Treatment of Post-Operative Pain Following Orthopedic Surgery With SPRINT® Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System

All participants were asked to complete daily diaries to record their average knee pain intensity during the past 24 hours on each day of a 7-day period using an 11-point numerical rating scale where 0 represents "No Pain" and 10 represents "Pain as bad as you can imagine." The average pain score was calculated across the 7-day diary(s) at baseline and across weeks 1 to 4 post-start of treatment. Percent reduction was then calculated for each participant. To be considered a success, participants must have experienced ≥ 50% reduction in average knee pain. The number of successes is presented.

All participants were asked to complete daily diaries to record their average knee pain intensity during the past 24 hours on each day of a 7-day period using an 11-point numerical rating scale where 0 represents "No Pain" and 10 represents "Pain as bad as you can imagine." The average pain score was calculated across the 7-day diary for each participant at baseline and at 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-months post-start of treatment. Percent reduction was then calculated for each participant. To be considered a success, participants must have experienced ≥ 50% reduction in average knee pain. The number of successes is presented.

All participants were asked to complete daily diaries to record their average knee pain intensity during the past 24 hours on each day of a 7-day period using an 11-point numerical rating scale where 0 represents "No Pain" and 10 represents "Pain as bad as you can imagine." The mean pain score was calculated across the 7-day diary(s) for each participant at baseline, 1-4 weeks post-start of treatment (SOT), 5-8 weeks post-SOT, and at 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-months post-SOT. The mean pain score is presented.

Participants recorded the amount/type of analgesics used in daily diaries. A blinded, third-party medication committee reviewed participants' diary medications for each time period to determine if each participant's analgesic usage changed. The committee determined whether there was No change (no change in dosage or change is not clinically meaningful to impact pain outcomes), an Increase (clinically meaningful increase in medication that would impact pain outcomes), or a Decrease (clinically meaningful decrease in medication that would impact pain outcomes) for each time period compared to baseline. The number of participants with a Decrease in analgesic medication usage for pain are reported. Participants that did not report any pain medications during the study were excluded from the analysis.

The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) questionnaire has 13 questions that assess rumination, magnification, and helplessness. Participants are asked to think back on painful experiences in the past and reflect on how often they had specific thoughts or feelings. Each of the 13 questions is scored on a 5-point scale where 0 represents "not at all," and 4 represents "all the time." The scores from each question were summed for each participant to provide a total PCS score, with a possible range from 0 to 52 with higher scores indicating a greater tendency to catastrophize pain (i.e. a higher score indicates a worse outcome). The mean score for each time point is presented.

The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Survey asks participants to rate their improvement with treatment on a 7-point scale ranging from -3 to 0 to +3, where -3 represents "very much worse," 0 is "no change," and +3 represents "very much improved" as compared to before stimulation treatment. The participants combine all the components of their experience into one overall score. The mean score of each group was calculated for each time frame.

Question 9 of the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-9) is a 7-part question that assesses the level of interference that participants experience in their daily lives due to pain. The 7 categories are general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life. Participants were asked to rate how much their post-surgical knee pain interferes with each aspect on an 11-point numerical scale where 0 represents "Does Not Interfere" and 10 represents "Completely Interferes." The average of these 7 scores was calculated for each participant at each time point. Percent reduction was then calculated for each participant. To be considered a success, participants must have experienced ≥ 50% reduction in pain interference. The number of successes is presented.

The Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) questionnaire consists of 24 items that evaluate pain, stiffness, and physical functional disability. Each item is scored on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate greater pain, stiffness, and disability. For each participant, the scores from each of the 24 items were averaged to calculate the participant's total score, with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 10. The mean total score was then calculated across participants and percent reduction was calculated for each time point. To be considered a success, participants must have experienced ≥ 33% reduction in their score. The number of successes is presented.

The total distance that a participant could walk in 6 minutes was recorded, and participants unable to walk at all were given a score of 0 meters. The mean distance was then determined across participants. The baseline score was compared to the score at the specified intervals after start of therapy.