AzTrials
AzTrials

Corona Virus InfectionPhase 3NCT04327388

Sarilumab COVID-19

A Phase 3 study testing Sarilumab SAR153191 in people with Corona Virus Infection, run by Sanofi at 47 sites in 11 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Primary Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of sarilumab relative to the control arm in adult participants hospitalized with severe or critical Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Secondary Objectives: Evaluate the 28-day survival rate. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Corona Virus Infection
What is being tested?
Sarilumab SAR153191
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
420 participants
Where
47 sitesin 11 countries
Study dates
28 Mar 2020to 2 Sep 2020
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Participants must be >=18 years of age. Participants must be hospitalized for less than or equal to 7 days with evidence of pneumonia and have one of the following disease categories: severe disease or critical disease.
  • Laboratory-confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection.

Who cannot join

  • Unlikely to survive after 48 hours from screening or unlikely to remain at the investigational site beyond 48 hours. Participants with multi organ dysfunction or requiring extracorporeal life support or renal replacement therapy were excluded.
  • Presence of neutropenia less than 2000/cubic millimeter (mmˆ3), aspartate transaminase or ALT greater than 5X ULN, platelets less than 50,000/mmˆ3.
  • Prior immunosuppressive therapies. Use of systemic chronic corticosteroids for non-COVID-19 related condition. Known or suspected history of tuberculosis. Suspected or known active systemic bacterial or fungal infections.
  • The above information was not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.

Trial locations and contacts

47 sites in 11 countries.

47 sites in 11 countries

France7 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 2500001

    Bordeaux, 33076

  • Investigational Site Number 2500007

    Clamart, 92140

  • Investigational Site Number 2500006

    La Roche-sur-Yon, 85925

  • Investigational Site Number 2500002

    Nantes, 44093

  • Investigational Site Number 2500005

    Paris, 75877

  • Investigational Site Number 2500003

    Strasbourg, 67098

  • Investigational Site Number 2500004

    Suresnes, 92151

Other trials in France

Italy6 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 3800005

    Milan, 20122

  • Investigational Site Number 3800001

    Milan, 20132

  • Investigational Site Number 3800002

    Milan, 20157

  • Investigational Site Number 3800003

    Modena, 41100

  • Investigational Site Number 3800004

    Parma, 43100

  • Investigational Site Number 3800006

    Rozzano, 20089

Other trials in Italy

Brazil5 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 0760003

    Porto Alegre, 90110-270

  • Investigational Site Number 0760004

    São José do Rio Preto, 15090-000

  • Investigational Site Number 0760001

    São Paulo, 01327-001

  • Investigational Site Number 0760002

    São Paulo, 04231-030

  • Investigational Site Number 0760005

    São Paulo, 04321-120

Other trials in Brazil

Canada5 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 1240001

    Montreal, H2X3E4

  • Investigational Site Number 1240005

    Montreal, H4A 3J1

  • Investigational Site Number 1240004

    Toronto, M4N3M5

  • Investigational Site Number 1240002

    Toronto, M5G 2N2

  • Investigational Site Number 1240003

    Vancouver, V5Z 1M9

Other trials in Canada

Spain5 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 7240003

    Barcelona, 08035

  • Investigational Site Number 7240004

    Barcelona, 08036

  • Investigational Site Number 7240002

    Madrid, 28007

  • Investigational Site Number 7240005

    Madrid, 28034

  • Investigational Site Number 7240001

    Madrid, 28046

Other trials in Spain

Chile4 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 1520003

    Santiago, 750-0691

  • Investigational Site Number 1520002

    Santiago, 80004005

  • Investigational Site Number 1520004

    Santiago

  • Investigational Site Number 1520001

    Talca, 3460001

Other trials in Chile

Argentina3 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 0320001

    Caba, 1430

  • Investigational Site Number 0320003

    Caba, C1180AAX

  • Investigational Site Number 0320004

    Caba, C1426AAM

Other trials in Argentina

Germany3 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 2760004

    Cologne, 50937

  • Investigational Site Number 2760002

    Essen, 45147

  • Investigational Site Number 2760001

    Münster, 48149

Other trials in Germany

Israel3 sites
  • Investigational site number 3760003

    Ashdod, 7747629

  • Investigational Site Number 3760002

    Jerusalem, 91120

  • Investigational Site Number 3760001

    Ramat Gan, 52662

Other trials in Israel

Japan3 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 3920002

    Fuchu-Shi

  • Investigational Site Number 3920003

    Iruma-Gun

  • Investigational Site Number 3920001

    Kamakura-Shi

Other trials in Japan

Russia3 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 6430003

    Moscow, 111539

  • Investigational Site Number 6430002

    Moscow, 123182

  • Investigational Site Number 6430001

    Moscow, 129301

Other trials in Russia

About this study

Official title: An Adaptive Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study Assessing Efficacy and Safety of Sarilumab for Hospitalized Patients With COVID19

Primary Objective:

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of sarilumab relative to the control arm in adult participants hospitalized with severe or critical Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Read more

Secondary Objectives:

  • Evaluate the 28-day survival rate.
  • Evaluate the clinical efficacy of sarilumab compared to the control arm by clinical severity.
  • Evaluate changes in the National Early Warning Score 2.
  • Evaluate the duration of predefined symptoms and signs (if applicable).
  • Evaluate the duration of supplemental oxygen dependency (if applicable).
  • Evaluate the incidence of new mechanical ventilation use during the study.
  • Evaluate the duration of new mechanical ventilation use during the Study.
  • Evaluate the proportion of participants requiring rescue medication during the 28-day period.
  • Evaluate need for admission into intensive care unit.
  • Evaluate duration of hospitalization (days).
  • The secondary safety objectives of the study were to evaluate the safety of sarilumab through hospitalization (up to Day 29 if participant was still hospitalized) compared to the control arm as assessed by incidence of:
  • Serious adverse events.
  • Major or opportunistic bacterial or fungal infections in participants with grade 4 neutropenia.
  • Grade greater than or equal to (>=) 2 infusion related reactions.
  • Grade >=2 hypersensitivity reactions.
  • Increase in alanine transaminase (ALT) >=3X upper limit of normal (ULN) (for participants with normal baseline) or greater than 3X ULN AND at least 2-fold increase from baseline value (for participants with abnormal baseline).
  • Major or opportunistic bacterial or fungal infections.
Read the detailed description

An individual participant would complete the study approximately 60 days from screening to follow-up on day 60 ±7 days.

Being tested
Sarilumab SAR153191, Placebo
Medical subject headings
Coronavirus Infections

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Sarilumab SAR153191Drug

    Also called REGN88, Kevzara®

    Pharmaceutical form: Solution for injection Route of administration: Intravenous infusion

  • PlaceboDrug

    Pharmaceutical form: Solution for injection Route of administration: Intravenous infusion

Study groups in NCT04327388
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Sarilumab 200 mgExperimentalSarilumab 200 milligrams (mg), single dose of intravenous (IV) injection on Day 1. Participants could receive a second dose of sarilumab 200 mg 24 to 48 hours after the first dose if first and any one of last three criteria was met as compared to Day 1 (as per following protocol amendment 2 [dated 08-Apr-2020]): * Benefit risk assessment by the investigator favored the administration of another dose of study drug without compromising safety and * Increase/recurrence of fever or * Increase/no change in fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) requirement or * Required vasopressors, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or development of multi-organ dysfunction.
Receives: Drug: Sarilumab SAR153191
Sarilumab 400 mgExperimentalSarilumab 400 mg, single dose of IV injection on Day 1. Participants could receive a second dose of sarilumab 400 mg 24 to 48 hours after the first dose if first and any one of last three criteria was met as compared to Day 1 (as per following protocol amendment 2 [dated 08-Apr-2020]): * Benefit risk assessment by the investigator favored the administration of another dose of study drug without compromising safety and * Increase/recurrence of fever or * Increase/no change in FiO2 requirement or * Required vasopressors, ECMO or development of multi-organ dysfunction.
Receives: Drug: Sarilumab SAR153191
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorPlacebo (for sarilumab), single dose of IV injection on Day 1. Participants could receive a second dose of placebo (for sarilumab) 24 to 48 hours after the first dose if first and any one of last three criteria was met as compared to Day 1 (as per following protocol amendment 2 [dated 08-Apr-2020]): * Benefit risk assessment by the investigator favored the administration of another dose of study drug without compromising safety and * Increase/recurrence of fever or * Increase/no change in FiO2 requirement or * Required vasopressors, ECMO or development of multi-organ dysfunction.
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Time to Improvement in Clinical Status of Participants (Using 7-point Ordinal Scale Score) by at Least 2 Points

    Time to improvement of greater than or equal (>=) 2 points in clinical status assessment was defined as time (in days) from first dose of study drug to the time of first occurrence of improvement of >=2 points in clinical status of participants assessed using 7-point ordinal scale (calculated as: Date of first occurrence/episode of the event - date of first dose + 1). Seven-point ordinal scale for clinical assessment ranges from 1= death; 2= hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation/ECMO; 3= hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation/high flow oxygen devices; 4= hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 5= hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical care (COVID-19 related/otherwise); 6= hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer required ongoing medical care; 7= not hospitalized, higher score = less severity. Kaplan-Meier method was used for analysis.

    Measured: Baseline to Day 29

Secondary outcomes (27)
  1. Percentage of Participants Who Were Alive at Day 29

    Percentage of participants who were alive at Day 29 were reported in this outcome measure.

    Measured: Day 29

  2. Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Clinical Status (According to 7-point Ordinal Scale Score) by at Least 1 Point From Baseline at Days 4, 7, 15, 21, and 29

    Clinical status of participants was assessed using 7-point ordinal scale ranges from: 1= death; 2= hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation/ECMO; 3= hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation/high flow oxygen devices; 4= hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 5= hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical care (COVID-19 related/otherwise); 6= hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer required ongoing medical care; 7= not hospitalized, higher score=less severity. Percentage of participants With >=1 point improvement in clinical status from Baseline at Days 4, 7, 15, 21, and 29 (assessed using the 7-point ordinal scale) were reported.

    Measured: Baseline, Days 4, 7, 15, 21, and 29

  3. Change From Baseline at Days 4, 7, 15, 21, 29 in 7-point Ordinal Scale Score

    Clinical status of participants was assessed using 7-point ordinal scale ranges from: 1= death; 2= hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation/ECMO; 3= hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation/high flow oxygen devices; 4= hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 5= hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical care (COVID-19 related/otherwise); 6= hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer required ongoing medical care; 7= not hospitalized, higher score=less severity.

    Measured: Baseline, Days 4, 7, 15, 21, and 29

  4. Time to Resolution of Fever

    Resolution of fever was defined as body temperature less than or equal to (<=) 36.6 degree Celsius (°C) (axilla), or <=37.2°C (oral), or <=37.8°C (rectal or tympanic) for at least 48 hours without antipyretics/until discharge, whichever was sooner. Time to resolution of fever (in days) was calculated as: date of first occurrence/episode of the event (resolution of fever) - date of first dose + 1. Kaplan-Meier method was used for estimation.

    Measured: Baseline to Day 29

  5. Time to Resolution of Fever and Improvement in Oxygenation

    Time to resolution of fever was defined as body temperature <=36.6°C (axilla), or <=37.2 °C (oral), or <=37.8°C (rectal or tympanic) for at least 48 hours without antipyretics or until discharge, whichever was sooner. Improvement in oxygenation was defined as oxygen saturation (SpO2)/FiO2 of 50 or greater compared to the nadir SpO2/FiO2 for at least 48 hours, or until discharge, whichever was sooner. Nadir SpO2/FiO2 was the nadir (lowest value) at any point in the study. Time to resolution of fever and improvement in oxygenation (in days) was calculated as: date of first occurrence/episode of the event (resolution of fever and improvement in oxygenation) - date of first dose + 1. Kaplan-Meier method was used for estimation.

    Measured: Baseline to Day 29

  6. Number of Days With Fever

    Fever was defined as body temperature greater than (>) 37.4°C (axilla), or >38.0 °C (oral), or >38.4°C (rectal or tympanic) based on maximum value observed during a 24-hour period. Number of days with fever were reported. Least square (LS) mean and standard error (SE) were estimated using the analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment group and randomization strata as fixed effects.

    Measured: Baseline to Day 29

  7. Percentage of Participants in Each National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) Clinical Risk Category at Baseline and at Days 4, 7, 15, 21, and 29

    NEWS2: used to standardize assessment of acute-illness severity, track clinical condition of participants and to alert clinical teams to participant deterioration. NEWS2 score was based on 7 clinical parameters: respiration rate, oxygen saturation, supplemental oxygen, systolic blood pressure, pulse rate, level of consciousness, and temperature. A score of 0, 1, 2, and 3 was allocated to each parameter except supplemental oxygen (a score of 0 or 1 was allocated) and level of consciousness (a score of 0 or 3 was allocated), where 0 = normal health condition to 3 = worst health condition; higher score indicated more severity. All scores were summed to get an aggregate score. Aggregate NEWS2 score ranged from 0 to 19, with higher scores meaning more severity/higher risk. Percentage of participants in following clinical risk categories were reported: low risk (score 0 to 4); low to medium risk (score of 3 in any individual parameter); medium risk (score 5 to 6); high risk (score 7 to 19).

    Measured: Baseline, Days 4, 7, 15, 21, and 29

  8. Time to National Early Warning Score of Less Than (<) 2 and Maintained for 24 Hours

    Time to NEWS2 <2 and maintained for 24 hours: time (in days) from 1st dose of study drug until 1st occurrence of NEWS score of <2 (maintained for 24 hours); calculated as: date of 1st occurrence/episode of event (NEWS score of <2) - date of 1st dose + 1. NEWS2 score was based on 7 clinical parameters: respiration rate, oxygen saturation, supplemental oxygen, systolic blood pressure, pulse rate, level of consciousness, and temperature. A score of 0, 1, 2, and 3 was allocated to each parameter except supplemental oxygen (score of 0 or 1 was allocated) and level of consciousness (score of 0 or 3 was allocated), where 0=normal health condition to 3=worst health condition; higher score=more severity. All scores were summed to get an aggregate score which ranged from 0 to 19, with higher scores=more severity/higher risk. Kaplan-Meier method was used for analysis.

    Measured: Baseline to Day 29

  9. Change From Baseline at Days 4, 7, 15, 21, and 29 in National Early Warning Score 2

    The NEWS2 was used to standardize the assessment of acute-illness severity, track the clinical condition of participants, and to alert clinical teams to participant deterioration. NEWS2 score is based on 7 clinical parameters: respiration rate, oxygen saturation, supplemental oxygen, systolic blood pressure, pulse rate, level of consciousness, and temperature. A score of 0, 1, 2, and 3 was allocated to each parameter except supplemental oxygen (a score of 0 or 1 was allocated) and level of consciousness (a score of 0 or 3 was allocated), where 0 = normal health condition to 3 = worst health condition; higher score indicated more severity. All scores were summed to get an aggregate score. Aggregate NEWS2 score ranged from 0 to 19, with higher scores meaning more severity/higher risk. LS means and SE were estimated using ANCOVA model with treatment group and randomization strata as fixed effects, and baseline NEWS2 score as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline, Days 4, 7, 15, 21, and 29

  10. Time-to-improvement in Oxygenation

    Time-to-improvement in oxygenation was defined as increase in SpO2/FiO2 of 50 or greater compared to the nadir SpO2/FiO2 for at least 48 hours or until discharge, whichever was sooner. Nadir SpO2/FiO2 was the nadir (lowest value) at any point in the study. Time to improvement in oxygenation was calculated as: date of first occurrence/episode of the event (oxygenation) - date of first dose + 1. Kaplan-Meier method was used for estimation.

    Measured: Baseline to Day 29

  11. Percentage of Participants Alive Off Supplemental Oxygen at Day 29

    Supplemental oxygen was defined as oxygen administration by nasal cannula, simple face mask, or other similar oxygen delivery device.

    Measured: Day 29

  12. Percentage of Days With Hypoxemia

    Hypoxemia (low level of oxygen in the blood) was defined as SpO2 <93% on room air, or required supplemental oxygen, or mechanical ventilatory support. Days meeting the criteria for hypoxemia since the first study dose were counted and the percentage of days with hypoxemia were calculated as:100*number of days with the hypoxemia divided by number of days of follow up (defined as the earlier date of death or discharge or last visit up to Day 29). LS mean and SE were estimated using the ANCOVA model with treatment group and randomization strata as fixed effects.

    Measured: Baseline to Day 29

  13. Percentage of Days With Supplemental Oxygen Use

    Supplemental oxygen (oxygen therapy) was defined as oxygen administration using oxygen delivery device (e.g. nasal cannula, simple face mask, non-rebreather mask, high flow nasal cannula, non-invasive ventilation, invasive mechanical ventilation, extracorporeal life support, etc.). Days meeting the criteria for supplemental oxygen use since the first study dose were counted and the percentage of days with supplemental oxygen use were calculated as:100*number of days with the supplemental oxygen use divided by number of days of follow up (defined as the earlier date of death or discharge or last visit up to Day 29) . LS mean and SE were estimated using the ANCOVA model with treatment group and randomization strata as fixed effects.

    Measured: Baseline to Day 29

  14. Percentage of Days With Resting Respiratory Rate > 24 Breaths Per Minute

    Resting respiratory rate was measured in terms of number of breaths per minute (bpm) while a person is at rest. Only the days with respiratory rate >24 breath per minute since the first dose were counted and percentage of days with respiratory rate > 24 bpm were calculated as:100*number of days with respiratory rate >24 bpm divided by number of days of follow up (defined as the earlier date of death or discharge or last visit up to Day 29). LS mean and SE were estimated using the ANCOVA model with treatment group and randomization strata as fixed effects.

    Measured: Baseline to Day 29

  15. Time to Oxygen Saturation >= 94% on Room Air

    Time to oxygen saturation >=94% on room air was defined as the time (in days) from first dose of study drug until the time of first occurrence of oxygen saturation >=94% and it was calculated as: Date of first occurrence/episode of the event (oxygen saturation >=94%) - date of first dose + 1.Kaplan-Meier method was used for estimation.

    Measured: Baseline to Day 29

  16. Mean Number of Ventilator Free Days

    Mean number of ventilator free days in participants were reported.

    Measured: Baseline to Day 29

  17. Percentage of Participants With Initiation of Mechanical Ventilation, Non-invasive Ventilation, or Use of High Flow Nasal Cannula

    Percentage of participants With initiation of mechanical ventilation or non-invasive ventilation, or use of high flow nasal cannula were reported in this outcome measure.

    Measured: Baseline to Day 29

  18. Percentage of Participants Who Required Rescue Medication

    Rescue medications were defined as the immunosuppressive (methylprednisolone, dexamethasone and prednisone) therapies. During the course of the study, participant who required rescue therapy was based on the judgement of the study physician.

    Measured: Baseline to Day 28

  19. Percentage of Participants Who Needed Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Care During Study

    Percentage of participants who needed ICU care until Day 29 were reported for those not in an ICU at baseline.

    Measured: Baseline to Day 29

  20. Number of Days of Hospitalization Among Survivors (Alive Participants)

    Number of days of hospitalization among alive participants were counted at Day 60 since the first dose. LS mean and SE were estimated using the ANCOVA model with treatment group and randomization strata as fixed effects.

    Measured: At Day 60

  21. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug and did not necessarily had to have a causal relationship with the treatment. Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were the AEs that developed or worsened or became serious during the TEAE period (from the time of first dose of study drug to the last dose of study drug + 60 days). SAEs were any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening, required initial or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or considered as medically important event.

    Measured: Baseline up to 60 days

  22. Number of Participants With Major or Opportunistic Bacterial or Fungal Infections

    Major or opportunistic bacterial or fungal infections was considered as an adverse event of special interest (AESI: defined as an AE [serious or non-serious] of scientific and medical concern specific to the Sponsor's product or program, for which ongoing monitoring and immediate notification by the Investigator to the Sponsor was required).

    Measured: Baseline up to 60 days

  23. Number of Participants With Grade 4 Neutropenia and Grade 4 Neutropenia With Concurrent Invasive Infection

    Grade 4 neutropenia was defined as participants with absolute neutrophil count (ANC) <500 per cubic millimeter (mm^3). Grade 4 neutropenia with concurrent invasive infection was defined as infections and infestations (in participants with Grade 4 neutropenia) within 1 week of ANC <500/mm^3 and was considered as an AESI (defined as an AE [serious or non-serious] of scientific and medical concern specific to the Sponsor's product or program, for which ongoing monitoring and immediate notification by the Investigator to the Sponsor was required).

    Measured: Baseline up to 60 days

  24. Number of Participants With Grade >=2 Infusion Reactions, Grade >=2 Hypersensitivity Reactions and Gastrointestinal Perforation

    Grade >=2 (moderate) infusion related reactions (defined as any TEAE signs or symptoms experienced by participants who received study medication within 24 hours of the start of infusion) and Grade >=2 (moderate) hypersensitivity reactions (anaphylactic reaction, hypersensitivity or angioedema and moderate reactions) were considered as AESI which was defined as an AE (serious or non-serious) of scientific and medical concern specific to the Sponsor's product or program, for which ongoing monitoring and immediate notification by the Investigator to the Sponsor was required. Gastrointestinal Perforation was defined as formation of a hole through the stomach, large bowel or small intestine.

    Measured: Baseline up to 60 days

  25. Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities (PCSA): Hematological Parameter - Hemoglobin, Leukocytes and Platelets

    Criteria for PCSA:

    • Hemoglobin: less than or equal to (<=) 115 grams per liter (g/L) (male) and <=95 g/L (female); greater than or equal to (>=) 185 g/L (male) and >=165 g/L (female); and decrease from baseline >=20 g/L.
    • Leukocytes: <3.0*10^9/Liters (L) (Non-Black) or <2.0*10^9/L (black); >=16.0*10^9/L.
    • Platelets: < 100*10^9/L; >=700*10^9/L.

    Measured: Baseline up to 60 days

  26. Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Function Parameters

    Criteria for PCSA: Creatinine: >=150 micromoles per liter (mcmol/L); >=30% change from baseline; >= 100% change from baseline.

    Measured: Baseline up to 60 days

  27. Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters

    • Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT): >3 upper limit of normal (ULN); >5 ULN; >10 ULN and >20 ULN.
    • Bilirubin: >1.5 ULN; >2 ULN.

    Measured: Baseline up to 60 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 Mar 2020
  2. Study start28 Mar 2020
  3. Primary completion31 Jul 2020
  4. Study completion2 Sep 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
420 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04327388
Sponsor's protocol ID
EFC16844
Other IDs
2020-001162-12, U1111-1249-6021
Status last verified
Sep 2025
First submitted
26 Mar 2020
Last updated
24 Sep 2025
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, blank case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of trial participants. Further details on Sanofi's data sharing criteria, eligible studies, and process for requesting access can be found at: https://vivli.org

Publications

  • Lescure FX, Honda H, Fowler RA, Lazar JS, Shi G, Wung P, Patel N, Hagino O; Sarilumab COVID-19 Global Study Group. Sarilumab in patients admitted to hospital with severe or critical COVID-19: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2021 May;9(5):522-532. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00099-0. Epub 2021 Mar 4.

    PubMed 33676590

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Sarilumab SAR153191 in people with Corona Virus Infection, run by Sanofi at 47 sites in 11 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Sep 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 47 sites in France, Italy, Brazil, Canada, Spain and 6 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 May 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Time to Improvement in Clinical Status of Participants (Using 7-point Ordinal Scale Score) by at Least 2 Points (time frame: Baseline to Day 29). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04327388, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Sep 2025.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in