AzTrials
AzTrials

Hepatitis C Virus InfectionPhase 4PHARM-CNCT04322981

Pharmacist-led Hepatitis C Management

A Phase 4 study testing Pharmacist-Led care in people with Hepatitis C Virus Infection, run by University Health Network, Toronto at 1 site in Canada.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) continues to disproportionately affect vulnerable and marginalized persons in Canada. During the interferon treatment era, certain circumstances precluded individuals from receiving treatment, most notably mental health concerns or active substance use. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Hepatitis C Virus Infection
What is being tested?
Pharmacist-Led care
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
108 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
13 Apr 2022to 1 Dec 2023
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • HCV infection
  • HCV RNA > 1,000 IU/mL
  • Aged 18 to 80
  • Willingness and capacity to provide informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Presence of or history of decompensated cirrhosis. This will be defined as evidence of clinical decompensation (history of either ascites, variceal hemorrhage, or hepatic encephalopathy/confusion), and Child-Pugh-Turcotte and Model for Endstage Liver Disease (MELD) score will also be used to assess this using laboratory investigations and clinical findings.
  • Platelets < 75,000/mm3, total albumin <35 g/L, total bilirubin (total and direct) >34.2 μmol/L, International Normalized Ratio (INR) >1.5
  • History of current or past hepatocellular carcinoma
  • Hepatitis B virus (HBV) co-infection as indicated by positive testing for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg +ve)or untreated HIV co-infection
  • Prior HCV antiviral therapy with direct-acting antivirals with or without peginterferon/ribavirin
  • Chronic liver disease other than mild non-alcoholic or alcoholic fatty liver disease from a cause other than HCV
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Significant co-morbid illness that precludes inclusion in the opinion of the investigator
  • Life expectancy of less than 1 year. If clarity is required, the provider who delivered the diagnosis will be contacted.
  • Pregnancy/breast-feeding/inability to use contraception
  • Use of concomitant contraindicated drugs

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Mia Biondi, PhD, NP-PHC contact

6476286471

mia.biondi@mail.mcgill.ca

Jordan Feld, MD, MPH contact

4163404584

jordan.feld@uhn.ca

Canada1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Specialty Rx Solutions

    Toronto, Ontario, M4Y 1G7

    Mia Biondi, NP-PHC, PhD, 6476276461, mbiondi@yorku.ca

    Jordan Feld, MD, MPH, 4163404584, jordan.feld@uhn.ca

    Recruiting

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Pharmacist-led Hepatitis C Diagnosis and Rapid Management - in Community

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) continues to disproportionately affect vulnerable and marginalized persons in Canada. During the interferon treatment era, certain circumstances precluded individuals from receiving treatment, most notably mental health concerns or active substance use. In addition to the tolerability and efficacy of all-oral direct acting antivirals (DAAs), novel diagnostic strategies have also increased engagement in the care cascade. Point-of care and/or dried blood spot antibody as well as RNA testing allow for diagnosis without the need for phlebotomy, a major barrier for those with a history of past or current injection drug use. Despite these advances in diagnostic streamlining and increased cure rates, engagement post-diagnosis continues to be a major gap. Although the exact mechanism of HCV acquisition may not be clear - people who inject drugs, persons who are street-involved or low-income, or persons who are difficult-to-reach for other reasons, often experience both structural and geographic challenges to obtaining care. Community pharmacists may be the first point of contact for higher risk populations and may avoid testing and/or treatment for fear of judgement or poor treatment in hospital/specialist settings. While studies have demonstrated the feasibility of treating people receiving opioid against therapy (OAT), it remains unclear whether Canadian pharmacists can safely and effectively screen, and/or confirm HCV, work-up patients for HCV treatment, and prescribe with minimal oversight. If this model proves successful, it may have global utility especially in areas of the world where pharmacists are the initial point of contact for healthcare issues. The aim of this study is to determine whether being tested and linked care and treatment will be more effective in a community pharmacy than a referral to a tertiary care hospital for management of HCV among people on stable OAT, or other populations who experience barriers to care but use community pharmacy services.

Being tested
Pharmacist-Led care, Standard of Care (Hepatology)
Keywords
Point-of-care testing, Rapid access to treatment, Pharmacist-led, Service co-localization
Medical subject headings
Hepatitis C

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Pharmacist-Led careBehavioural

    Rapid testing in a community pharmacy, with rapid linkage to care and treatment that is pharmacist-led

  • Standard of Care (Hepatology)Behavioural

    Rapid testing in a community pharmacy, with standard of care referral to academic hepatology

Study groups in NCT04322981
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Community Pharmacist-LedExperimentalPatients in Arm 1 will receive care and treatment at their home pharmacy and be evaluated and treated by a community pharmacist under medical directives and with study oversight.
Receives: Behavioral: Pharmacist-Led care
Academic hepatologyActive comparatorPatients in Arm 2 will be evaluated and treated by hepatologists at the Toronto Centre for Liver Disease.
Receives: Behavioral: Standard of Care (Hepatology)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Intention to treat by Completion Rates

    Intention to treat direct acting antiviral (DAA) completion rates in non-cirrhotic or compensated cirrhotic patients treated with DAAs in pharmacist-led programs in community pharmacies, compared to treatment completion rates with referral and treatment in tertiary care hepatology (Toronto Centre for Liver Disease).

    Measured: 24 months

Secondary outcomes (14)
  1. Sustained Virologic Response by Intention-to-Treat

    Compare Sustained Virologic Response rates by Intention to treat in both sites.

    Measured: 24 months

  2. Sustained Virologic Response by modified Intention-to-Treat

    Compare the rates of Sustained Virologic Response by modified Intention to treat (including all participants who take at least one dose of medication)

    Measured: 24 months

  3. Sustained Virologic Response by Per Protocol analysis

    Compare the rates of Sustained Virologic Response by per protocol analysis including all individuals who complete treatment in both groups.

    Measured: 24 months

  4. Hepatitis C Community seroprevalence in downtown Toronto

    Determine the seroprevalence of HCV among individuals tested in downtown Toronto.

    Measured: 18 months

  5. Community Pharmacist Fibrosis Identification

    Comparison of pharmacist-assessed fibrosis stage vs fibrosis stage assessed by hepatologist (gold standard)

    Measured: 18 months

  6. Community Pharmacist Decompensation Identification

    Comparison of pharmacist-assessed hepatic decompensation score vs hepatic decompensation assessed by hepatologist (gold standard)

    Measured: 18 months

  7. Minimum Mean Time-to-Treatment

    Determine the minimum mean time-to-treatment initiation in both groups

    Measured: 18 months

  8. Community Appointment Adherence

    Assess appointment adherence in both arms

    Measured: 24 months

  9. Medication Adherence

    Assess self-reported medication adherence at both sites

    Measured: 18 months

  10. Quality of Life and Substance Use

    Evaluate quality of life for patients with chronic liver disease (CLDQ-HCV) before and after treatment (endpoint and SV12) at both sites.

    Measured: 24 months

  11. Substance Use

    Evaluate the Maudsley Addiction Profile (MAP) before and after treatment (endpoint and SV12) at both sites.

    Measured: 24 months

  12. Patient Understanding and Satisfaction

    Compare patient understanding and satisfaction with HCV treatment with the Hepatitis Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (HPSQ)

    Measured: 24 months

  13. Reinfection

    Assess rates of reinfection in patients who achieve Sustained Virologic Response, at 48 weeks.

    Measured: 24 months

  14. Patient empowerment

    Compare measure of patient empowerment by treatment-arm using the Health Care Empowerment (HCE) survey

    Measured: 24 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Mar 2020
  2. Study start13 Apr 2022
  3. Primary completion1 Jun 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Dec 2023 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Screening, evaluation and treatment at an outpatient pharmacy compared to referral to hepatology clinics
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
108 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04322981
Sponsor's protocol ID
20-5265
Acronym
PHARM-C
Status last verified
Dec 2021
First submitted
20 Feb 2020
Last updated
27 Apr 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Pharmacist-Led care in people with Hepatitis C Virus Infection, run by University Health Network, Toronto at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Apr 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Mia Biondi, PhD, NP-PHC (6476286471, mia.biondi@mail.mcgill.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Intention to treat by Completion Rates (time frame: 24 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Apr 2022.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in