Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)Phase 3SAC-COVIDNCT04317040
Efprezimod Alfa (CD24Fc, MK-7110) as a Non-antiviral Immunomodulator in COVID-19 Treatment (MK-7110-007)
A Phase 3 study testing Efprezimod alfa in people with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), run by Oncoimmune, Inc., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. (Rahway, New Jersey USA) at 10 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of efprezimod alfa in hospitalized adult participants who are diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and receiving oxygen support. The primary hypothesis of the study is clinical improvement in the experimental group versus the control group. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
- What is being tested?
- Efprezimod alfa
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 234 participants
- Where
- 10 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 24 Apr 2020to 20 Oct 2020
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-coV-2) viral infection
- Severe or critical COVID-19, or National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) 8-point ordinal score 2, 3 or 4 (Scale 2: requiring invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); Scale 3: non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices; Scale 4: supplemental oxygen support; a peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2) </= 94% or tachypnea (respiratory rate >/= 24 breaths/min). Intubation should be within 7 days
Who cannot join
- Participants who are pregnant, breastfeeding, or have a positive pregnancy test result before enrollment
- Participants previously enrolled in the efprezimod alfa study
- Intubation for invasive mechanical ventilation is over 7 days
- Documented acute renal or hepatic failure
- The investigator believes that participating in the trial is not in the best interests of the participant, or the investigator considers unsuitable for enrollment (such as unpredictable risks or subject compliance issues)
Trial locations and contacts
10 sites in 1 country.
10 sites in 1 country
United States10 sites
Anne Anundel Medical Center
Annapolis, Maryland, 21401
Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland Baltimore
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201
Cooper University Hospital
Camden, New Jersey, 08103
University Hospitals of Cleveland
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106
The Ohio State University Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
University of Texas at Houston
Houston, Texas, 77030
Baptist Health Research Institute
Jacksonville, Florida, 32207
Atlantic Health System
Morristown, New Jersey, 07960
Shady Grove Medical Center
Rockville, Maryland, 20850
White Oak Medical Center
Silver Spring, Maryland, 20904
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multi-site, Phase III Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of CD24Fc in COVID-19 Treatment
This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of efprezimod alfa in hospitalized adult participants who are diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and receiving oxygen support.
The primary hypothesis of the study is clinical improvement in the experimental group versus the control group.
- Conditions
- Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
- Being tested
- Efprezimod alfa, Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- COVID-19
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Efprezimod alfaDrug
Also called Human CD24, Human IgG Fc Fusion Protein, MK-7110
Efprezimod alfa is given on Day 1.
PlaceboDrug
Also called Saline
Placebo is given on Day 1.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Efprezimod alfa | Experimental | Participants receive single dose of 480 mg efprezimod alfa, diluted to 100 ml with normal saline, intravenous (IV) infusion in 60 minutes on Day 1. Receives: Drug: Efprezimod alfa |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Participants receive single dose of placebo as normal saline solution 100 ml, IV infusion in 60 minutes, on Day 1. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time to Improvement in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Clinical Status
Time to improvement in COVID-19 clinical status: defined as time (days) required from start of treatment to improvement of clinical status severe - moderate/mild or improvement from score 2-4 to ≥5 sustained without drop below 5 within 28 days from randomization, total follow-up period 29 days (Randomization Day 1 + 28 days follow up) per National Institute of Allergy \& Infectious Diseases (NIAID) ordinal scale graded: 1=Death; 2=Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV)/extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); 3=Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation (NIV)/high flow oxygen devices; 4=Hospitalized, require supplemental oxygen; 5=Hospitalized, no supplemental oxygen, require medical care; 6=Hospitalized, no supplemental oxygen, don't require medical care; 7=Not hospitalized, limitation on activities \&/or require home oxygen; 8=Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities. Median time \& 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported using Brookmeyer-Crowley method.
Measured: Up to Day 29
Number of Participants Who Experience an Adverse Event (AE)
An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it is considered related to the medical treatment or procedure, that occurs during the course of the study. Per protocol, only AEs with Common Terminology Criteria for AE (CTACAE) grade ≥3 were included. The number of participants who experienced an AE were reported.
Measured: Up to 30 days
Secondary outcomes (13)
Percentage of Participants Who Died or Had Respiratory Failure (RF)
RF was defined as the need for any of the following: 1) mechanical ventilation (MV), 2) ECMO, 3) NIV, or 4) high flow oxygen devices. Percentage of participants who died or had respiratory failure by Day 29 were reported.
Measured: Up to Day 29
Time to Disease Progression in Clinical Status of COVID-19
Time to disease progression in clinical status is defined as the time (days) for progression from NIAID score (3 or 4) to (2 or 1) or from 2 to 1 within 28 days from randomization, total follow-up period 29 days (Randomization Day 1 + 28 days follow up). NIAID ordinal scale graded as: 1=Death; 2=Hospitalized, on IMV/ECMO; 3=Hospitalized, on NIV/high flow oxygen devices; 4= Hospitalized, require supplemental oxygen; 5=Hospitalized, no supplemental oxygen, require medical care; 6=Hospitalized, no supplemental oxygen, do not require medical care; 7=Not Hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or require home oxygen; 8=Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities.
Measured: Up to Day 29
Number of Participants Who Died Due to Any Cause
Number of participants who died due to any cause were assessed per protocol on Day 15 and Day 29.
Measured: Up to Day 29
Rate of Clinical Relapse
Rate of clinical relapse was defined as the percentage of participants who had initially reached score 5 on NIAID ordinal scale for more than one day but subsequently became dependent on oxygen support for more than 1 day within 28 days from randomization after initial recovery with a total follow-up period of 29 days (Day 1 of randomization plus 28 days of follow-up). NIAID ordinal scale graded as: 1=Death; 2=Hospitalized, on IMV/ECMO; 3=Hospitalized, on NIV/high flow oxygen devices; 4= Hospitalized, require supplemental oxygen; 5=Hospitalized, no supplemental oxygen, require medical care; 6=Hospitalized, no supplemental oxygen, do not require medical care; 7=Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or require home oxygen; 8=Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities. Clopper-Pearson method was used to report the 95% CI.
Measured: Up to Day 29
Conversion Rate of COVID-19 Clinical Status
Conversion rate of COVID-19 clinical status on days 8 and 15 was defined as the percentage of participants who changed from NIAID ordinal score 2, 3, 4 to score 5 or higher and reported. NIAID ordinal scale graded as: 1=Death; 2=Hospitalized, on IMV/ECMO; 3=Hospitalized, on NIV/high flow oxygen devices; 4= Hospitalized, require supplemental oxygen; 5=Hospitalized, no supplemental oxygen, require medical care; 6=Hospitalized, no supplemental oxygen, do not require medical care; 7=Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or require home oxygen; 8=Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities.
Measured: Up to Day 15
Time to Hospital Discharge
The hospital discharge time was defined as the time from randomization to discharge from the hospital and reported. Time to Hospital Discharge (days) from randomization is calculated as: Time to hospital discharge = Date of hospital discharge - Date of randomization.
Measured: Up to Day 29
Duration of MV
MV included IMV and NIV. Duration of MV (days) was calculated as: End Date of MV - Start Date of MV + 1 and reported.
Measured: Up to Day 29
Duration of Pressors
Pressor administration included norepinephrine, epinephrine, vasopressin, dopamine and phenylephrine. Duration of pressor (days) was defined as: End Date of Pressor - Start Date of Pressor + 1 and reported.
Measured: Up to Day 29
Duration of ECMO
Duration of ECMO treatment (days) was calculated as: End Date of ECMO Treatment - Start Date of ECMO Treatment + 1 and reported.
Measured: Up to Day 29
Duration of High Flow Oxygen Therapy
Duration of oxygen therapy (oxygen inhalation by high flow nasal cannula or mask) (days) was calculated as: End Date of high flow oxygen therapy - Start Date of high flow oxygen therapy + 1 and reported.
Measured: Up to Day 29
Length of Hospital Stay
Length of Hospital Stay (Days) was defined as date of discharge - date of admission + 1 and reported. Data presented below include hospitalization time prior to enrollment in the study with total duration of up to 90 days.
Measured: Up to 90 days
Change From Baseline in Absolute Lymphocyte Count
Blood samples were collected to present the change from baseline in the absolute lymphocyte count on days 1, 4, 8, and 15 in peripheral blood. To calculate the change from baseline in absolute lymphocyte count at specific timepoints (Days 1, 4, 8 and 15), only the participants who had both, a baseline, and a post baseline value at the specific timepoint (Days 1, 4, 8 and 15) were included in the analysis.
Measured: Baseline and up to Day 15
Change From Baseline in D-Dimer Concentration
Blood samples were collected to present the change from baseline in the D-dimer concentration on days 4, 8 and 15 in peripheral blood. To calculate change from baseline in D-dimer concentration at specific timepoints (Days 4, 8 and 15), only the participants who had both, a baseline, and a post baseline value at the specific timepoint (Days 4, 8 and 15) were included in the analysis.
Measured: Baseline and up to Day 15
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Mar 2020
- Study start24 Apr 2020
- Primary completion20 Oct 2020
- Study completion20 Oct 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 234 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Oncoimmune, Inc., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. (Rahway, New Jersey USA)
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Medical Director, Study director, Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04317040
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 7110-007
- Other IDs
- 20200674, CD24Fc-007-US, MK-7110-007
- Acronym
- SAC-COVID
- Status last verified
- Jan 2023
- First submitted
- 19 Mar 2020
- Last updated
- 8 Feb 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: http://engagezone.msd.com/doc/ProcedureAccessClinicalTrialData.pdf
Publications
Chen GY, Brown NK, Zheng P, Liu Y. Siglec-G/10 in self-nonself discrimination of innate and adaptive immunity. Glycobiology. 2014 Sep;24(9):800-6. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwu068. Epub 2014 Jul 4.
PubMed 24996822Liu Y, Chen GY, Zheng P. Sialoside-based pattern recognitions discriminating infections from tissue injuries. Curr Opin Immunol. 2011 Feb;23(1):41-5. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2010.10.004. Epub 2011 Jan 3.
PubMed 21208791Chen GY, Chen X, King S, Cavassani KA, Cheng J, Zheng X, Cao H, Yu H, Qu J, Fang D, Wu W, Bai XF, Liu JQ, Woodiga SA, Chen C, Sun L, Hogaboam CM, Kunkel SL, Zheng P, Liu Y. Amelioration of sepsis by inhibiting sialidase-mediated disruption of the CD24-SiglecG interaction. Nat Biotechnol. 2011 May;29(5):428-35. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1846. Epub 2011 Apr 10.
PubMed 21478876Chen GY, Tang J, Zheng P, Liu Y. CD24 and Siglec-10 selectively repress tissue damage-induced immune responses. Science. 2009 Mar 27;323(5922):1722-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1168988. Epub 2009 Mar 5.
PubMed 19264983Tian RR, Zhang MX, Zhang LT, Zhang P, Ma JP, Liu M, Devenport M, Zheng P, Zhang XL, Lian XD, Ye M, Zheng HY, Pang W, Zhang GH, Zhang LG, Liu Y, Zheng YT. CD24 and Fc fusion protein protects SIVmac239-infected Chinese rhesus macaque against progression to AIDS. Antiviral Res. 2018 Sep;157:9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2018.07.004. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
PubMed 29983395Tian RR, Zhang MX, Liu M, Fang X, Li D, Zhang L, Zheng P, Zheng YT, Liu Y. CD24Fc protects against viral pneumonia in simian immunodeficiency virus-infected Chinese rhesus monkeys. Cell Mol Immunol. 2020 Aug;17(8):887-888. doi: 10.1038/s41423-020-0452-5. Epub 2020 May 7. No abstract available.
PubMed 32382131Welker J, Pulido JD, Catanzaro AT, Malvestutto CD, Li Z, Cohen JB, Whitman ED, Byrne D, Giddings OK, Lake JE, Chua JV, Li E, Chen J, Zhou X, He K, Gates D, Kaur A, Chen J, Chou HY, Devenport M, Touomou R, Kottilil S, Liu Y, Zheng P; SAC-COVID Study Team. Efficacy and safety of CD24Fc in hospitalised patients with COVID-19: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 May;22(5):611-621. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00058-5. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
PubMed 35286843Song NJ, Allen C, Vilgelm AE, Riesenberg BP, Weller KP, Reynolds K, Chakravarthy KB, Kumar A, Khatiwada A, Sun Z, Ma A, Chang Y, Yusuf M, Li A, Zeng C, Evans JP, Bucci D, Gunasena M, Xu M, Liyanage NPM, Bolyard C, Velegraki M, Liu SL, Ma Q, Devenport M, Liu Y, Zheng P, Malvestutto CD, Chung D, Li Z. Treatment with soluble CD24 attenuates COVID-19-associated systemic immunopathology. J Hematol Oncol. 2022 Jan 10;15(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13045-021-01222-y.
PubMed 35012610
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Feb 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multi-site, Phase III Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of CD24Fc in COVID-19 Treatment
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04317040
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SAC-COVID / 7110-007
- Conditions
- Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 234 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Oncoimmune, Inc., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. (Rahway, New Jersey USA)Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 24 Apr 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Oct 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 Oct 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 15 Oct 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of efprezimod alfa in hospitalized adult participants who are diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and receiving oxygen support.
The primary hypothesis of the study is clinical improvement in the experimental group versus the control group.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Efprezimod alfa | Experimental | Drug: Efprezimod alfaParticipants receive single dose of 480 mg efprezimod alfa, diluted to 100 ml with normal saline, intravenous (IV) infusion in 60 minutes on Day 1. |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboParticipants receive single dose of placebo as normal saline solution 100 ml, IV infusion in 60 minutes, on Day 1. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-coV-2) viral infection
- Severe or critical COVID-19, or National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) 8-point ordinal score 2, 3 or 4 (Scale 2: requiring invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); Scale 3: non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices; Scale 4: supplemental oxygen support; a peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2) </= 94% or tachypnea (respiratory rate >/= 24 breaths/min). Intubation should be within 7 days
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Participants who are pregnant, breastfeeding, or have a positive pregnancy test result before enrollment
- Participants previously enrolled in the efprezimod alfa study
- Intubation for invasive mechanical ventilation is over 7 days
- Documented acute renal or hepatic failure
- The investigator believes that participating in the trial is not in the best interests of the participant, or the investigator considers unsuitable for enrollment (such as unpredictable risks or subject compliance issues)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Efprezimod alfaAlso: Human CD24, Human IgG Fc Fusion Protein, MK-7110Efprezimod alfa is given on Day 1. | Drug | Efprezimod alfa |
| PlaceboAlso: SalinePlacebo is given on Day 1. | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Time to Improvement in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Clinical Status
Time frame: Up to Day 29
Time to improvement in COVID-19 clinical status: defined as time (days) required from start of treatment to improvement of clinical status severe - moderate/mild or improvement from score 2-4 to ≥5 sustained without drop below 5 within 28 days from randomization, total follow-up period 29 days (Randomization Day 1 + 28 days follow up) per National Institute of Allergy \& Infectious Diseases (NIAID) ordinal scale graded: 1=Death; 2=Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV)/extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); 3=Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation (NIV)/high flow oxygen devices; 4=Hospitalized, require supplemental oxygen; 5=Hospitalized, no supplemental oxygen, require medical care; 6=Hospitalized, no supplemental oxygen, don't require medical care; 7=Not hospitalized, limitation on activities \&/or require home oxygen; 8=Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities. Median time \& 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported using Brookmeyer-Crowley method.
Number of Participants Who Experience an Adverse Event (AE)
Time frame: Up to 30 days
An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it is considered related to the medical treatment or procedure, that occurs during the course of the study. Per protocol, only AEs with Common Terminology Criteria for AE (CTACAE) grade ≥3 were included. The number of participants who experienced an AE were reported.
13 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants Who Died or Had Respiratory Failure (RF)
Time frame: Up to Day 29
Time to Disease Progression in Clinical Status of COVID-19
Time frame: Up to Day 29
Number of Participants Who Died Due to Any Cause
Time frame: Up to Day 29
Rate of Clinical Relapse
Time frame: Up to Day 29
Conversion Rate of COVID-19 Clinical Status
Time frame: Up to Day 15
Time to Hospital Discharge
Time frame: Up to Day 29
Duration of MV
Time frame: Up to Day 29
Duration of Pressors
Time frame: Up to Day 29
Duration of ECMO
Time frame: Up to Day 29
Duration of High Flow Oxygen Therapy
Time frame: Up to Day 29
Length of Hospital Stay
Time frame: Up to 90 days
Change From Baseline in Absolute Lymphocyte Count
Time frame: Baseline and up to Day 15
Change From Baseline in D-Dimer Concentration
Time frame: Baseline and up to Day 15
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Feb 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 24996822Chen GY, Brown NK, Zheng P, Liu Y. Siglec-G/10 in self-nonself discrimination of innate and adaptive immunity. Glycobiology. 2014 Sep;24(9):800-6. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwu068. Epub 2014 Jul 4.
- Background: PubMed 21208791Liu Y, Chen GY, Zheng P. Sialoside-based pattern recognitions discriminating infections from tissue injuries. Curr Opin Immunol. 2011 Feb;23(1):41-5. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2010.10.004. Epub 2011 Jan 3.
- Background: PubMed 21478876Chen GY, Chen X, King S, Cavassani KA, Cheng J, Zheng X, Cao H, Yu H, Qu J, Fang D, Wu W, Bai XF, Liu JQ, Woodiga SA, Chen C, Sun L, Hogaboam CM, Kunkel SL, Zheng P, Liu Y. Amelioration of sepsis by inhibiting sialidase-mediated disruption of the CD24-SiglecG interaction. Nat Biotechnol. 2011 May;29(5):428-35. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1846. Epub 2011 Apr 10.
- Background: PubMed 19264983Chen GY, Tang J, Zheng P, Liu Y. CD24 and Siglec-10 selectively repress tissue damage-induced immune responses. Science. 2009 Mar 27;323(5922):1722-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1168988. Epub 2009 Mar 5.
- Background: PubMed 29983395Tian RR, Zhang MX, Zhang LT, Zhang P, Ma JP, Liu M, Devenport M, Zheng P, Zhang XL, Lian XD, Ye M, Zheng HY, Pang W, Zhang GH, Zhang LG, Liu Y, Zheng YT. CD24 and Fc fusion protein protects SIVmac239-infected Chinese rhesus macaque against progression to AIDS. Antiviral Res. 2018 Sep;157:9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2018.07.004. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
- Background: PubMed 32382131Tian RR, Zhang MX, Liu M, Fang X, Li D, Zhang L, Zheng P, Zheng YT, Liu Y. CD24Fc protects against viral pneumonia in simian immunodeficiency virus-infected Chinese rhesus monkeys. Cell Mol Immunol. 2020 Aug;17(8):887-888. doi: 10.1038/s41423-020-0452-5. Epub 2020 May 7. No abstract available.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35286843Welker J, Pulido JD, Catanzaro AT, Malvestutto CD, Li Z, Cohen JB, Whitman ED, Byrne D, Giddings OK, Lake JE, Chua JV, Li E, Chen J, Zhou X, He K, Gates D, Kaur A, Chen J, Chou HY, Devenport M, Touomou R, Kottilil S, Liu Y, Zheng P; SAC-COVID Study Team. Efficacy and safety of CD24Fc in hospitalised patients with COVID-19: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 May;22(5):611-621. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00058-5. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35012610Song NJ, Allen C, Vilgelm AE, Riesenberg BP, Weller KP, Reynolds K, Chakravarthy KB, Kumar A, Khatiwada A, Sun Z, Ma A, Chang Y, Yusuf M, Li A, Zeng C, Evans JP, Bucci D, Gunasena M, Xu M, Liyanage NPM, Bolyard C, Velegraki M, Liu SL, Ma Q, Devenport M, Liu Y, Zheng P, Malvestutto CD, Chung D, Li Z. Treatment with soluble CD24 attenuates COVID-19-associated systemic immunopathology. J Hematol Oncol. 2022 Jan 10;15(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13045-021-01222-y.
- Merck Oncology Clinical Trials InformationLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. http://engagezone.msd.com/doc/ProcedureAccessClinicalTrialData.pdf
Related trials for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Phase I Open-Label Safety Trial of Pembrolizumab for Neurological Post- Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PD1-PASC I)
Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Safety and Immunogenicity Trial of OCU500, ChAd36 Vector Encoding SARS-CoV-2 Spike Vaccine Via Intranasal and Inhalational Routes in Previously Vaccinated Adults
COVID-19
Active, not recruiting
Intervention to Address Disparate Mental Health Consequences of COVID-19 Pandemic on Latinx and African Newcomers
Mental Health Issue, Mental Health Disorder
Recruiting
Home-Based Exercise Tele-Rehabilitation After COVID-19
Post SARS-CoV2 (COVID-19)
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Safety, Reactogenicity and Immunogenicity Trial of RVX-sCPD9 Booster Intranasal COVID-19 Vaccine
COVID -19
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Medical Director study director
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
10 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Efprezimod alfa in people with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), run by Oncoimmune, Inc., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. (Rahway, New Jersey USA) at 10 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Feb 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 10 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 Oct 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time to Improvement in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Clinical Status (time frame: Up to Day 29). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04317040, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Feb 2023.