Insulin ResistanceNCT04327245
To Compare the Effects of Non-nutritive Sweeteners Intake in Woman With Insulin Resistance
A study testing Intervention ingest a 5000 mg of D-tagatose and Intervention ingest a 15,3 mg of stevia in people with Insulin Resistance and Hyperinsulinism, run by University of Chile.
Trial summary
ABSTRACT Introduction: There is no current data about the effects of non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS) about important factors, such as the energy intake, appetite and its relationship in people with insulin resistance when tasting sweet. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 35 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Insulin Resistance, Hyperinsulinism
- What is being tested?
- Intervention ingest a 5000 mg of D-tagatose and Intervention ingest a 15,3 mg of stevia
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 33 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 15 Jan 2017to 25 Oct 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 35 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Woman with Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) ≥ 2,5
- Body Mass Index (BMI) between 18.5 to 34.9 kg / m2
- Stable doses of oral contraceptive
- cigarette smoking <5 units / day
- Women on metformin treatment were allowed with the requirement of discontinuation for a period of four weeks prior to study initiation.
Who cannot join
- sex male
- pregnant or lactating women
- women with diseases, conditions or medications that provoke hyperinsulinism or that alter the glucidic metabolism, the postprandial hormonal response, appetite and / or satiety
- those who carry out moderate to intense physical activity three or more times a week for more than 30 minutes at a time
- those with the use of vitamin supplements or antioxidants
- Women with an allergy or aversion to the sweeteners used in the study.
About this study
Official title: Effect of Intake of Stevia and D-tagatose Sweeteners on Glycemia, Peptide C and Appetite-satiety in Women With Insulin Resistance
ABSTRACT
Introduction: There is no current data about the effects of non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS) about important factors, such as the energy intake, appetite and its relationship in people with insulin resistance when tasting sweet. It is highly relevant to compare the effects of NNS intake, such as, stevia (steviol glycosides) and D-tagatose, previous to a 75-gram oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) on glycaemic and C-peptide responses in women with insulin resistance.
Read more
Objective: To compare the effects of non-nutritive sweeteners intake: stevia (steviol glyco-sides) and sucralose previous to OGTT on appetite, glycemia and C-peptide plasmatic concentrations in women with insulin resistance.
Methods: Thirty-three women with T2DM were studied in 3 different moments and they received 3 treatments: pre-load of water or D-tagatose or stevia and then offered to consume a 75-gram oral glucose tolerance test. Blood samples were obtained to measure the dependent variables, glycemic at times -10, 0, 30, 60, 90, 120 and 180 minutes and C-peptide at times -10, 30, 90, 120 and 180 minutes. The analogue visual scale questionnaires (VAS) was conducted every 30 minutes in order to obtain the results of the depend variables: appetite and wish of specific type of food in a subjective way; appetite, satiety, relax, wish to eat any food, craving for something sweet, craving for something salty, something tasty, something fatty. Through food provided ad libi-tum (objective appetite), were obtained the results of: energy, carbohydrates, proteins and lipid intakes. The statistical analysis applied included the Shapiro-Wilk's Normality test, repeated measures ANOVA to assess differences among treatments, Friedman's test followed by Wilcoxon test corrected by Bonferroni as needed. The degree of association between variables was conducted using the Pearson's or Spearman's correlation coefficient tests, as requested. A probability value p <0.05 was considered significant.
Read the detailed description
Protocol The experimental design was developed 3 times. Each intervention was performed separately for a minimum period of 7 days out and a maximum of 14 days, depending on the availability of the experimental subjects. Cross treatment design (crossover) each women serves as its own control The first intervention corresponded to the control group, in order to maintain the ignorance of the type of sweetener they were receiving, between day 7 or maximum 14 days post-intervention the order of the test of the NNS was reversed. Therefore, during the second or third intervention they were given to drink water with D-tagatose or stevia respectively. For each intervention a check list was followed.
Subjects were asked to maintain their normal diet between study days and abstain from strenuous exercise and alcohol intake for 24 hours before each evaluation. The subjects attended with an 8-hour fast, without having ingested medication, to the sampling room of the Pharmacy Faculty, University of Valparaís. The study was only begun if they had a capillary glycemia <100%, measured through a glucometer.
Then, they were asked to answer the analogue visual scale (VAS) questionnaire and an intravenous catheter was installed in the antecubital vein to take the blood samples at "time -10". Immediately, they were given to drink 60 ml of water or 60 ml of water with 5000 mg of D-tagatose or an equivalent volume with 15,3 mg of stevia (steviol glycosides), which they had to consume in less than 2 minutes.
After 10 minutes, at "time 0" immediately after the second blood sample, the individuals consumed a 75-gram oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT).
The following blood samples were taken at times 30, 60, 90, 120 and 180 minutes after "time 0". In total, 28 ml of blood was extracted, in each time the glycemia and C-peptide were determined (4 ml was taken at a time).
In addition, VAS questionnaires were applied every 30 minutes, from "time -10" to 180 minutes for appetite determinations.
After completing the extraction of blood samples at 180 minutes and removing the intravenous catheter, the subjects were offered a meal for 30 minutes, which consisted of a variety of foods of high acceptability, previously weighed and fractionated.
Statistic analysis The normal distribution of the variables was determined by the Shapiro-Wilk test. The natural logarithm was applied to the parameters without normal distribution. The variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation or median plus interquartile interval (Q1-Q3). The statistical significance between the differences in plasma glucose concentrations, area under the curve (AUC) of glycaemia, energy intake and macronutrients by treatment (preload water, D-tagatose and stevia), was evaluated through Anova of repeated samples . To analyze the differences between plasma concentrations and AUC of C-peptide and glycaemia per treatment (preload water, D-tagatose and stevia), Friedman's test was used, followed by Wilcoxon and adjusted by Bonferroni.
To identify the relationships between glycemic responses and intake of food at will (energy intake and macronutrients by treatment, preload water, D-tagatose and stevia), the Pearson correlation factor was used, in contrast to C-peptide response and the visual analogue scale (VAS) and food intake at will per treatment Spearman's correlation factor was used.
The statistical analysis was performed with the SPSS 20.0 computer program (SPSS Inc., Chicago Illinois). A p <0.05 was considered statistically significant for all the analyzes.
- Conditions
- Insulin Resistance, Hyperinsulinism
- Being tested
- Intervention ingest a 5000 mg of D-tagatose, Intervention ingest a 15,3 mg of stevia
- Keywords
- High-Intensity Sweeteners, Non-Nutritive Sweeteners, Stevia rebaudiana, C-Peptide, Blood Glucose
- Medical subject headings
- Insulin Resistance, Hyperinsulinism
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Intervention ingest a 5000 mg of D-tagatoseOther
Woman with resistance insulin who ingest a 5000 mg of D-tagatose. D-tagatose is a sweetener of natural origin, low in calories (1.5 kcal / g) and with a sweetness power of 0.9.
About 20 to 25% of the ingested D-tagatose is absorbed and metabolized in the liver, the rest is fermented by the microbiota producing short chain fatty acids.
Intervention ingest a 15,3 mg of steviaOther
Woman with resistance insulin who ingest a 15,3 mg of stevia (steviol glycosides). The word "stevia" refers to the whole plant of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni (SRB), only some of the components of the stevia leaf are sweet. Steviol glycosides are up to 300 times sweeter than sucrose, do not provide calories and can be used as a substitute for sucrose or as a non-nutritive sweetener alternative. Your allowable daily intake is 4 mg / kg / body weight (expressed as steviol)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention ingest a 5000 mg of D-tagatose | Experimental | Intervention: Women with resistance insulin who ingest a 5000 mg of D-tagatose. D-tagatose is a sweetener of natural origin, low in calories (1.5 kcal / g) and with a sweetness power of 0.9.e. Receives: Other: Intervention ingest a 5000 mg of D-tagatose |
| No Intervention: Intervention ingest a water (control group) | No intervention | Woman with resistance insulin who ingest a water (control group) |
| Intervention ingest a 15,3 mg of stevia | Experimental | Intervention: Woman with resistance insulin who ingest a 15,3 mg of stevia (steviol glycosides). The word "stevia" refers to the whole plant of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni (SRB), only some of the components of the stevia leaf are sweet. Receives: Other: Intervention ingest a 15,3 mg of stevia |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
glycemic response in blood
Area under the curve was built for each subjects after steviol or D-tagatose or water intake.
Measured: Three hours
Secondary outcomes (1)
C-peptide response in blood
Area under the curve was built for each subjects after steviol or D-tagatose or water intake.
Measured: Three Hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Mar 2020
- Study start15 Jan 2017
- Primary completion23 Dec 2018
- Study completion25 Oct 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Insulin ResistanceStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Model description
- The experimental design was developed 3 times. Each intervention was performed separately for a minimum period of 7 days out and a maximum of 14 days, depending on the availability of the experimental subjects. Cross treatment design (crossover) each women serves as its own control The first intervention corresponded to the control group, in order to maintain the ignorance of the type of sweetener they were receiving, between day 7 or maximum 14 days post-intervention the order of the test of the NNS was reversed. Therefore, during the second or third intervention they were given to drink water with D-tagatose or stevia respectively
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 33 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Chile
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Sociedad Chilena de Diabetes y Endocrinología (SOCHED)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Verónica Sambra Vásquez, University of Chile
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04327245
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SOCHED
- Status last verified
- Mar 2020
- First submitted
- 26 Mar 2020
- Last updated
- 31 Mar 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Sambra V, Vicuna IA, Priken KM, Luna SL, Allendes DA, Godoy PM, Novik V, Vega CA. Acute responses of stevia and d-tagatose intake on metabolic parameters and appetite/satiety in insulin resistance. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2022 Jun;49:217-224. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2022.04.018. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
PubMed 35623816
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Mar 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Intake of Stevia and D-tagatose Sweeteners on Glycemia, Peptide C and Appetite-satiety in Women With Insulin Resistance
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04327245
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SOCHED
- Conditions
- Insulin Resistance, Hyperinsulinism
- Keywords
- High-Intensity Sweeteners, Non-Nutritive Sweeteners, Stevia rebaudiana, C-Peptide, Blood Glucose
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 33 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of ChileUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Sociedad Chilena de Diabetes y Endocrinología (SOCHED)
- Study start
- 15 Jan 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 23 Dec 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 25 Oct 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: There is no current data about the effects of non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS) about important factors, such as the energy intake, appetite and its relationship in people with insulin resistance when tasting sweet. It is highly relevant to compare the effects of NNS intake, such as, stevia (steviol glycosides) and D-tagatose, previous to a 75-gram oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) on glycaemic and C-peptide responses in women with insulin resistance.
Objective: To compare the effects of non-nutritive sweeteners intake: stevia (steviol glyco-sides) and sucralose previous to OGTT on appetite, glycemia and C-peptide plasmatic concentrations in women with insulin resistance.
Methods: Thirty-three women with T2DM were studied in 3 different moments and they received 3 treatments: pre-load of water or D-tagatose or stevia and then offered to consume a 75-gram oral glucose tolerance test. Blood samples were obtained to measure the dependent variables, glycemic at times -10, 0, 30, 60, 90, 120 and 180 minutes and C-peptide at times -10, 30, 90, 120 and 180 minutes. The analogue visual scale questionnaires (VAS) was conducted every 30 minutes in order to obtain the results of the depend variables: appetite and wish of specific type of food in a subjective way; appetite, satiety, relax, wish to eat any food, craving for something sweet, craving for something salty, something tasty, something fatty. Through food provided ad libi-tum (objective appetite), were obtained the results of: energy, carbohydrates, proteins and lipid intakes. The statistical analysis applied included the Shapiro-Wilk's Normality test, repeated measures ANOVA to assess differences among treatments, Friedman's test followed by Wilcoxon test corrected by Bonferroni as needed. The degree of association between variables was conducted using the Pearson's or Spearman's correlation coefficient tests, as requested. A probability value p <0.05 was considered significant.
Detailed description
Protocol The experimental design was developed 3 times. Each intervention was performed separately for a minimum period of 7 days out and a maximum of 14 days, depending on the availability of the experimental subjects. Cross treatment design (crossover) each women serves as its own control The first intervention corresponded to the control group, in order to maintain the ignorance of the type of sweetener they were receiving, between day 7 or maximum 14 days post-intervention the order of the test of the NNS was reversed. Therefore, during the second or third intervention they were given to drink water with D-tagatose or stevia respectively. For each intervention a check list was followed.
Subjects were asked to maintain their normal diet between study days and abstain from strenuous exercise and alcohol intake for 24 hours before each evaluation. The subjects attended with an 8-hour fast, without having ingested medication, to the sampling room of the Pharmacy Faculty, University of Valparaís. The study was only begun if they had a capillary glycemia <100%, measured through a glucometer.
Then, they were asked to answer the analogue visual scale (VAS) questionnaire and an intravenous catheter was installed in the antecubital vein to take the blood samples at "time -10". Immediately, they were given to drink 60 ml of water or 60 ml of water with 5000 mg of D-tagatose or an equivalent volume with 15,3 mg of stevia (steviol glycosides), which they had to consume in less than 2 minutes.
After 10 minutes, at "time 0" immediately after the second blood sample, the individuals consumed a 75-gram oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT).
The following blood samples were taken at times 30, 60, 90, 120 and 180 minutes after "time 0". In total, 28 ml of blood was extracted, in each time the glycemia and C-peptide were determined (4 ml was taken at a time).
In addition, VAS questionnaires were applied every 30 minutes, from "time -10" to 180 minutes for appetite determinations.
After completing the extraction of blood samples at 180 minutes and removing the intravenous catheter, the subjects were offered a meal for 30 minutes, which consisted of a variety of foods of high acceptability, previously weighed and fractionated.
Statistic analysis The normal distribution of the variables was determined by the Shapiro-Wilk test. The natural logarithm was applied to the parameters without normal distribution. The variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation or median plus interquartile interval (Q1-Q3). The statistical significance between the differences in plasma glucose concentrations, area under the curve (AUC) of glycaemia, energy intake and macronutrients by treatment (preload water, D-tagatose and stevia), was evaluated through Anova of repeated samples . To analyze the differences between plasma concentrations and AUC of C-peptide and glycaemia per treatment (preload water, D-tagatose and stevia), Friedman's test was used, followed by Wilcoxon and adjusted by Bonferroni.
To identify the relationships between glycemic responses and intake of food at will (energy intake and macronutrients by treatment, preload water, D-tagatose and stevia), the Pearson correlation factor was used, in contrast to C-peptide response and the visual analogue scale (VAS) and food intake at will per treatment Spearman's correlation factor was used.
The statistical analysis was performed with the SPSS 20.0 computer program (SPSS Inc., Chicago Illinois). A p <0.05 was considered statistically significant for all the analyzes.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- The experimental design was developed 3 times. Each intervention was performed separately for a minimum period of 7 days out and a maximum of 14 days, depending on the availability of the experimental subjects. Cross treatment design (crossover) each women serves as its own control The first intervention corresponded to the control group, in order to maintain the ignorance of the type of sweetener they were receiving, between day 7 or maximum 14 days post-intervention the order of the test of the NNS was reversed. Therefore, during the second or third intervention they were given to drink water with D-tagatose or stevia respectively
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention ingest a 5000 mg of D-tagatose | Experimental | Other: Intervention ingest a 5000 mg of D-tagatoseIntervention: Women with resistance insulin who ingest a 5000 mg of D-tagatose. D-tagatose is a sweetener of natural origin, low in calories (1.5 kcal / g) and with a sweetness power of 0.9.e. |
| No Intervention: Intervention ingest a water (control group) | No intervention | –Woman with resistance insulin who ingest a water (control group) |
| Intervention ingest a 15,3 mg of stevia | Experimental | Other: Intervention ingest a 15,3 mg of steviaIntervention: Woman with resistance insulin who ingest a 15,3 mg of stevia (steviol glycosides). The word "stevia" refers to the whole plant of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni (SRB), only some of the components of the stevia leaf are sweet. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 35 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Woman with Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) ≥ 2,5
- Body Mass Index (BMI) between 18.5 to 34.9 kg / m2
- Stable doses of oral contraceptive
- cigarette smoking <5 units / day
- Women on metformin treatment were allowed with the requirement of discontinuation for a period of four weeks prior to study initiation.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- sex male
- pregnant or lactating women
- women with diseases, conditions or medications that provoke hyperinsulinism or that alter the glucidic metabolism, the postprandial hormonal response, appetite and / or satiety
- those who carry out moderate to intense physical activity three or more times a week for more than 30 minutes at a time
- those with the use of vitamin supplements or antioxidants
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention ingest a 5000 mg of D-tagatoseWoman with resistance insulin who ingest a 5000 mg of D-tagatose. D-tagatose is a sweetener of natural origin, low in calories (1.5 kcal / g) and with a sweetness power of 0.9. About 20 to 25% of the ingested D-tagatose is absorbed and metabolized in the liver, the rest is fermented by the microbiota producing short chain fatty acids. | Other | Intervention ingest a 5000 mg of D-tagatose |
| Intervention ingest a 15,3 mg of steviaWoman with resistance insulin who ingest a 15,3 mg of stevia (steviol glycosides). The word "stevia" refers to the whole plant of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni (SRB), only some of the components of the stevia leaf are sweet. Steviol glycosides are up to 300 times sweeter than sucrose, do not provide calories and can be used as a substitute for sucrose or as a non-nutritive sweetener alternative. Your allowable daily intake is 4 mg / kg / body weight (expressed as steviol) | Other | Intervention ingest a 15,3 mg of stevia |
Primary outcome
glycemic response in blood
Time frame: Three hours
Area under the curve was built for each subjects after steviol or D-tagatose or water intake.
1 secondary outcome
C-peptide response in blood
Time frame: Three Hours
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Mar 2020.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35623816Sambra V, Vicuna IA, Priken KM, Luna SL, Allendes DA, Godoy PM, Novik V, Vega CA. Acute responses of stevia and d-tagatose intake on metabolic parameters and appetite/satiety in insulin resistance. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2022 Jun;49:217-224. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2022.04.018. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Insulin Resistance
Active, not recruiting
Effect of Probiotics on Insulin Sensitivity in Overweight and Obese Pregnancy
Obesity & Overweight, Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Trial of the Combination of Alpha-Lipoic Acid and Mirabegron in Women and in Men With Obesity
Insulin Resistance, Obesity
Recruiting
Effects of Urolithin A Supplementation on Glucose Metabolism in Healthy Adults 55 >= Years Old: A Randomized Triple-Masked Controlled Clinical Trial
Healthy Volunteer
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Effects of Meal Macronutrients on Postprandial Lipids
Nephrotic Syndrome, Lipodystrophy
RecruitingObservational study
Food-i-Sense Analytics: Integrating AI Into Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Analysis for Precision Nutrition.
Prediabetes (Insulin Resistance, Impaired Glucose Tolerance), Artificial Intelligence Mobile Application
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Intervention ingest a 5000 mg of D-tagatose and Intervention ingest a 15,3 mg of stevia in people with Insulin Resistance and Hyperinsulinism, run by University of Chile.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Mar 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
glycemic response in blood (time frame: Three hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04327245, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Mar 2020.