AzTrials
AzTrials

Cyclic Vomiting SyndromeNCT04329637

Effects of an Integrative Health Care Model With Meditation and Care Cordination in CVS

A study testing Integrative healt care in people with Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome, run by Medical College of Wisconsin.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Cyclic vomiting syndrome is a chronic functional gastrointestinal disorder that is a significant health care problem. It affects 1-2% of the population and imposes an enormous burden on patients, families and the health care system. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome
What is being tested?
Integrative healt care
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
74 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
5 Oct 2016to 15 Dec 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • All subjects with CVS

Who cannot join

  • Severe cognitive impairment, active mental health problems such as suicidal ideation, severe anxiety or depression requiring inpatient care, or an inability to sit for at least 20 minutes. Subjects with severe cardiopulmonary diseases, malignancy, liver cirrhosis, renal failure on dialysis or those who were pregnant at the time of enrollment were excluded.

About this study

Official title: An Integrative, Patient-Centered Model of Care: Meditation and Care Coordination to Improve Healthcare Outcomes in Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome

Cyclic vomiting syndrome is a chronic functional gastrointestinal disorder that is a significant health care problem. It affects 1-2% of the population and imposes an enormous burden on patients, families and the health care system. Due to the recalcitrant nature of the disease, patients have high rates of health care utilization with multiple emergency department visits and hospitalizations. These in turn lead to school and work absenteeism, job loss, divorce and even disability. CVS is also associated with multiple comorbid conditions such as anxiety and depression, which further contribute to disease severity. Both neuroimaging studies and other data demonstrate the role of the central nervous system in the pathophysiology of CVS with stress being a significant trigger for episodes of CVS. In summary, CVS is common, disabling and expensive and is associated with significant psychosocial comorbidity that contributes to impaired quality of life . Our current healthcare delivery model is disease-centric and does not adequately address the psychosocial barriers that contribute to poor health in this patient population. We propose a novel, collaborative, integrative health care model that shifts the paradigm of care from one that is episodic and disease-centered to a patient-centered approach that addresses psychosocial determinants of health not addressed in our current traditional health care system. We will incorporate meditation practices that have been shown to reduce psychological distress and also add a care coordinator to our health care delivery team. The primary role of the care coordinator is to identify patient goals, preferences and barriers to self-management and address psychosocial and environmental issues that determine health. Patients will be randomized to either the integrative health care model or usual care. The primary aim of our study is to determine the impact of our proposed integrative health care model on health care outcomes which will include a reduction in psychological distress, improvement in coping skills for managing chronic disease, cognitive symptom management, improvement in health-related quality of life and reduction in health care utilization. This collaborative effort between physicians, community partners, and allied health personnel will redesign the health care delivery system, facilitate access to appropriate healthcare services, optimize chronic disease management and improve overall healthcare outcomes.

Read the detailed description

Background \& Aims: Cyclic vomiting syndrome (CVS) is associated with psychosocial comorbidity and often triggered by stress. The current disease-centered model of care does not address psychosocial factors that impact patient outcomes. The investigators hypothesized that a holistic, patient-centered care model integrating meditation and addressing psychosocial needs through a care coordinator, will improve healthcare outcomes in CVS.

Methods: The investigators conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial of 49 patients with CVS (mean age: 34 ± 14 years; 81% female) who were randomized to conventional healthcare (control group) or Integrative Health Care (IHC) (27: control group, 22: IHC group;). In the IHC group, patients were assigned a care coordinator and received meditation sessions from certified trainers from the Heartfulness Institute. Outcomes including psychological distress, coping strategies to manage chronic stress, cognitive symptom management, and Health-Related Quality of Life were measured with validated tools. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed.

Being tested
Integrative healt care
Keywords
cyclic vomiting; meditation; care coordination
Medical subject headings
Familial cyclic vomiting syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Integrative healt careOther

    Also called IHC

    Meditation and use of a care cordinator

Study groups in NCT04329637
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
IHC (intergrative health care) armActive comparatorMeditation and care coordination in addition to usual care
Receives: Other: Integrative healt care
usual careNo interventionusual care

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Levels of psychological distress is measured using a validated questionnaire called the Basic Symptom Inventory

    Basic symptom inventory The Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) consists of 53 items covering nine symptom dimensions: Somatization, Obsession-Compulsion, Interpersonal Sensitivity, Depression, Anxiety, Hostility, Phobic anxiety, Paranoid ideation and Psychoticism; and three global indices of distress: Global Severity Index, Positive Symptom Distress Index, and Positive Symptom Total. The global indices measure current or past level of symptomatology, intensity of symptoms, and number of reported symptoms, respectively.

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Mutiple domains of coping will be measured by the COPE questionanire which is a validated tool

    COPE questionanire: The COPE questionnaire consists of the following. Five scales (of four items each) measure conceptually distinct aspects of problem-focused coping (active coping, planning, suppression of competing activities, restraint coping, seeking of instrumental social support); five scales measure aspects of what might be viewed as emotional-focused coping (seeking of emotional social support, positive reinterpretation, acceptance, denial, turning to religion); and three scales measure coping responses that arguably are less useful (focus on and venting of emotions, behavioral disengagement, mental disengagement).

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Apr 2020
  2. Study start5 Oct 2016
  3. Primary completion5 Feb 2019
  4. Study completion15 Dec 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Patients were prospectively randomized to either the integrative health care model (IHC model) or usual care (UC)/control group after signing informed consent. Demographics, clinical characteristics and outcomes of interest were measured at baseline before the intervention, and at 3 and 6 months. Global psychological distress ,depression, catastrophizing, anxiety/pain-related fear, and social support were assessed using validated tools. Coping skills were measured with the validated short version of the COPE questionnaire. Quality of sleep was assessed using Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). HRQoL was measured with the NIH PROMIS Short Forms. Health care utilization was recorded.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
74 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04329637
Sponsor's protocol ID
PRO00027409
Status last verified
Mar 2020
First submitted
26 Mar 2020
Last updated
1 Apr 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Integrative healt care in people with Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome, run by Medical College of Wisconsin.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Apr 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Levels of psychological distress is measured using a validated questionnaire called the Basic Symptom Inventory (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Apr 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in