AzTrials
AzTrials

Chemotherapy EffectNCT04331678

Evaluation of a Mobile App to Promote Social Support for Oncology Patients

A study testing Comparator App in people with Chemotherapy Effect, run by West Cancer Center at 3 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Our study will evaluate patient and caregiver use of a new mobile application (app) to support patients undergoing chemotherapy treatment for cancer. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Chemotherapy Effect
What is being tested?
Comparator App
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
230 participants
Where
3 sitesUnited States
Study dates
12 Mar 2020to 24 Oct 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • At least 18 years of age
  • Patients must have a confirmed diagnosis of cancer and be prior to or within one month of initiating chemotherapy or immunotherapy
  • Have a valid email address
  • Have a smart mobile device (Android or iOS) with a data plan
  • Willing to download and use the study app

Who cannot join

  • Unable to communicate in English.

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

United States3 sites
  • West Cancer Center

    Germantown, Tennessee, 38138

  • West Cancer Center

    Memphis, Tennessee, 38104

  • West Cancer Center

    Southaven, Mississippi, 38671

Other trials in United States

About this study

Our study will evaluate patient and caregiver use of a new mobile application (app) to support patients undergoing chemotherapy treatment for cancer.

Read the detailed description

The app is designed to be used by the patient and members of their support network. It provides wide-ranging functionality, including: reminders for appointments and tasks, the ability to track health measures (fitness, emotion, pain, sleep), archive health related documents, maintain notes and recordings from visits, social networking functions to connect with family and friends to coordinate support activities and share news, and educational resources. We will randomize 230 patients initiating chemotherapy cancer treatment and up to one caregiver to the App group (asked to use the app once or more per week) or the Usual Care group, and evaluate the 3-month efficacy of app use on key outcomes.

Being tested
Comparator App

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Comparator AppBehavioural

    Participants will download and agree to use the study app at least once per week during the 3-month intervention period.

    The app allows participants to invite a network of friends and family to provide emotional and logistical support during their treatment.

Study groups in NCT04331678
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Usual CareNo interventionParticipants will be complete survey at enrollment and then again in 3 months.
ActiveActive comparatorParticipants in the App group will receive usual care and complete survey at enrollment and then again in 3 months. In addition, they will be asked to download the study app to their mobile device and use it at least once per week during the 3-month study period.
Receives: Behavioral: Comparator App

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) Score

    1. Investigators will measure the relative changes in functional status of cancer patients using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) questionnaire. FACT-G is a 27-item questionnaire asking participants to report the four primary QoL domains, including physical, social/family, emotional and functional well-being on a 5-point Likert scale where 0 = Not at all to 4 = Very much with higher scores representing better general QoL.

    Measured: Baseline, Three months

  2. Change in Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12)

    1. Investigators will measure differences in quality of life between the two study arms with the SF-12 instrument. The SF-12 is a multipurpose short form survey with 12 questions, all selected from the SF-36 Health Survey. SF-12 is a standardized self-report questionnaire that assesses mental and physical functioning. The SF-12 consists of 12 items with a Likert-type response format that measures quality of life with a Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS). Subscales associated with the PCS include physical functioning, role limitations due to physical problems, bodily pain, and general health perceptions. Subscales associated with the MCS include vitality (energy and fatigue), social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. A scoring algorithm is used to generate a total score for each component ranging from 0 to 100. Low values represent a poor health state while high values represent a good health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Three months

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Caregiver's Burden

    Changes in the caregiver's burden assessed using the 10-item Caregiver Quality of Life - Cancer Scale (CQOLC) Burden Subscale, where higher scores indicate greater burden.

    Measured: Baseline, Three months

  2. Caregiver's Disruptiveness

    Changes in the caregiver's disruptiveness of daily life will be assessed using the 7-item CQOLC Disruptiveness Subscale, where scores are calculated as described for burden, and higher scores indicate greater disruptiveness.

    Measured: Baseline, Three months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Apr 2020
  2. Study start12 Mar 2020
  3. Primary completion24 Oct 2021
  4. Study completion24 Oct 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
230 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04331678
Sponsor's protocol ID
2018-002b
Status last verified
Dec 2023
First submitted
31 Mar 2020
Last updated
18 Dec 2023
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Graetz I, Hu X, Curry AN, Robles A, Vidal GA, Schwartzberg LS. Mobile application to support oncology patients during treatment on patient outcomes: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial. Cancer Med. 2023 Mar;12(5):6190-6199. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5351. Epub 2022 Oct 18.

    PubMed 36258654

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Comparator App in people with Chemotherapy Effect, run by West Cancer Center at 3 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Dec 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) Score (time frame: Baseline, Three months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04331678, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Dec 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in