AzTrials
AzTrials

NASH - Nonalcoholic SteatohepatitisPhase 2NCT04321343

Study of PXL065 in Patients With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH)

A Phase 2 study testing PXL065 in people with NASH - Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis, run by Poxel SA at 29 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study will assess the effect of 3 doses of PXL065 versus placebo on liver fat content in NASH patients after 36 weeks of treatment Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
NASH - Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis
What is being tested?
PXL065
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
117 participants
Where
29 sitesUnited States
Study dates
1 Sep 2020to 20 Jun 2022
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients have given written informed consent
  • Body mass index (BMI) ≤ 50 kg/m²
  • For patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: either naive of glucose lowering drug or under stable oral glucose lowering drug
  • Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 45 mL/min/1.73m²
  • Liver fat content ≥ 8% on MRI-PDFF
  • Qualifying liver biopsy (NAS) ≥ 4 and fibrosis score F1, F2 or F3
  • Effective contraception for women of child bearing potential

Who cannot join

  • Evidence of another form of liver disease
  • Evidence of liver cirrhosis
  • Evidence of hepatic impairment
  • Positive serologic evidence of current infectious liver disease
  • History of excessive alcohol intake
  • Acute cardiovascular disease within 6 months prior to Randomization
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Any disease which in the Investigator's opinion which in the Investigator's opinion would exclude the patient from the study
  • Use of non-permitted concomitant medication
  • Pregnancy or lactation

Trial locations and contacts

29 sites in 1 country.

29 sites in 1 country

United States29 sites
  • Study site 19

    Austin, Texas, 78746

  • Study site 15

    Boca Raton, Florida, 33434

  • Study site 11

    Chandler, Arizona, 85224

  • Study site 25

    Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37411

  • Study site 17

    Chula Vista, California, 91910

  • Study site 30

    Clarksville, Tennessee, 37040

  • Study site 27

    East Syracuse, New York, 13057

  • Study site 09

    Edinburg, Texas, 78539

  • Study site 23

    Edinburg, Texas, 78539

  • Study site 14

    Fayetteville, North Carolina, 28304

  • Study site 24

    Flowood, Mississippi, 39232

  • Study site 31

    Fort Myers, Florida, 33912

  • Study site 16

    Fresno, California, 93720

  • Study Site 02

    Germantown, Tennessee, 38138

  • Study site 12

    Glendale, Arizona, 85306

  • Study site 04

    Huntington Park, California, 90255

  • Study site 10

    Jackson, Mississippi, 39216

  • Study site 18

    Kansas City, Kansas, 61431

  • Study site 05

    Los Angeles, California, 90057

  • Study site 22

    Orange, California, 92866

  • Study site 06

    Panorama City, California, 90402

  • Study site 08

    Port Orange, Florida, 32127

  • Pinnacle Clinical Research (Study site 20)

    San Antonio, Texas, 78229

  • Study site 07

    Santa Ana, California, 92704

  • Study site 01

    Sarasota, Florida, 34240

  • Study site 29

    Summerville, South Carolina, 29485

  • Study site 13

    Tucson, Arizona, 85712

  • Study site 21

    Tucson, Arizona, 85712

  • Study site 28

    West Des Moines, Iowa, 50265

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A 36-week, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of PXL065 Versus Placebo in Noncirrhotic Biopsy-proven NonAlcoholic SteatoHepatitis (NASH) Patients

This study will assess the effect of 3 doses of PXL065 versus placebo on liver fat content in NASH patients after 36 weeks of treatment

Read the detailed description

The study will be performed in patients with NASH. The primary endpoint will be the assessment of the change in the percentage of liver fat content (assessed by MRI-PDFF).

Being tested
PXL065, Placebo oral tablet
Medical subject headings
Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PXL065Drug

    PXL065 oral tablet

  • Placebo oral tabletDrug

    Placebo oral tablet

Study groups in NCT04321343
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group 1ExperimentalPXL065 Dose 1
Receives: Drug: PXL065
Group 2ExperimentalPXL065 Dose 2
Receives: Drug: PXL065
Group 3ExperimentalPXL065 Dose 3
Receives: Drug: PXL065
Group 4Placebo comparatorPlacebo oral tablet
Receives: Drug: Placebo oral tablet

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Relative Change From Baseline to Week 36 in the Percentage of Liver Fat Content (LFC) (Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging - Proton Density Fat Fraction [MRI-PDFF])

    MRI-PDFF was performed using a standardized imaging protocol, and a central reader analyzed the results. The central reader for this study trained the local imaging centers and provided the imaging manual.

    Relative change from baseline to Week 36 was calculated as follows: (LFC at Week 36 - LFC at baseline) / LFC at baseline x 100.

    The primary analysis was performed for the Intent-to-treat Set (ITTS) using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model adjusting for treatment, for stratification factors, and for the baseline LFC as a continuous covariate. LFC missing values at Week 36 were imputed using a multivariate imputation approach by fully conditional specification regression method assuming Missing At Random Mechanism.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 36

  2. Relative Change From Baseline to Week 36 in the Percentage of LFC (Assessed by MRI-PDFF) (Wilcoxon Test Sensitivity Analysis)

    MRI-PDFF was performed using a standardized imaging protocol, and a central reader analyzed the results. The central reader for this study trained the local imaging centers and provided the imaging manual. The sensitivity analysis was performed for the Intent-to-treat Set (ITTS) using a non parametric pairwise Wilcoxon test stratified according to T2DM status and NASH CRN fibrosis scoring system. LFC missing values at Week 36 were imputed using a multivariate imputation approach by fully conditional specification regression method assuming Missing At Random Mechanism.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 36

Secondary outcomes (25)
  1. Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 36 in the Percentage of LFC (Assessed by MRI-PDFF)

    MRI-PDFF was performed using a standardized imaging protocol, and a central reader analyzed the results. The central reader for this study trained the local imaging centers and provided the imaging manual.

    Absolute change from baseline to Week 36 was calculated as follows: LFC at Week 36 - LFC at baseline.

    The analysis of the absolute change in LFC was performed for the Intent-to-treat Set (ITTS) using an ANCOVA model adjusting for treatment, for stratification factors, and for the baseline LFC as a continuous covariate. LFC missing values at Week 36 were imputed using a multivariate imputation approach by fully conditional specification regression method assuming Missing At Random Mechanism.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 36

  2. Percentage of Responders (Relative Reduction of at Least 30% in LFC) at Week 36

    Responders were defined as patients who achieved a clinically meaningful relative reduction of at least 30% in LFC from baseline to Week 36 as assessed by MRI-PDFF

    Measured: Baseline and Week 36

  3. Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Alanine Amino Transferase (ALT)

    Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 36

  4. Percentage of Responders (Normalization of ALT)

    Normalization of ALT was analyzed in the subset of patients with baseline greater than the upper reference range. Patients were classed as responders if ALT normalized, i.e. decreased to < upper reference range at a post baseline visit.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 36

  5. Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Aspartate Amino Transferase (AST)

    Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 36

  6. Percentage of Responders (Normalization of AST)

    Normalization of AST was analyzed in the subset of patients with baseline greater than the upper reference range. Patients were classed as responders if AST normalized, i.e. decreased to < upper reference range at a post baseline visit.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 36

  7. Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Gamma Glutamyltransferase (GGT)

    Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 36

  8. Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP)

    Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 36

  9. Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Pro-C3

    Pro-C3 is the released N-terminal pro-peptide of type III collagen. It is a fibrosis marker.

    Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 36

  10. Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) Score

    ELF score is an extracellular matrix marker set consisting of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 1 (TIMP-1), amino-terminal propeptide of type III procollagen (PIIINP) and hyaluronic acid (HA) showing good correlations with fibrosis stages in chronic liver disease.The set cutoffs for this scoring are: ELF < 7.7: no to mild fibrosis; ELF between 7.7 - 9.8: moderate fibrosis; ELF between 9.8 - 11.3: severe fibrosis; and ELF > or = 11.3: cirrhosis.

    Blood samples used for TIMP-1, PIIINP and HA were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 36

  11. Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Fibrosis-4 (Fib-4) Score

    Fib-4 score is a non invasive method based on clinical determinations that indicates the level of fibrosis/ scarring of the liver. The set cutoffs for this scoring are: Fib-4 < 1.45: absence of cirrhosis; Fib-4 between 1.45 - 3.25: inconclusive and Fib-4 > 3.25: cirrhosis.

    Fib-4 score was calculated as (Age [years] × AST [U/L]) / (platelet [10^9/L] × √[ALT [U/L]]). Blood samples used for AST, ALT and platelet counts were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 36

  12. Change From Baseline to Week 36 in NAFLD Fibrosis Score

    The NFS is based on a combination of clinical and laboratory measurements (i.e. age, glycemia, BMI, platelet, albumin and AST/ALT ratio). The set cutoffs for this scoring are: < -1.455 for exclusion of advance fibrosis, > -1.455 to < or = 0.675 for indetermined, and > 0.675 for presence of advance fibrosis.

    NFS was calculated as: 1.675 + 0.037 x age (years) + 0.094 x BMI (kg/m²) + 1.13 x Impaired Fasting Glucose or Diabetes (yes =1; no=0) + 0.99 x AST/ALT ratio - 0.013 x platelet (10^9/L) - 0.66 x albumin (g/dL)

    Measured: Baseline and Week 36

  13. Improvement of at Least 1 Point in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score From Baseline to Week 36

    Improvement in fibrosis is defined as a decrease of at least one stage in NASH CRN fibrosis score.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 36

  14. Improvement in NAS of at Least 2 Points With no Worsening in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score From Baseline to Week 36

    NAS is the NAFLD activity score, calculated as the sum of steatosis, lobular inflammation and ballooning scores. Improvement in NAS is defined as a decrease of at least 2 points. No worsening in NASH CRN fibrosis score means that the score remained stable or decreased.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 36

  15. NASH Resolution With no Worsening in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score at Week 36

    NASH resolution is defined as a NAS score of 0-1 for inflammation, 0 for ballooning, and any value for steatosis. No worsening in NASH CRN fibrosis score means that the score remained stable or decreased.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 36

  16. NASH Resolution With Improvement of at Least 1 Point in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score at Week 36

    NASH resolution is defined as a NAS score of 0-1 for inflammation, 0 for ballooning, and any value for steatosis. Improvement in fibrosis is defined as a decrease of at least one stage in NASH CRN fibrosis score.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 36

  17. Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)

    Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 36

  18. Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)

    Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 36

  19. Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Serum Insulin

    Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 36

  20. Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Serum C-peptide

    Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 36

  21. Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)

    HOMA-IR was calculated as: Serum C-peptide (ng/mL) × FPG (mg/dL) / 405 Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.

    HOMA-IR is an indicator of insulin resistance. The higher the value, the greater the insulin resistance. There is no minimum or maximum index score.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 36

  22. Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index (QUICKI)

    The QUICKI was calculated as: 1 / (log (FPG [mg/dL]) + log (C-peptide [ng/mL])).

    Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.

    QUICKI is an indicator of insulin resistance. Lower numbers reflect greater insulin resistance. There is no minimum or maximum index score.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 36

  23. Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Adipo-IR

    The Adipo-IR was calculated as: Fasting serum Free Fatty Acids (mmol/L) x Fasting serum insulin (μIU/mL) Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.

    The Adipo-IR is a marker of adipose tissue insulin resistance. Higher the value, the greater the insulin resistance. There is no minimum or maximum index score.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 36

  24. Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Adiponectin

    Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 36

  25. Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Weight

    Body weight was measured using a scale with appropriate resolution, placed on a stable, flat surface. Shoes, bulky layers of clothing, and jackets had to be removed so that only light clothing remained.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 36

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Mar 2020
  2. Study start1 Sep 2020
  3. Primary completion8 Jun 2022
  4. Study completion20 Jun 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
117 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04321343
Sponsor's protocol ID
PXL065-003
Status last verified
Aug 2023
First submitted
23 Mar 2020
Last updated
29 Aug 2023
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing PXL065 in people with NASH - Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis, run by Poxel SA at 29 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Aug 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 29 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 29 Aug 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Relative Change From Baseline to Week 36 in the Percentage of Liver Fat Content (LFC) (Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging - Proton Density Fat Fraction [MRI-PDFF]) (time frame: Baseline and Week 36). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Aug 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in