Chronic Apical PeriodontitisPhase 2/3NCT04336709
Comparison of Anti-microbial Efficacy of Calcipex and Metapex in Endodontic Treatment of Chronic Apical Periodontitis
A Phase 2/3 study testing Calcipex II and Metapex in people with Chronic Apical Periodontitis, run by Aga Khan University at 1 site in Pakistan.
Trial summary
Introduction: Pulpal necrosis may lead to spread of the infection from the pulp to involve the apex of the tooth and surrounding bone which when asymptomatic with periapical radiolucency on radiograph, is called chronic apical periodontitis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Apical Periodontitis
- What is being tested?
- Calcipex II and Metapex
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePakistan
- Study dates
- 6 Apr 2020to 30 Apr 2021
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Single rooted human permanent teeth
- Single root canal clinically diagnosed with chronic apical periodontitis
- No history of antibiotics use in last 3 months.
Who cannot join
- Periodontally compromised teeth with Grade III mobility.
- Endodontically non-salvageable teeth.
- Immuno-compromised patients/systemic illness.
- Excessive root resorption.
- History of allergy to calcium hydroxide or iodoform.
- Endodontic retreatment cases.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Introduction:
Pulpal necrosis may lead to spread of the infection from the pulp to involve the apex of the tooth and surrounding bone which when asymptomatic with periapical radiolucency on radiograph, is called chronic apical periodontitis. In order to eliminate the virulent bacteria and to overcome the inflammation in the root apex, endodontic treatment is the treatment of choice. Bacteria usually survive in the complex anatomy of the root canal system. In order to eliminate the remaining bacteria, various intracanal medicaments have been used widely however, there is controversy over their use and efficacy. Calcium hydroxide (CH) is the most commonly used intracanal medicament between root canal treatment sessions and available in different combinations. Multiple studies have been conducted to evaluate the effect of various types of CH based medicaments but whether CH with iodoform is more effective than CH alone against endodontic pathogens is a matter of controversy. In order to evaluate the true reduction in microbial load from the infected canals, microbial culture is a predictable and convenient tool.
Read more
Thus, this study aims to evaluate the antimicrobial effectiveness of inter-appointment intracanal medicament with either CH alone (Calcipex) or CH with iodoform (Metapex) for the treatment of infected root canals of teeth diagnosed with chronic apical periodontitis using colony forming unit (CFU).
Objective: To compare the anti-microbial efficacy of calcipex and metapex in endodontic treatment of teeth diagnosed with chronic apical periodontitis and to compare two different methods for removal of oil based intracanal medicaments.
Method: Approval from ERC is obtained. The selected subjects will be divided in to two study groups using a computer generated randomization list i.e., Group A - Calcipex group (n = 30) and Group B - Metapex group (n = 30). Two samples will be collected from the root canals for evaluation of microbial load after chemomechanical preparation (S1) (before use of intracanal medicament) and after usage of intra canal medicament (S2)(after 7 days).
Two techniques will be used for removal of oil based medicaments. Two radiographs will be obtained for each technique, after oil based medicament placement and after medicament removal for evaluation.
Data Analysis: Mean and standard deviation of continuous variable will be computed. Frequency distribution and proportion of categorical variables will be determined. Paired t-test will be used to assess difference bet¬ween antimicrobial efficacies within groups of medicaments. Independent sample t-test will be used to assess antimicrobial efficacies between groups. Level of significance will be kept at 0.05.
Mann whitney U test will be used to evaluate medicament removal between 2 groups and at three canal levels; coronal, middle and apical.
Read the detailed description
This study aims to evaluate the antimicrobial effectiveness of inter-appointment intracanal medicament with either CH alone (Calcipex) or CH with iodoform (Metapex) for the treatment of infected root canals of teeth diagnosed with chronic apical periodontitis.
And, to compare the effectiveness of rotary master apical file with ultrasonic activation of endodontic file in the removal of oil based intracanal medicament from the canal.
Risk / Benefit Assessment At this point investigators are not anticipating any risk related to the trial intervention.
TRIAL DESIGN: Two-arm parallel design, Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Dental Clinics, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi
EXPECTED DURATION OF TRIAL:
Study Duration: Four months after registration By visit: 2 visits, with followup period of 7 days±3 after the first visit.
CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION Primary Efficacy Endpoint Reduction in microbial load (CFU/ml) at 7 days after use of intracanal medicament Safety Evaluations No Incidence of adverse events with any agent
Investigational product management: The investigator will purchase the drug locally and will label and store in safe and secure place. The product can be stored at room temperature i.e.1-30℃
Sampling technique: Non probability purposive sampling Sampling size: Sample size was calculated using WHO sample size calculator. Dutta et al.16 showed that the population mean and SD of teeth treated with calcium hydroxide based intracanal medicaments were 50.3±13 CFU/mL. Keeping the absolute precision at 0.05 and level of confidence at 95%, the required sample size turned out to be 26 teeth. The sample is inflated to 30. As tthere are two groups, therefore, a total of 60 teeth will be taken.
RANDOMIZATION, BLINDING AND TREATMENT ALLOCATION:
The selected subjects will be assigned to one of the two study groups only known to the researcher who is not involved in the outcome assessment using block randomization. This would be facilitated by CTU. The block size would be 6.
Group A (Control group) - Calcipex group (n = 30) Group B (Intervention group) - Metapex group (n = 30) The sample in eppendorff tubes will be sent in a zip lock bag to the microbiology laboratory labeled with either group A or B. Patient, analyzer and the statistician will be blinded about the intervention groups. The recruitment of patients, collection of samples and placement of intracanal medicament will be performed by a single investigator.
POSSIBLE RISKS OR BENEFITS:
There is no risk involved in this study as the study is based on routine procedure of endodontic treatment. It will be a benefit for future patients which will help us to decide which intracanal medicament is more effective to use in infected canals.
DATA COLLECTION INSTRUMENTS The data will be collected on case report form (CRF) on first and second visit. The CRF has been developed by investigator and reviewed by experts of the field. Data will be stored in a password protected database. To assure quality, data will be double checked to avoid discrepancies and errors.
PATIENT CONFIDENTIALITY, ACCESS AND STORAGE:
The information provided by the participant will remain confidential. Nobody except investigators will have access to it. Participants' name and identity will not be disclosed at any time. However, the data may be seen by ethical review committee, DSMB or any local regulatory body. As per GCP and other guidelines, data will be retained for 3 years.
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS:
The study will be started after obtaining approval from Institutional Ethics Review Committee(approved already). Patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria will receive detailed information regarding the study and only those participants will be recruited who will sign the written consent form. The study will be conducted according to the World Medical Association's Declaration of Helsinki and the principles of GCP (Good Clinical Practice). Any subsequent protocol amendments will be submitted to ERC and regulatory authorities for approval. The trial will be conducted in compliance with regulations, particularly specifying pharmaco-vigilance reporting and a copy of final study report will be submitted to ERC.
DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURE:
First visit: The tooth diagnosed with chronic apical periodontitis will be anesthetized using 2% lidocaine (with 1:100,000 epinephrine) and isolated with the rubber dam. Access opening will be performed using high and low speed round bur. Coronal and radicular necrotic pulp will be extirpated using barbed broaches. The root canal will be initially prepared by using hand K-files (Endoflex; K-File, Size 8-20, NiTi) with quarter turn and pull motion. A 23-gauge side vented needle will be used to deliver 1 mL of sodium hypochlorite for irrigation after each instrument size. The working length will be established with an apex locator and confirmed by the periapical radiographs. Chemo-mechanical preparation will be completed using Protaper Next (Dentsply; Sirona, USA) depending on both root anatomy and initial diameter of the root canal. The preparation will be completed in the same appointment in all cases. After completion of the preparation, the canals will be irrigated with saline and dried with paper points. A sterile paper point (size 20; EZ Endo, USA) will be inserted to the confirmed working length of the canal, and retained in position for 60 seconds for sampling (S1). Afterwards, the paperpoint will be gently removed and placed in an eppendorf tube (5 ml) containing Brain Heart Infusion Broth and sent directly to the microbiology laboratory for microbial cultivation.
In Group A, the canal will be medicated with Calcipex (Calcipex®II, Nishika, Yamaguchi, Japan) which will be placed by means of lentulo spiral fillers and packed with a cotton pellet at the level of canal entrance. Access cavity will be filled with a temporary filling, Cavit-G (3M-ESPE, USA). In Group B, the canal will be medicated with Metapex (Meta Biomed, Korea) using the same protocol as mentioned above.
Second visit: Patient will be followed up on seven +/- 3 days, the tooth will be isolated and the protocol will be followed the same way as described before. The temporary filling will be removed and the paste carried out of the canal by using sterile file and irrigated with normal saline to wash out the medicament. A post medication sample will be taken with the help of sterile paper point in both groups as described previously (S2). The canals will be then obturated with gutta-percha and calcium hydroxide sealer (Sealapex, Kerr Dental, USA) by lateral compaction technique. A definitive restoration will be placed subsequently.
Outcome assessment: It will be done in the microbiology laboratory on the basis of CFU/ml.
RIGHT OF REFUSAL TO PARTICIPATE AND WITHDRAWAL:
Participants will be given choice to either participate or refuse to participate in the study
INCENTIVE:
No incentive will be given to the patient.
- Conditions
- Chronic Apical Periodontitis
- Being tested
- Calcipex II, Metapex
- Keywords
- intracanal medicament, medicament removal, bacterial culture, efficacy, oil based medicament, colony forming unit
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Calcipex IIDrug
Water based intracanal medicament
MetapexDrug
Oil based intracanal medicament
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Calcipex II | Active comparator | Calcipex group Manufactures Nishika, Yamaguchi, Japan Color- White Formulation- Water based Duration- 7 days Form: Paste Frequency: Used once on 1st day only till canal fills. Composition- Water-based calcium hydroxide paste without radio contrast agent (Barium Sulfate) Packaging- (1 syringe of Calcipex Plain II (1.8g), 2 needles of Nishika Spin with 2 needle caps) Storage requirement- Room temperature (1-30℃). Receives: Drug: Calcipex II |
| Metapex | Active comparator | Metapex group Manufactures- Meta Biomed, Korea Color- Yellow Formulation- Oil based Duration- 7 days Form: Paste Frequency: Used once on 1st day only till canal fills. Composition- Premixed oil-based paste composed of Calcium Hydroxide with Iodoform and silicon oil Packaging-2.2g paste in 1 syringe. 20 disposable tips. 1 ring rotator for direction control of the tip Storage requirement- Room temperature (1-30℃). Receives: Drug: Metapex |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Antimicrobial efficacy
antimicrobial efficacy of intracanal medicament as measuring using Colony forming unit/ml via bacterial culture. The higher CFU/ml suggests more bacterial colonies. We expect the counts to reduce after using the intracanal medicament
Measured: 7 days
Secondary outcomes (1)
Efficacy of intracanal medicament removal
Efficacy of intracanal medicament removal using four grade scoring system given by Khademi et al to evaluate amount of medicament remnant in the canal as seen and evaluated using periapical radiographs.
GRADING:
Removal efficacy 0 = the surface was not covered with calcium hydroxide
- = 1/3 of the surface was covered with calcium hydroxide
- = 2/3 of the surface was covered with calcium hydroxide
- = the surface was covered with calcium hydroxide completely Grade 0 and 1 will be taken as effective cleaning Grade 2 and 3 will be taken as non-effective cleaning
Measured: 7 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Apr 2020
- Study start6 Apr 2020
- Primary completion30 Apr 2021
- Study completion30 Apr 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chronic Apical PeriodontitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- First visit: After chemomechanical preparation, irrigation and drying, a sterile paper point (size 20; EZ Endo, USA) will be inserted to the confirmed working length of the canal, and retained in position for 60 seconds for sampling (S1). Afterwards, the paperpoint will be gently removed and placed in an eppendorf tube (5 ml) containing Brain Heart Infusion Broth and sent directly to the microbiology laboratory for microbial cultivation. Respective intracanal medicament will be placed by means of lentulo spiral fillers and packed with a cotton pellet at the level of canal entrance. Access cavity will be filled with a temporary filling, Cavit-G. Second visit after 7 day, medicament will be removed. In case of Metapex (oil based medicament) either Protaper rotary or ultrasonic activation of file will be used for removal and radiograph obtained to ensure removal and sample will be obtained(S2). The canals will be then obturated. A definitive restoration will be placed subsequently.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Aga Khan University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Momina Anis Motiwala, Aga Khan University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04336709
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2019-0304-3229
- Status last verified
- Jul 2021
- First submitted
- 31 Mar 2020
- Last updated
- 29 Jul 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Everything will be managed and reported and collected and available for sharing to remove bias and ensure accurate conductance of study according to given protocols.
Publications
Mozayeni MA, Haeri A, Dianat O, Jafari AR. Antimicrobial effects of four intracanal medicaments on enterococcus faecalis: an in vitro study. Iran Endod J. 2014 Summer;9(3):195-8. Epub 2014 Jul 5.
PubMed 25031593Martinho FC, Gomes BP. Quantification of endotoxins and cultivable bacteria in root canal infection before and after chemomechanical preparation with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite. J Endod. 2008 Mar;34(3):268-72. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.11.015. Epub 2008 Jan 31.
PubMed 18291273Manzur A, Gonzalez AM, Pozos A, Silva-Herzog D, Friedman S. Bacterial quantification in teeth with apical periodontitis related to instrumentation and different intracanal medications: a randomized clinical trial. J Endod. 2007 Feb;33(2):114-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.11.003.
PubMed 17258626Gautam S, Rajkumar B, Landge SP, Dubey S, Nehete P, Boruah LC. Antimicrobial efficacy of metapex (calcium hydroxide with iodoform formulation) at different concentrations against selected microorganisms--an in vitro study. Nepal Med Coll J. 2011 Dec;13(4):297-300.
PubMed 23016485Motiwala MA, Habib S, Ghafoor R, Irfan S. Comparison of antimicrobial efficacy of Calcipex and Metapex in endodontic treatment of chronic apical periodontitis: a randomised controlled trial study protocol. BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 21;11(7):e048947. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048947.
PubMed 34290069
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Jul 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Anti-microbial Efficacy of Calcipex and Metapex in Endodontic Treatment of Chronic Apical Periodontitis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04336709
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2019-0304-3229
- Conditions
- Chronic Apical Periodontitis
- Keywords
- intracanal medicament, medicament removal, bacterial culture, efficacy, oil based medicament, colony forming unit
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Aga Khan UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 6 Apr 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Apr 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Apr 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Apr 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Introduction:
Pulpal necrosis may lead to spread of the infection from the pulp to involve the apex of the tooth and surrounding bone which when asymptomatic with periapical radiolucency on radiograph, is called chronic apical periodontitis. In order to eliminate the virulent bacteria and to overcome the inflammation in the root apex, endodontic treatment is the treatment of choice. Bacteria usually survive in the complex anatomy of the root canal system. In order to eliminate the remaining bacteria, various intracanal medicaments have been used widely however, there is controversy over their use and efficacy. Calcium hydroxide (CH) is the most commonly used intracanal medicament between root canal treatment sessions and available in different combinations. Multiple studies have been conducted to evaluate the effect of various types of CH based medicaments but whether CH with iodoform is more effective than CH alone against endodontic pathogens is a matter of controversy. In order to evaluate the true reduction in microbial load from the infected canals, microbial culture is a predictable and convenient tool.
Thus, this study aims to evaluate the antimicrobial effectiveness of inter-appointment intracanal medicament with either CH alone (Calcipex) or CH with iodoform (Metapex) for the treatment of infected root canals of teeth diagnosed with chronic apical periodontitis using colony forming unit (CFU).
Objective: To compare the anti-microbial efficacy of calcipex and metapex in endodontic treatment of teeth diagnosed with chronic apical periodontitis and to compare two different methods for removal of oil based intracanal medicaments.
Method: Approval from ERC is obtained. The selected subjects will be divided in to two study groups using a computer generated randomization list i.e., Group A - Calcipex group (n = 30) and Group B - Metapex group (n = 30). Two samples will be collected from the root canals for evaluation of microbial load after chemomechanical preparation (S1) (before use of intracanal medicament) and after usage of intra canal medicament (S2)(after 7 days).
Two techniques will be used for removal of oil based medicaments. Two radiographs will be obtained for each technique, after oil based medicament placement and after medicament removal for evaluation.
Data Analysis: Mean and standard deviation of continuous variable will be computed. Frequency distribution and proportion of categorical variables will be determined. Paired t-test will be used to assess difference bet¬ween antimicrobial efficacies within groups of medicaments. Independent sample t-test will be used to assess antimicrobial efficacies between groups. Level of significance will be kept at 0.05.
Mann whitney U test will be used to evaluate medicament removal between 2 groups and at three canal levels; coronal, middle and apical.
Detailed description
This study aims to evaluate the antimicrobial effectiveness of inter-appointment intracanal medicament with either CH alone (Calcipex) or CH with iodoform (Metapex) for the treatment of infected root canals of teeth diagnosed with chronic apical periodontitis.
And, to compare the effectiveness of rotary master apical file with ultrasonic activation of endodontic file in the removal of oil based intracanal medicament from the canal.
Risk / Benefit Assessment At this point investigators are not anticipating any risk related to the trial intervention.
TRIAL DESIGN: Two-arm parallel design, Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Dental Clinics, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi
EXPECTED DURATION OF TRIAL:
Study Duration: Four months after registration By visit: 2 visits, with followup period of 7 days±3 after the first visit.
CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION Primary Efficacy Endpoint Reduction in microbial load (CFU/ml) at 7 days after use of intracanal medicament Safety Evaluations No Incidence of adverse events with any agent
Investigational product management: The investigator will purchase the drug locally and will label and store in safe and secure place. The product can be stored at room temperature i.e.1-30℃
Sampling technique: Non probability purposive sampling Sampling size: Sample size was calculated using WHO sample size calculator. Dutta et al.16 showed that the population mean and SD of teeth treated with calcium hydroxide based intracanal medicaments were 50.3±13 CFU/mL. Keeping the absolute precision at 0.05 and level of confidence at 95%, the required sample size turned out to be 26 teeth. The sample is inflated to 30. As tthere are two groups, therefore, a total of 60 teeth will be taken.
RANDOMIZATION, BLINDING AND TREATMENT ALLOCATION:
The selected subjects will be assigned to one of the two study groups only known to the researcher who is not involved in the outcome assessment using block randomization. This would be facilitated by CTU. The block size would be 6.
Group A (Control group) - Calcipex group (n = 30) Group B (Intervention group) - Metapex group (n = 30) The sample in eppendorff tubes will be sent in a zip lock bag to the microbiology laboratory labeled with either group A or B. Patient, analyzer and the statistician will be blinded about the intervention groups. The recruitment of patients, collection of samples and placement of intracanal medicament will be performed by a single investigator.
POSSIBLE RISKS OR BENEFITS:
There is no risk involved in this study as the study is based on routine procedure of endodontic treatment. It will be a benefit for future patients which will help us to decide which intracanal medicament is more effective to use in infected canals.
DATA COLLECTION INSTRUMENTS The data will be collected on case report form (CRF) on first and second visit. The CRF has been developed by investigator and reviewed by experts of the field. Data will be stored in a password protected database. To assure quality, data will be double checked to avoid discrepancies and errors.
PATIENT CONFIDENTIALITY, ACCESS AND STORAGE:
The information provided by the participant will remain confidential. Nobody except investigators will have access to it. Participants' name and identity will not be disclosed at any time. However, the data may be seen by ethical review committee, DSMB or any local regulatory body. As per GCP and other guidelines, data will be retained for 3 years.
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS:
The study will be started after obtaining approval from Institutional Ethics Review Committee(approved already). Patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria will receive detailed information regarding the study and only those participants will be recruited who will sign the written consent form. The study will be conducted according to the World Medical Association's Declaration of Helsinki and the principles of GCP (Good Clinical Practice). Any subsequent protocol amendments will be submitted to ERC and regulatory authorities for approval. The trial will be conducted in compliance with regulations, particularly specifying pharmaco-vigilance reporting and a copy of final study report will be submitted to ERC.
DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURE:
First visit: The tooth diagnosed with chronic apical periodontitis will be anesthetized using 2% lidocaine (with 1:100,000 epinephrine) and isolated with the rubber dam. Access opening will be performed using high and low speed round bur. Coronal and radicular necrotic pulp will be extirpated using barbed broaches. The root canal will be initially prepared by using hand K-files (Endoflex; K-File, Size 8-20, NiTi) with quarter turn and pull motion. A 23-gauge side vented needle will be used to deliver 1 mL of sodium hypochlorite for irrigation after each instrument size. The working length will be established with an apex locator and confirmed by the periapical radiographs. Chemo-mechanical preparation will be completed using Protaper Next (Dentsply; Sirona, USA) depending on both root anatomy and initial diameter of the root canal. The preparation will be completed in the same appointment in all cases. After completion of the preparation, the canals will be irrigated with saline and dried with paper points. A sterile paper point (size 20; EZ Endo, USA) will be inserted to the confirmed working length of the canal, and retained in position for 60 seconds for sampling (S1). Afterwards, the paperpoint will be gently removed and placed in an eppendorf tube (5 ml) containing Brain Heart Infusion Broth and sent directly to the microbiology laboratory for microbial cultivation.
In Group A, the canal will be medicated with Calcipex (Calcipex®II, Nishika, Yamaguchi, Japan) which will be placed by means of lentulo spiral fillers and packed with a cotton pellet at the level of canal entrance. Access cavity will be filled with a temporary filling, Cavit-G (3M-ESPE, USA). In Group B, the canal will be medicated with Metapex (Meta Biomed, Korea) using the same protocol as mentioned above.
Second visit: Patient will be followed up on seven +/- 3 days, the tooth will be isolated and the protocol will be followed the same way as described before. The temporary filling will be removed and the paste carried out of the canal by using sterile file and irrigated with normal saline to wash out the medicament. A post medication sample will be taken with the help of sterile paper point in both groups as described previously (S2). The canals will be then obturated with gutta-percha and calcium hydroxide sealer (Sealapex, Kerr Dental, USA) by lateral compaction technique. A definitive restoration will be placed subsequently.
Outcome assessment: It will be done in the microbiology laboratory on the basis of CFU/ml.
RIGHT OF REFUSAL TO PARTICIPATE AND WITHDRAWAL:
Participants will be given choice to either participate or refuse to participate in the study
INCENTIVE:
No incentive will be given to the patient.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- First visit: After chemomechanical preparation, irrigation and drying, a sterile paper point (size 20; EZ Endo, USA) will be inserted to the confirmed working length of the canal, and retained in position for 60 seconds for sampling (S1). Afterwards, the paperpoint will be gently removed and placed in an eppendorf tube (5 ml) containing Brain Heart Infusion Broth and sent directly to the microbiology laboratory for microbial cultivation. Respective intracanal medicament will be placed by means of lentulo spiral fillers and packed with a cotton pellet at the level of canal entrance. Access cavity will be filled with a temporary filling, Cavit-G. Second visit after 7 day, medicament will be removed. In case of Metapex (oil based medicament) either Protaper rotary or ultrasonic activation of file will be used for removal and radiograph obtained to ensure removal and sample will be obtained(S2). The canals will be then obturated. A definitive restoration will be placed subsequently.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Calcipex II | Active comparator | Drug: Calcipex IICalcipex group Manufactures Nishika, Yamaguchi, Japan Color- White Formulation- Water based Duration- 7 days Form: Paste Frequency: Used once on 1st day only till canal fills. Composition- Water-based calcium hydroxide paste without radio contrast agent (Barium Sulfate) Packaging- (1 syringe of Calcipex Plain II (1.8g), 2 needles of Nishika Spin with 2 needle caps) Storage requirement- Room temperature (1-30℃). |
| Metapex | Active comparator | Drug: MetapexMetapex group Manufactures- Meta Biomed, Korea Color- Yellow Formulation- Oil based Duration- 7 days Form: Paste Frequency: Used once on 1st day only till canal fills. Composition- Premixed oil-based paste composed of Calcium Hydroxide with Iodoform and silicon oil Packaging-2.2g paste in 1 syringe. 20 disposable tips. 1 ring rotator for direction control of the tip Storage requirement- Room temperature (1-30℃). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Single rooted human permanent teeth
- Single root canal clinically diagnosed with chronic apical periodontitis
- No history of antibiotics use in last 3 months.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Periodontally compromised teeth with Grade III mobility.
- Endodontically non-salvageable teeth.
- Immuno-compromised patients/systemic illness.
- Excessive root resorption.
- History of allergy to calcium hydroxide or iodoform.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Calcipex IIWater based intracanal medicament | Drug | Calcipex II |
| MetapexOil based intracanal medicament | Drug | Metapex |
Primary outcome
Antimicrobial efficacy
Time frame: 7 days
antimicrobial efficacy of intracanal medicament as measuring using Colony forming unit/ml via bacterial culture. The higher CFU/ml suggests more bacterial colonies. We expect the counts to reduce after using the intracanal medicament
1 secondary outcome
Efficacy of intracanal medicament removal
Time frame: 7 days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Jul 2021.
- Background: PubMed 25031593Mozayeni MA, Haeri A, Dianat O, Jafari AR. Antimicrobial effects of four intracanal medicaments on enterococcus faecalis: an in vitro study. Iran Endod J. 2014 Summer;9(3):195-8. Epub 2014 Jul 5.
- Background: PubMed 18291273Martinho FC, Gomes BP. Quantification of endotoxins and cultivable bacteria in root canal infection before and after chemomechanical preparation with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite. J Endod. 2008 Mar;34(3):268-72. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.11.015. Epub 2008 Jan 31.
- Background: PubMed 17258626Manzur A, Gonzalez AM, Pozos A, Silva-Herzog D, Friedman S. Bacterial quantification in teeth with apical periodontitis related to instrumentation and different intracanal medications: a randomized clinical trial. J Endod. 2007 Feb;33(2):114-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.11.003.
- Background: PubMed 23016485Gautam S, Rajkumar B, Landge SP, Dubey S, Nehete P, Boruah LC. Antimicrobial efficacy of metapex (calcium hydroxide with iodoform formulation) at different concentrations against selected microorganisms--an in vitro study. Nepal Med Coll J. 2011 Dec;13(4):297-300.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34290069Motiwala MA, Habib S, Ghafoor R, Irfan S. Comparison of antimicrobial efficacy of Calcipex and Metapex in endodontic treatment of chronic apical periodontitis: a randomised controlled trial study protocol. BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 21;11(7):e048947. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048947.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Everything will be managed and reported and collected and available for sharing to remove bias and ensure accurate conductance of study according to given protocols.
Related trials for Chronic Apical Periodontitis
Not yet recruiting
Clinical and Inflammatory Outcomes of Regenerative Endodontic Treatment Using Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Mature Necrotic Teeth With Chronic Apical Periodontitis.
Chronic Apical Periodontitis, Pulp Necrosis
Recruiting
Effect of Cyperus Articulatus on Bacterial Reduction and Postoperative Pain
Chronic Apical Periodontitis
Recruiting
Postoperative Pain and Success of Single-Visit Root Canal Treatment Using Different Root Canal Sealers in Asymptomatic Teeth
Single-visit, Periapical Periodontitis
Active, not recruiting
Effects of Irrigation Activation Methods on Periapical Healing in Chronic Apical Periodontitis
Chronic Apical Periodontitis
Active, not recruiting
Rotary Versus Manual Degranulation in Alveolar Ridge Preservation
Chronic Periapical Periodontitis, Alveolar Ridge Preservation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing Calcipex II and Metapex in people with Chronic Apical Periodontitis, run by Aga Khan University at 1 site in Pakistan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jul 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Antimicrobial efficacy (time frame: 7 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04336709, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jul 2021.