section we perform this study to compare the use of misoprostol to carbetocin in reducing blood loss during cesarean section.
Patients and Methods This was a retrospective comparative study conducted in Port Said General Hospital And Private practice in Port Said Egypt. Following approval of the study protocol by the ethical committee in Faculty of medicine Port Said University. The medical records of patients in the period from January 2018 to February 2019 were searched; women who underwent CS and were considered at low risk for postpartum including 1- singleton pregnancy, 2- less than previous four deliveries, 3- elective lower segment C.S, 4- C.S was done under general anesthesia 5- No medical disorders complicating pregnancy, 6- Placenta neither previa nor morbidly adherent, 7- Average amount of amniotic fluid, 8- No past history of postpartum hemorrhage and 9- No contraindications to Misopristol or Carbetocin 300 patients were eligible and were enrolled in this study. Women who received Carbetocin 100ug i.v (PABAL 100 micrograms/ml solution for injection, Ferring Pharmaceuticals Ltd) intra operative immediately after extraction of the fetus, were enrolled into group A and women who received misoprostol 600ug (cytotec 200ug tablet, Pfizer G.D. Searle LLC) rectally immediately before sterilization during caesarean section were enrolled into group B.
Maternal data (demographic and clinical), ultrasound findings, operative details, and postoperative characteristics were recorded in a database. The outcome measures of this study were the need for blood products transfusion, the amount of blood products transfusion, the operative time, operative complications uterine atony the need for surgical interventions to stop bleeding as uterine artery ligation and uterine compression sutures and the deficit in hemoglobin level.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| A | – | Drug: Carbetocinrecieved carbetocin 100ug iv after immediately after extraction of the fetus during cesarean section |
| B | – | –women who received misoprostol 600ug rectally immediately before sterilization during cesarean section |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- women who underwent CS and were considered at low risk for postpartum including 1- singleton pregnancy, 2- less than previous four deliveries, 3- elective lower segment C.S, 4- C.S was done under general anesthesia 5- No medical disorders complicating pregnancy, 6- Placenta neither previa nor morbidly adherent, 7- Average amount of amniotic fluid, 8- No past history of postpartum hemorrhage and 9- No contraindications to Misopristol or Carbetocin
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- parity less than 4
- unscarred uterus or previous one cesarean section
- elective C.S
- general anesthesia
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- medical disorders complicating pregnancy
- more than one C.S
- selective C.S
- Risk factors for Postpartum hemorrhage
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CarbetocinAlso: misoprostoliv infusion of 100ug carbetocin after extraction of the fetus during cesarean section | Drug | A |
Primary outcome
blood loss
Time frame: during operation
reduction of blood loss during cesarean section operation
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Mar 2020.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cesarean Section Complications
Recruiting
Clinical Impact of Uterine Repair During Cesarean Section With Barbed Suture on the Incidence of Isthmocele
Isthmocele, Cesarean Scar Defect
Not yet recruiting
The Mepilex Cesarean Delivery Trial / MEPIDEL
Surgical Site Infection
Recruiting
Lateral QL Block vs Intrathecal Morphine for Cesarean Section
Anesthesia, Postoperative Pain
Recruiting
Sustained Cord Circulation at Emergency Cesarean Section
Asphyxia Neonatorum, Fetal Hypoxia
Recruiting
Reducing Chronic Pain Following Cesarean Delivery
Chronic Pain, Cesarean Section Complications
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Cesarean Section Complications, run by Port Said University hospital at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Mar 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
blood loss (time frame: during operation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Mar 2020.