Peri-ImplantitisNCT04323540
Treatment of Peri-implantitis With or Without Simultaneous Soft Tissue Augmentation
A study testing Peri-implantitis reconstructive surgery in people with Peri-Implantitis, run by George Eastman Dental Hospital, Italy at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
The study will aim to compare two modalities in the reconstructive treatment of peri-implantitis defects. More specifically, the control group will be a reconstructive approach (xenograft bone graft granules and collagen membrane, BioOss and BioGide, Geistlich, Wolhusen). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Peri-Implantitis
- What is being tested?
- Peri-implantitis reconstructive surgery
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 32 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 5 Feb 2021to 1 Jan 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- · Be able and willing to provide consent and sign the informed consent form.
- Be able and willing to comply with study procedures and follow-up appointments required by the study protocol.
- Age>18 years
- Presence of at least one implant affected with peri-implantitis, defined as the following con-dition: at least one site presenting peri-implant probing depth (PPD) >6 mm and simultane-ous presence of profuse BoP/SUP and a radiographically documented change in bone level greater than initial bone remodeling. In the likely event that a baseline radiographic image is absent, the bone level will be compared to where it would likely have been at the time of implant insertion and a difference of >3 mm from that level will be considered.
- Implants in function (i.e. loaded) for at least 1 year.
- Screw- and cement-retained suprastructures for both fixed and removable prostheses.
Who cannot join
- Compromised systemic health which contraindicates the study procedures.
- Pregnant or nursing women.
- Cigarette smoking>5 per day
- Systemic conditions compromising healing (i.e. diabetes mellitus). Patients with diabe-tes mellitus types I or II will be asked to provide information regarding their most re-cent HbA1c values. Only patients with HbA1c<7% will be enrolled.
- Patients taking medications known to interfere with gingival or bone metabolism.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Surgical Reconstructive Treatment of Peri-Implantitis With or Without Simultaneous Soft Tissue Augmentation: a Multi-center Randomized Controlled Trial
The study will aim to compare two modalities in the reconstructive treatment of peri-implantitis defects. More specifically, the control group will be a reconstructive approach (xenograft bone graft granules and collagen membrane, BioOss and BioGide, Geistlich, Wolhusen). The test group will be the same, with the exception of an autologous sub-epithelial connective tissue palatal graft, sutured beneath the flap, which will be used in addition to grafting materials.
Outcomes will include CAL, PD, MR, defect resolution, PI, BoP, SUPP, surgical characteristics, and patient-reported outcome measures, including an aesthetic self-evaluation.
Read the detailed description
The study will aim to compare two modalities in the reconstructive treatment of peri-implantitis defects.
More specifically, the control group will be a "pure" reconstructive approach (xenograft bone graft granules and resorbable collagen membrane, BioOss and BioGide, Geistlich, Wolhusen). This is in accordance with gold standard practices of reconstructive therapy of peri-implant defects.
The test group will be treated with the same approach and materials, with the exception of an autologous sub-epithelial connective tissue palatal graft, sutured beneath the flap, which will be used in addition to the grafting materials. The graft will be harvested from the homolateral palate (molar region).
Outcomes will include clinical attachment level (CAL; primary outcome), probing depth (PD), mucosal recession (MR), defect resolution (a composite outcome defined as the simultaneous absence of PD > 5 mm, bleeding on probing [BOP] and/or suppuration [SUP], and bone level changes > 0.5 mm), plaque index (PI), BOP, suppuration on probing, suppuration on palpation, surgical duration, the Early Wound Healing Index (EHI), and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), including aesthetic self-evaluation.
PROMs will assess patients' perception of surgery, pain intensity, perceived swelling, perceived bleeding, and analgesic intake.
Clinical measurements will be recorded at baseline and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. EHI will be assessed at 1 and 2 weeks postoperatively. Radiographic bone levels at 12 and 24 months will be compared with those recorded on radiographs obtained at baseline. All PROMs variables, as well as aesthetic self-evaluation, will be collected using specially designed questionnaires completed by the patients. PROMs data will be recorded at 4, 8, and 12 hours after surgery on the day of surgery (day 0), and daily from postoperative day 2 to day 7. Aesthetic self-evaluation will be recorded at baseline and at 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively.
- Conditions
- Peri-Implantitis
- Being tested
- Peri-implantitis reconstructive surgery
- Medical subject headings
- Peri-Implantitis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Peri-implantitis reconstructive surgeryProcedure or surgery
For both arms (excluding the already included information): defect debridement, removal of debris using titanium curettes, titanium brushes on the implant surface, irrigation with saline, application of sterile cotton pellets with saline solution. Grafting with (experimental) xenograft and soft tissue, or xenograft alone (control). Suture.
Specific to control group (active comparator): the peri-implant defect will be filled with xenograft, and a collagen membrane will be fitted and trimmed to the defect area.
Specific to test/experimental group: same as above (for control). In addition a soft tissue graft will be harvested from the palate and sutured to the buccal flap. The entire flap will then be sutured to the lingual flap.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Xenograft+collagen membrane | Active comparator | Reconstructive approach (Xenograft+collegen membrane) Receives: Procedure: Peri-implantitis reconstructive surgery |
| Xenograft+collagen membrane+autologous soft tissue graft | Experimental | Reconstructive approach (Xenograft+collegen membrane) plus soft tissue graft (autologous, harvested as FGG) Receives: Procedure: Peri-implantitis reconstructive surgery |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Clinical attachment level
linear distance (mm) from the implant platform to the bottom of the pocket
Measured: change from baseline to: 6, 12, 18, 24 months
Secondary outcomes (17)
Probing depth
linear distance (mm) from the gingival margin to the bottom of the pocket
Measured: 6, 12, 18, 24 months
Disease resolution
No PD greater than or equal to 5 mm and simultaneous absence of BOP/SUP and no more than 0.5 mm change between 2 weeks and 12 and 24 months on radiograph
Measured: 6, 12, 18, 24 months
Mucosal recession
linear distance (mm) from the implant platform to the gingival margin
Measured: 6, 12, 18, 24 months
plaque index (minimum value 0, maximum 1)
binary outcome: yes/ no detected running the probe into the peri-implant sulcus
Measured: 6, 12, 18, 24 months
profuse bleeding
abundant bleeding evoked upon probing immediately after
Measured: 6, 12, 18, 24 months
BOP
bleeding upon probing: bleeding evoked upon probing after 1 second
Measured: 6, 12, 18, 24 months
suppuration
Binary: yes or no, detected upon probing or digital palpation
Measured: 6, 12, 18, 24 months
Gingival thickness
Measured in a horizontal direction at 1 mm from the gingival margin
Measured: 6, 12, 18, 24 months
PROMs - Patient perception of surgery
Assessed using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS), where higher scores indicate a more positive perception of the surgical procedure.
Measured: 4 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, and Days 2-7 after surgery
Radiographic bone levels
radiographic bone level changes between the 2 week and 12 and 24 month follow-ups
Measured: 2 weeks, 12 months, 24 months
PROMs - Patient-reported pain intensity
Assessed using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS), where higher scores indicate greater pain intensity.
Measured: 4 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, and Days 2-7 after surgery
PROMs - Patient-reported swelling
Assessed using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS), where higher scores indicate greater perceived swelling.
Measured: 4 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, and Days 2-7 after surgery
PROMs - Patient-reported bleeding
Assessed using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS), where higher scores indicate greater perceived bleeding.
Measured: 4 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, and Days 2-7 after surgery
PROMs - Analgesic consumption
Number of analgesic tablets consumed by the patient during the first postoperative week.
Measured: 12 hours after surgery and daily from day 2 through day 7 after surgery
PROMs - aesthetic self-evaluation
Assessed using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS), where higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with the esthetic outcome.
Measured: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months
Early wound healing
Wound healing scores ranging from 1 to 5 by the surgeon
Measured: 1 week and 2 weeks after surgery
Surgical duration
The interval between the initial incision and placement of the final suture, measured in minutes.
Measured: at the surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Mar 2020
- Study start5 Feb 2021
- Primary completion1 Jan 2025
- Study completion1 Jan 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Peri-ImplantitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 32 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- George Eastman Dental Hospital, Italy
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Belgrade
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Lucrezia Paternò Holtzman, George Eastman Dental Hospital, Italy
- Investigators
- Luca Cordaro, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, G. Eastman Dental Hospital Rome, Italy
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04323540
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 18117
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 23 Mar 2020
- Last updated
- 24 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Holtzman LP, Milinkovic I, Vuckovic M, Malpassi C, Cuppini M, Solderer A, Aleksic Z, Cordaro L. Effect of Connective Tissue Graft as an Adjunct to Guided Bone Regeneration in the Surgical Treatment of Peri-Implantitis: A Dual-Center Randomized Controlled Trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2026 Apr;37(4):478-495. doi: 10.1111/clr.70093. Epub 2026 Jan 31.
PubMed 41618697
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Surgical Reconstructive Treatment of Peri-Implantitis With or Without Simultaneous Soft Tissue Augmentation: a Multi-center Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04323540
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 18117
- Conditions
- Peri-Implantitis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 32 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- George Eastman Dental Hospital, ItalyUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Belgrade
- Study start
- 5 Feb 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jan 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jan 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study will aim to compare two modalities in the reconstructive treatment of peri-implantitis defects. More specifically, the control group will be a reconstructive approach (xenograft bone graft granules and collagen membrane, BioOss and BioGide, Geistlich, Wolhusen). The test group will be the same, with the exception of an autologous sub-epithelial connective tissue palatal graft, sutured beneath the flap, which will be used in addition to grafting materials.
Outcomes will include CAL, PD, MR, defect resolution, PI, BoP, SUPP, surgical characteristics, and patient-reported outcome measures, including an aesthetic self-evaluation.
Detailed description
The study will aim to compare two modalities in the reconstructive treatment of peri-implantitis defects.
More specifically, the control group will be a "pure" reconstructive approach (xenograft bone graft granules and resorbable collagen membrane, BioOss and BioGide, Geistlich, Wolhusen). This is in accordance with gold standard practices of reconstructive therapy of peri-implant defects.
The test group will be treated with the same approach and materials, with the exception of an autologous sub-epithelial connective tissue palatal graft, sutured beneath the flap, which will be used in addition to the grafting materials. The graft will be harvested from the homolateral palate (molar region).
Outcomes will include clinical attachment level (CAL; primary outcome), probing depth (PD), mucosal recession (MR), defect resolution (a composite outcome defined as the simultaneous absence of PD > 5 mm, bleeding on probing [BOP] and/or suppuration [SUP], and bone level changes > 0.5 mm), plaque index (PI), BOP, suppuration on probing, suppuration on palpation, surgical duration, the Early Wound Healing Index (EHI), and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), including aesthetic self-evaluation.
PROMs will assess patients' perception of surgery, pain intensity, perceived swelling, perceived bleeding, and analgesic intake.
Clinical measurements will be recorded at baseline and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. EHI will be assessed at 1 and 2 weeks postoperatively. Radiographic bone levels at 12 and 24 months will be compared with those recorded on radiographs obtained at baseline. All PROMs variables, as well as aesthetic self-evaluation, will be collected using specially designed questionnaires completed by the patients. PROMs data will be recorded at 4, 8, and 12 hours after surgery on the day of surgery (day 0), and daily from postoperative day 2 to day 7. Aesthetic self-evaluation will be recorded at baseline and at 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Xenograft+collagen membrane | Active comparator | Procedure: Peri-implantitis reconstructive surgeryReconstructive approach (Xenograft+collegen membrane) |
| Xenograft+collagen membrane+autologous soft tissue graft | Experimental | Procedure: Peri-implantitis reconstructive surgeryReconstructive approach (Xenograft+collegen membrane) plus soft tissue graft (autologous, harvested as FGG) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- · Be able and willing to provide consent and sign the informed consent form.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Compromised systemic health which contraindicates the study procedures.
- Pregnant or nursing women.
- Cigarette smoking>5 per day
- Systemic conditions compromising healing (i.e. diabetes mellitus). Patients with diabe-tes mellitus types I or II will be asked to provide information regarding their most re-cent HbA1c values. Only patients with HbA1c<7% will be enrolled.
- Patients taking medications known to interfere with gingival or bone metabolism.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Peri-implantitis reconstructive surgeryFor both arms (excluding the already included information): defect debridement, removal of debris using titanium curettes, titanium brushes on the implant surface, irrigation with saline, application of sterile cotton pellets with saline solution. Grafting with (experimental) xenograft and soft tissue, or xenograft alone (control). Suture. Specific to control group (active comparator): the peri-implant defect will be filled with xenograft, and a collagen membrane will be fitted and trimmed to the defect area. Specific to test/experimental group: same as above (for control). In addition a soft tissue graft will be harvested from the palate and sutured to the buccal flap. The entire flap will then be sutured to the lingual flap. | Procedure or surgery | Xenograft+collagen membrane, Xenograft+collagen membrane+autologous soft tissue graft |
Primary outcome
Clinical attachment level
Time frame: change from baseline to: 6, 12, 18, 24 months
linear distance (mm) from the implant platform to the bottom of the pocket
17 secondary outcomes
Probing depth
Time frame: 6, 12, 18, 24 months
Disease resolution
Time frame: 6, 12, 18, 24 months
Mucosal recession
Time frame: 6, 12, 18, 24 months
plaque index (minimum value 0, maximum 1)
Time frame: 6, 12, 18, 24 months
profuse bleeding
Time frame: 6, 12, 18, 24 months
BOP
Time frame: 6, 12, 18, 24 months
suppuration
Time frame: 6, 12, 18, 24 months
Gingival thickness
Time frame: 6, 12, 18, 24 months
PROMs - Patient perception of surgery
Time frame: 4 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, and Days 2-7 after surgery
Radiographic bone levels
Time frame: 2 weeks, 12 months, 24 months
PROMs - Patient-reported pain intensity
Time frame: 4 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, and Days 2-7 after surgery
PROMs - Patient-reported swelling
Time frame: 4 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, and Days 2-7 after surgery
PROMs - Patient-reported bleeding
Time frame: 4 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, and Days 2-7 after surgery
PROMs - Analgesic consumption
Time frame: 12 hours after surgery and daily from day 2 through day 7 after surgery
PROMs - aesthetic self-evaluation
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months
Early wound healing
Time frame: 1 week and 2 weeks after surgery
Surgical duration
Time frame: at the surgery
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Jun 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41618697Holtzman LP, Milinkovic I, Vuckovic M, Malpassi C, Cuppini M, Solderer A, Aleksic Z, Cordaro L. Effect of Connective Tissue Graft as an Adjunct to Guided Bone Regeneration in the Surgical Treatment of Peri-Implantitis: A Dual-Center Randomized Controlled Trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2026 Apr;37(4):478-495. doi: 10.1111/clr.70093. Epub 2026 Jan 31.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Peri-Implantitis
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Customized Versus Stock Healing Abutments on Peri-Implant Soft Tissue
Peri-Implantitis
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation of 25(OH)D3 and LL-37 Levels in Periimplant Sulcus Fluid
Peri Implantitis, Peri Implant Mucositis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Diagnostic Accuracy of Large Language Models for Peri-Implant Marginal Bone Loss on Panoramic Radiographs
Peri-implantitis, Alveolar Bone Loss
RecruitingObservational study
Access to Probing and Peri-implant Diseases
Peri-implantitis, Peri-implant Bone Loss
Not yet recruitingObservational study
ATR-FTIR and Raman Spectroscopy of Peri-Implant Crevicular Fluid in Peri-Implantitis
Peri-Implantitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Luca Cordaro, MD, PhD principal investigator
G. Eastman Dental Hospital Rome, Italy
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Peri-implantitis reconstructive surgery in people with Peri-Implantitis, run by George Eastman Dental Hospital, Italy at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Clinical attachment level (time frame: change from baseline to: 6, 12, 18, 24 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04323540, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jun 2026.