AzTrials
AzTrials

Pressure InjuryPhase 3PROTECTNCT04328246

Pressure injuRy preventiOn by inTermittent EleCtrical sTimulation

A Phase 3 study testing IES System in people with Pressure Injury, run by AHS Cancer Control Alberta at 1 site in Canada.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The proposed study assesses the superiority of IES supplementation to the standard of care alone (offloading pressure every two hours) in improving the prevention and treatment of sacral and ischial pressure injuries. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Pressure Injury
What is being tested?
IES System
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
4 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
26 Feb 2021to 14 Mar 2022
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Modified Braden Scale score of 14 or less. The Modified Braden Scale score is calculated as follows:
  • Braden Scale score (Ranges from 6 to 23)
  • 1 for Low Serum Albumin
  • 1 for Type II Diabetes
  • Anticipated length of stay of at least 4 days
  • BMI < 35
  • Participants capable of giving informed consent, or if appropriate, participants having an acceptable individual capable of giving consent on the participant's behalf.

Who cannot join

  • Existing pressure injuries above Stage II and injuries classified as DTI or unstageable
  • Neuromuscular blocking drugs \& myasthenia gravis: may prevent the ability of electrical stimulation to induce muscular contraction
  • Unstable spinal, pelvic, or hip fractures that may be displaced by a forced contraction
  • Rhabdomyolysis
  • Use of a Pacemaker
  • Skin breakdown over the gluteal regions that would preclude the use of surface electrodes.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • Cross Cancer Institute

    Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: The PROTECT Study: Pressure injuRy preventiOn by inTermittent EleCtrical sTimulation

The proposed study assesses the superiority of IES supplementation to the standard of care alone (offloading pressure every two hours) in improving the prevention and treatment of sacral and ischial pressure injuries.

Conditions
Pressure Injury
Being tested
IES System, Standard of Care Therapy
Medical subject headings
Pressure Ulcer

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • IES SystemDevice

    The IES system is composed of a stimulator and self-adhesive surface gel electrodes.

  • Standard of Care TherapyOther

    Standard institutional practices for treating pressure injury.

Study groups in NCT04328246
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
IES Device + Standard of CareExperimentalIntermittent electrical stimulation system. Charged pulses will be administered to bilateral gluteus maximus through surface electrodes. Stimulation occurs at 30 Hz for 10s every 10 minutes. The intervention is administered 24/7 and added to the standard of care management. Standard of care is defined as turning the patient every two hours.
Receives: Device: IES System; Other: Standard of Care Therapy
Standard of CareActive comparatorStandard of care treatment for pressure injuries is turning the patient every two hours.
Receives: Other: Standard of Care Therapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Clinical course of pressure injury over time

    Chauhan Weighted Trajectory Analysis (CWTA) will be used to compare the morbidity associated with sacral and ischial pressure injuries through time. A one-sided Chauhan logrank test at a significance of 0.05 will be used to assess for superiority of the experimental arm over the control arm.

    Measured: Patients will be assessed daily for pressure injury location and stage through treatment completion, an average of 14 days.

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Clinical course of pressure injury in subgroups

    Chauhan Weighted Trajectory Analysis (CWTA) will be used to compare the morbidity associated with sacral and ischial pressure injuries through time. A one-sided Chauhan logrank test at a significance of 0.05 will be used to assess superiority.

    Measured: Patients will be assessed daily for pressure injury location and stage through treatment completion, an average of 14 days.

  2. Kaplan-Meier Time-to-Event Analysis

    A Kaplan Meier Curve and logrank Test (one-sided significance at p < 0.05) will be used to evaluate a difference in sacral and ischial pressure injury time-to-event morbidity between groups. An "event" is defined as the development of any stage/class of pressure ulcer.

    Measured: Final analysis will be performed at end of study (expected completion 2 years)

  3. Cox Regression Analysis

    Cox-regression analysis will be used to determine whether the implementation of the IES device is associated with a significant difference in sacral and ischial pressure injury time-to-event occurrence between treatment groups.

    Measured: Final analysis will be performed at end of study (expected completion 2 years)

  4. Observed Counts of Pressure Injuries

    Descriptive statistics and Chi-square testing will be used to compare in incidence rates and proportion between the treatment groups for sacral and ischial pressure injuries classified as Stage I-IV or Unstageable

    Measured: Final analysis will be performed at end of study (expected completion 2 years)

  5. Onset Time

    Descriptive statistics will be used to report the central tendency and spread of the onset time of a sacral and ischial pressure injury for both treatment groups and for injuries classified as Stage I-IV or Unstageable

    Measured: Final analysis will be performed at end of study (expected completion 2 years)

  6. Relative Risk

    Relative risk of sacral and ischial pressure injuries will be compared between treatment groups using a 2x2 contingency table with a 95% confidence interval.

    Measured: Final analysis will be performed at end of study (expected completion 2 years)

  7. Duration of Inpatient Stay

    Descriptive statistics will be used to report the central tendency and spread of the duration of inpatient stay for both treatment groups

    Measured: Final analysis will be performed at end of study (expected completion 2 years)

  8. Description of adverse events related to IES

    We will report frequency and severity of skin changes underlying the electrodes, categorized as i) transient erythema after electrode removal, ii) non-transient skin changes after electrode removal, iii) skin breakdown under electrode.

    Measured: Final analysis will be performed at end of study (expected completion 2 years)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 Mar 2020
  2. Study start26 Feb 2021
  3. Primary completion14 Mar 2022
  4. Study completion14 Mar 2022

Why it stopped: Recruitment was not feasible at site.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
4 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04328246
Sponsor's protocol ID
IIT-0018
Acronym
PROTECT
Status last verified
Mar 2020
First submitted
26 Mar 2020
Last updated
11 Jan 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing IES System in people with Pressure Injury, run by AHS Cancer Control Alberta at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jan 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: Recruitment was not feasible at site.). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Clinical course of pressure injury over time (time frame: Patients will be assessed daily for pressure injury location and stage through treatment completion, an average of 14 days.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jan 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in