AzTrials
AzTrials

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveNCT04319523

Abnormal Pain Processing in COPD Patients

An observational study of Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive and Pain, run by Universidad de Granada at 1 site in Spain.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Dyspnea, cough, and fatigue are the symptoms characteristic of moderate-severe COPD. Within the progression of disease was also reported a prevalence of 34-77% of pain symptoms in these patients. A review observed a higher score in pain intensity/interference associated with multiples pain locations of COPD patients. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Pain
How many people
65 participants
Where
1 siteSpain
Study dates
1 Nov 2018to 3 Dec 2021
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Stable COPD patients with a grade III and IV of Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD). Patients were recruited in the pneumology services of San Cecilio and Virgen de las Nieves University Hospitals (Granada, Spain).

Who may be able to join

  • Between 50 and older age
  • Accepted to sign the informed consent

Who cannot join

  • comorbidities with a course of chronic pain that interfered with evaluation
  • the presence of cognitive impairment to understand the questionnaire

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Spain1 site
  • Faculty of Health Sciences. University of Granada.

    Granada, Andalusia, 18071

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Dyspnea, cough, and fatigue are the symptoms characteristic of moderate-severe COPD. Within the progression of disease was also reported a prevalence of 34-77% of pain symptoms in these patients. A review observed a higher score in pain intensity/interference associated with multiples pain locations of COPD patients. Pain in chronic diseases may appear to result from abnormalities in pain processing because of the damage and/or inflammation of peripheral structures.

Read the detailed description

Dyspnea, cough, and fatigue are the symptoms characteristic of moderate-severe COPD. Within the progression of disease was also reported a prevalence of 34-77% of pain symptoms in these patients. A review observed a higher score in pain intensity/interference associated with multiples pain locations of COPD patients. Several studies reported that comorbidities, GOLD grade, and breathlessness may contribute to a higher pain prevalence in COPD patients because of the systemic inflammatory process and lung hyperinflation. Pain in chronic diseases may appear to result from abnormalities in pain processing and alteration of sensitization due to the damage and/or inflammation of peripheral structures.

Medical subject headings
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT04319523
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
COPD patientsNot described
Healthy subjectsNot described

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pressure pain thresholds

    Pressure pain thresholds (PPT) was used to measure pressure pain sensitivity in muscles with an algometer. With the patient in a seated position, pressure was applied three times at five bilateral points of the body: the distal thumb phalangeal, the gracilis muscle tendon at the inside of the knee, the distal of the middle part of the clavicle, the supraspinous muscle and the trapezius muscle's second portion. When the participant reported that pressure changed to pain, the pressure was stopped, and the mean value was registered.

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Temporal summation

    Temporal summation (TS) was used to evaluated peripheral sensitization. First, the pressure was applied with gradually increasing pressure until the subject reported pain in the flexor digitorum muscle of each arm. Second, 15 stimuli were applicated to one arm at an interstimulus interval (ISI) of 3 s and then to the other arm at an ISI of 5 s. After a 5 min, the series of stimuli were repeated in reverse order. The evaluation of TS was measured with a standardized numerical scale for rating the magnitude of late sensations experienced during the first, fifth, tenth, and fifteenth stimuli, and 15 and 60 s after the last stimulus in each series to evaluated the temporal summation. The scale ranged from 0 (no pain) to 100 (intolerable pain).

    Measured: Baseline

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire

    The Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ) measured general pain sensitivity. It consists of 17 items, each describing a daily life situation and asking the patients to rate how painful this situation would be for them on a numeric rating scale ranging from 0 (not painful) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). A major score in the questionnaire a higher pain sensitivity.

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Borg scale

    The Borg scale was used to assess the dyspnea, which is a comprehensive instrument designed to measure breathlessness in patients with respiratory pathology. Patients rated their dyspnoea from 0 to 10, where 0 represents "no dyspnoea" and 10 represents "maximum dyspnoea." A difference of 0.9 units was considered as the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), according to previous studies in patients with respiratory disease

    Measured: Baseline

  3. International Physical Activity Questionnaire

    The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) measures total physical activity (MET·minutes·days per week).

    Measured: Baseline

  4. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

    The HADS is a self-rated questionnaire originally developed for minor depressive symptoms in general medical outpatients. It consists of 14 items, depression (seven items) and anxiety (seven times), each with four choices numbered alphabetically. Each of the subscales' scores ranges from 0 to 21, corresponding to total scores of 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating greater distress.

    Measured: Baseline

  5. London Chest Activity of Daily Living

    The London Chest Activity of Daily Living (LCADL) was used to assess the impact and severity of breathlessness on ADLs. The LCADL has been used as an outcome measure in COPD. Higher scores reflect greater breathlessness during daily activity and the tool includes an anchor question identifying an individual's overall perception of the impact of breathlessness on their daily life.

    Measured: Baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Mar 2020
  2. Study start1 Nov 2018
  3. Primary completion15 Jun 2020 (estimated)
  4. Study completion3 Dec 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
65 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04319523
Sponsor's protocol ID
DF0087UG
Status last verified
Mar 2020
First submitted
20 Mar 2020
Last updated
24 Mar 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive and Pain, run by Universidad de Granada at 1 site in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Mar 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pressure pain thresholds (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Mar 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in