Evaluation of Optimal Operating Table Height for Successful Placement of Proseal Laryngeal Mask AirwayNCT04338412
Evaluating Optimal Operating Table Height for ProSeal-LMA™ Insertion
A study testing ProSeal-LMA™ in people with Evaluation of Optimal Operating Table Height for Successful Placement of Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway, run by National University of Malaysia at 1 site in Malaysia.
Trial summary
Usage of LMA has gained much importance especially as a rescue device for failed intubation. We hypothesised optimal operating table height could improve successful attempt of ProSeal-LMA™ (P-LMA™) insertion. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Evaluation of Optimal Operating Table Height for Successful Placement of Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway
- What is being tested?
- ProSeal-LMA™
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 150 participants
- Where
- 1 siteMalaysia
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2019to 31 May 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age between 18 to 65 years old
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-II patients
- Elective and emergency surgeries requiring general anaesthesia where use of P-LMA™ is not contraindicated
Who cannot join
- Congenital or acquired airway abnormality
- Cervical spine pathology
- Edentulous or loose tooth
- BMI ≥35 kg/m2
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Malaysia1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre
Kuala Lumpur, 56000
AZLINA MASDAR, MD UKM, +060391455555 ext. 5773, azlinamasdar@yahoo.com
SONG LIN LOW, MBBS, +060391455555 ext. 5773, songlin_87@hotmail.com
About this study
Usage of LMA has gained much importance especially as a rescue device for failed intubation. We hypothesised optimal operating table height could improve successful attempt of ProSeal-LMA™ (P-LMA™) insertion.
The main objective of this study is to evaluate the optimal operating table height for successful placement of P-LMA™ by comparing operating table height to operators' body landmark.
The secondary objectives of this study are to evaluate duration required for a successful P-LMA™ insertion and its associated complications during the attempt.
Read the detailed description
Written informed consent will be obtained by primary investigator from patients recruited into this study. The study will be conducted by anesthesiology medical officers with more than 3 years of anesthetic experience.
All recruited patients will be reviewed by the primary investigator prior to their operation. Patients' demographic characteristics and airway assessment will be recorded preoperatively. Airway assessment consists of Mallampati score, mouth opening and thyromental distance (TMD). Mallampati score is assessed based on modified Samsoon and Young test. Mouth opening is taken as distance between upper and lower incisor teeth when mouth is maximally opened. TMD is measured as distance between symphysis menti and thyroid notch with the head in full extension. Patients are required to be fasted for at least 6 hours before the scheduled operation. They will then be randomly allocated by computer generated randomisation into one of three groups based on height of operating table with reference to the performers' anatomical landmark. The height of the operating table will be adjusted at levels corresponding to the performers' umbilicus (Group U), lowest rib margin (Group R) or xiphoid process (Group X).
In the operation theatre, standard monitoring will be applied. Operating table will be adjusted according to the respective group randomization. Patient will be preoxygenated with 100% oxygen until end-tidal oxygen (etO2) of 85% is achieved. Following which, intravenous (IV) anesthetic induction drugs will be given: fentanyl 1.5 mcg/kg, propofol 2.0 mg/kg. After loss of consciousness, the attending anesthesiology medical officer will proceed with mask ventilation with a mixture of oxygen and sevoflurane to achieve Minimum Alveolar Concentration (MAC) of 1.0 to 1.2. If there is no difficult ventilation, IV rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg will be given and the patient will be subsequently ventilated for 3 minutes. If unexpected difficult ventilation occurs, patient will be drop out from this study and management of the patient will be at the discretion of attending anesthesiologist.
P-LAM™ will then be inserted by the attending anesthesiology medical officer. The size of P-LMA™ used will be according to the manufacturer's recommendation. The P-LMA™ will be thoroughly checked and tested as per manufacturer recommendations i.e.: visual inspection and; inflation and deflation test. All P-LMA™ are reuse within the manufacturers' recommendation, i.e. ≤40 usages and manufactured by The Laryngeal Mask Airway Co Ltd, Mahe, Seychelles.
The P-LMA™ will be inserted with cuff fully deflated using introducer technique on all attempts. Patient's head will be positioned with flexion of the neck and extension of the head using operator's non-dominant hand. The P-LMA™ is held and inserted while pressing up against palate and posterior pharyngeal wall until resistance is felt. P-LMA™ cuff is inflated with a volume of air recommended by the manufacturer. The P-LMA™ cuff pressure is then measured by a cuff pressure manometer to ensure cuff pressure achieves 60 cmH2O.
A successful insertion is determined when it fulfills both positional and performance tests. Positional tests includes gastric tube 'bubble' test, suprasternal notch tap test and insertion of gastric tube through its drain tube which verifies the ideal position of P-LMA™ placement. Another set of test known as performance test consists of oropharyngeal leak pressure test and it determines how well P-LMA™ is able to perform once it is inserted. All these tests will be done after insertion and are recorded by a second anesthesiology medical officer who was not involved in the insertion process. General anesthesia is maintained with a mixture of oxygen/air (50%/50%) and sevoflurane to achieve Minimum Alveolar Concentration (MAC) of 1.0 to 1.2 intraoperatively.
Gastric tube 'bubble' test is done by sealing the drainage tube of P-LMA™ with a drop of gel 2-3 mm height followed by Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation (IPPV) with a tidal volume of 8 ml/kg. If no air leak out and gel remains in the drainage tube, it suggests good P-LMA™ placement. Suprasternal notch test is done by placing a drop of gel 2-3 mm height and a firm pressure is applied to suprasternal notch with a finger. P-LMA™ placement is considered good if gel column moves synchronously with the applied pressure. Successful insertion of a 14 Fr or 16 Fr orogastric tube via drainage tube without encountering any resistance and confirmation of its position in gastric suggests a good P-LMA™ placement. Position of orogastric tube is verified by presence of gastric fluid aspiration and audible gastric insufflation at the epigastrium during auscultation via stethoscope after 20 ml injection of air.
Subsequently, to test for oropharyngeal leak pressure test, airway seal pressure is determined by setting Adjustable Pressure Limiting (APL) valve to 30 cmH2O and fresh gas flow at ≥3 L/min. A good oropharyngeal leak pressure is determined by its capability to record a stable airway pressure of ≥25 cmH2O in supine position and such recording suggests a good P-LMA™placement.
The same assistant who records the data will also record duration taken for P-LMA™ insertion by using a standard stopwatch and it starts from the time when operator places the P-LMA™ at the aperture of oral orifice till appearance of first end-tidal CO2 (etCO2) waveform on capnography. Time measurement is only done during the first P-LMA™insertion.
If there is a failure of insertion or failure of placement of P-LMA™ during the first attempt, defines as any failure of individual positional and performance tests, the patient will be considered as failed P-LMA™ attempt and subsequently airway management will be up to the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist. Ease of placement of P-LMA™ is evaluated by the operator via subjective ease of insertion whereby score 1=very easy, 2=easy, 3=difficult, 4=very difficult. Presence of airway morbidity during the first attempt of P-LMA™ insertion will be recorded. Examples of complications monitored includes oxygen desaturation of <90%, airway obstruction, laryngospasm, bronchospasm and oropharyngeal trauma (defined as presence of blood upon removal of P-LMA™). After the procedure is done, operating table height will be adjusted according to surgical operation requirements.
- Being tested
- ProSeal-LMA™
- Keywords
- Proseal LMA, Table height, LMA placement, Body landmark
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ProSeal-LMA™Device
It is a second generation LMA that is commonly used among all other LMAs
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group U | Active comparator | Performers' umbilicus Receives: Device: ProSeal-LMA™ |
| Group R | Active comparator | Performers' lowest rib margin Receives: Device: ProSeal-LMA™ |
| Group X | Active comparator | Performers' xiphoid process Receives: Device: ProSeal-LMA™ |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Optimal operating table height for successful placement of P-LMA™
To evaluate optimal operating table height for successful placement of P-LMA™ by comparing operating table height to operators' body landmark
Measured: 2 years
Secondary outcomes (2)
Evaluation of time required for a successful P-LMA™ insertion
To evaluate duration of time required for a successful P-LMA™ insertion and its associated complications during the attempt
Measured: 2 years
Evaluation of associated complications during P-LMA™ insertion
To evaluate associated complications during P-LMA™ insertion
Measured: 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Apr 2020
- Study start1 Jun 2019
- Primary completion31 Jan 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion31 May 2021 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Evaluation of Optimal Operating Table Height for Successful Placement of Proseal Laryngeal Mask AirwayStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National University of Malaysia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Azlina Masdar, National University of Malaysia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04338412
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AzlinaM
- Status last verified
- Apr 2020
- First submitted
- 6 Apr 2020
- Last updated
- 8 Apr 2020
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Apr 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluating Optimal Operating Table Height for ProSeal-LMA™ Insertion
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04338412
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AzlinaM
- Keywords
- Proseal LMA, Table height, LMA placement, Body landmark
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- National University of MalaysiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jan 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 May 2021 (estimated)
- First posted
- 8 Apr 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Usage of LMA has gained much importance especially as a rescue device for failed intubation. We hypothesised optimal operating table height could improve successful attempt of ProSeal-LMA™ (P-LMA™) insertion.
The main objective of this study is to evaluate the optimal operating table height for successful placement of P-LMA™ by comparing operating table height to operators' body landmark.
The secondary objectives of this study are to evaluate duration required for a successful P-LMA™ insertion and its associated complications during the attempt.
Detailed description
Written informed consent will be obtained by primary investigator from patients recruited into this study. The study will be conducted by anesthesiology medical officers with more than 3 years of anesthetic experience.
All recruited patients will be reviewed by the primary investigator prior to their operation. Patients' demographic characteristics and airway assessment will be recorded preoperatively. Airway assessment consists of Mallampati score, mouth opening and thyromental distance (TMD). Mallampati score is assessed based on modified Samsoon and Young test. Mouth opening is taken as distance between upper and lower incisor teeth when mouth is maximally opened. TMD is measured as distance between symphysis menti and thyroid notch with the head in full extension. Patients are required to be fasted for at least 6 hours before the scheduled operation. They will then be randomly allocated by computer generated randomisation into one of three groups based on height of operating table with reference to the performers' anatomical landmark. The height of the operating table will be adjusted at levels corresponding to the performers' umbilicus (Group U), lowest rib margin (Group R) or xiphoid process (Group X).
In the operation theatre, standard monitoring will be applied. Operating table will be adjusted according to the respective group randomization. Patient will be preoxygenated with 100% oxygen until end-tidal oxygen (etO2) of 85% is achieved. Following which, intravenous (IV) anesthetic induction drugs will be given: fentanyl 1.5 mcg/kg, propofol 2.0 mg/kg. After loss of consciousness, the attending anesthesiology medical officer will proceed with mask ventilation with a mixture of oxygen and sevoflurane to achieve Minimum Alveolar Concentration (MAC) of 1.0 to 1.2. If there is no difficult ventilation, IV rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg will be given and the patient will be subsequently ventilated for 3 minutes. If unexpected difficult ventilation occurs, patient will be drop out from this study and management of the patient will be at the discretion of attending anesthesiologist.
P-LAM™ will then be inserted by the attending anesthesiology medical officer. The size of P-LMA™ used will be according to the manufacturer's recommendation. The P-LMA™ will be thoroughly checked and tested as per manufacturer recommendations i.e.: visual inspection and; inflation and deflation test. All P-LMA™ are reuse within the manufacturers' recommendation, i.e. ≤40 usages and manufactured by The Laryngeal Mask Airway Co Ltd, Mahe, Seychelles.
The P-LMA™ will be inserted with cuff fully deflated using introducer technique on all attempts. Patient's head will be positioned with flexion of the neck and extension of the head using operator's non-dominant hand. The P-LMA™ is held and inserted while pressing up against palate and posterior pharyngeal wall until resistance is felt. P-LMA™ cuff is inflated with a volume of air recommended by the manufacturer. The P-LMA™ cuff pressure is then measured by a cuff pressure manometer to ensure cuff pressure achieves 60 cmH2O.
A successful insertion is determined when it fulfills both positional and performance tests. Positional tests includes gastric tube 'bubble' test, suprasternal notch tap test and insertion of gastric tube through its drain tube which verifies the ideal position of P-LMA™ placement. Another set of test known as performance test consists of oropharyngeal leak pressure test and it determines how well P-LMA™ is able to perform once it is inserted. All these tests will be done after insertion and are recorded by a second anesthesiology medical officer who was not involved in the insertion process. General anesthesia is maintained with a mixture of oxygen/air (50%/50%) and sevoflurane to achieve Minimum Alveolar Concentration (MAC) of 1.0 to 1.2 intraoperatively.
Gastric tube 'bubble' test is done by sealing the drainage tube of P-LMA™ with a drop of gel 2-3 mm height followed by Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation (IPPV) with a tidal volume of 8 ml/kg. If no air leak out and gel remains in the drainage tube, it suggests good P-LMA™ placement. Suprasternal notch test is done by placing a drop of gel 2-3 mm height and a firm pressure is applied to suprasternal notch with a finger. P-LMA™ placement is considered good if gel column moves synchronously with the applied pressure. Successful insertion of a 14 Fr or 16 Fr orogastric tube via drainage tube without encountering any resistance and confirmation of its position in gastric suggests a good P-LMA™ placement. Position of orogastric tube is verified by presence of gastric fluid aspiration and audible gastric insufflation at the epigastrium during auscultation via stethoscope after 20 ml injection of air.
Subsequently, to test for oropharyngeal leak pressure test, airway seal pressure is determined by setting Adjustable Pressure Limiting (APL) valve to 30 cmH2O and fresh gas flow at ≥3 L/min. A good oropharyngeal leak pressure is determined by its capability to record a stable airway pressure of ≥25 cmH2O in supine position and such recording suggests a good P-LMA™placement.
The same assistant who records the data will also record duration taken for P-LMA™ insertion by using a standard stopwatch and it starts from the time when operator places the P-LMA™ at the aperture of oral orifice till appearance of first end-tidal CO2 (etCO2) waveform on capnography. Time measurement is only done during the first P-LMA™insertion.
If there is a failure of insertion or failure of placement of P-LMA™ during the first attempt, defines as any failure of individual positional and performance tests, the patient will be considered as failed P-LMA™ attempt and subsequently airway management will be up to the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist. Ease of placement of P-LMA™ is evaluated by the operator via subjective ease of insertion whereby score 1=very easy, 2=easy, 3=difficult, 4=very difficult. Presence of airway morbidity during the first attempt of P-LMA™ insertion will be recorded. Examples of complications monitored includes oxygen desaturation of <90%, airway obstruction, laryngospasm, bronchospasm and oropharyngeal trauma (defined as presence of blood upon removal of P-LMA™). After the procedure is done, operating table height will be adjusted according to surgical operation requirements.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group U | Active comparator | Device: ProSeal-LMA™Performers' umbilicus |
| Group R | Active comparator | Device: ProSeal-LMA™Performers' lowest rib margin |
| Group X | Active comparator | Device: ProSeal-LMA™Performers' xiphoid process |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age between 18 to 65 years old
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-II patients
- Elective and emergency surgeries requiring general anaesthesia where use of P-LMA™ is not contraindicated
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Congenital or acquired airway abnormality
- Cervical spine pathology
- Edentulous or loose tooth
- BMI ≥35 kg/m2
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ProSeal-LMA™It is a second generation LMA that is commonly used among all other LMAs | Device | Group R, Group U, Group X |
Primary outcome
Optimal operating table height for successful placement of P-LMA™
Time frame: 2 years
To evaluate optimal operating table height for successful placement of P-LMA™ by comparing operating table height to operators' body landmark
2 secondary outcomes
Evaluation of time required for a successful P-LMA™ insertion
Time frame: 2 years
Evaluation of associated complications during P-LMA™ insertion
Time frame: 2 years
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Apr 2020.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing ProSeal-LMA™ in people with Evaluation of Optimal Operating Table Height for Successful Placement of Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway, run by National University of Malaysia at 1 site in Malaysia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Apr 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Malaysia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact AZLINA MASDAR, MD UKM (+60391455555 ext. 5773, azlinamasdar@yahoo.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Optimal operating table height for successful placement of P-LMA™ (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Apr 2020; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 3 Nov 2026.