COVID-19Phase 2/3ConCoVid-19NCT04342182
Convalescent Plasma as Therapy for Covid-19 Severe SARS-CoV-2 Disease (CONCOVID Study)
A Phase 2/3 study testing Convalescent plasma in people with COVID-19, run by Erasmus Medical Center at 18 sites in Netherlands.
Trial summary
Passive immunization with immunoglobulins is occasionally used as therapy for the treatment of viral infectious diseases. Immunoglobulins are used for the treatment of CMV disease, and is effective as prophylaxis when given soon after exposure to varicella zoster virus, rabies, and hepatitis B virus. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- COVID-19
- What is being tested?
- Convalescent plasma
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 86 participants
- Where
- 18 sitesNetherlands
- Study dates
- 8 Apr 2020to 30 Sep 2020
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with PCR confirmed COVID disease
- Admitted to the hospital
- The most recent PCR positive sample is <96hrs old
- Written informed consent by patient or legal patient representative
- Age at least 18 years
Who cannot join
- Participation in another intervention trial on the treatment of COVID-19 that falls under the Dutch law human research (WMO) and in which individual patients are randomized to different treatment options
- Known IgA deficiency
- Invasive ventilation for already >96 hours
- Donors: Eligibility for plasma donation
- Inclusions Criteria:
- A history of COVID infection that was documented by PCR
Show all 21Show fewer
- Known ABO-Resus(D) blood group
- A screening for irregular antibodies with a titer ≤ 1:32
- Asymptomatic for at least 14 days
- Written informed consent regarding the plasmapheresis procedure
- Tested negative for HIV, HBV, HCV, HEV, HTLV and syfilis
- Age <18 years and > 65 years
- Weight <50kg
- Medical history of heart failure
- History of transfusion with red blood cells, platelets or plasma
- History of organ- or tissue transplant
- A cumulative stay in the United Kingdom of ≥ 6 months in the period between 01-01-1980 and 31-12-1996
- A history of i.v. drug use
- Insulin dependent diabetes
- An underlying severe chronic illness (i.e. history of heart failure, cancer or stroke)
- Tested positive for HLA- or HNA-antibodies
Trial locations and contacts
18 sites in 1 country.
18 sites in 1 country
Netherlands18 sites
NoordWest Ziekenhuisgroep
Alkmaar
Onze Lieve Vrouwen Gasthuis
Amsterdam
Rijnstate Ziekenhuis
Arnhem
Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis
Delft
Catharina Ziekenhuis
Eindhoven
Medisch Spectrum Twente
Enschede
Groene Hart Ziekenhuis
Gouda
Martini Hospital
Groningen
Spaarna Gasthuis
Haarlem
Alrijne Ziekenhuis
Leiderdorp
Sint Antonius Ziekenhuis
Nieuwegein
Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital
Nijmegen
Erasmus Medical Center
Rotterdam, South Holland, 3000 CA
Maasstad Ziekenhuis
Rotterdam
ZorgSaam Hospital
Terneuzen
Haaglanden Medisch Centrum
The Hague
Bernhoven Hospital
Uden
VieCuri
Venlo
About this study
Official title: Convalescent Plasma Therapy From Recovered Covid-19 Patients as Therapy for Hospitalized Patients With Covid-19
Passive immunization with immunoglobulins is occasionally used as therapy for the treatment of viral infectious diseases. Immunoglobulins are used for the treatment of CMV disease, and is effective as prophylaxis when given soon after exposure to varicella zoster virus, rabies, and hepatitis B virus.
Neutralizing antibodies against MERS, SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 have been shown to be present in patients previously infected with MERS, SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 respectively. During the 2003 SARS outbreak in Hong-Kong,a non-randomized study in hospitalized SARS patients showed that treatment with convalescent plasma (convP) from SARS-recovered donors significantly increased the day 22 discharge rate and decreased mortality. A study in non-human primates showed that rhesus macaques could not be re-infected with SARS-CoV-2 after primary infection.
Read more
With no proven effective therapy against COVID, this study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of convalescent plasma from COVID-recovered donors as a treatment for hospitalized patients with symptomatic COVID-19. The study will focus on patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 in the last 96 hours before inclusion
Primary objectives
- Decrease overall mortality in patients within COVID disease
Study design:
This trial is a randomized comparative trial. Patients will be randomized between the infusion of 300mL of convP with standard of care.
Patient population:
Patients with PCR confirmed COVID disease, age >18 years Donors will be included with a known history of COVID who have been asymptomatic for at least 14 days.
Intervention: 300mL of convP Duration of treatment: ConvP will be given as a one-time infusion Duration of follow up: For the primary endpoint: until discharge or death before day 60, whichever comes first. For the secondary endpoints (with separate consent) up to 1 year.
Target number of patients: 426 Target number of donors: 100 Expected duration of accrural: 36 months
Read the detailed description
Secondary (exploratory) objectives
- Evaluate the effect of 300ml convP on hospital stay
- Evaluate the change of the 8-point WHO COVID19 disease severity scale on day 15 and 30
- Evaluate the change of the 8-point WHO COVID19 disease severity scale on day 15 in the subgroup of patients with a baseline neutralizing antibody titer (PRNT50) <80
- Evaluate the effect of 300ml convP on mortality in patients admitted to the ICU
- Evaluate the effect of 300ml plasma therapy on hospital days for patients admitted to the ICU within 24 hours after admission
- Evaluate the impact of plasma therapy on the decrease in SARS-CoV2 shedding from airways
- Evaluate the difference in effect of convP on mortality in patients with a duration of symptoms < or > the median duration of symptoms in the study population
- Evaluate the impact of CTL and NK cell immunity on the likelihood of being protected from immune serum transfer
- Safety of convP therapy
- Evaluate the impact of covP on long-term lung function
- Conditions
- COVID-19
- Being tested
- Convalescent plasma
- Medical subject headings
- COVID-19
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Convalescent plasmaBiological
Infusion of plasma retrieved from donors with a history of PCR proven symptomatic COVID.
Plasma will be administered according to the Erasmus MC KIS protocol regarding the use of blood products
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Convalescent plasma | Experimental | Standard of care plus 300mL of convalescent plasma from COVID-19 recovered donors Receives: Biological: Convalescent plasma |
| Standard of care | No intervention | standard of care (supportive care, oxygen, antibiotics) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overall mortality until discharge from the hospital or a maximum of 60 days after admission whichever comes first
the mortality in the 300ml convP group will be compared with the control arm
Measured: until hospital discharge or a maximum of 60 days whichever comes first
Secondary outcomes (12)
Impact of 300ml convP therapy on hospital days
the hospital days in the 300ml convP group will be compared with the control arm
Measured: until hospital discharge or a maximum of 60 days whichever comes first
Impact of 300ml convP on weaning from oxygen therapy
A patient will be considered weaned from oxygen therapy when the patient did not receive oxygen for at least 24 hours.
Measured: until hospital discharge or a maximum of 60 days whichever comes first
Impact of 300ml convP on overall mortality in patients admitted to the ICU within 24 hours after admission
the overall mortality in hospital days in patients admitted tot the ICU within 24 hours after admission in the 300ml convP group will be compared with the patients admitted tot the ICU within 24 hours after admission in the control arm
Measured: until hospital discharge or a maximum of 60 days whichever comes first
Difference in the effect of convP on mortality in patients with a duration of symptoms less or more the median duration of symptoms in the study population
The mortality in patients with a duration of symptoms less than the median duration of symptoms in the study population will be compared with the mortality in patients with a duration of symptoms more than the median duration of symptoms in the study population
Measured: hospital discharge or a maximum of 60 days whichever comes first
Impact of 300ml convP therapy on ICU days in patients admitted to the ICU within 24 hours after admission
the ICU days in hospital days in patients admitted to the ICU within 24 hours after admission in the 300ml convP group will be compared with the patients admitted tot the ICU within 24 hours after admission in the control arm
Measured: Until hospital discharge, estimated average 4 weeks
Impact of plasma therapy on the decrease in SARS-CoV2 shedding from airways
airway samples will be taken on day 1 - 3 - 5 - 7 - 10 - 14 - and at discharge
Measured: until hospital discharge, estimated average 2 weeks
Impact of CTL and NK cell immunity on the likelihood of being protected from immune serum transfer
Blood wil be drawn at day 1, day 7 and day 14
Measured: until hospital discharge, extimated average 2 weeks
Safety of convP therapy
Evaluation of Severe Adverse Events and transfusion related adverse events
Measured: until hospital discharge or a maximum of 60 days whichever comes first
Change of the 8-point WHO COVID19 disease severity scale on day 15
The WHO COVID19 disease severity scale on day 15 will be compared with the WHO COVID19 disease severity scale on day 1
Measured: until day 15
Change of the 8-point WHO COVID19 disease severity scale on day 30
The WHO COVID19 disease severity scale on day 30 will be compared with the WHO COVID19 disease severity scale on day 1 and day 15
Measured: until day 30
Change of the 8-point WHO COVID19 disease severity scale on day 15 in the subgroup of patients with a baseline neutralizing antibody titer (PRNT50) <80.
The WHO COVID19 disease severity scale on day 15 will be compared with the WHO COVID19 disease severity scale on day 1 in patients with a baseline neutralizing antibody titer (PRNT50) <80.
Measured: until day 15
Impact of plasma therapy on risk of long-term structural lung damage and lung function
Low dose CT and lung function is done 6 weeks after discharge and if abnormal again 3 months after discharge.
Measured: up to 12 months after plasma transfusion
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Apr 2020
- Study start8 Apr 2020
- Primary completion1 Jul 2020
- Study completion30 Sep 2020
Why it stopped: new insights into COVID19 pathogenesis
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for COVID-19Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Erasmus Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This trial is a randomized comparative trial. Patients will be randomized between the infusion of 300mL of convP versus the standard of care.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 86 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Erasmus Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Prothya Biosolutions
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Bart Rijnders, Erasmus Medical Center
- Investigators
- Bart Rijnders, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Erasmus Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04342182
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NL73489.078.20
- Acronym
- ConCoVid-19
- Status last verified
- Mar 2022
- First submitted
- 31 Mar 2020
- Last updated
- 1 Apr 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Iannizzi C, Chai KL, Piechotta V, Valk SJ, Kimber C, Monsef I, Wood EM, Lamikanra AA, Roberts DJ, McQuilten Z, So-Osman C, Jindal A, Cryns N, Estcourt LJ, Kreuzberger N, Skoetz N. Convalescent plasma for people with COVID-19: a living systematic review. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 10;5(5):CD013600. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013600.pub6.
PubMed 37162745Iannizzi C, Chai KL, Piechotta V, Valk SJ, Kimber C, Monsef I, Wood EM, Lamikanra AA, Roberts DJ, McQuilten Z, So-Osman C, Jindal A, Cryns N, Estcourt LJ, Kreuzberger N, Skoetz N. Convalescent plasma for people with COVID-19: a living systematic review. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 1;2(2):CD013600. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013600.pub5.
PubMed 36734509Piechotta V, Iannizzi C, Chai KL, Valk SJ, Kimber C, Dorando E, Monsef I, Wood EM, Lamikanra AA, Roberts DJ, McQuilten Z, So-Osman C, Estcourt LJ, Skoetz N. Convalescent plasma or hyperimmune immunoglobulin for people with COVID-19: a living systematic review. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 20;5(5):CD013600. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013600.pub4.
PubMed 34013969Chai KL, Valk SJ, Piechotta V, Kimber C, Monsef I, Doree C, Wood EM, Lamikanra AA, Roberts DJ, McQuilten Z, So-Osman C, Estcourt LJ, Skoetz N. Convalescent plasma or hyperimmune immunoglobulin for people with COVID-19: a living systematic review. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 12;10:CD013600. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013600.pub3.
PubMed 33044747
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Apr 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Convalescent Plasma Therapy From Recovered Covid-19 Patients as Therapy for Hospitalized Patients With Covid-19
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04342182
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ConCoVid-19 / NL73489.078.20
- Conditions
- COVID-19
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: new insights into COVID19 pathogenesis
- Enrolment
- 86 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Erasmus Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Prothya Biosolutions
- Study start
- 8 Apr 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jul 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Apr 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Passive immunization with immunoglobulins is occasionally used as therapy for the treatment of viral infectious diseases. Immunoglobulins are used for the treatment of CMV disease, and is effective as prophylaxis when given soon after exposure to varicella zoster virus, rabies, and hepatitis B virus.
Neutralizing antibodies against MERS, SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 have been shown to be present in patients previously infected with MERS, SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 respectively. During the 2003 SARS outbreak in Hong-Kong,a non-randomized study in hospitalized SARS patients showed that treatment with convalescent plasma (convP) from SARS-recovered donors significantly increased the day 22 discharge rate and decreased mortality. A study in non-human primates showed that rhesus macaques could not be re-infected with SARS-CoV-2 after primary infection.
With no proven effective therapy against COVID, this study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of convalescent plasma from COVID-recovered donors as a treatment for hospitalized patients with symptomatic COVID-19. The study will focus on patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 in the last 96 hours before inclusion
Primary objectives
- Decrease overall mortality in patients within COVID disease
Study design:
This trial is a randomized comparative trial. Patients will be randomized between the infusion of 300mL of convP with standard of care.
Patient population:
Patients with PCR confirmed COVID disease, age >18 years Donors will be included with a known history of COVID who have been asymptomatic for at least 14 days.
Intervention: 300mL of convP Duration of treatment: ConvP will be given as a one-time infusion Duration of follow up: For the primary endpoint: until discharge or death before day 60, whichever comes first. For the secondary endpoints (with separate consent) up to 1 year.
Target number of patients: 426 Target number of donors: 100 Expected duration of accrural: 36 months
Detailed description
Secondary (exploratory) objectives
- Evaluate the effect of 300ml convP on hospital stay
- Evaluate the change of the 8-point WHO COVID19 disease severity scale on day 15 and 30
- Evaluate the change of the 8-point WHO COVID19 disease severity scale on day 15 in the subgroup of patients with a baseline neutralizing antibody titer (PRNT50) <80
- Evaluate the effect of 300ml convP on mortality in patients admitted to the ICU
- Evaluate the effect of 300ml plasma therapy on hospital days for patients admitted to the ICU within 24 hours after admission
- Evaluate the impact of plasma therapy on the decrease in SARS-CoV2 shedding from airways
- Evaluate the difference in effect of convP on mortality in patients with a duration of symptoms < or > the median duration of symptoms in the study population
- Evaluate the impact of CTL and NK cell immunity on the likelihood of being protected from immune serum transfer
- Safety of convP therapy
- Evaluate the impact of covP on long-term lung function
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This trial is a randomized comparative trial. Patients will be randomized between the infusion of 300mL of convP versus the standard of care.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Convalescent plasma | Experimental | Biological: Convalescent plasmaStandard of care plus 300mL of convalescent plasma from COVID-19 recovered donors |
| Standard of care | No intervention | –standard of care (supportive care, oxygen, antibiotics) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients with PCR confirmed COVID disease
- Admitted to the hospital
- The most recent PCR positive sample is <96hrs old
- Written informed consent by patient or legal patient representative
- Age at least 18 years
Key exclusion criteria (21 listed)
- Participation in another intervention trial on the treatment of COVID-19 that falls under the Dutch law human research (WMO) and in which individual patients are randomized to different treatment options
- Known IgA deficiency
- Invasive ventilation for already >96 hours
- Donors: Eligibility for plasma donation
- A history of COVID infection that was documented by PCR
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Convalescent plasmaInfusion of plasma retrieved from donors with a history of PCR proven symptomatic COVID. Plasma will be administered according to the Erasmus MC KIS protocol regarding the use of blood products | Biological | Convalescent plasma |
Primary outcome
Overall mortality until discharge from the hospital or a maximum of 60 days after admission whichever comes first
Time frame: until hospital discharge or a maximum of 60 days whichever comes first
the mortality in the 300ml convP group will be compared with the control arm
12 secondary outcomes
Impact of 300ml convP therapy on hospital days
Time frame: until hospital discharge or a maximum of 60 days whichever comes first
Impact of 300ml convP on weaning from oxygen therapy
Time frame: until hospital discharge or a maximum of 60 days whichever comes first
Impact of 300ml convP on overall mortality in patients admitted to the ICU within 24 hours after admission
Time frame: until hospital discharge or a maximum of 60 days whichever comes first
Difference in the effect of convP on mortality in patients with a duration of symptoms less or more the median duration of symptoms in the study population
Time frame: hospital discharge or a maximum of 60 days whichever comes first
Impact of 300ml convP therapy on ICU days in patients admitted to the ICU within 24 hours after admission
Time frame: Until hospital discharge, estimated average 4 weeks
Impact of plasma therapy on the decrease in SARS-CoV2 shedding from airways
Time frame: until hospital discharge, estimated average 2 weeks
Impact of CTL and NK cell immunity on the likelihood of being protected from immune serum transfer
Time frame: until hospital discharge, extimated average 2 weeks
Safety of convP therapy
Time frame: until hospital discharge or a maximum of 60 days whichever comes first
Change of the 8-point WHO COVID19 disease severity scale on day 15
Time frame: until day 15
Change of the 8-point WHO COVID19 disease severity scale on day 30
Time frame: until day 30
Change of the 8-point WHO COVID19 disease severity scale on day 15 in the subgroup of patients with a baseline neutralizing antibody titer (PRNT50) <80.
Time frame: until day 15
Impact of plasma therapy on risk of long-term structural lung damage and lung function
Time frame: up to 12 months after plasma transfusion
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: new insights into COVID19 pathogenesis). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Apr 2022.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37162745Iannizzi C, Chai KL, Piechotta V, Valk SJ, Kimber C, Monsef I, Wood EM, Lamikanra AA, Roberts DJ, McQuilten Z, So-Osman C, Jindal A, Cryns N, Estcourt LJ, Kreuzberger N, Skoetz N. Convalescent plasma for people with COVID-19: a living systematic review. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 10;5(5):CD013600. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013600.pub6.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36734509Iannizzi C, Chai KL, Piechotta V, Valk SJ, Kimber C, Monsef I, Wood EM, Lamikanra AA, Roberts DJ, McQuilten Z, So-Osman C, Jindal A, Cryns N, Estcourt LJ, Kreuzberger N, Skoetz N. Convalescent plasma for people with COVID-19: a living systematic review. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 1;2(2):CD013600. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013600.pub5.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34013969Piechotta V, Iannizzi C, Chai KL, Valk SJ, Kimber C, Dorando E, Monsef I, Wood EM, Lamikanra AA, Roberts DJ, McQuilten Z, So-Osman C, Estcourt LJ, Skoetz N. Convalescent plasma or hyperimmune immunoglobulin for people with COVID-19: a living systematic review. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 20;5(5):CD013600. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013600.pub4.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33044747Chai KL, Valk SJ, Piechotta V, Kimber C, Monsef I, Doree C, Wood EM, Lamikanra AA, Roberts DJ, McQuilten Z, So-Osman C, Estcourt LJ, Skoetz N. Convalescent plasma or hyperimmune immunoglobulin for people with COVID-19: a living systematic review. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 12;10:CD013600. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013600.pub3.
Related trials for COVID-19
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Phase I Open-Label Safety Trial of Pembrolizumab for Neurological Post- Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PD1-PASC I)
Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Safety and Immunogenicity Trial of OCU500, ChAd36 Vector Encoding SARS-CoV-2 Spike Vaccine Via Intranasal and Inhalational Routes in Previously Vaccinated Adults
COVID-19
Active, not recruiting
Intervention to Address Disparate Mental Health Consequences of COVID-19 Pandemic on Latinx and African Newcomers
Mental Health Issue, Mental Health Disorder
Recruiting
Home-Based Exercise Tele-Rehabilitation After COVID-19
Post SARS-CoV2 (COVID-19)
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Safety, Reactogenicity and Immunogenicity Trial of RVX-sCPD9 Booster Intranasal COVID-19 Vaccine
COVID -19
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bart Rijnders, MD, PhD principal investigator
Erasmus Medical Center
18 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing Convalescent plasma in people with COVID-19, run by Erasmus Medical Center at 18 sites in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 21 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Apr 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 18 sites in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: new insights into COVID19 pathogenesis). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overall mortality until discharge from the hospital or a maximum of 60 days after admission whichever comes first (time frame: until hospital discharge or a maximum of 60 days whichever comes first). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04342182, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Apr 2022.