Peripheral Arterial DiseaseNCT04343196
Digital Variance Angiography in Diagnostic Angiographies for Effective Radiation Dose Reduction
A study testing Diagnostic Angiography (DSA or DVA based on randomization result) in people with Peripheral Arterial Disease and Peripheral Artery Disease, run by Kinepict Health Ltd. at 1 site in Hungary.
Trial summary
Digital Variance Angiography (DVA) is a new tool in medical imaging with proven image quality reserve. The previously observed quality reserve of Digital Variance Angiography (DVA) in lower extremity angiographies, allowed to lower radiation exposure by 70 % during DSA in lower extremity diagnostic angiographies with… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Peripheral Arterial Disease, Peripheral Artery Disease, Femoral Artery Stenosis
- What is being tested?
- Diagnostic Angiography (DSA or DVA based on randomization result)
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 114 participants
- Where
- 1 siteHungary
- Study dates
- 21 Apr 2020to 30 Oct 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with lower limb peripheral arterial disease, admitted for diagnostic angiography
- Fontaine II- IV
- Normal renal function: GFR> 60ml/min/m2
- Age > 18
Who cannot join
- Acute myocardial infarction
- Severe heart/liver/renal failure
- Iodine contrast allergy
- Atrioventricular block
- Coagulopathy and Hematological Bleeding Disorders
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Application of Digital Variance Angiography in Diagnostic Lower Limb Angiographiy for Radiation Exposure Reduction a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial
Digital Variance Angiography (DVA) is a new tool in medical imaging with proven image quality reserve.
The previously observed quality reserve of Digital Variance Angiography (DVA) in lower extremity angiographies, allowed to lower radiation exposure by 70 % during DSA in lower extremity diagnostic angiographies with non-inferior image quality.
Read more
The aim of this study is to apply this non-inferior image quality and use it for radiation exposure reduction in diagnostic lower limb angiography.
The project would prospectively block-randomise (50:50) patients, who undergo elective diagnostic angiography into two groups: a comparator group examined by means of conventional DSA using a standard care protocol (Siemens Artis Zee, Extremities Care setting, 1.2 µGy/frame) (Group B) and a study group examined by means of DVA using a low-dose protocol (0.36 µGy/frame corresponding to 70% decrease of radiation dose) (Group A). During each procedure the investigators record radiation exposure (cumulative dosage, dose area product) and contrast media usage and procedural time then compare the results of the groups. Qualitative image review is done to compare conventional DSA and reduced radiation exposure DVA images after image acquisition.
Our hypothesis is that with the previously proven non-inferior image quality, the investigators will be able to reduce radiation exposure of the participants and also staff members in everyday clinical practice.
- Conditions
- Peripheral Arterial Disease, Peripheral Artery Disease, Femoral Artery Stenosis, Femoral Artery Occlusion, Popliteal Stenosis, Iliac Artery Stenosis
- Being tested
- Diagnostic Angiography (DSA or DVA based on randomization result)
- Keywords
- Radiation protection, X-ray angiography, Digital Variance Angiography, Digital Subtraction Angiography, Peripheral Arterial Disease, Kinepict, Image acquistion, Image quality, Radiation exposure
- Medical subject headings
- Peripheral Arterial Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Diagnostic Angiography (DSA or DVA based on randomization result)Radiation
After radial/brachial/femoral artery puncture using Seldinger technique, the investigators first position a pigtail catheter above the level of the renal arteries. With Siemens Artis Zee Pure DSA machine the examiner will use a postero-anterior X-ray view for the first image, which is an aortography of some part of the iliac system. Then, the catheter will be repositioned to the aortic bifurcation and 15-18 mL contrast media (CM) with 9-10 mL/s flow for the ilio-femoral region will be injected. All of the following image series will be made from this catheter position, with a 9 mL/s flow rate. In cases for when the recorded image series will be inconclusive, image series with left/right oblique position will be recorded. All femoro-popliteal images will be recorded with 10-16 ml CM and crural regions with 12-22mml. DSA images will be calculated from all series on a dedicated Syngo workstation and used for diagnosis. DVA images will be calculated by the Kinepict Medical Imaging Tool
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group A: Low-dose DVA group | Experimental | Image acquisition at a reduced X-ray dose, 0.36 µGy/frame (70% reduction) image processing by DVA Receives: Radiation: Diagnostic Angiography (DSA or DVA based on randomization result) |
| Group B: Normal-dose DSA group | Active comparator | Image acquisition at a normal dose (1.2 µGy/frame) image processing by DSA Receives: Radiation: Diagnostic Angiography (DSA or DVA based on randomization result) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Total procedural Dose-area product(DAP)
Indicator of a patient's irradiation dosage (microGy*cm2 or Gy*cm2)
Measured: During the procedure
Total DSA-related DAP
Radiation load of the patient during DSA image acquistion (microGy*cm2 or Gy*cm2)
Measured: During the procedure
Image quality review
Blinded, anonymised and randomised qualitative review and comparison of images by multiple endovascular specialists in multiple regions using a 1-5 Likert-scale for each image. Region specific scores are compared between DSA and DVA technique.
Measured: Upon completion of enrollment, approximately 1-year period
TASC classification
Blinded, anonymised and randomised review of images by multiple endovascular specialists. Clinically relevant sides for each patient are reviewed in a separate questionnaire: each reviewer have to classify each patient's angiographic image according to the Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus Document's second version.
Measured: Upon completion of enrollment, approximately 1-year period
Secondary outcomes (3)
Contrast media usage
The volume of the iodinated contrast agent used for enhancing the image quality (mL)
Measured: During the procedure
Number of protocol change
The number of occasions when the reduced radiation level protocol has to be switched back to conventional protocol in one region because of unsuitable image quality.
Measured: During the procedure
Procedure time
Duration of the whole procedure, from radial artery puncture till the removal of every tool (min).
Measured: During the procedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Apr 2020
- Study start21 Apr 2020
- Primary completion30 Sep 2020
- Study completion30 Oct 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Peripheral Arterial DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- All enrolled participants will undergo a diagnostic lower limb angiography, but the image acquisition protocol will be different. In the active comparator group a normal radiation dose will be used and the DSA images will be used for diagnosis whereas in the experimental group a low dose radiation will be applied (70% decrease compared tot he DSA protocol) and the DVA images will be used for diagnosis.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 114 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Kinepict Health Ltd.
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Collaborators
- Semmelweis University Heart and Vascular Center
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Krisztián Szigeti, Ph.D., Study chair, Kinepict Health Ltd.Szabolcs Osváth, Ph.D., Study chair, Kinepict Health Ltd.János Kiss, M.D.,Ph.D.,D.Sc., Study chair, Kinepict Health Ltd.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04343196
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Kinepict-008
- Status last verified
- Sep 2021
- First submitted
- 6 Apr 2020
- Last updated
- 13 Sep 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Orias VI, Gyano M, Gog I, Szollosi D, Veres DS, Nagy Z, Csobay-Novak C, Zoltan O, Kiss JP, Osvath S, Szigeti K, Zoltan R, Sotonyi P. Digital Variance Angiography as a Paradigm Shift in Carbon Dioxide Angiography. Invest Radiol. 2019 Jul;54(7):428-436. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000555.
PubMed 30829769Gyano M, Gog I, Orias VI, Ruzsa Z, Nemes B, Csobay-Novak C, Olah Z, Nagy Z, Merkely B, Szigeti K, Osvath S, Sotonyi P. Kinetic Imaging in Lower Extremity Arteriography: Comparison to Digital Subtraction Angiography. Radiology. 2019 Jan;290(1):246-253. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018172927. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
PubMed 30325284
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Sep 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Application of Digital Variance Angiography in Diagnostic Lower Limb Angiographiy for Radiation Exposure Reduction a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04343196
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Kinepict-008
- Conditions
- Peripheral Arterial Disease, Peripheral Artery Disease, Femoral Artery Stenosis, Femoral Artery Occlusion, Popliteal Stenosis, Iliac Artery Stenosis
- Keywords
- Radiation protection, X-ray angiography, Digital Variance Angiography, Digital Subtraction Angiography, Peripheral Arterial Disease, Kinepict, Image acquistion, Image quality
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 114 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Kinepict Health Ltd.Research network
- Collaborators
- Semmelweis University Heart and Vascular Center
- Study start
- 21 Apr 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Oct 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Apr 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Digital Variance Angiography (DVA) is a new tool in medical imaging with proven image quality reserve.
The previously observed quality reserve of Digital Variance Angiography (DVA) in lower extremity angiographies, allowed to lower radiation exposure by 70 % during DSA in lower extremity diagnostic angiographies with non-inferior image quality.
The aim of this study is to apply this non-inferior image quality and use it for radiation exposure reduction in diagnostic lower limb angiography.
The project would prospectively block-randomise (50:50) patients, who undergo elective diagnostic angiography into two groups: a comparator group examined by means of conventional DSA using a standard care protocol (Siemens Artis Zee, Extremities Care setting, 1.2 µGy/frame) (Group B) and a study group examined by means of DVA using a low-dose protocol (0.36 µGy/frame corresponding to 70% decrease of radiation dose) (Group A). During each procedure the investigators record radiation exposure (cumulative dosage, dose area product) and contrast media usage and procedural time then compare the results of the groups. Qualitative image review is done to compare conventional DSA and reduced radiation exposure DVA images after image acquisition.
Our hypothesis is that with the previously proven non-inferior image quality, the investigators will be able to reduce radiation exposure of the participants and also staff members in everyday clinical practice.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- All enrolled participants will undergo a diagnostic lower limb angiography, but the image acquisition protocol will be different. In the active comparator group a normal radiation dose will be used and the DSA images will be used for diagnosis whereas in the experimental group a low dose radiation will be applied (70% decrease compared tot he DSA protocol) and the DVA images will be used for diagnosis.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group A: Low-dose DVA group | Experimental | Radiation: Diagnostic Angiography (DSA or DVA based on randomization result)Image acquisition at a reduced X-ray dose, 0.36 µGy/frame (70% reduction) image processing by DVA |
| Group B: Normal-dose DSA group | Active comparator | Radiation: Diagnostic Angiography (DSA or DVA based on randomization result)Image acquisition at a normal dose (1.2 µGy/frame) image processing by DSA |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients with lower limb peripheral arterial disease, admitted for diagnostic angiography
- Fontaine II- IV
- Normal renal function: GFR> 60ml/min/m2
- Age > 18
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Acute myocardial infarction
- Severe heart/liver/renal failure
- Iodine contrast allergy
- Atrioventricular block
- Coagulopathy and Hematological Bleeding Disorders
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic Angiography (DSA or DVA based on randomization result)After radial/brachial/femoral artery puncture using Seldinger technique, the investigators first position a pigtail catheter above the level of the renal arteries. With Siemens Artis Zee Pure DSA machine the examiner will use a postero-anterior X-ray view for the first image, which is an aortography of some part of the iliac system. Then, the catheter will be repositioned to the aortic bifurcation and 15-18 mL contrast media (CM) with 9-10 mL/s flow for the ilio-femoral region will be injected. All of the following image series will be made from this catheter position, with a 9 mL/s flow rate. In cases for when the recorded image series will be inconclusive, image series with left/right oblique position will be recorded. All femoro-popliteal images will be recorded with 10-16 ml CM and crural regions with 12-22mml. DSA images will be calculated from all series on a dedicated Syngo workstation and used for diagnosis. DVA images will be calculated by the Kinepict Medical Imaging Tool | Radiation | Group A: Low-dose DVA group, Group B: Normal-dose DSA group |
Primary outcome
Total procedural Dose-area product(DAP)
Time frame: During the procedure
Indicator of a patient's irradiation dosage (microGy*cm2 or Gy*cm2)
Total DSA-related DAP
Time frame: During the procedure
Radiation load of the patient during DSA image acquistion (microGy*cm2 or Gy*cm2)
Image quality review
Time frame: Upon completion of enrollment, approximately 1-year period
Blinded, anonymised and randomised qualitative review and comparison of images by multiple endovascular specialists in multiple regions using a 1-5 Likert-scale for each image. Region specific scores are compared between DSA and DVA technique.
TASC classification
Time frame: Upon completion of enrollment, approximately 1-year period
Blinded, anonymised and randomised review of images by multiple endovascular specialists. Clinically relevant sides for each patient are reviewed in a separate questionnaire: each reviewer have to classify each patient's angiographic image according to the Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus Document's second version.
3 secondary outcomes
Contrast media usage
Time frame: During the procedure
Number of protocol change
Time frame: During the procedure
Procedure time
Time frame: During the procedure
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Sep 2021.
- Background: PubMed 30829769Orias VI, Gyano M, Gog I, Szollosi D, Veres DS, Nagy Z, Csobay-Novak C, Zoltan O, Kiss JP, Osvath S, Szigeti K, Zoltan R, Sotonyi P. Digital Variance Angiography as a Paradigm Shift in Carbon Dioxide Angiography. Invest Radiol. 2019 Jul;54(7):428-436. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000555.
- Background: PubMed 30325284Gyano M, Gog I, Orias VI, Ruzsa Z, Nemes B, Csobay-Novak C, Olah Z, Nagy Z, Merkely B, Szigeti K, Osvath S, Sotonyi P. Kinetic Imaging in Lower Extremity Arteriography: Comparison to Digital Subtraction Angiography. Radiology. 2019 Jan;290(1):246-253. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018172927. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
- Homepage for the Kinepict scientific group, source for additional information about digital variance angiographyLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Peripheral Arterial Disease
Active, not recruiting
SUCCESS (SelUtion, Safety, effiCaCy, hEalth economicS and promS) PTA Study
Peripheral Artery Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
Reducing Adverse Vascular Outcomes With Factor XI Inhibition in Adult Participants With Peripheral Artery Disease
Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD)
Recruiting
The THOR IDE Study
Peripheral Artery Disease, Peripheral Artery Stenosis
Not yet recruiting
Daily Stretching to Improve Walking in Older Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease: The STRETCH PAD Study
Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD), Intermittent Claudication
Recruiting
WIN Ratio Analysis to Determine a Strategy of Non- Invasive SUpport for Respiratory Failure in the EmeRgency Department
Acute Hypoxic Respiratory Failure, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Krisztián Szigeti, Ph.D. study chair
Kinepict Health Ltd.
Szabolcs Osváth, Ph.D. study chair
Kinepict Health Ltd.
János Kiss, M.D.,Ph.D.,D.Sc. study chair
Kinepict Health Ltd.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Diagnostic Angiography (DSA or DVA based on randomization result) in people with Peripheral Arterial Disease and Peripheral Artery Disease, run by Kinepict Health Ltd. at 1 site in Hungary.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Sep 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Hungary. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Total procedural Dose-area product(DAP) (time frame: During the procedure). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04343196, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Sep 2021.