AzTrials
AzTrials

In-hospital Cardiac ArrestNCT04321213

In-hospital Healthcare Professionals' Attitudes and Their Experience in Performing Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.

An observational study of In-hospital Cardiac Arrest, run by Dalarna County Council, Sweden at 2 sites in Sweden.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Attitudes among healthcare professionals can possibly affect the treatment given in cardiac arrest situations. The attitudes of healthcare professionals towards cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has been poorly studied. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
In-hospital Cardiac Arrest
How many people
3,639 participants
Where
2 sitesSweden
Study dates
1 Dec 2008to 30 Dec 2016
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: In-hospital healthcare professionals of all professions at five hospitals in the region of Västmanland and Region of Dalarna, Sweden.

Who may be able to join

  • In-hospital healthcare professionals.
  • Patient contact

Who cannot join

  • Absent during the survey
  • Parental leave
  • Leave of absence
  • Sick leave.

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Sweden2 sites
  • Region of Dalarna

    Mora, 79285

  • Region of Västmanland

    Västerås, Västmanland County, 72189

Other trials in Sweden

About this study

Attitudes among healthcare professionals can possibly affect the treatment given in cardiac arrest situations. The attitudes of healthcare professionals towards cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has been poorly studied. The few existing previous international results shows attitudes reported by nurses as hesitation, fear of defibrillation, anxiety and fear of harming the patient.

The aim of this study was to describe the attitudes towards performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation among in-hospital healthcare professionals, furthermore to assess if experience in performing CPR has an effect on attitudes.

Read the detailed description

Data will be collected using questionnaires containing attitude questions. The questionnaires contains questions regarding attitudes towards being required to perform CPR (6 questions), previous experience in performing CPR (time since last performance and number of performances) and attitudes during the latest CPR performance (8 questions). All attitude questions are constructed as multiple choice questions.

Results regarding attitudes towards being required to perform CPR and attitudes during the latest CPR performance will be presented descriptively. To analyse a possible effect of time since CPR performance and number of CPR performances on attitudes during the latest CPR performance logistic regression will be used. Response variables will be "yes" or "no" on 8 specific attitude questions with predictors consisting of time since CPR performance (0-3 months ago, 4-23 months ago and >24 months) and number of CPR performances (1-3 times, 4-10 times and >10 times).

Keywords
in-hospital cardiac arrest, attitudes, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, CPR
Medical subject headings
Behavior

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT04321213
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Healthcare professionals in the Region of VästmanlandHealthcare professionals of all professions working in-hospital with patient contact at two hospitals in the Region of Västmanland, Sweden. Data is collected by questionnaires.
Healthcare professionals in the Region of DalarnaHealthcare professionals of all professions working in-hospital with patient contact at three hospitals in the Region of Dalarna, Sweden. Data is collected by questionnaires.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. In-hospital healthcare professionals' attitudes towards CPR.

    14 questions regarding attitudes towards performing CPR will be presented descriptively. Number of respondents answering "yes", "no" and "I don´t know" to each attitude question will be presented.

    Measured: one month

  2. In-hospital healthcare professionals' experience in performing CPR.

    Two questions regarding experience in performing CPR will be presented descriptively. Number of respondents in each response category concerning number of previous CPR performances and time since last CPR performance will be presented.

    Measured: one month

  3. Does experience in performing CPR have an effect on attitudes towards CPR

    The effect of previous experience in CPR on attitudes during a cardiac arrest situation will be analysed using binary logistic regression. Each of the eight questions concerning attitudes during a cardiac arrest situation will serve as a dependent variable with "yes" as the response. Independent variables consists of number of previous CPR performances, time since last CPR performance and workplace. Independent variables associated with the dependent variable at a level of p <0.1 will be included in a multiple model. The model will be adjusted for profession and number of years in profession.

    Measured: two months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Mar 2020
  2. Study start1 Dec 2008
  3. Primary completion30 Dec 2016
  4. Study completion30 Dec 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
3,639 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04321213
Sponsor's protocol ID
2006/201/2 (part 2)
Status last verified
Mar 2020
First submitted
21 Feb 2020
Last updated
26 Mar 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of In-hospital Cardiac Arrest, run by Dalarna County Council, Sweden at 2 sites in Sweden.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Mar 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

In-hospital healthcare professionals' attitudes towards CPR. (time frame: one month). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Mar 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in