AzTrials
AzTrials

Pain, AcutePhase 3NCT04332159

Inhaled Methoxyflurane for Pain Management in Nasal Bone Fracture Reduction

A Phase 3 study testing Closed nasal fracture reduction in people with Pain, Acute and Nasal Fracture, run by Université de Sherbrooke at 1 site in Canada.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled study to evaluate the efficacy of Methoxyflurane (Penthrox®) for the treatment of acute pain during closed nasal fracture reduction. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Pain, Acute, Nasal Fracture
What is being tested?
Closed nasal fracture reduction
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
34 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
10 Oct 2019to 30 Mar 2021
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Being a man or a woman between 18 and 75 years old, inclusively ; and
  • Being covered by the Quebec medical insurance (RAMQ); and
  • Presenting an uncomplicated nasal fracture requiring a delayed (7 to 10 days) closed reduction.

Who cannot join

  • Pregnant or breastfeeding woman; or
  • Known for renal insufficiency (DFG < 50) ; or
  • Known for hepatic impairment; or
  • Personal or familial allergies/hypersensitivity to fluorinated products; or
  • Contraindications to local anesthesia (including allergies); or
  • Personal or family history of malignant hyperthermia; or
Show all 15Show fewer
  • Other facial fractures and/or significant injuries; or
  • Altered state of consciousness (dementia, drug intoxication, head trauma or other similar psychologic disorder); or
  • Significant respiratory impairment; or
  • Haemodynamic instability; or
  • Simultaneous use of alcohol, isoniazid, phenobarbital, rifampin, opioids, sedatives, hypnotics, sedative antihistaminics, general anesthetics, phenothiazines, tranquilizers, myorelaxants, nephrotoxic antibiotics (tetracycline, gentamicin, colistine, polymyxin B, amphotericin B); or
  • Use of cannabis or other illicit drugs the day of the procedure; or
  • Use of pain medication in past 6 hours; or
  • Use of Methoxyflurane : more than 6 mL in the last 48 hours or more than 15 mL in the last week or usage in the last 3 months; or
  • Need of sedation or general anesthesia for the procedure.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Pierre-Hugues Fortier, M.D. FRCSC contact

8193461110 ext. 24927

Pierre-Hugues.Fortier@USherbrooke.ca

Canada1 site, 1 recruiting
  • CIUSSS de l'Estrie - Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke

    Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1H 5N4

    Frederic Lemieux-Martel, (819) 346-1110 ext. 24927, frederic.lemieux-martel@usherbrooke.ca

    Recruiting

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Inhaled Methoxyflurane for Pain Management in Nasal Bone Fracture Reduction : A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

This is a randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled study to evaluate the efficacy of Methoxyflurane (Penthrox®) for the treatment of acute pain during closed nasal fracture reduction.

The study aims to provide evidence under blinded controlled conditions that Penthrox is safe and effective in patients aged 18 to 65 years during closed nasal fracture reduction.

Read the detailed description

The main objective of this study is to establish if the addition of Methoxyflurane to local anesthesia has the ability to significantly reduce the pain during closed nasal fracture reduction compared to local anesthesia with placebo.

The secondary outcomes consist of assessing if inclusion of Methoxyflurane will have a positive impact on the time needed to achieve the reduction, the need for backup analgesia, the rate of reduction failure, pain level during infiltration of local anesthesia and the clinician's appreciation of the procedure.

As an hypothesis, the investigators expect that the addition of Methoxyflurane to the standard local anesthesia will significantly reduce the pain compared to local anesthesia with placebo during closed nasal fracture reduction. The investigators also think that Methoxyflurane might reduce the duration of the reduction, limit the need for backup analgesia, reduce the rate of reduction failure, reduce the pain level due to infiltration of local anesthesia and facilitate the procedure for the clinician.

To reach these objectives, the investigators propose a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study on a sample of patients randomized in two different groups:

  • Group A (intervention) : Closed nasal fracture reduction under local anesthesia and inhaled Methoxyflurane.
  • Group B (control) : Closed nasal fracture reduction under local anesthesia and placebo.

The placebo in this study is a 0,9% saline solution that will come in an identical Penthrox inhaler. The inhaler will be prepared by a pharmacy technician experienced in double-blind research right before its use. The characteristic smell of the Methoxyflurane solution will be reproduced by pouring a few drops of Methoxyflurane just above the tip of the inhaler. N95 masks will be worn by the clinician and research nurse throughout the procedure to lower the risk of group identification.

PROCEDURE Patient referred to the investigators outpatient clinic for nasal fracture 7 to 10 days from the trauma date will be evaluated by one of the investigator and the need for intervention will be established.

Eligible patients will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to have 17 patients per treatment arm (an interim analysis will be done after 10 patients per treatment arm). Eligible patients will receive either methoxyflurane or placebo from the PENTHROX® inhaler in a 1:1 ratio.

Before the procedure, the patient will assess his current level of pain on the visual analog scale (baseline pain). The patient will then self-administer 6 to 10 successive inhalations of Penthrox or placebo (assisted by the research nurse). The clinician will then wait 5 minutes before proceeding with local anesthesia as follow :

  1. Two sprays of 4% lidocaine in each nostril.
  2. Bilateral infratrochlear block with local 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100000 (approximately 0.5 cc on each side). This will be done carefully to ensure that anatomical landmarks are preserved in order to obtain a proper reduction. (Infiltration of the skin on the lateral walls of the nose right above the proper nasal bone)
  3. Bilateral infra-orbital block through the buccal mucosa using local 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100 000 (approximately 1.5 cc on each side)
  4. Efficacy of the local lidocaine is evaluated and additional infiltration will be done when needed.
  5. Packing of the nose with cotton balls soaked with 10 cc of a ½ lidocaine- ½ oxymetazoline solution. (4% lidocaine)

The patient will use the inhaler one more after local anesthesia and the investigator will wait 5 minutes prior to proceeding with the closed reduction to ensure an adequate efficacy of the topical lidocaine-oxymetazoline anesthesia.

The cotton balls will then be removed and the clinician will proceed with the closed reduction.

The research nurse then documents the time at which the reduction begins. A scalpel handle is placed against the external nose to measure the distance from the medial canthus to the nostril rim. The scalpel handle is inserted between the depressed nasal bone and the the nasal septum, parallel to the nasal dorsum. The depressed bone is pulled laterally and guided into a neutral position with the scalpel handle while direct pressure is applied medially on the contralateral nasal bone (the laterally deviated side) in order to push it back into its neutral position. If needed, centrally depressed fragments require an anterior lifting motion with the elevator. These steps are repeated until the patient and the clinician are satisfied with the aesthetic result or if the patient asks the clinician to stop the procedure. End time of the procedure will also be noted.

The patient can ask for additional Methoxyflurane inhalations at anytime during the procedure. The patient is provided with 3 mL bottle of Methoxyflurane (or placebo) and cannot ask for another one. If during the procedure the patient asks for additional analgesia, his nose will be packed with cotton balls soaked in lidocaine-oxymetazoline for 5 minutes. However, if despite additional analgesia the procedure is interrupted because it is too painful for the patient, it will be considered as a reduction failure due to pain (whether the procedure is carried out under systemic analgesia, sedation or is abandoned). In the event of failure to achieve adequate fracture reduction, sedation and/or general anesthesia will be offered to the patient to complete the reduction.

After the procedure, pain levels (during infiltration of local anesthesia, mean and peak pain during the reduction) will be reported on the visual analog scale.

Being tested
Closed nasal fracture reduction
Medical subject headings
Acute Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Closed nasal fracture reductionProcedure or surgery

    Closed nasal fracture reduction is performed under local anesthesia with addition of Methoxyflurane or placebo

Study groups in NCT04332159
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intervention groupExperimentalInhalation of Methoxyflurane through a Penthrox inhaler
Receives: Procedure: Closed nasal fracture reduction
Control groupPlacebo comparatorInhalation of placebo (0.9% salin solution) through a Penthrox inhaler
Receives: Procedure: Closed nasal fracture reduction

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pain level variation during nasal closed reduction: visual analog scale

    The primary outcome is pain level variation during the closed reduction. Three pain levels will be collected using the visual analog scale :

    • Pain level before the procedure (or "baseline pain") : will be assessed in order to analyse pain variation during the procedure between the two groups
    • Mean pain level during the procedure (or "mean pain"), defined as the average amount of pain felt throughout the procedure by the patient
    • Peak pain level during the procedure (or "peak pain"), defined as the worst pain that the patient had felt during the procedure

    The visual analog scale is a validated scale on which patients are asked to report their pain level, from zero (absence of pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable).

    Pain variation during the procedure will be assessed using two outcome measures :

    1. The mean pain due to procedure (the difference between the "mean pain" and the "baseline pain")
    2. The peak pain during the procedure, as measured on the visual analog scale

    Measured: The "baseline pain" will be assessed before local anesthesia will be administered (at the very beginning of the procedure), whereas the "mean pain" and the "peak pain" will be assessed after the closed reduction is completed.

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Time needed to achieve the reduction

    Time needed to achieve closed reduction, from the beginning of the reduction manoeuvres until nasal reduction is completed, will be monitored and compared between the two groups. (This will not take into account the time taken for Methoxyflurane administration and local anesthesia infiltration.)

    Measured: The time needed to achieve the reduction will be calculated by subtracting the time at the beginning of the reduction to the time at the end of the reduction, which will be documented by a research nurse during the procedure.

  2. Rate of participants requesting backup analgesia during the procedure

    The need for additional analgesia during the procedure will be documented and compared between the two groups, more precisely

    1. Additional use of inhaler
    2. Lidocaine-oxymetazoline cotton balls At the end of the procedure, the investigator will document if the patient requested backup analgesia during the procedure.

    Measured: Immediately after the intervention

  3. Reduction failure rate

    Reduction failure due to inadequate pain management despite additional measures will be documented and compared between the two groups

    Measured: Immediately after the intervention

  4. Pain level during anesthesia: visual analog scale

    Pain level during infiltration of local anesthesia will be assessed on a visual analog scale and compared between the two groups

    The visual analog scale is a validated scale on which patients are asked to report their pain level, from zero (absence of pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable).

    Measured: Immediately after the intervention

  5. Number of procedures limited by pain

    After the procedure, the investigator will assess, by answering "yes" or "no", If he believed that the pain felt by the participant was limiting the execution of the closed nasal reduction and therefore jeopardizing the aesthetic result

    Measured: Immediately after the intervention

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Apr 2020
  2. Study start10 Oct 2019
  3. Primary completion1 Mar 2021 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Mar 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
To reach their objectives, the investigators propose a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study on a sample of patients randomized in two different groups: * Group A (intervention) : Closed nasal fracture reduction under local anesthesia and inhaled Methoxyflurane. * Group B (control) : Closed nasal fracture reduction under local anesthesia and placebo.
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
34 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04332159
Sponsor's protocol ID
CÉR 2020-3355
Status last verified
Apr 2020
First submitted
27 Jan 2020
Last updated
7 Apr 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Closed nasal fracture reduction in people with Pain, Acute and Nasal Fracture, run by Université de Sherbrooke at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Apr 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Pierre-Hugues Fortier, M.D. FRCSC (8193461110 ext. 24927, Pierre-Hugues.Fortier@USherbrooke.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pain level variation during nasal closed reduction: visual analog scale (time frame: The "baseline pain" will be assessed before local anesthesia will be administered (at the very beginning of the procedure), whereas the "mean pain" and the "peak pain" will be assessed after the closed reduction is completed.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Apr 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in