Colorectal CancerNCT04336397
Stool DNA to Improve Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Alaska Native People
A study testing Multi-target stool DNA test and Colonoscopy in people with Colorectal Cancer, run by Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Only 59% of Alaska Native people have been adequately screened for colorectal cancer (CRC) despite having the highest reported incidence of CRC in the world. A new at-home multi-target stool DNA screening test (MT-sDNA; Cologuard®) with high sensitivity for pre-cancerous polyps and CRC is now available. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 45 to 75 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Colorectal Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Multi-target stool DNA test and Colonoscopy
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 2,029 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 29 Apr 2021to 15 Nov 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 45 to 75 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Alaska Native adults eligible to receive health care through the Alaska Tribal Health System
- Active health system users with at least one Alaska Tribal Health System visit in the previous three years
- Due for colorectal cancer screening (have not had colonoscopy in past 10 years or fecal occult blood test in past 1 year or flexible sigmoidoscopy in past 5 years)
Who cannot join
- First-degree relative diagnosed with CRC at age 60 or younger
- History of familial adenomatous polyposis
- Hereditary non-polyposis CRC
- Previous colonoscopic evidence of inflammatory bowel disease, Crohn's disease, colorectal adenomas, or CRC
- Known history of colectomy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Yukon-Kuskokwim Health Corporation
Bethel, Alaska, 99559
About this study
Official title: Randomized Controlled Trial of the Stool DNA Test to Improve Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Alaska Native People
Only 59% of Alaska Native people have been adequately screened for colorectal cancer (CRC) despite having the highest reported incidence of CRC in the world. A new at-home multi-target stool DNA screening test (MT-sDNA; Cologuard®) with high sensitivity for pre-cancerous polyps and CRC is now available. MT-sDNA has not been tested for feasibility or acceptability within the Alaska tribal health care delivery system, and it is unknown whether use of this new test will increase Alaska Native CRC screening rates. The long-term study goal is to improve screening and reduce CRC-attributable mortality. The objective of this application is to test the effectiveness of MT-sDNA for increasing CRC screening in Alaska Native communities using a mixed methods, community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach. The study will be conducted in collaboration with regional Tribal health organizations responsible for providing health care to geographically remote Alaska Native communities. Although the proposed implementation strategy is evidence-informed and promising, it is novel in that MT-sDNA has not been evaluated in the tribal health setting or among rural/remote populations. Using the RE-AIM Model, the research will be multi-level, examining influence on patients, providers, and tribal health organizations (THOs). This research study will pursue two specific aims: (1) Identify patient-, provider-, and system-level factors associated with CRC screening preferences, uptake, and follow-up; and (2) test the effectiveness of graded intensity MT-sDNA intervention in the Alaska Native community setting. For the first aim, focus groups with Alaska Native people who are not adherent to CRC screening guidelines and interviews with healthcare providers will be used to identify factors for future intervention. For the second aim, a three-arm cluster randomized controlled trial (high intensity with patient navigation, medium intensity with mailed reminders, usual care) will provide evidence on the MT-sDNA usefulness (MT-sDNA sample quality and neoplastic yield) as well as the first data on MT-sDNA follow up adherence rates in the Alaska Native population, which will inform plans to scale-up the intervention model. This research has the potential to sustainably improve public health by increasing CRC screening rates among a rural/remote tribal population as well as provide a model for other integrated health systems that provide care to high-risk or underserved populations in the U.S. and worldwide.
Read the detailed description
The study will employ a cluster-randomized design, in which 32 communities within one Tribal health region will be randomized to one of the two study intervention conditions, matched by community size, with 14 communities in the control arm. All Alaska Native adults aged 45-75 due for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening within each community will be offered the same intervention. At least 770 participants will be recruited in at least 13 communities per study arm.
- High Intensity Intervention: Participants will receive navigated tribal health worker outreach, a mailed MT-sDNA kit, mailed culturally appropriate educational material describing CRC screening options available and follow-up reminders
- Medium Intensity Intervention: Participants will receive mailed culturally appropriate educational material describing CRC screening options available, including MT-sDNA, and navigated follow-up outreach reminders
- Usual Care (Control arm): All other communities in the participating Tribal health region will serve as the reference group receiving usual care (i.e., screening recommendation at a clinic visit) Participants receiving the high intensity intervention are expected to have a 20% increase in screening uptake while those receiving medium intensity intervention will have a 10% increase in screening uptake over those receiving usual care. The study will also measure MT-sDNA sample quality and neoplastic yield in these remote Alaska Native communities. The investigators anticipate that the proportion of MT-sDNA tests meeting quality control standards will be the same as in the general US population (96%) and that pre-cancerous polyp detection rates at diagnostic post-MT-sDNA colonoscopy will exceed routine clinical practice rates in the general US population (52%-67%).
During and following the graded intensity intervention, the investigators will survey samples of patients to evaluate their awareness and response to the CRC screening intervention. The investigators will assess their perceived severity, perceived susceptibility, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, and self-efficacy relevant to CRC screening as well as measure the time-to-respond and screening method used. The study will use focus groups and key informant interviews to learn about factors associated with screening response. For the focus groups, AN people ages 45-75 who are unscreened or non-adherent to screening guidelines (colonoscopy within 10 years, sigmoidoscopy within five years, or fecal occult blood testing within preceding 12 months) will be invited to provide their views on barriers to and facilitators of screening, including barriers described in the literature and identified in the investigators previous work. Non-adherence will be identified through tribal medical records. Each focus group will last up to two hours, and will include 6-8 participants. All focus groups will be stratified by gender, and focus groups will be balanced so that approximately equal numbers of men and women are included in the analysis.
The investigators will also conduct a brief survey and key informant interviews (6-8 clinician interviews at each location) among community health aides, providers, and tribal health system administrators using validated measures of intervention feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness to characterize provider- and system-level barriers and promotors to MT-sDNA implementation.
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer
- Being tested
- Multi-target stool DNA test, Colonoscopy
- Keywords
- screening
- Medical subject headings
- Colorectal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Multi-target stool DNA testDiagnostic test
Also called Cologuard
Cluster randomized trial of high and medium intensity outreach with MT-sDNA or colonoscopy compared with usual care
ColonoscopyDiagnostic test
Cluster randomized trial of high and medium intensity outreach with MT-sDNA or colonoscopy compared with usual care
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| High Intensity | Active comparator | Navigated tribal health worker telephone outreach up to 5 telephone calls and 1 mailed culturally appropriate educational material describing CRC screening options available. If MT-sDNA selected, sent a MT-sDNA kit and follow-up reminders. Receives: Diagnostic Test: Multi-target stool DNA test; Diagnostic Test: Colonoscopy |
| Medium Intensity | Active comparator | 1 mailed culturally appropriate educational material describing CRC screening options available and 1 telephone call from a tribal health worker. If MT-sDNA selected, sent a MT-sDNA kit and follow-up reminders. Receives: Diagnostic Test: Multi-target stool DNA test; Diagnostic Test: Colonoscopy |
| Usual Care | No intervention | usual care (i.e., opportunistic screening recommendation at a clinic visit) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Colorectal Cancer Screening by Study Arm
Incident CRC screening episode defined as having at least one of the following within 1 year of follow-up after randomization and intervention: colonoscopy; MT-sDNA with a negative result; or MT-sDNA with a positive result followed by a colonoscopy within 1 year.
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (2)
Test Requested (MT-sDNA or Colonoscopy)
Test requested (MT-sDNA or colonoscopy) by intervention participants
Measured: 1 year
MT-sDNA Diagnostic Follow-up
Rate of positive MT-sDNA test follow up to diagnostic colonoscopy
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Apr 2020
- Study start29 Apr 2021
- Primary completion15 Nov 2024
- Study completion15 Nov 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Colorectal CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- 3-arm cluster-randomized controlled trial
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 2,029 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Mayo Clinic, Yukon Kuskokwim Health Corporation
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Diana Redwood, PhD, Principal investigator, Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04336397
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1R01CA247642-01
- Status last verified
- Nov 2025
- First submitted
- 3 Apr 2020
- Last updated
- 10 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Pending Tribal approval, the final combined dataset can be shared as a completely de-identified dataset as defined by the Health Information Portability and Accountability Act and excluding any variable causing risk of identification due to small numbers.
Publications
Redwood D, Flanagan C, Jeffries L, Holck P, Rutten LF, Desnoyers C, Bailie D, Kisiel J. Increasing colorectal cancer screening among Alaska Native peoples living in remote areas of Alaska: a multitarget stool DNA cluster randomized controlled trial. BMC Prim Care. 2026 May 26;27(1):303. doi: 10.1186/s12875-026-03370-x.
PubMed 42185758
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Controlled Trial of the Stool DNA Test to Improve Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Alaska Native People
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04336397
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1R01CA247642-01
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer
- Keywords
- screening
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 2,029 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Alaska Native Tribal Health ConsortiumUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Mayo Clinic, Yukon Kuskokwim Health Corporation
- Study start
- 29 Apr 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Nov 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Nov 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Apr 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 19 Nov 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Only 59% of Alaska Native people have been adequately screened for colorectal cancer (CRC) despite having the highest reported incidence of CRC in the world. A new at-home multi-target stool DNA screening test (MT-sDNA; Cologuard®) with high sensitivity for pre-cancerous polyps and CRC is now available. MT-sDNA has not been tested for feasibility or acceptability within the Alaska tribal health care delivery system, and it is unknown whether use of this new test will increase Alaska Native CRC screening rates. The long-term study goal is to improve screening and reduce CRC-attributable mortality. The objective of this application is to test the effectiveness of MT-sDNA for increasing CRC screening in Alaska Native communities using a mixed methods, community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach. The study will be conducted in collaboration with regional Tribal health organizations responsible for providing health care to geographically remote Alaska Native communities. Although the proposed implementation strategy is evidence-informed and promising, it is novel in that MT-sDNA has not been evaluated in the tribal health setting or among rural/remote populations. Using the RE-AIM Model, the research will be multi-level, examining influence on patients, providers, and tribal health organizations (THOs). This research study will pursue two specific aims: (1) Identify patient-, provider-, and system-level factors associated with CRC screening preferences, uptake, and follow-up; and (2) test the effectiveness of graded intensity MT-sDNA intervention in the Alaska Native community setting. For the first aim, focus groups with Alaska Native people who are not adherent to CRC screening guidelines and interviews with healthcare providers will be used to identify factors for future intervention. For the second aim, a three-arm cluster randomized controlled trial (high intensity with patient navigation, medium intensity with mailed reminders, usual care) will provide evidence on the MT-sDNA usefulness (MT-sDNA sample quality and neoplastic yield) as well as the first data on MT-sDNA follow up adherence rates in the Alaska Native population, which will inform plans to scale-up the intervention model. This research has the potential to sustainably improve public health by increasing CRC screening rates among a rural/remote tribal population as well as provide a model for other integrated health systems that provide care to high-risk or underserved populations in the U.S. and worldwide.
Detailed description
The study will employ a cluster-randomized design, in which 32 communities within one Tribal health region will be randomized to one of the two study intervention conditions, matched by community size, with 14 communities in the control arm. All Alaska Native adults aged 45-75 due for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening within each community will be offered the same intervention. At least 770 participants will be recruited in at least 13 communities per study arm.
- High Intensity Intervention: Participants will receive navigated tribal health worker outreach, a mailed MT-sDNA kit, mailed culturally appropriate educational material describing CRC screening options available and follow-up reminders
- Medium Intensity Intervention: Participants will receive mailed culturally appropriate educational material describing CRC screening options available, including MT-sDNA, and navigated follow-up outreach reminders
- Usual Care (Control arm): All other communities in the participating Tribal health region will serve as the reference group receiving usual care (i.e., screening recommendation at a clinic visit) Participants receiving the high intensity intervention are expected to have a 20% increase in screening uptake while those receiving medium intensity intervention will have a 10% increase in screening uptake over those receiving usual care. The study will also measure MT-sDNA sample quality and neoplastic yield in these remote Alaska Native communities. The investigators anticipate that the proportion of MT-sDNA tests meeting quality control standards will be the same as in the general US population (96%) and that pre-cancerous polyp detection rates at diagnostic post-MT-sDNA colonoscopy will exceed routine clinical practice rates in the general US population (52%-67%).
During and following the graded intensity intervention, the investigators will survey samples of patients to evaluate their awareness and response to the CRC screening intervention. The investigators will assess their perceived severity, perceived susceptibility, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, and self-efficacy relevant to CRC screening as well as measure the time-to-respond and screening method used. The study will use focus groups and key informant interviews to learn about factors associated with screening response. For the focus groups, AN people ages 45-75 who are unscreened or non-adherent to screening guidelines (colonoscopy within 10 years, sigmoidoscopy within five years, or fecal occult blood testing within preceding 12 months) will be invited to provide their views on barriers to and facilitators of screening, including barriers described in the literature and identified in the investigators previous work. Non-adherence will be identified through tribal medical records. Each focus group will last up to two hours, and will include 6-8 participants. All focus groups will be stratified by gender, and focus groups will be balanced so that approximately equal numbers of men and women are included in the analysis.
The investigators will also conduct a brief survey and key informant interviews (6-8 clinician interviews at each location) among community health aides, providers, and tribal health system administrators using validated measures of intervention feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness to characterize provider- and system-level barriers and promotors to MT-sDNA implementation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- 3-arm cluster-randomized controlled trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| High Intensity | Active comparator | Diagnostic Test: Multi-target stool DNA test, Diagnostic Test: ColonoscopyNavigated tribal health worker telephone outreach up to 5 telephone calls and 1 mailed culturally appropriate educational material describing CRC screening options available. If MT-sDNA selected, sent a MT-sDNA kit and follow-up reminders. |
| Medium Intensity | Active comparator | Diagnostic Test: Multi-target stool DNA test, Diagnostic Test: Colonoscopy1 mailed culturally appropriate educational material describing CRC screening options available and 1 telephone call from a tribal health worker. If MT-sDNA selected, sent a MT-sDNA kit and follow-up reminders. |
| Usual Care | No intervention | –usual care (i.e., opportunistic screening recommendation at a clinic visit) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 45 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Alaska Native adults eligible to receive health care through the Alaska Tribal Health System
- Active health system users with at least one Alaska Tribal Health System visit in the previous three years
- Due for colorectal cancer screening (have not had colonoscopy in past 10 years or fecal occult blood test in past 1 year or flexible sigmoidoscopy in past 5 years)
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- First-degree relative diagnosed with CRC at age 60 or younger
- History of familial adenomatous polyposis
- Hereditary non-polyposis CRC
- Previous colonoscopic evidence of inflammatory bowel disease, Crohn's disease, colorectal adenomas, or CRC
- Known history of colectomy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-target stool DNA testAlso: CologuardCluster randomized trial of high and medium intensity outreach with MT-sDNA or colonoscopy compared with usual care | Diagnostic test | High Intensity, Medium Intensity |
| ColonoscopyCluster randomized trial of high and medium intensity outreach with MT-sDNA or colonoscopy compared with usual care | Diagnostic test | High Intensity, Medium Intensity |
Primary outcome
Colorectal Cancer Screening by Study Arm
Time frame: 1 year
Incident CRC screening episode defined as having at least one of the following within 1 year of follow-up after randomization and intervention: colonoscopy; MT-sDNA with a negative result; or MT-sDNA with a positive result followed by a colonoscopy within 1 year.
2 secondary outcomes
Test Requested (MT-sDNA or Colonoscopy)
Time frame: 1 year
MT-sDNA Diagnostic Follow-up
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Sep 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42185758Redwood D, Flanagan C, Jeffries L, Holck P, Rutten LF, Desnoyers C, Bailie D, Kisiel J. Increasing colorectal cancer screening among Alaska Native peoples living in remote areas of Alaska: a multitarget stool DNA cluster randomized controlled trial. BMC Prim Care. 2026 May 26;27(1):303. doi: 10.1186/s12875-026-03370-x.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Pending Tribal approval, the final combined dataset can be shared as a completely de-identified dataset as defined by the Health Information Portability and Accountability Act and excluding any variable causing risk of identification due to small numbers.
Related trials for Colorectal Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingObservational study
Pre- and On-treatment Multi-omics Profiling of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Rectal Neoplasms
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Tislelizumab in People With Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Diana Redwood, PhD principal investigator
Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Multi-target stool DNA test and Colonoscopy in people with Colorectal Cancer, run by Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Nov 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Colorectal Cancer Screening by Study Arm (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04336397, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Sep 2026.