AgeismNCT04319393
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Ageism
A study testing Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in people with Ageism, run by Jordan University of Science and Technology at 1 site in Jordan.
Trial summary
Background: Healthcare settings must be a patient-friendly environment for the investigator's older adults who are in an imperative need for compassionate healthcare when approaching their later life. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 22 to 45 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Ageism
- What is being tested?
- Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 110 participants
- Where
- 1 siteJordan
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2019to 1 Nov 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 22 to 45 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- The eligible participants in this study were nurses caring for older adults and working in the hospital for at least one year of clinical experience.
Who cannot join
- Nurses working in Pediatric, maternity, and psychiatric departments
- Nurses with clinical experience less than one year
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Testing the Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Relieving Nurses' Ageism Toward Older Adults
Background: Healthcare settings must be a patient-friendly environment for the investigator's older adults who are in an imperative need for compassionate healthcare when approaching their later life. However, older adults until this moment are experiencing age discriminative acts by nurses who are supposed to act in favor of their patients. Ageism is not always a result of either negative attitudes or misconceptions toward older adults, but to the innate fear of death where nurses perceive older adults as a powerful reminder of death. Although cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is well known for targeting psychological distresses, to date, no research has investigated its effectiveness in relieving nurses' death anxiety and ageism. This study examined the effectiveness of CBT to relieve nurses' death anxiety and ageism toward older adults.
Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted during August 2019 in the university hospital. A total of 110 nurses selected through proportional stratified sampling and randomly assigned to the experimental and control groups. The intervention consisted of six two-hour training sessions delivered in five modules with the integration of different CBT exercises. The effect of CBT was assessed on measures of a series of validated questionnaires of study variables before and after the training sessions.
Read the detailed description
Procedure After getting the IRB approval and completing the informed consent procedure, the researchers met with the administrator of the hospital to (1) discuss the inclusion criteria and obtain a list of eligible participants, (2) discuss the workflow of the study procedure, and (3) agree on the time/date of site visits to collect the data and run the CBT sessions based on the convenience of nurses and their work schedule. After having a list of all eligible nurses recorded in an excel sheet, the researcher randomly assigned the nurses into control and intervention groups using Excel's RAND function. After randomization was performed, the researchers distributed the pretest questionnaires to the nurses in both groups and asked them to drop the completed questionnaires in the designated box next to the front desk of their work department. Three days later the researchers collected the questionnaires.
Intervention The CBT intervention was carried out through six two-hour sessions over a month. The intervention group was divided into three subgroups of 18 to 19 nurses each. It was required for each subgroup to attend two CBT sessions to complete the intervention. The main objective of the CBT was to improve nurses' senses of self-esteem, interpersonal relationship, and symbolic immortality. The CBT was guided by the five-factor model, which extensively used within the context of CBT (Bagby, Gralnick, Al-Dajani, \& Uliaszek, 2016). A detailed description of the model was discussed in previous recent studies (Bagby et al., 2016; Hawley et al., 2017). The model explains the interactions between beliefs, attitudes, emotions, and behaviors. The intervention emphasized on how nurses can reinforce and enhance their anxiety buffering system by an improved understanding of how unconscious realization of eventual mortality affects explicit attitudes. Throughout the intervention, nurses were trained about the five-factor model and therapeutic beliefs, emotions, attitudes, and behaviors pertinent to death anxiety. The differences between therapeutic and nontherapeutic coping strategies of death anxiety were identified and discussed with nurses in the intervention group.
The CB therapist followed the same structure in the delivery of each CBT session. The CBT session was delivered in five modules: generating objectives and outcomes, enhancing self-esteem and interpersonal relationships, changing beliefs regarding symbolic mortality, and changing attitudes regarding death anxiety. The CBT was tailored to meet the training needs of nurses based on the analysis of pretest questionnaire scores. The first session began with highlighting the objectives of the CBT. Then, a detailed presentation of the intervention modules was provided to the nurses with the integration of CBT exercises, including cognitive restructuring, graded exposure, mindfulness meditation, interpersonal skills training, and activity scheduling.
. At the end of the first session, the nurses were assigned to solve some homework questions relevant to the CBT exercises. The second session began with a brainstorming of the CBT training assignments from the first session. Then thoughts and understandings of training assignments and reflection on life stories or real experiences of alternative therapeutic behaviors were discussed. The CBT therapist was an experienced certified psychologist with a Ph.D. degree in Applied Psychology.
The nurses in the control group were divided into the same number of subgroups as the CBT nurses and trained by an experienced gerontological nurse who provided two consultations of 120 minutes for each subgroup. The main objective of the consultations was to instruct the nurses on how to deal with or care for older adults with respect and dignity as well as eliminate any ageist attitudes that they might have. The control group did not receive active advice or referrals to a psychologist or CBT therapist. During the consultations, the nurses received written and verbal information about the atypical presentation of illnesses and the most common misconceptions related to aging. The nurses in the control group had the opportunity to discuss and reflect on their own experiences in caring for older adults and other geriatric care-related issues. The consultations were nurse-centered, goal-oriented, and guided by nurses' questions. On the last day of the training for each group (intervention and control), the nurses were asked to fill out the posttest questionnaires and return them to the researchers.
Measures Outcome variables were measured twice; pre and posttest. The primary outcomes in the current were death anxiety and ageism, while the secondary outcomes self-esteem, interpersonal relationship, and symbolic immortality.
Primary Outcome Measures Death anxiety. Death anxiety was measured using The revised Collett-Lester Fear of Death Scale (CL-FODS) (Lester \& Abdel-Khalek, 2003). The CL-FODS is a 28-item scale measure death anxiety about four main aspects of death and dying, including: " your own death,"; "your own dying"; " the death of others,"; and " the dying of other". Each subscale has seven items answered on a 3-point intensity scale (ranged from 1= "no" to 5= "very"). The CL-FODS had very satisfactory reliability scores ranged from .88 to .93, and good internal consistency scores ranged from .74 to .90 in the original study. In the current study, the internal consistency reliability was satisfactory (Cronbach's alpha= 0.79) Ageism. The Fraboni Scale of Ageism (FSA) (Fraboni et al., 1990) was used to measure nurses' ageist attitudes toward older adults. The FSA is a 29-item scale measuring the attitudinal and affective aspects of ageism. The FSA has three positive items (e.g., "Old people can be very creative"), which were reverse coded before calculating the total score. Each item of the FSA has four possible responses, including: "1= strongly disagree,"; "2= disagree,"; " 3=agree,"; and " 4= strongly agree". The possible range of the total score of the FSA is from 29 to 116. Higher scores indicate greater levels of ageist attitudes. The internal consistency reliability of the FSA in this study was high (Cronbach's alpha = 0.89), which is very close to the original research (0.86) (Fraboni et al., 1990) Secondary Outcome Measures Self-esteem. Nurses' self-esteem was measured using the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) (Rosenberg, 2015). The RSES has five positive (e.g., "I take a positive attitude toward myself") and five negatives (e.g., "I feel I do not have much to be proud of") items. The nurses responded to these items using a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1= "strongly disagree" to 4= "strongly agree." The total score of the RSES was calculated after reverse coding of the negative items yielding a range from 10 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater levels of self-esteem. The Cronbach's alpha reliability of the RSES in this study was high (0.91) Interpersonal relationship. Nurses' interpersonal relationships were measured using the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) (Davis, 1980). The IRS has four subscales consisting of five positive and two negative items each. The subscales include perspective-taking, fantasy, empathic concern, and personal distress. The nurses responded to the 28 items of IRS with five responses ranging from 0=" Does not describe me well" to 4= "describes me very well." The total score of the IRS was calculated after reverse coding the negative items, yielding a range from 0 to 112. The Cronbach's alpha reliability of the IRI in this study was very good (0.81) Symbolic immortality. Symbolic immortality was measured using the Sense of Symbolic Immortality Scale (SSIS) (Drolet, 2007). The SSIS contains 11 negatives (e.g., nothing interesting happens in my life) and positive (e.g., I feel that I am doing what I want in life) items about areas of life showing the desire for symbolic immortality. The nurses responded to these items using a Likert scale of five choices ranging from 1 = "strongly disagree," to 5 = "strongly agree." The total score of the SSIS was calculated after reverse coding the negative items, yielding a range from 26 to130. Higher scores indicate a greater sense of symbolic immortality. The SSIS had good internal consistency in this study (Cronbach alpha = 0.86).
Other Measures Demographic questionnaire. The demographic data of nurses such as age, gender, level of education, years of clinical experience, marital status, and the number of older adults living in their households were collected by asking the nurses to fill out the demographic questionnaire.
Data Analysis IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0. (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp) was used for the analysis of all statistical tests in this study. Descriptive statistics, including mean, standard deviation, and frequency were used to describe the nurses' levels of self-esteem, interpersonal relationship, sense of symbolic immortality, death anxiety, and ageism as well as sociodemographic and professional characteristics. Independent t-tests were used for comparisons between the intervention and control groups in the main variables of interest. For comparisons between the pre and posttest scores of nurses in both groups, paired t-tests were used. Hierarchical multiple regression was used to examine the significant predictors of nurses' ageism. The order of entry of the variables into the regression model was based on their order in the TMT. Death anxiety was entered in the final step into the regression model as it is the main independent variable of ageism.
- Conditions
- Ageism
- Being tested
- Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
- Keywords
- Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Older Adults, Nurses, Death anxiety, Randomized Clinical Trials
- Medical subject headings
- Ageism, Necrophobia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cognitive Behavioral TherapyBehavioural
The CBT intervention was carried out through six two-hour sessions over a month. The intervention group was divided into three subgroups of 18 to 19 nurses each. It was required for each subgroup to attend two CBT sessions to complete the intervention.
The CB therapist followed the same structure in the delivery of each CBT session. The CBT session was delivered in five modules: generating objectives and outcomes, enhancing self-esteem and interpersonal relationships, changing beliefs regarding symbolic mortality, and changing attitudes regarding death anxiety. The first session began with highlighting the objectives of the CBT. Then, a detailed presentation of the intervention modules was provided to the nurses with integration of CBT exercises, including cognitive restructuring, graded exposure, mindfulness meditation, interpersonal skills training, and activity scheduling
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| CBT Nurses | Experimental | Interventional group Receives: Behavioral: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy |
| Consultation Nurses | No intervention | Control Group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Ageism
The Fraboni Scale of Ageism (FSA) (Fraboni et al., 1990) was used to measure nurses' ageist attitudes toward older adults. The FSA is a 29-item scale measuring the attitudinal and affective aspects of ageism. The FSA has three positive items (e.g., "Old people can be very creative"), which were reverse coded before calculating the total score. Each item of the FSA has four possible responses, including: "1= strongly disagree,"; "2= disagree,"; " 3=agree,"; and " 4= strongly agree". The possible range of the total score of the FSA is from 29 to 116. Higher scores indicate greater levels of ageist attitudes. The internal consistency reliability of the FSA in this study was high (Cronbach's alpha = 0.89), which is very close to the original research (0.86) (Fraboni et al., 1990)
Measured: Two months
Death anxiety
Death anxiety was measured using The revised Collett-Lester Fear of Death Scale (CL-FODS) (Lester \& Abdel-Khalek, 2003). The CL-FODS is a 28-item scale measure death anxiety about four main aspects of death and dying, including: " your own death,"; "your own dying"; " the death of others,"; and " the dying of other". Each subscale has seven items answered on a 3-point intensity scale (ranged from 1= "no" to 5= "very"). The CL-FODS had very satisfactory reliability scores ranged from .88 to .93, and good internal consistency scores ranged from .74 to .90 in the original study. In the current study, the internal consistency reliability was satisfactory (Cronbach's alpha= 0.79)
Measured: two Months
Secondary outcomes (3)
symbolic immortality
Symbolic immortality was measured using the Sense of Symbolic Immortality Scale (SSIS) (Drolet, 2007). The SSIS contains 11 negatives (e.g., nothing interesting happens in my life) and positive (e.g., I feel that I am doing what I want in life) items about areas of life showing the desire for symbolic immortality. The nurses responded to these items using a Likert scale of five choices ranging from 1 = "strongly disagree," to 5 = "strongly agree." The total score of the SSIS was calculated after reverse coding the negative items, yielding a range from 26 to130. Higher scores indicate a greater sense of symbolic immortality. The SSIS had good internal consistency in this study (Cronbach alpha = 0.86).
Measured: Two Months
self-esteem
Nurses' self-esteem was measured using the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) (Rosenberg, 2015). The RSES has five positive (e.g., "I take a positive attitude toward myself") and five negatives (e.g., "I feel I do not have much to be proud of") items. The nurses responded to these items using a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1= "strongly disagree" to 4= "strongly agree." The total score of the RSES was calculated after reverse coding of the negative items yielding a range from 10 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater levels of self-esteem. The Cronbach's alpha reliability of the RSES in this study was high (0.91)
Measured: two Months
interpersonal relationship
Nurses' interpersonal relationships were measured using the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) (Davis, 1980). The IRS has four subscales consisting of five positive and two negative items each. The subscales include perspective-taking, fantasy, empathic concern, and personal distress. The nurses responded to the 28 items of IRS with five responses ranging from 0=" Does not describe me well" to 4= "describes me very well." The total score of the IRS was calculated after reverse coding the negative items, yielding a range from 0 to 112. The Cronbach's alpha reliability of the IRI in this study was very good (0.81)
Measured: two Months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Mar 2020
- Study start1 Jan 2019
- Primary completion1 Sep 2019
- Study completion1 Nov 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for AgeismStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Care provider
- Enrolment
- 110 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Jordan University of Science and Technology
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Mohammad Rababa, PhD, Principal investigator, Jordan University of Science and Technology
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04319393
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 20180217
- Status last verified
- Mar 2020
- First submitted
- 19 Mar 2020
- Last updated
- 24 Mar 2020
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Rababa M, Alhawatmeh H, Al Ali N, Kassab M. Testing the Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Relieving Nurses' Ageism Toward Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Cognit Ther Res. 2021;45(2):355-366. doi: 10.1007/s10608-020-10167-4. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
PubMed 33100426
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Mar 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Testing the Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Relieving Nurses' Ageism Toward Older Adults
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04319393
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 20180217
- Conditions
- Ageism
- Keywords
- Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Older Adults, Nurses, Death anxiety, Randomized Clinical Trials
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 110 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Jordan University of Science and TechnologyUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Sep 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Nov 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background: Healthcare settings must be a patient-friendly environment for the investigator's older adults who are in an imperative need for compassionate healthcare when approaching their later life. However, older adults until this moment are experiencing age discriminative acts by nurses who are supposed to act in favor of their patients. Ageism is not always a result of either negative attitudes or misconceptions toward older adults, but to the innate fear of death where nurses perceive older adults as a powerful reminder of death. Although cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is well known for targeting psychological distresses, to date, no research has investigated its effectiveness in relieving nurses' death anxiety and ageism. This study examined the effectiveness of CBT to relieve nurses' death anxiety and ageism toward older adults.
Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted during August 2019 in the university hospital. A total of 110 nurses selected through proportional stratified sampling and randomly assigned to the experimental and control groups. The intervention consisted of six two-hour training sessions delivered in five modules with the integration of different CBT exercises. The effect of CBT was assessed on measures of a series of validated questionnaires of study variables before and after the training sessions.
Detailed description
Procedure After getting the IRB approval and completing the informed consent procedure, the researchers met with the administrator of the hospital to (1) discuss the inclusion criteria and obtain a list of eligible participants, (2) discuss the workflow of the study procedure, and (3) agree on the time/date of site visits to collect the data and run the CBT sessions based on the convenience of nurses and their work schedule. After having a list of all eligible nurses recorded in an excel sheet, the researcher randomly assigned the nurses into control and intervention groups using Excel's RAND function. After randomization was performed, the researchers distributed the pretest questionnaires to the nurses in both groups and asked them to drop the completed questionnaires in the designated box next to the front desk of their work department. Three days later the researchers collected the questionnaires.
Intervention The CBT intervention was carried out through six two-hour sessions over a month. The intervention group was divided into three subgroups of 18 to 19 nurses each. It was required for each subgroup to attend two CBT sessions to complete the intervention. The main objective of the CBT was to improve nurses' senses of self-esteem, interpersonal relationship, and symbolic immortality. The CBT was guided by the five-factor model, which extensively used within the context of CBT (Bagby, Gralnick, Al-Dajani, \& Uliaszek, 2016). A detailed description of the model was discussed in previous recent studies (Bagby et al., 2016; Hawley et al., 2017). The model explains the interactions between beliefs, attitudes, emotions, and behaviors. The intervention emphasized on how nurses can reinforce and enhance their anxiety buffering system by an improved understanding of how unconscious realization of eventual mortality affects explicit attitudes. Throughout the intervention, nurses were trained about the five-factor model and therapeutic beliefs, emotions, attitudes, and behaviors pertinent to death anxiety. The differences between therapeutic and nontherapeutic coping strategies of death anxiety were identified and discussed with nurses in the intervention group.
The CB therapist followed the same structure in the delivery of each CBT session. The CBT session was delivered in five modules: generating objectives and outcomes, enhancing self-esteem and interpersonal relationships, changing beliefs regarding symbolic mortality, and changing attitudes regarding death anxiety. The CBT was tailored to meet the training needs of nurses based on the analysis of pretest questionnaire scores. The first session began with highlighting the objectives of the CBT. Then, a detailed presentation of the intervention modules was provided to the nurses with the integration of CBT exercises, including cognitive restructuring, graded exposure, mindfulness meditation, interpersonal skills training, and activity scheduling.
. At the end of the first session, the nurses were assigned to solve some homework questions relevant to the CBT exercises. The second session began with a brainstorming of the CBT training assignments from the first session. Then thoughts and understandings of training assignments and reflection on life stories or real experiences of alternative therapeutic behaviors were discussed. The CBT therapist was an experienced certified psychologist with a Ph.D. degree in Applied Psychology.
The nurses in the control group were divided into the same number of subgroups as the CBT nurses and trained by an experienced gerontological nurse who provided two consultations of 120 minutes for each subgroup. The main objective of the consultations was to instruct the nurses on how to deal with or care for older adults with respect and dignity as well as eliminate any ageist attitudes that they might have. The control group did not receive active advice or referrals to a psychologist or CBT therapist. During the consultations, the nurses received written and verbal information about the atypical presentation of illnesses and the most common misconceptions related to aging. The nurses in the control group had the opportunity to discuss and reflect on their own experiences in caring for older adults and other geriatric care-related issues. The consultations were nurse-centered, goal-oriented, and guided by nurses' questions. On the last day of the training for each group (intervention and control), the nurses were asked to fill out the posttest questionnaires and return them to the researchers.
Measures Outcome variables were measured twice; pre and posttest. The primary outcomes in the current were death anxiety and ageism, while the secondary outcomes self-esteem, interpersonal relationship, and symbolic immortality.
Primary Outcome Measures Death anxiety. Death anxiety was measured using The revised Collett-Lester Fear of Death Scale (CL-FODS) (Lester \& Abdel-Khalek, 2003). The CL-FODS is a 28-item scale measure death anxiety about four main aspects of death and dying, including: " your own death,"; "your own dying"; " the death of others,"; and " the dying of other". Each subscale has seven items answered on a 3-point intensity scale (ranged from 1= "no" to 5= "very"). The CL-FODS had very satisfactory reliability scores ranged from .88 to .93, and good internal consistency scores ranged from .74 to .90 in the original study. In the current study, the internal consistency reliability was satisfactory (Cronbach's alpha= 0.79) Ageism. The Fraboni Scale of Ageism (FSA) (Fraboni et al., 1990) was used to measure nurses' ageist attitudes toward older adults. The FSA is a 29-item scale measuring the attitudinal and affective aspects of ageism. The FSA has three positive items (e.g., "Old people can be very creative"), which were reverse coded before calculating the total score. Each item of the FSA has four possible responses, including: "1= strongly disagree,"; "2= disagree,"; " 3=agree,"; and " 4= strongly agree". The possible range of the total score of the FSA is from 29 to 116. Higher scores indicate greater levels of ageist attitudes. The internal consistency reliability of the FSA in this study was high (Cronbach's alpha = 0.89), which is very close to the original research (0.86) (Fraboni et al., 1990) Secondary Outcome Measures Self-esteem. Nurses' self-esteem was measured using the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) (Rosenberg, 2015). The RSES has five positive (e.g., "I take a positive attitude toward myself") and five negatives (e.g., "I feel I do not have much to be proud of") items. The nurses responded to these items using a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1= "strongly disagree" to 4= "strongly agree." The total score of the RSES was calculated after reverse coding of the negative items yielding a range from 10 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater levels of self-esteem. The Cronbach's alpha reliability of the RSES in this study was high (0.91) Interpersonal relationship. Nurses' interpersonal relationships were measured using the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) (Davis, 1980). The IRS has four subscales consisting of five positive and two negative items each. The subscales include perspective-taking, fantasy, empathic concern, and personal distress. The nurses responded to the 28 items of IRS with five responses ranging from 0=" Does not describe me well" to 4= "describes me very well." The total score of the IRS was calculated after reverse coding the negative items, yielding a range from 0 to 112. The Cronbach's alpha reliability of the IRI in this study was very good (0.81) Symbolic immortality. Symbolic immortality was measured using the Sense of Symbolic Immortality Scale (SSIS) (Drolet, 2007). The SSIS contains 11 negatives (e.g., nothing interesting happens in my life) and positive (e.g., I feel that I am doing what I want in life) items about areas of life showing the desire for symbolic immortality. The nurses responded to these items using a Likert scale of five choices ranging from 1 = "strongly disagree," to 5 = "strongly agree." The total score of the SSIS was calculated after reverse coding the negative items, yielding a range from 26 to130. Higher scores indicate a greater sense of symbolic immortality. The SSIS had good internal consistency in this study (Cronbach alpha = 0.86).
Other Measures Demographic questionnaire. The demographic data of nurses such as age, gender, level of education, years of clinical experience, marital status, and the number of older adults living in their households were collected by asking the nurses to fill out the demographic questionnaire.
Data Analysis IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0. (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp) was used for the analysis of all statistical tests in this study. Descriptive statistics, including mean, standard deviation, and frequency were used to describe the nurses' levels of self-esteem, interpersonal relationship, sense of symbolic immortality, death anxiety, and ageism as well as sociodemographic and professional characteristics. Independent t-tests were used for comparisons between the intervention and control groups in the main variables of interest. For comparisons between the pre and posttest scores of nurses in both groups, paired t-tests were used. Hierarchical multiple regression was used to examine the significant predictors of nurses' ageism. The order of entry of the variables into the regression model was based on their order in the TMT. Death anxiety was entered in the final step into the regression model as it is the main independent variable of ageism.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (care provider)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| CBT Nurses | Experimental | Behavioral: Cognitive Behavioral TherapyInterventional group |
| Consultation Nurses | No intervention | –Control Group |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 22 to 45 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- The eligible participants in this study were nurses caring for older adults and working in the hospital for at least one year of clinical experience.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Nurses working in Pediatric, maternity, and psychiatric departments
- Nurses with clinical experience less than one year
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive Behavioral TherapyThe CBT intervention was carried out through six two-hour sessions over a month. The intervention group was divided into three subgroups of 18 to 19 nurses each. It was required for each subgroup to attend two CBT sessions to complete the intervention. The CB therapist followed the same structure in the delivery of each CBT session. The CBT session was delivered in five modules: generating objectives and outcomes, enhancing self-esteem and interpersonal relationships, changing beliefs regarding symbolic mortality, and changing attitudes regarding death anxiety. The first session began with highlighting the objectives of the CBT. Then, a detailed presentation of the intervention modules was provided to the nurses with integration of CBT exercises, including cognitive restructuring, graded exposure, mindfulness meditation, interpersonal skills training, and activity scheduling | Behavioural | CBT Nurses |
Primary outcome
Ageism
Time frame: Two months
The Fraboni Scale of Ageism (FSA) (Fraboni et al., 1990) was used to measure nurses' ageist attitudes toward older adults. The FSA is a 29-item scale measuring the attitudinal and affective aspects of ageism. The FSA has three positive items (e.g., "Old people can be very creative"), which were reverse coded before calculating the total score. Each item of the FSA has four possible responses, including: "1= strongly disagree,"; "2= disagree,"; " 3=agree,"; and " 4= strongly agree". The possible range of the total score of the FSA is from 29 to 116. Higher scores indicate greater levels of ageist attitudes. The internal consistency reliability of the FSA in this study was high (Cronbach's alpha = 0.89), which is very close to the original research (0.86) (Fraboni et al., 1990)
Death anxiety
Time frame: two Months
Death anxiety was measured using The revised Collett-Lester Fear of Death Scale (CL-FODS) (Lester \& Abdel-Khalek, 2003). The CL-FODS is a 28-item scale measure death anxiety about four main aspects of death and dying, including: " your own death,"; "your own dying"; " the death of others,"; and " the dying of other". Each subscale has seven items answered on a 3-point intensity scale (ranged from 1= "no" to 5= "very"). The CL-FODS had very satisfactory reliability scores ranged from .88 to .93, and good internal consistency scores ranged from .74 to .90 in the original study. In the current study, the internal consistency reliability was satisfactory (Cronbach's alpha= 0.79)
3 secondary outcomes
symbolic immortality
Time frame: Two Months
self-esteem
Time frame: two Months
interpersonal relationship
Time frame: two Months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Mar 2020.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33100426Rababa M, Alhawatmeh H, Al Ali N, Kassab M. Testing the Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Relieving Nurses' Ageism Toward Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Cognit Ther Res. 2021;45(2):355-366. doi: 10.1007/s10608-020-10167-4. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
Related trials for Ageism
Recruiting
Intergenerational Interaction Program for Nursing Home Residents and Nursing Students
Ageism, Loneliness
Not yet recruiting
Reducing Ageism in Organizations: A Study Protocol
Ageism, Job Satisfaction
Recruiting
Reframing Expectations About Aging - Physical Activity and Inclusive Reappraisal
Self-perceptions of Aging, Physical Activity
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mohammad Rababa, PhD principal investigator
Jordan University of Science and Technology
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in people with Ageism, run by Jordan University of Science and Technology at 1 site in Jordan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Mar 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Jordan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Ageism (time frame: Two months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04319393, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Mar 2020; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 30 Oct 2026.