Corona Virus InfectionPhase 3NCT04327388
Sarilumab COVID-19
A Phase 3 study testing Sarilumab SAR153191 in people with Corona Virus Infection, run by Sanofi at 47 sites in 11 countries.
Trial summary
Primary Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of sarilumab relative to the control arm in adult participants hospitalized with severe or critical Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Secondary Objectives: Evaluate the 28-day survival rate. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Corona Virus Infection
- What is being tested?
- Sarilumab SAR153191
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 420 participants
- Where
- 47 sitesin 11 countries
- Study dates
- 28 Mar 2020to 2 Sep 2020
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Participants must be >=18 years of age. Participants must be hospitalized for less than or equal to 7 days with evidence of pneumonia and have one of the following disease categories: severe disease or critical disease.
- Laboratory-confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection.
Who cannot join
- Unlikely to survive after 48 hours from screening or unlikely to remain at the investigational site beyond 48 hours. Participants with multi organ dysfunction or requiring extracorporeal life support or renal replacement therapy were excluded.
- Presence of neutropenia less than 2000/cubic millimeter (mmˆ3), aspartate transaminase or ALT greater than 5X ULN, platelets less than 50,000/mmˆ3.
- Prior immunosuppressive therapies. Use of systemic chronic corticosteroids for non-COVID-19 related condition. Known or suspected history of tuberculosis. Suspected or known active systemic bacterial or fungal infections.
- The above information was not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.
Trial locations and contacts
47 sites in 11 countries.
47 sites in 11 countries
France7 sites
Investigational Site Number 2500001
Bordeaux, 33076
Investigational Site Number 2500007
Clamart, 92140
Investigational Site Number 2500006
La Roche-sur-Yon, 85925
Investigational Site Number 2500002
Nantes, 44093
Investigational Site Number 2500005
Paris, 75877
Investigational Site Number 2500003
Strasbourg, 67098
Investigational Site Number 2500004
Suresnes, 92151
Italy6 sites
Investigational Site Number 3800005
Milan, 20122
Investigational Site Number 3800001
Milan, 20132
Investigational Site Number 3800002
Milan, 20157
Investigational Site Number 3800003
Modena, 41100
Investigational Site Number 3800004
Parma, 43100
Investigational Site Number 3800006
Rozzano, 20089
Brazil5 sites
Investigational Site Number 0760003
Porto Alegre, 90110-270
Investigational Site Number 0760004
São José do Rio Preto, 15090-000
Investigational Site Number 0760001
São Paulo, 01327-001
Investigational Site Number 0760002
São Paulo, 04231-030
Investigational Site Number 0760005
São Paulo, 04321-120
Canada5 sites
Investigational Site Number 1240001
Montreal, H2X3E4
Investigational Site Number 1240005
Montreal, H4A 3J1
Investigational Site Number 1240004
Toronto, M4N3M5
Investigational Site Number 1240002
Toronto, M5G 2N2
Investigational Site Number 1240003
Vancouver, V5Z 1M9
Spain5 sites
Investigational Site Number 7240003
Barcelona, 08035
Investigational Site Number 7240004
Barcelona, 08036
Investigational Site Number 7240002
Madrid, 28007
Investigational Site Number 7240005
Madrid, 28034
Investigational Site Number 7240001
Madrid, 28046
Chile4 sites
Investigational Site Number 1520003
Santiago, 750-0691
Investigational Site Number 1520002
Santiago, 80004005
Investigational Site Number 1520004
Santiago
Investigational Site Number 1520001
Talca, 3460001
Argentina3 sites
Investigational Site Number 0320001
Caba, 1430
Investigational Site Number 0320003
Caba, C1180AAX
Investigational Site Number 0320004
Caba, C1426AAM
Germany3 sites
Investigational Site Number 2760004
Cologne, 50937
Investigational Site Number 2760002
Essen, 45147
Investigational Site Number 2760001
Münster, 48149
Israel3 sites
Investigational site number 3760003
Ashdod, 7747629
Investigational Site Number 3760002
Jerusalem, 91120
Investigational Site Number 3760001
Ramat Gan, 52662
Japan3 sites
Investigational Site Number 3920002
Fuchu-Shi
Investigational Site Number 3920003
Iruma-Gun
Investigational Site Number 3920001
Kamakura-Shi
Russia3 sites
Investigational Site Number 6430003
Moscow, 111539
Investigational Site Number 6430002
Moscow, 123182
Investigational Site Number 6430001
Moscow, 129301
About this study
Official title: An Adaptive Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study Assessing Efficacy and Safety of Sarilumab for Hospitalized Patients With COVID19
Primary Objective:
To evaluate the clinical efficacy of sarilumab relative to the control arm in adult participants hospitalized with severe or critical Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).
Read more
Secondary Objectives:
- Evaluate the 28-day survival rate.
- Evaluate the clinical efficacy of sarilumab compared to the control arm by clinical severity.
- Evaluate changes in the National Early Warning Score 2.
- Evaluate the duration of predefined symptoms and signs (if applicable).
- Evaluate the duration of supplemental oxygen dependency (if applicable).
- Evaluate the incidence of new mechanical ventilation use during the study.
- Evaluate the duration of new mechanical ventilation use during the Study.
- Evaluate the proportion of participants requiring rescue medication during the 28-day period.
- Evaluate need for admission into intensive care unit.
- Evaluate duration of hospitalization (days).
- The secondary safety objectives of the study were to evaluate the safety of sarilumab through hospitalization (up to Day 29 if participant was still hospitalized) compared to the control arm as assessed by incidence of:
- Serious adverse events.
- Major or opportunistic bacterial or fungal infections in participants with grade 4 neutropenia.
- Grade greater than or equal to (>=) 2 infusion related reactions.
- Grade >=2 hypersensitivity reactions.
- Increase in alanine transaminase (ALT) >=3X upper limit of normal (ULN) (for participants with normal baseline) or greater than 3X ULN AND at least 2-fold increase from baseline value (for participants with abnormal baseline).
- Major or opportunistic bacterial or fungal infections.
Read the detailed description
An individual participant would complete the study approximately 60 days from screening to follow-up on day 60 ±7 days.
- Conditions
- Corona Virus Infection
- Being tested
- Sarilumab SAR153191, Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Coronavirus Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Sarilumab SAR153191Drug
Also called REGN88, Kevzara®
Pharmaceutical form: Solution for injection Route of administration: Intravenous infusion
PlaceboDrug
Pharmaceutical form: Solution for injection Route of administration: Intravenous infusion
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Sarilumab 200 mg | Experimental | Sarilumab 200 milligrams (mg), single dose of intravenous (IV) injection on Day 1. Participants could receive a second dose of sarilumab 200 mg 24 to 48 hours after the first dose if first and any one of last three criteria was met as compared to Day 1 (as per following protocol amendment 2 [dated 08-Apr-2020]):
* Benefit risk assessment by the investigator favored the administration of another dose of study drug without compromising safety and
* Increase/recurrence of fever or
* Increase/no change in fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) requirement or
* Required vasopressors, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or development of multi-organ dysfunction. Receives: Drug: Sarilumab SAR153191 |
| Sarilumab 400 mg | Experimental | Sarilumab 400 mg, single dose of IV injection on Day 1. Participants could receive a second dose of sarilumab 400 mg 24 to 48 hours after the first dose if first and any one of last three criteria was met as compared to Day 1 (as per following protocol amendment 2 [dated 08-Apr-2020]):
* Benefit risk assessment by the investigator favored the administration of another dose of study drug without compromising safety and
* Increase/recurrence of fever or
* Increase/no change in FiO2 requirement or
* Required vasopressors, ECMO or development of multi-organ dysfunction. Receives: Drug: Sarilumab SAR153191 |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Placebo (for sarilumab), single dose of IV injection on Day 1. Participants could receive a second dose of placebo (for sarilumab) 24 to 48 hours after the first dose if first and any one of last three criteria was met as compared to Day 1 (as per following protocol amendment 2 [dated 08-Apr-2020]):
* Benefit risk assessment by the investigator favored the administration of another dose of study drug without compromising safety and
* Increase/recurrence of fever or
* Increase/no change in FiO2 requirement or
* Required vasopressors, ECMO or development of multi-organ dysfunction. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time to Improvement in Clinical Status of Participants (Using 7-point Ordinal Scale Score) by at Least 2 Points
Time to improvement of greater than or equal (>=) 2 points in clinical status assessment was defined as time (in days) from first dose of study drug to the time of first occurrence of improvement of >=2 points in clinical status of participants assessed using 7-point ordinal scale (calculated as: Date of first occurrence/episode of the event - date of first dose + 1). Seven-point ordinal scale for clinical assessment ranges from 1= death; 2= hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation/ECMO; 3= hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation/high flow oxygen devices; 4= hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 5= hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical care (COVID-19 related/otherwise); 6= hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer required ongoing medical care; 7= not hospitalized, higher score = less severity. Kaplan-Meier method was used for analysis.
Measured: Baseline to Day 29
Secondary outcomes (27)
Percentage of Participants Who Were Alive at Day 29
Percentage of participants who were alive at Day 29 were reported in this outcome measure.
Measured: Day 29
Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Clinical Status (According to 7-point Ordinal Scale Score) by at Least 1 Point From Baseline at Days 4, 7, 15, 21, and 29
Clinical status of participants was assessed using 7-point ordinal scale ranges from: 1= death; 2= hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation/ECMO; 3= hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation/high flow oxygen devices; 4= hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 5= hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical care (COVID-19 related/otherwise); 6= hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer required ongoing medical care; 7= not hospitalized, higher score=less severity. Percentage of participants With >=1 point improvement in clinical status from Baseline at Days 4, 7, 15, 21, and 29 (assessed using the 7-point ordinal scale) were reported.
Measured: Baseline, Days 4, 7, 15, 21, and 29
Change From Baseline at Days 4, 7, 15, 21, 29 in 7-point Ordinal Scale Score
Clinical status of participants was assessed using 7-point ordinal scale ranges from: 1= death; 2= hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation/ECMO; 3= hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation/high flow oxygen devices; 4= hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 5= hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical care (COVID-19 related/otherwise); 6= hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer required ongoing medical care; 7= not hospitalized, higher score=less severity.
Measured: Baseline, Days 4, 7, 15, 21, and 29
Time to Resolution of Fever
Resolution of fever was defined as body temperature less than or equal to (<=) 36.6 degree Celsius (°C) (axilla), or <=37.2°C (oral), or <=37.8°C (rectal or tympanic) for at least 48 hours without antipyretics/until discharge, whichever was sooner. Time to resolution of fever (in days) was calculated as: date of first occurrence/episode of the event (resolution of fever) - date of first dose + 1. Kaplan-Meier method was used for estimation.
Measured: Baseline to Day 29
Time to Resolution of Fever and Improvement in Oxygenation
Time to resolution of fever was defined as body temperature <=36.6°C (axilla), or <=37.2 °C (oral), or <=37.8°C (rectal or tympanic) for at least 48 hours without antipyretics or until discharge, whichever was sooner. Improvement in oxygenation was defined as oxygen saturation (SpO2)/FiO2 of 50 or greater compared to the nadir SpO2/FiO2 for at least 48 hours, or until discharge, whichever was sooner. Nadir SpO2/FiO2 was the nadir (lowest value) at any point in the study. Time to resolution of fever and improvement in oxygenation (in days) was calculated as: date of first occurrence/episode of the event (resolution of fever and improvement in oxygenation) - date of first dose + 1. Kaplan-Meier method was used for estimation.
Measured: Baseline to Day 29
Number of Days With Fever
Fever was defined as body temperature greater than (>) 37.4°C (axilla), or >38.0 °C (oral), or >38.4°C (rectal or tympanic) based on maximum value observed during a 24-hour period. Number of days with fever were reported. Least square (LS) mean and standard error (SE) were estimated using the analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment group and randomization strata as fixed effects.
Measured: Baseline to Day 29
Percentage of Participants in Each National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) Clinical Risk Category at Baseline and at Days 4, 7, 15, 21, and 29
NEWS2: used to standardize assessment of acute-illness severity, track clinical condition of participants and to alert clinical teams to participant deterioration. NEWS2 score was based on 7 clinical parameters: respiration rate, oxygen saturation, supplemental oxygen, systolic blood pressure, pulse rate, level of consciousness, and temperature. A score of 0, 1, 2, and 3 was allocated to each parameter except supplemental oxygen (a score of 0 or 1 was allocated) and level of consciousness (a score of 0 or 3 was allocated), where 0 = normal health condition to 3 = worst health condition; higher score indicated more severity. All scores were summed to get an aggregate score. Aggregate NEWS2 score ranged from 0 to 19, with higher scores meaning more severity/higher risk. Percentage of participants in following clinical risk categories were reported: low risk (score 0 to 4); low to medium risk (score of 3 in any individual parameter); medium risk (score 5 to 6); high risk (score 7 to 19).
Measured: Baseline, Days 4, 7, 15, 21, and 29
Time to National Early Warning Score of Less Than (<) 2 and Maintained for 24 Hours
Time to NEWS2 <2 and maintained for 24 hours: time (in days) from 1st dose of study drug until 1st occurrence of NEWS score of <2 (maintained for 24 hours); calculated as: date of 1st occurrence/episode of event (NEWS score of <2) - date of 1st dose + 1. NEWS2 score was based on 7 clinical parameters: respiration rate, oxygen saturation, supplemental oxygen, systolic blood pressure, pulse rate, level of consciousness, and temperature. A score of 0, 1, 2, and 3 was allocated to each parameter except supplemental oxygen (score of 0 or 1 was allocated) and level of consciousness (score of 0 or 3 was allocated), where 0=normal health condition to 3=worst health condition; higher score=more severity. All scores were summed to get an aggregate score which ranged from 0 to 19, with higher scores=more severity/higher risk. Kaplan-Meier method was used for analysis.
Measured: Baseline to Day 29
Change From Baseline at Days 4, 7, 15, 21, and 29 in National Early Warning Score 2
The NEWS2 was used to standardize the assessment of acute-illness severity, track the clinical condition of participants, and to alert clinical teams to participant deterioration. NEWS2 score is based on 7 clinical parameters: respiration rate, oxygen saturation, supplemental oxygen, systolic blood pressure, pulse rate, level of consciousness, and temperature. A score of 0, 1, 2, and 3 was allocated to each parameter except supplemental oxygen (a score of 0 or 1 was allocated) and level of consciousness (a score of 0 or 3 was allocated), where 0 = normal health condition to 3 = worst health condition; higher score indicated more severity. All scores were summed to get an aggregate score. Aggregate NEWS2 score ranged from 0 to 19, with higher scores meaning more severity/higher risk. LS means and SE were estimated using ANCOVA model with treatment group and randomization strata as fixed effects, and baseline NEWS2 score as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline, Days 4, 7, 15, 21, and 29
Time-to-improvement in Oxygenation
Time-to-improvement in oxygenation was defined as increase in SpO2/FiO2 of 50 or greater compared to the nadir SpO2/FiO2 for at least 48 hours or until discharge, whichever was sooner. Nadir SpO2/FiO2 was the nadir (lowest value) at any point in the study. Time to improvement in oxygenation was calculated as: date of first occurrence/episode of the event (oxygenation) - date of first dose + 1. Kaplan-Meier method was used for estimation.
Measured: Baseline to Day 29
Percentage of Participants Alive Off Supplemental Oxygen at Day 29
Supplemental oxygen was defined as oxygen administration by nasal cannula, simple face mask, or other similar oxygen delivery device.
Measured: Day 29
Percentage of Days With Hypoxemia
Hypoxemia (low level of oxygen in the blood) was defined as SpO2 <93% on room air, or required supplemental oxygen, or mechanical ventilatory support. Days meeting the criteria for hypoxemia since the first study dose were counted and the percentage of days with hypoxemia were calculated as:100*number of days with the hypoxemia divided by number of days of follow up (defined as the earlier date of death or discharge or last visit up to Day 29). LS mean and SE were estimated using the ANCOVA model with treatment group and randomization strata as fixed effects.
Measured: Baseline to Day 29
Percentage of Days With Supplemental Oxygen Use
Supplemental oxygen (oxygen therapy) was defined as oxygen administration using oxygen delivery device (e.g. nasal cannula, simple face mask, non-rebreather mask, high flow nasal cannula, non-invasive ventilation, invasive mechanical ventilation, extracorporeal life support, etc.). Days meeting the criteria for supplemental oxygen use since the first study dose were counted and the percentage of days with supplemental oxygen use were calculated as:100*number of days with the supplemental oxygen use divided by number of days of follow up (defined as the earlier date of death or discharge or last visit up to Day 29) . LS mean and SE were estimated using the ANCOVA model with treatment group and randomization strata as fixed effects.
Measured: Baseline to Day 29
Percentage of Days With Resting Respiratory Rate > 24 Breaths Per Minute
Resting respiratory rate was measured in terms of number of breaths per minute (bpm) while a person is at rest. Only the days with respiratory rate >24 breath per minute since the first dose were counted and percentage of days with respiratory rate > 24 bpm were calculated as:100*number of days with respiratory rate >24 bpm divided by number of days of follow up (defined as the earlier date of death or discharge or last visit up to Day 29). LS mean and SE were estimated using the ANCOVA model with treatment group and randomization strata as fixed effects.
Measured: Baseline to Day 29
Time to Oxygen Saturation >= 94% on Room Air
Time to oxygen saturation >=94% on room air was defined as the time (in days) from first dose of study drug until the time of first occurrence of oxygen saturation >=94% and it was calculated as: Date of first occurrence/episode of the event (oxygen saturation >=94%) - date of first dose + 1.Kaplan-Meier method was used for estimation.
Measured: Baseline to Day 29
Mean Number of Ventilator Free Days
Mean number of ventilator free days in participants were reported.
Measured: Baseline to Day 29
Percentage of Participants With Initiation of Mechanical Ventilation, Non-invasive Ventilation, or Use of High Flow Nasal Cannula
Percentage of participants With initiation of mechanical ventilation or non-invasive ventilation, or use of high flow nasal cannula were reported in this outcome measure.
Measured: Baseline to Day 29
Percentage of Participants Who Required Rescue Medication
Rescue medications were defined as the immunosuppressive (methylprednisolone, dexamethasone and prednisone) therapies. During the course of the study, participant who required rescue therapy was based on the judgement of the study physician.
Measured: Baseline to Day 28
Percentage of Participants Who Needed Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Care During Study
Percentage of participants who needed ICU care until Day 29 were reported for those not in an ICU at baseline.
Measured: Baseline to Day 29
Number of Days of Hospitalization Among Survivors (Alive Participants)
Number of days of hospitalization among alive participants were counted at Day 60 since the first dose. LS mean and SE were estimated using the ANCOVA model with treatment group and randomization strata as fixed effects.
Measured: At Day 60
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug and did not necessarily had to have a causal relationship with the treatment. Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were the AEs that developed or worsened or became serious during the TEAE period (from the time of first dose of study drug to the last dose of study drug + 60 days). SAEs were any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening, required initial or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or considered as medically important event.
Measured: Baseline up to 60 days
Number of Participants With Major or Opportunistic Bacterial or Fungal Infections
Major or opportunistic bacterial or fungal infections was considered as an adverse event of special interest (AESI: defined as an AE [serious or non-serious] of scientific and medical concern specific to the Sponsor's product or program, for which ongoing monitoring and immediate notification by the Investigator to the Sponsor was required).
Measured: Baseline up to 60 days
Number of Participants With Grade 4 Neutropenia and Grade 4 Neutropenia With Concurrent Invasive Infection
Grade 4 neutropenia was defined as participants with absolute neutrophil count (ANC) <500 per cubic millimeter (mm^3). Grade 4 neutropenia with concurrent invasive infection was defined as infections and infestations (in participants with Grade 4 neutropenia) within 1 week of ANC <500/mm^3 and was considered as an AESI (defined as an AE [serious or non-serious] of scientific and medical concern specific to the Sponsor's product or program, for which ongoing monitoring and immediate notification by the Investigator to the Sponsor was required).
Measured: Baseline up to 60 days
Number of Participants With Grade >=2 Infusion Reactions, Grade >=2 Hypersensitivity Reactions and Gastrointestinal Perforation
Grade >=2 (moderate) infusion related reactions (defined as any TEAE signs or symptoms experienced by participants who received study medication within 24 hours of the start of infusion) and Grade >=2 (moderate) hypersensitivity reactions (anaphylactic reaction, hypersensitivity or angioedema and moderate reactions) were considered as AESI which was defined as an AE (serious or non-serious) of scientific and medical concern specific to the Sponsor's product or program, for which ongoing monitoring and immediate notification by the Investigator to the Sponsor was required. Gastrointestinal Perforation was defined as formation of a hole through the stomach, large bowel or small intestine.
Measured: Baseline up to 60 days
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities (PCSA): Hematological Parameter - Hemoglobin, Leukocytes and Platelets
Criteria for PCSA:
- Hemoglobin: less than or equal to (<=) 115 grams per liter (g/L) (male) and <=95 g/L (female); greater than or equal to (>=) 185 g/L (male) and >=165 g/L (female); and decrease from baseline >=20 g/L.
- Leukocytes: <3.0*10^9/Liters (L) (Non-Black) or <2.0*10^9/L (black); >=16.0*10^9/L.
- Platelets: < 100*10^9/L; >=700*10^9/L.
Measured: Baseline up to 60 days
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Function Parameters
Criteria for PCSA: Creatinine: >=150 micromoles per liter (mcmol/L); >=30% change from baseline; >= 100% change from baseline.
Measured: Baseline up to 60 days
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters
- Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT): >3 upper limit of normal (ULN); >5 ULN; >10 ULN and >20 ULN.
- Bilirubin: >1.5 ULN; >2 ULN.
Measured: Baseline up to 60 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Mar 2020
- Study start28 Mar 2020
- Primary completion31 Jul 2020
- Study completion2 Sep 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Corona Virus InfectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by SanofiThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 420 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sanofi
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Sciences & Operations, Study director, Sanofi
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04327388
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EFC16844
- Other IDs
- 2020-001162-12, U1111-1249-6021
- Status last verified
- Sep 2025
- First submitted
- 26 Mar 2020
- Last updated
- 24 Sep 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, blank case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of trial participants. Further details on Sanofi's data sharing criteria, eligible studies, and process for requesting access can be found at: https://vivli.org
Publications
Lescure FX, Honda H, Fowler RA, Lazar JS, Shi G, Wung P, Patel N, Hagino O; Sarilumab COVID-19 Global Study Group. Sarilumab in patients admitted to hospital with severe or critical COVID-19: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2021 May;9(5):522-532. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00099-0. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
PubMed 33676590
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Sep 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An Adaptive Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study Assessing Efficacy and Safety of Sarilumab for Hospitalized Patients With COVID19
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04327388
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EFC16844
- Conditions
- Corona Virus Infection
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 420 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- SanofiIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
- Study start
- 28 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jul 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 2 Sep 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 13 May 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Primary Objective:
To evaluate the clinical efficacy of sarilumab relative to the control arm in adult participants hospitalized with severe or critical Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).
Secondary Objectives:
- Evaluate the 28-day survival rate.
- Evaluate the clinical efficacy of sarilumab compared to the control arm by clinical severity.
- Evaluate changes in the National Early Warning Score 2.
- Evaluate the duration of predefined symptoms and signs (if applicable).
- Evaluate the duration of supplemental oxygen dependency (if applicable).
- Evaluate the incidence of new mechanical ventilation use during the study.
- Evaluate the duration of new mechanical ventilation use during the Study.
- Evaluate the proportion of participants requiring rescue medication during the 28-day period.
- Evaluate need for admission into intensive care unit.
- Evaluate duration of hospitalization (days).
- The secondary safety objectives of the study were to evaluate the safety of sarilumab through hospitalization (up to Day 29 if participant was still hospitalized) compared to the control arm as assessed by incidence of:
- Serious adverse events.
- Major or opportunistic bacterial or fungal infections in participants with grade 4 neutropenia.
- Grade greater than or equal to (>=) 2 infusion related reactions.
- Grade >=2 hypersensitivity reactions.
- Increase in alanine transaminase (ALT) >=3X upper limit of normal (ULN) (for participants with normal baseline) or greater than 3X ULN AND at least 2-fold increase from baseline value (for participants with abnormal baseline).
- Major or opportunistic bacterial or fungal infections.
Detailed description
An individual participant would complete the study approximately 60 days from screening to follow-up on day 60 ±7 days.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Sarilumab 200 mg | Experimental | Drug: Sarilumab SAR153191Sarilumab 200 milligrams (mg), single dose of intravenous (IV) injection on Day 1. Participants could receive a second dose of sarilumab 200 mg 24 to 48 hours after the first dose if first and any one of last three criteria was met as compared to Day 1 (as per following protocol amendment 2 [dated 08-Apr-2020]): * Benefit risk assessment by the investigator favored the administration of another dose of study drug without compromising safety and * Increase/recurrence of fever or * Increase/no change in fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) requirement or * Required vasopressors, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or development of multi-organ dysfunction. |
| Sarilumab 400 mg | Experimental | Drug: Sarilumab SAR153191Sarilumab 400 mg, single dose of IV injection on Day 1. Participants could receive a second dose of sarilumab 400 mg 24 to 48 hours after the first dose if first and any one of last three criteria was met as compared to Day 1 (as per following protocol amendment 2 [dated 08-Apr-2020]): * Benefit risk assessment by the investigator favored the administration of another dose of study drug without compromising safety and * Increase/recurrence of fever or * Increase/no change in FiO2 requirement or * Required vasopressors, ECMO or development of multi-organ dysfunction. |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboPlacebo (for sarilumab), single dose of IV injection on Day 1. Participants could receive a second dose of placebo (for sarilumab) 24 to 48 hours after the first dose if first and any one of last three criteria was met as compared to Day 1 (as per following protocol amendment 2 [dated 08-Apr-2020]): * Benefit risk assessment by the investigator favored the administration of another dose of study drug without compromising safety and * Increase/recurrence of fever or * Increase/no change in FiO2 requirement or * Required vasopressors, ECMO or development of multi-organ dysfunction. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Participants must be >=18 years of age. Participants must be hospitalized for less than or equal to 7 days with evidence of pneumonia and have one of the following disease categories: severe disease or critical disease.
- Laboratory-confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Unlikely to survive after 48 hours from screening or unlikely to remain at the investigational site beyond 48 hours. Participants with multi organ dysfunction or requiring extracorporeal life support or renal replacement therapy were excluded.
- Presence of neutropenia less than 2000/cubic millimeter (mmˆ3), aspartate transaminase or ALT greater than 5X ULN, platelets less than 50,000/mmˆ3.
- Prior immunosuppressive therapies. Use of systemic chronic corticosteroids for non-COVID-19 related condition. Known or suspected history of tuberculosis. Suspected or known active systemic bacterial or fungal infections.
- The above information was not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Sarilumab SAR153191Also: REGN88, Kevzara®Pharmaceutical form: Solution for injection Route of administration: Intravenous infusion | Drug | Sarilumab 200 mg, Sarilumab 400 mg |
| PlaceboPharmaceutical form: Solution for injection Route of administration: Intravenous infusion | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Time to Improvement in Clinical Status of Participants (Using 7-point Ordinal Scale Score) by at Least 2 Points
Time frame: Baseline to Day 29
Time to improvement of greater than or equal (>=) 2 points in clinical status assessment was defined as time (in days) from first dose of study drug to the time of first occurrence of improvement of >=2 points in clinical status of participants assessed using 7-point ordinal scale (calculated as: Date of first occurrence/episode of the event - date of first dose + 1). Seven-point ordinal scale for clinical assessment ranges from 1= death; 2= hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation/ECMO; 3= hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation/high flow oxygen devices; 4= hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 5= hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical care (COVID-19 related/otherwise); 6= hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer required ongoing medical care; 7= not hospitalized, higher score = less severity. Kaplan-Meier method was used for analysis.
27 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants Who Were Alive at Day 29
Time frame: Day 29
Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Clinical Status (According to 7-point Ordinal Scale Score) by at Least 1 Point From Baseline at Days 4, 7, 15, 21, and 29
Time frame: Baseline, Days 4, 7, 15, 21, and 29
Change From Baseline at Days 4, 7, 15, 21, 29 in 7-point Ordinal Scale Score
Time frame: Baseline, Days 4, 7, 15, 21, and 29
Time to Resolution of Fever
Time frame: Baseline to Day 29
Time to Resolution of Fever and Improvement in Oxygenation
Time frame: Baseline to Day 29
Number of Days With Fever
Time frame: Baseline to Day 29
Percentage of Participants in Each National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) Clinical Risk Category at Baseline and at Days 4, 7, 15, 21, and 29
Time frame: Baseline, Days 4, 7, 15, 21, and 29
Time to National Early Warning Score of Less Than (<) 2 and Maintained for 24 Hours
Time frame: Baseline to Day 29
Change From Baseline at Days 4, 7, 15, 21, and 29 in National Early Warning Score 2
Time frame: Baseline, Days 4, 7, 15, 21, and 29
Time-to-improvement in Oxygenation
Time frame: Baseline to Day 29
Percentage of Participants Alive Off Supplemental Oxygen at Day 29
Time frame: Day 29
Percentage of Days With Hypoxemia
Time frame: Baseline to Day 29
Percentage of Days With Supplemental Oxygen Use
Time frame: Baseline to Day 29
Percentage of Days With Resting Respiratory Rate > 24 Breaths Per Minute
Time frame: Baseline to Day 29
Time to Oxygen Saturation >= 94% on Room Air
Time frame: Baseline to Day 29
Mean Number of Ventilator Free Days
Time frame: Baseline to Day 29
Percentage of Participants With Initiation of Mechanical Ventilation, Non-invasive Ventilation, or Use of High Flow Nasal Cannula
Time frame: Baseline to Day 29
Percentage of Participants Who Required Rescue Medication
Time frame: Baseline to Day 28
Percentage of Participants Who Needed Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Care During Study
Time frame: Baseline to Day 29
Number of Days of Hospitalization Among Survivors (Alive Participants)
Time frame: At Day 60
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time frame: Baseline up to 60 days
Number of Participants With Major or Opportunistic Bacterial or Fungal Infections
Time frame: Baseline up to 60 days
Number of Participants With Grade 4 Neutropenia and Grade 4 Neutropenia With Concurrent Invasive Infection
Time frame: Baseline up to 60 days
Number of Participants With Grade >=2 Infusion Reactions, Grade >=2 Hypersensitivity Reactions and Gastrointestinal Perforation
Time frame: Baseline up to 60 days
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities (PCSA): Hematological Parameter - Hemoglobin, Leukocytes and Platelets
Time frame: Baseline up to 60 days
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Function Parameters
Time frame: Baseline up to 60 days
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters
Time frame: Baseline up to 60 days
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Sep 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33676590Lescure FX, Honda H, Fowler RA, Lazar JS, Shi G, Wung P, Patel N, Hagino O; Sarilumab COVID-19 Global Study Group. Sarilumab in patients admitted to hospital with severe or critical COVID-19: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2021 May;9(5):522-532. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00099-0. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
- EFC16844 Plain Language Results SummaryLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, blank case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of trial participants. Further details on Sanofi's data sharing criteria, eligible studies, and process for requesting access can be found at: https://vivli.org
Related trials for Corona Virus Infection
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Phase I Open-Label Safety Trial of Pembrolizumab for Neurological Post- Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PD1-PASC I)
Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 2
SARS-CoV-2 and Herpesvirus Inhibition for Ending Long COVID Dysfunction
Post-acute Sequelae of COVID-19, Long COVID
RecruitingPhase 4
Comparative Immunogenicity of Respiratory Virus Vaccines (CIRV2) Study
COVID -19, COVID - 19
Enrolling by invitation
Fareon Open Label Device Clinical Trial
Cognitive Dysfunction, Acquired Brain Injury
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of VYD2311 for the Treatment of Adults With Long-COVID or Post-Vaccination Syndrome
Long COVID, COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2 Infection)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Sciences & Operations study director
Sanofi
47 sites in 11 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Sarilumab SAR153191 in people with Corona Virus Infection, run by Sanofi at 47 sites in 11 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Sep 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 47 sites in France, Italy, Brazil, Canada, Spain and 6 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 May 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time to Improvement in Clinical Status of Participants (Using 7-point Ordinal Scale Score) by at Least 2 Points (time frame: Baseline to Day 29). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04327388, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Sep 2025.