AzTrials
AzTrials

Peripheral Pulmonary NodulesNCT04331587

Thin and Ultrathin Bronchoscopy With Transbronchial Needle Aspiration and Radial Probe Endobronchial Ultrasound for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions

An observational study of Peripheral Pulmonary Nodules, run by Washington University School of Medicine at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To collect data on diagnostic yield of thin and ultrathin bronchoscopes with radial probe endobronchial ultrasound (radial EBUS) and transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) during routine standard of care bronchoscopy for peripheral pulmonary lesions. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Peripheral Pulmonary Nodules
What is being tested?
BF-P190 4 mm thin bronchoscope, BF-MP190F 3 mm ultrathin bronchoscope and Radial ultrasound probe (UM S20-17S)
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
80 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
20 Apr 2020to 22 Aug 2024
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients being seen at Washington University School of Medicine.

Who may be able to join

  • Patients age 18 and older
  • Patients presenting with peripheral pulmonary lesions 1-7cm in greatest diameter on axial CT or PET scan in need of bronchoscopic biopsy for clinical purposes

Who cannot join

  • Patients who are unable to undergo flexible bronchoscopy as determined by the bronchoscopist prior to the procedure
  • Patients unwilling or unable to provide informed consent.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Washington University School of Medicine

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of Thin and Ultrathin Bronchoscopy With Transbronchial Needle Aspiration and Radial Probe Endobronchial Ultrasound for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions

To collect data on diagnostic yield of thin and ultrathin bronchoscopes with radial probe endobronchial ultrasound (radial EBUS) and transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) during routine standard of care bronchoscopy for peripheral pulmonary lesions.

Being tested
BF-P190 4 mm thin bronchoscope, BF-MP190F 3 mm ultrathin bronchoscope, Radial ultrasound probe (UM S20-17S), PeriView FLEX 21G Single Use Aspiration Needle

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • BF-P190 4 mm thin bronchoscopeDevice

    • EVIS EXERA III Bronchofiberviedoscopes
    • Olympus
  • BF-MP190F 3 mm ultrathin bronchoscopeDevice

    • EVIS EXERA III Bronchofiberviedoscopes
    • Olympus
  • Radial ultrasound probe (UM S20-17S)Device

    -Olympus

  • PeriView FLEX 21G Single Use Aspiration NeedleDevice

    • NA-403D-2021
    • Gyrus ACMI, Inc.
Study groups in NCT04331587
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
BronchoscopyThe bronchoscopy procedure and use of both the thin and ultrathin bronchoscopes are considered standard of care and will be performed under moderate sedation in an outpatient bronchoscopy suite as part of each patient's clinical care.
Receives: Device: BF-P190 4 mm thin bronchoscope; Device: BF-MP190F 3 mm ultrathin bronchoscope; Device: Radial ultrasound probe (UM S20-17S); Device: PeriView FLEX 21G Single Use Aspiration Needle

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Overall diagnostic yield (concentric and eccentric lesions) for peripheral pulmonary nodules

    -To determine overall diagnostic yield (concentric and eccentric lesions) for peripheral pulmonary nodules utilizing using a standard of care combined approach of 4mm thin and 3mm ultrathin bronchoscopes with TBNA and radial EBUS and compare it to a historical baseline diagnostic yield of 60% established at Washington University School of Medicine (WUSM) when using TBNA and radial EBUS and a 4mm thin bronchoscope.

    Measured: Receipt of cytology/histopathology results (approximately 7 days)

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Incidence of related adverse events

    -Adverse events related to the bronchoscopy procedure and/or devices used during the procedure (bronchoscope, radial EBUS, PeriView Flex needle).

    Measured: Up to 4 days following procedure

  2. Procedure time measured in minutes from oral scope insertion to scope removal upon completion of the bronchoscopy procedure

    Measured: From start of procedure through end of procedure (day 1)

  3. Size of target lesions measured at the greatest diameter in centimeters

    Measured: From start of procedure through end of procedure (day 1)

  4. Diagnostic yield of bronchoscopy utilizing a 3mm bronchoscope for eccentric lesions

    -Will be compared with historical controlled data of cases in which peripheral bronchoscopy was performed for peripheral lesions using radial probe EBUS and a 4mm bronchoscope in which eccentric ultrasound views were obtained

    Measured: Receipt of cytology/histopathology results (approximately 7 days)

  5. Ability to successfully convert ultrasound images from eccentric to concentric view by exchanging the 4mm thin bronchoscope for the 3mm ultrathin bronchoscope

    -The ability to convert will be based on the ultrasound image that is obtained using the 3mm bronchoscope (it will either be eccentric or concentric) compared to the eccentric ultrasound image obtained with the 4mm bronchoscope

    Measured: From start of procedure through end of procedure (day 1)

  6. Types of deficiencies associated with medical device

    Measured: From start of procedure through end of procedure (day 1)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Apr 2020
  2. Study start20 Apr 2020
  3. Primary completion22 Aug 2024
  4. Study completion22 Aug 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
80 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04331587
Sponsor's protocol ID
202003071
Status last verified
Sep 2024
First submitted
27 Mar 2020
Last updated
19 Sep 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Peripheral Pulmonary Nodules, run by Washington University School of Medicine at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Sep 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Overall diagnostic yield (concentric and eccentric lesions) for peripheral pulmonary nodules (time frame: Receipt of cytology/histopathology results (approximately 7 days)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Sep 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in