AzTrials
AzTrials

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)Phase 3SAC-COVIDNCT04317040

Efprezimod Alfa (CD24Fc, MK-7110) as a Non-antiviral Immunomodulator in COVID-19 Treatment (MK-7110-007)

A Phase 3 study testing Efprezimod alfa in people with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), run by Oncoimmune, Inc., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. (Rahway, New Jersey USA) at 10 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of efprezimod alfa in hospitalized adult participants who are diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and receiving oxygen support. The primary hypothesis of the study is clinical improvement in the experimental group versus the control group. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
What is being tested?
Efprezimod alfa
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
234 participants
Where
10 sitesUnited States
Study dates
24 Apr 2020to 20 Oct 2020
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-coV-2) viral infection
  • Severe or critical COVID-19, or National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) 8-point ordinal score 2, 3 or 4 (Scale 2: requiring invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); Scale 3: non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices; Scale 4: supplemental oxygen support; a peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2) </= 94% or tachypnea (respiratory rate >/= 24 breaths/min). Intubation should be within 7 days

Who cannot join

  • Participants who are pregnant, breastfeeding, or have a positive pregnancy test result before enrollment
  • Participants previously enrolled in the efprezimod alfa study
  • Intubation for invasive mechanical ventilation is over 7 days
  • Documented acute renal or hepatic failure
  • The investigator believes that participating in the trial is not in the best interests of the participant, or the investigator considers unsuitable for enrollment (such as unpredictable risks or subject compliance issues)

Trial locations and contacts

10 sites in 1 country.

10 sites in 1 country

United States10 sites
  • Anne Anundel Medical Center

    Annapolis, Maryland, 21401

  • Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland Baltimore

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21201

  • Cooper University Hospital

    Camden, New Jersey, 08103

  • University Hospitals of Cleveland

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44106

  • The Ohio State University Medical Center

    Columbus, Ohio, 43210

  • University of Texas at Houston

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • Baptist Health Research Institute

    Jacksonville, Florida, 32207

  • Atlantic Health System

    Morristown, New Jersey, 07960

  • Shady Grove Medical Center

    Rockville, Maryland, 20850

  • White Oak Medical Center

    Silver Spring, Maryland, 20904

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multi-site, Phase III Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of CD24Fc in COVID-19 Treatment

This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of efprezimod alfa in hospitalized adult participants who are diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and receiving oxygen support.

The primary hypothesis of the study is clinical improvement in the experimental group versus the control group.

Being tested
Efprezimod alfa, Placebo
Medical subject headings
COVID-19

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Efprezimod alfaDrug

    Also called Human CD24, Human IgG Fc Fusion Protein, MK-7110

    Efprezimod alfa is given on Day 1.

  • PlaceboDrug

    Also called Saline

    Placebo is given on Day 1.

Study groups in NCT04317040
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Efprezimod alfaExperimentalParticipants receive single dose of 480 mg efprezimod alfa, diluted to 100 ml with normal saline, intravenous (IV) infusion in 60 minutes on Day 1.
Receives: Drug: Efprezimod alfa
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorParticipants receive single dose of placebo as normal saline solution 100 ml, IV infusion in 60 minutes, on Day 1.
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Time to Improvement in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Clinical Status

    Time to improvement in COVID-19 clinical status: defined as time (days) required from start of treatment to improvement of clinical status severe - moderate/mild or improvement from score 2-4 to ≥5 sustained without drop below 5 within 28 days from randomization, total follow-up period 29 days (Randomization Day 1 + 28 days follow up) per National Institute of Allergy \& Infectious Diseases (NIAID) ordinal scale graded: 1=Death; 2=Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV)/extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); 3=Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation (NIV)/high flow oxygen devices; 4=Hospitalized, require supplemental oxygen; 5=Hospitalized, no supplemental oxygen, require medical care; 6=Hospitalized, no supplemental oxygen, don't require medical care; 7=Not hospitalized, limitation on activities \&/or require home oxygen; 8=Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities. Median time \& 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported using Brookmeyer-Crowley method.

    Measured: Up to Day 29

  2. Number of Participants Who Experience an Adverse Event (AE)

    An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it is considered related to the medical treatment or procedure, that occurs during the course of the study. Per protocol, only AEs with Common Terminology Criteria for AE (CTACAE) grade ≥3 were included. The number of participants who experienced an AE were reported.

    Measured: Up to 30 days

Secondary outcomes (13)
  1. Percentage of Participants Who Died or Had Respiratory Failure (RF)

    RF was defined as the need for any of the following: 1) mechanical ventilation (MV), 2) ECMO, 3) NIV, or 4) high flow oxygen devices. Percentage of participants who died or had respiratory failure by Day 29 were reported.

    Measured: Up to Day 29

  2. Time to Disease Progression in Clinical Status of COVID-19

    Time to disease progression in clinical status is defined as the time (days) for progression from NIAID score (3 or 4) to (2 or 1) or from 2 to 1 within 28 days from randomization, total follow-up period 29 days (Randomization Day 1 + 28 days follow up). NIAID ordinal scale graded as: 1=Death; 2=Hospitalized, on IMV/ECMO; 3=Hospitalized, on NIV/high flow oxygen devices; 4= Hospitalized, require supplemental oxygen; 5=Hospitalized, no supplemental oxygen, require medical care; 6=Hospitalized, no supplemental oxygen, do not require medical care; 7=Not Hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or require home oxygen; 8=Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities.

    Measured: Up to Day 29

  3. Number of Participants Who Died Due to Any Cause

    Number of participants who died due to any cause were assessed per protocol on Day 15 and Day 29.

    Measured: Up to Day 29

  4. Rate of Clinical Relapse

    Rate of clinical relapse was defined as the percentage of participants who had initially reached score 5 on NIAID ordinal scale for more than one day but subsequently became dependent on oxygen support for more than 1 day within 28 days from randomization after initial recovery with a total follow-up period of 29 days (Day 1 of randomization plus 28 days of follow-up). NIAID ordinal scale graded as: 1=Death; 2=Hospitalized, on IMV/ECMO; 3=Hospitalized, on NIV/high flow oxygen devices; 4= Hospitalized, require supplemental oxygen; 5=Hospitalized, no supplemental oxygen, require medical care; 6=Hospitalized, no supplemental oxygen, do not require medical care; 7=Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or require home oxygen; 8=Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities. Clopper-Pearson method was used to report the 95% CI.

    Measured: Up to Day 29

  5. Conversion Rate of COVID-19 Clinical Status

    Conversion rate of COVID-19 clinical status on days 8 and 15 was defined as the percentage of participants who changed from NIAID ordinal score 2, 3, 4 to score 5 or higher and reported. NIAID ordinal scale graded as: 1=Death; 2=Hospitalized, on IMV/ECMO; 3=Hospitalized, on NIV/high flow oxygen devices; 4= Hospitalized, require supplemental oxygen; 5=Hospitalized, no supplemental oxygen, require medical care; 6=Hospitalized, no supplemental oxygen, do not require medical care; 7=Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or require home oxygen; 8=Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities.

    Measured: Up to Day 15

  6. Time to Hospital Discharge

    The hospital discharge time was defined as the time from randomization to discharge from the hospital and reported. Time to Hospital Discharge (days) from randomization is calculated as: Time to hospital discharge = Date of hospital discharge - Date of randomization.

    Measured: Up to Day 29

  7. Duration of MV

    MV included IMV and NIV. Duration of MV (days) was calculated as: End Date of MV - Start Date of MV + 1 and reported.

    Measured: Up to Day 29

  8. Duration of Pressors

    Pressor administration included norepinephrine, epinephrine, vasopressin, dopamine and phenylephrine. Duration of pressor (days) was defined as: End Date of Pressor - Start Date of Pressor + 1 and reported.

    Measured: Up to Day 29

  9. Duration of ECMO

    Duration of ECMO treatment (days) was calculated as: End Date of ECMO Treatment - Start Date of ECMO Treatment + 1 and reported.

    Measured: Up to Day 29

  10. Duration of High Flow Oxygen Therapy

    Duration of oxygen therapy (oxygen inhalation by high flow nasal cannula or mask) (days) was calculated as: End Date of high flow oxygen therapy - Start Date of high flow oxygen therapy + 1 and reported.

    Measured: Up to Day 29

  11. Length of Hospital Stay

    Length of Hospital Stay (Days) was defined as date of discharge - date of admission + 1 and reported. Data presented below include hospitalization time prior to enrollment in the study with total duration of up to 90 days.

    Measured: Up to 90 days

  12. Change From Baseline in Absolute Lymphocyte Count

    Blood samples were collected to present the change from baseline in the absolute lymphocyte count on days 1, 4, 8, and 15 in peripheral blood. To calculate the change from baseline in absolute lymphocyte count at specific timepoints (Days 1, 4, 8 and 15), only the participants who had both, a baseline, and a post baseline value at the specific timepoint (Days 1, 4, 8 and 15) were included in the analysis.

    Measured: Baseline and up to Day 15

  13. Change From Baseline in D-Dimer Concentration

    Blood samples were collected to present the change from baseline in the D-dimer concentration on days 4, 8 and 15 in peripheral blood. To calculate change from baseline in D-dimer concentration at specific timepoints (Days 4, 8 and 15), only the participants who had both, a baseline, and a post baseline value at the specific timepoint (Days 4, 8 and 15) were included in the analysis.

    Measured: Baseline and up to Day 15

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Mar 2020
  2. Study start24 Apr 2020
  3. Primary completion20 Oct 2020
  4. Study completion20 Oct 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
234 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04317040
Sponsor's protocol ID
7110-007
Other IDs
20200674, CD24Fc-007-US, MK-7110-007
Acronym
SAC-COVID
Status last verified
Jan 2023
First submitted
19 Mar 2020
Last updated
8 Feb 2023
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: http://engagezone.msd.com/doc/ProcedureAccessClinicalTrialData.pdf

Publications

  • Chen GY, Brown NK, Zheng P, Liu Y. Siglec-G/10 in self-nonself discrimination of innate and adaptive immunity. Glycobiology. 2014 Sep;24(9):800-6. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwu068. Epub 2014 Jul 4.

    PubMed 24996822
  • Liu Y, Chen GY, Zheng P. Sialoside-based pattern recognitions discriminating infections from tissue injuries. Curr Opin Immunol. 2011 Feb;23(1):41-5. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2010.10.004. Epub 2011 Jan 3.

    PubMed 21208791
  • Chen GY, Chen X, King S, Cavassani KA, Cheng J, Zheng X, Cao H, Yu H, Qu J, Fang D, Wu W, Bai XF, Liu JQ, Woodiga SA, Chen C, Sun L, Hogaboam CM, Kunkel SL, Zheng P, Liu Y. Amelioration of sepsis by inhibiting sialidase-mediated disruption of the CD24-SiglecG interaction. Nat Biotechnol. 2011 May;29(5):428-35. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1846. Epub 2011 Apr 10.

    PubMed 21478876
  • Chen GY, Tang J, Zheng P, Liu Y. CD24 and Siglec-10 selectively repress tissue damage-induced immune responses. Science. 2009 Mar 27;323(5922):1722-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1168988. Epub 2009 Mar 5.

    PubMed 19264983
  • Tian RR, Zhang MX, Zhang LT, Zhang P, Ma JP, Liu M, Devenport M, Zheng P, Zhang XL, Lian XD, Ye M, Zheng HY, Pang W, Zhang GH, Zhang LG, Liu Y, Zheng YT. CD24 and Fc fusion protein protects SIVmac239-infected Chinese rhesus macaque against progression to AIDS. Antiviral Res. 2018 Sep;157:9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2018.07.004. Epub 2018 Jul 3.

    PubMed 29983395
  • Tian RR, Zhang MX, Liu M, Fang X, Li D, Zhang L, Zheng P, Zheng YT, Liu Y. CD24Fc protects against viral pneumonia in simian immunodeficiency virus-infected Chinese rhesus monkeys. Cell Mol Immunol. 2020 Aug;17(8):887-888. doi: 10.1038/s41423-020-0452-5. Epub 2020 May 7. No abstract available.

    PubMed 32382131
  • Welker J, Pulido JD, Catanzaro AT, Malvestutto CD, Li Z, Cohen JB, Whitman ED, Byrne D, Giddings OK, Lake JE, Chua JV, Li E, Chen J, Zhou X, He K, Gates D, Kaur A, Chen J, Chou HY, Devenport M, Touomou R, Kottilil S, Liu Y, Zheng P; SAC-COVID Study Team. Efficacy and safety of CD24Fc in hospitalised patients with COVID-19: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 May;22(5):611-621. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00058-5. Epub 2022 Mar 11.

    PubMed 35286843
  • Song NJ, Allen C, Vilgelm AE, Riesenberg BP, Weller KP, Reynolds K, Chakravarthy KB, Kumar A, Khatiwada A, Sun Z, Ma A, Chang Y, Yusuf M, Li A, Zeng C, Evans JP, Bucci D, Gunasena M, Xu M, Liyanage NPM, Bolyard C, Velegraki M, Liu SL, Ma Q, Devenport M, Liu Y, Zheng P, Malvestutto CD, Chung D, Li Z. Treatment with soluble CD24 attenuates COVID-19-associated systemic immunopathology. J Hematol Oncol. 2022 Jan 10;15(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13045-021-01222-y.

    PubMed 35012610

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Efprezimod alfa in people with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), run by Oncoimmune, Inc., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. (Rahway, New Jersey USA) at 10 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Feb 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 10 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 Oct 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Time to Improvement in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Clinical Status (time frame: Up to Day 29). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04317040, which also lists 8 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Feb 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in