Intravitreal InjectionsPhase 4COPIVINNCT04343222
Control of Pain in Intravitreal Injections Using Topical NSAIDs
A Phase 4 study testing Bromfenac and Artificial tears in people with Intravitreal Injections and IVI, run by University of Wisconsin, Madison at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Intravitreal injections (IVI) are a common form of treatment for multiple retinal pathologies. The investigators hypothesize that an intervention with a topical NSAID will alleviate pain experienced at intravitreal injection (IVI) and post-IVI. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Intravitreal Injections, IVI
- What is being tested?
- Bromfenac and Artificial tears
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 46 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 27 Jun 2019to 19 Dec 2019
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Eyes with retinal pathology requiring anti-VEGF therapy
- Previously had an IVI
Who cannot join
- History of previous eye surgery other than cataract extraction
- Herpetic eye disease
- Uncontrolled glaucoma
- Uveitis
- Acute conjunctivitis
- Pregnancy
Show all 12Show fewer
- Known previous adverse response or contraindication to intravitreal injection, Bromfenac, or other NSAIDs.
- Keratitis including povidone-induced keratitis
- Bullous keratopathy
- Diagnosis of dry eye syndrome
- Uncontrolled diabetes
- NSAID use 3 days prior to IVI
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Control of Pain in Intravitreal Injections (COPIVIN Study): A Study Evaluating the Use of Combination Topical Anesthetic and Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs)
Intravitreal injections (IVI) are a common form of treatment for multiple retinal pathologies. The investigators hypothesize that an intervention with a topical NSAID will alleviate pain experienced at intravitreal injection (IVI) and post-IVI. 46 participants will be recruited, randomized into 1 of 3 treatment arms, and can expect to be on study for a day.
Read the detailed description
Intravitreal injections are a very common form of treatment for a variety of ocular pathologies. The use of these injections has only increased given the large utility they provide. They both improved visual outcomes and provided patients an overall better quality of life. However, a problem experienced by patients who undergo these injections is the need for multiple reoccurring injections to maintain control of their disease. It has long been an issue to provide patients optimal pain relief both during and after their intravitreal injections. Topical anesthesia is often utilized through frequent rounds of proparacaine eye drops. Other providers often use Lidocaine gel or Lidocaine-soaked cotton swaps with variable results in terms of pain control. Subconjunctival lidocaine has also been utilized with variable control of pain, however patients did report anxiety with the thought of being given an additional injection.
Patient pain is subjective and difficult to objectively quantify when comparing different methods of post-injection control. One commonly employed pain rating system is the Wong-Baker FACES pain scale which has been quite successful in objectively quantifying patient discomfort. It should be noted that this scale is only reliable in a patient whom is able to understand how the scale works.
Other research studies have shown adequate to improved pain control through the use of topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) eye drops. One study looked at the use of topical Nepafenac 0.10% on post injection pain. This study used the McGill pain assessment questionnaire, which not only quantified pain but the additional benefit of describing the nature of the pain the patient experienced.
A clinical research study looked at pain immediately and 6 hours after injection. The researchers found that when compared to the control group (artificial tears) the group who received NSAID eye drops had better pain control. In a similar study, Bromfenac, another topical NSAID eye drop, provided good pain relief post injection, setting a precedent for the use of topical NSAIDs in controlling IVI pain.
However, studies have only reported pain relief immediately and 6 hours after injection. There have not been any studies showing pain control 24 hours post injection. Furthermore, no studies to date have compared the timing of application of a topical NSAID, in the alleviation of long-term pain patients experience. Bromfenac 0.09% is the agent of choice given its previously demonstrated effectiveness in pain control and also strength when compared to other ophthalmic NSAIDs. This was demonstrated in a paper by Sheppard that compared Bromfenac with other topical NSAID eye drops and proved that it offered approximately 3-4 times higher levels of COX-2 inhibition. It has been approved by the FDA as a one time daily eye drop to reduce inflammation. It is commonly utilized following cataract surgery to help reduce intraocular inflammation. This study looks at this medication's utility to control pain following IVI, another invasive procedure. Pain control would be assessed immediately following injection, 6 hours post injection and 24 hours post injection. This will allow evaluation of Bromfenac 0.09%'s effectiveness on overall immediate pain control as well as on ocular discomfort/soreness that can often follow IVI. Additionally, two intervention groups to compare Bromfenac 0.09% instillation 30 minutes prior to IVI and instillation immediately following IVI.
The primary goal of this study is to determine if topically administered Bromfenac 0.09% eye drops can reduce the discomfort that patient experience both during and after intravitreal injections. Additionally, the effect of both pre and post injection application of topical Bromfenac 0.09% on subjective pain scores will be investigated.
This study will be a pilot study consisting of 46 participants. These participants will be selected from those that have a diagnosis requiring intravitreal injection of an anti-VEGF agent (Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)). Participants that have already undergone intravitreal injection at least once before will be eligible. This will serve to minimize bias from initial injection anxiety and will give participants a comparative data point (prior injection discomfort). Participants will be randomized into one of three groups, which will be known as group A, B or C. The groups will have drop regimens as follows:
- Group A: Will receive 1 drop of topical Bromfenac 0.09% 30 minutes prior to the injection and then 1 drop of an artificial tear eye drop immediately after the injection and wash.
- Group B: Will receive 1 drop of an artificial tear eye drop 30 minutes prior to the injection and then 1 drop of topical Bromfenac 0.09% immediately after the injection and wash.
- Group C: Will receive 1 drop of an artificial tear eye drop 30 minutes prior to the injection and then 1 drop of an artificial tear eye drop immediately after the injection and wash.
All labels will be removed from the bottles and the participants will be blinded to which group they belong to. The treating physicians will also be blinded to which group the participants belong to.
Immediately following the injection, each participant will be asked to rate their pain using the Wong-Baker FACES pain scale as well as the McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ). Participants will then be given instructions and will be told to expect a call at 6 and 24 hours regarding further follow up phone questionnaires. Participants will also be provided with a phone number to contact should they have any complications (ie. discomfort, increased pain, vision changes, or any other questions). Participants will be provided with a copy of the Wong-Baker FACES pain scale and the McGill Pain Questionnaire to take home with them. Participants will be called 6 hours post-injection for further assessment of their pain using both the Wong-Baker FACES pain scale and the McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ). At 24 hours, participants will again be contacted and their pain will be assessed one final time using both the Wong-Baker FACES pain scale and the McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ). This will serve as the last point of data gathered from participants.
- Conditions
- Intravitreal Injections, IVI
- Being tested
- Bromfenac, Artificial tears
- Keywords
- pain
- Medical subject headings
- Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
BromfenacDrug
An NSAID used to treat eye pain and swelling
Artificial tearsDrug
eye drops to lubricate the eye and maintain moisture
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group A: Bromfenac then Artificial Tears | Experimental | Participant receives 1 drop of topical Bromfenac 0.09% 30 minutes prior to the injection and then 1 drop of an artificial tear eye drop immediately after the injection and wash. Receives: Drug: Bromfenac; Drug: Artificial tears |
| Group B: Artificial Tears then Bromfenac | Experimental | Participant receives 1 drop of an artificial tear eye drop 30 minutes prior to the injection and then 1 drop of topical Bromfenac 0.09% immediately after the injection and wash. Receives: Drug: Bromfenac; Drug: Artificial tears |
| Group C: Artificial Tears then Artificial Tears | Placebo comparator | Participants receives 1 drop of an artificial tear eye drop 30 minutes prior to the injection and then 1 drop of an artificial tear eye drop immediately after the injection and wash. Receives: Drug: Artificial tears |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) Scores at Baseline
Assessment of topical 0.09% Bromfenac's analgesic effect pre- and post-injection in participants undergoing intravitreal injections (IVI) of anti-VEGFs as measured by the SF-MPQ. The SF-MPQ questionnaire contains 15 sensory and affective descriptors each rated on a 0-3 scale where 0 is none, 1 is mild, 2 is moderate, and 3 is severe. The total possible range of scores is 0-45 where the higher the score, the more intense the pain.
Measured: Baseline
McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) Scores at 6 Hours Post Injection
Assessment of topical 0.09% Bromfenac's analgesic effect pre- and post-injection in participants undergoing intravitreal injections (IVI) of anti-VEGFs as measured by the SF-MPQ. The SF-MPQ questionnaire contains 15 sensory and affective descriptors each rated on a 0-3 scale where 0 is none, 1 is mild, 2 is moderate, and 3 is severe. The total possible range of scores is 0-45 where the higher the score, the more intense the pain.
Measured: 6 hours post injection
McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) Scores at 24 Hours Post Injection
Assessment of topical 0.09% Bromfenac's analgesic effect pre- and post-injection in participants undergoing intravitreal injections (IVI) of anti-VEGFs as measured by the SF-MPQ. The SF-MPQ questionnaire contains 15 sensory and affective descriptors each rated on a 0-3 scale where 0 is none, 1 is mild, 2 is moderate, and 3 is severe. The total possible range of scores is 0-45 where the higher the score, the more intense the pain.
Measured: 24 hours post injection
Wong-Baker FACES Pain Scale Scores at Baseline
Assessment of topical 0.09% Bromfenac's analgesic effect pre- and post-injection in patients undergoing intravitreal injections of anti-VEGFs as measured by the Wong-Baker FACES pain scale. This scale is compromised of drawings of faces that appear to be experiencing increasing pain, from which the participant chooses their current level of pain. Scoring is defined on the scale as, "Face 0 doesn't hurt at all. Face 2 hurts just a little bit. Face 4 hurts a little bit more. Face 6 hurts even more. Face 8 hurts a whole lot. Face 10 hurts as much as you can imagine, although you don't have to be crying to have this worst pain."
Measured: Baseline
Wong-Baker FACES Pain Scale Scores at 6 Hours Post Injection
Assessment of topical 0.09% Bromfenac's analgesic effect pre- and post-injection in patients undergoing intravitreal injections of anti-VEGFs as measured by the Wong-Baker FACES pain scale. This scale is compromised of drawings of faces that appear to be experiencing increasing pain, from which the participant chooses their current level of pain. Scoring is defined on the scale as, "Face 0 doesn't hurt at all. Face 2 hurts just a little bit. Face 4 hurts a little bit more. Face 6 hurts even more. Face 8 hurts a whole lot. Face 10 hurts as much as you can imagine, although you don't have to be crying to have this worst pain."
Measured: 6 hours post injection
Wong-Baker FACES Pain Scale Scores at 24 Hours Post Injection
Assessment of topical 0.09% Bromfenac's analgesic effect pre- and post-injection in patients undergoing intravitreal injections of anti-VEGFs as measured by the Wong-Baker FACES pain scale. This scale is compromised of drawings of faces that appear to be experiencing increasing pain, from which the participant chooses their current level of pain. Scoring is defined on the scale as, "Face 0 doesn't hurt at all. Face 2 hurts just a little bit. Face 4 hurts a little bit more. Face 6 hurts even more. Face 8 hurts a whole lot. Face 10 hurts as much as you can imagine, although you don't have to be crying to have this worst pain."
Measured: 24 hours post injection
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Apr 2020
- Study start27 Jun 2019
- Primary completion19 Dec 2019
- Study completion19 Dec 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Intravitreal InjectionsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Wisconsin, MadisonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 46 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Wisconsin, Madison
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Mihai Mititelu, MD, MPH, Principal investigator, University of Wisconsin, MadisonMaxwell Wingelaar, MD, Principal investigator, University of Wisconsin, Madison
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04343222
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2019-0095
- Other IDs
- A536000, SMPH/OPHTHAL&VIS SCI/GEN
- Acronym
- COPIVIN
- Status last verified
- Sep 2020
- First submitted
- 8 Apr 2020
- Last updated
- 12 Jun 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Jun 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Control of Pain in Intravitreal Injections (COPIVIN Study): A Study Evaluating the Use of Combination Topical Anesthetic and Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04343222
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- COPIVIN / 2019-0095
- Conditions
- Intravitreal Injections, IVI
- Keywords
- pain
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 46 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Wisconsin, MadisonUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 27 Jun 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 19 Dec 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 19 Dec 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Apr 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 19 Oct 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Intravitreal injections (IVI) are a common form of treatment for multiple retinal pathologies. The investigators hypothesize that an intervention with a topical NSAID will alleviate pain experienced at intravitreal injection (IVI) and post-IVI. 46 participants will be recruited, randomized into 1 of 3 treatment arms, and can expect to be on study for a day.
Detailed description
Intravitreal injections are a very common form of treatment for a variety of ocular pathologies. The use of these injections has only increased given the large utility they provide. They both improved visual outcomes and provided patients an overall better quality of life. However, a problem experienced by patients who undergo these injections is the need for multiple reoccurring injections to maintain control of their disease. It has long been an issue to provide patients optimal pain relief both during and after their intravitreal injections. Topical anesthesia is often utilized through frequent rounds of proparacaine eye drops. Other providers often use Lidocaine gel or Lidocaine-soaked cotton swaps with variable results in terms of pain control. Subconjunctival lidocaine has also been utilized with variable control of pain, however patients did report anxiety with the thought of being given an additional injection.
Patient pain is subjective and difficult to objectively quantify when comparing different methods of post-injection control. One commonly employed pain rating system is the Wong-Baker FACES pain scale which has been quite successful in objectively quantifying patient discomfort. It should be noted that this scale is only reliable in a patient whom is able to understand how the scale works.
Other research studies have shown adequate to improved pain control through the use of topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) eye drops. One study looked at the use of topical Nepafenac 0.10% on post injection pain. This study used the McGill pain assessment questionnaire, which not only quantified pain but the additional benefit of describing the nature of the pain the patient experienced.
A clinical research study looked at pain immediately and 6 hours after injection. The researchers found that when compared to the control group (artificial tears) the group who received NSAID eye drops had better pain control. In a similar study, Bromfenac, another topical NSAID eye drop, provided good pain relief post injection, setting a precedent for the use of topical NSAIDs in controlling IVI pain.
However, studies have only reported pain relief immediately and 6 hours after injection. There have not been any studies showing pain control 24 hours post injection. Furthermore, no studies to date have compared the timing of application of a topical NSAID, in the alleviation of long-term pain patients experience. Bromfenac 0.09% is the agent of choice given its previously demonstrated effectiveness in pain control and also strength when compared to other ophthalmic NSAIDs. This was demonstrated in a paper by Sheppard that compared Bromfenac with other topical NSAID eye drops and proved that it offered approximately 3-4 times higher levels of COX-2 inhibition. It has been approved by the FDA as a one time daily eye drop to reduce inflammation. It is commonly utilized following cataract surgery to help reduce intraocular inflammation. This study looks at this medication's utility to control pain following IVI, another invasive procedure. Pain control would be assessed immediately following injection, 6 hours post injection and 24 hours post injection. This will allow evaluation of Bromfenac 0.09%'s effectiveness on overall immediate pain control as well as on ocular discomfort/soreness that can often follow IVI. Additionally, two intervention groups to compare Bromfenac 0.09% instillation 30 minutes prior to IVI and instillation immediately following IVI.
The primary goal of this study is to determine if topically administered Bromfenac 0.09% eye drops can reduce the discomfort that patient experience both during and after intravitreal injections. Additionally, the effect of both pre and post injection application of topical Bromfenac 0.09% on subjective pain scores will be investigated.
This study will be a pilot study consisting of 46 participants. These participants will be selected from those that have a diagnosis requiring intravitreal injection of an anti-VEGF agent (Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)). Participants that have already undergone intravitreal injection at least once before will be eligible. This will serve to minimize bias from initial injection anxiety and will give participants a comparative data point (prior injection discomfort). Participants will be randomized into one of three groups, which will be known as group A, B or C. The groups will have drop regimens as follows:
- Group A: Will receive 1 drop of topical Bromfenac 0.09% 30 minutes prior to the injection and then 1 drop of an artificial tear eye drop immediately after the injection and wash.
- Group B: Will receive 1 drop of an artificial tear eye drop 30 minutes prior to the injection and then 1 drop of topical Bromfenac 0.09% immediately after the injection and wash.
- Group C: Will receive 1 drop of an artificial tear eye drop 30 minutes prior to the injection and then 1 drop of an artificial tear eye drop immediately after the injection and wash.
All labels will be removed from the bottles and the participants will be blinded to which group they belong to. The treating physicians will also be blinded to which group the participants belong to.
Immediately following the injection, each participant will be asked to rate their pain using the Wong-Baker FACES pain scale as well as the McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ). Participants will then be given instructions and will be told to expect a call at 6 and 24 hours regarding further follow up phone questionnaires. Participants will also be provided with a phone number to contact should they have any complications (ie. discomfort, increased pain, vision changes, or any other questions). Participants will be provided with a copy of the Wong-Baker FACES pain scale and the McGill Pain Questionnaire to take home with them. Participants will be called 6 hours post-injection for further assessment of their pain using both the Wong-Baker FACES pain scale and the McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ). At 24 hours, participants will again be contacted and their pain will be assessed one final time using both the Wong-Baker FACES pain scale and the McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ). This will serve as the last point of data gathered from participants.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group A: Bromfenac then Artificial Tears | Experimental | Drug: Bromfenac, Drug: Artificial tearsParticipant receives 1 drop of topical Bromfenac 0.09% 30 minutes prior to the injection and then 1 drop of an artificial tear eye drop immediately after the injection and wash. |
| Group B: Artificial Tears then Bromfenac | Experimental | Drug: Bromfenac, Drug: Artificial tearsParticipant receives 1 drop of an artificial tear eye drop 30 minutes prior to the injection and then 1 drop of topical Bromfenac 0.09% immediately after the injection and wash. |
| Group C: Artificial Tears then Artificial Tears | Placebo comparator | Drug: Artificial tearsParticipants receives 1 drop of an artificial tear eye drop 30 minutes prior to the injection and then 1 drop of an artificial tear eye drop immediately after the injection and wash. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Eyes with retinal pathology requiring anti-VEGF therapy
- Previously had an IVI
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- History of previous eye surgery other than cataract extraction
- Herpetic eye disease
- Uncontrolled glaucoma
- Uveitis
- Acute conjunctivitis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| BromfenacAn NSAID used to treat eye pain and swelling | Drug | Group A: Bromfenac then Artificial Tears, Group B: Artificial Tears then Bromfenac |
| Artificial tearseye drops to lubricate the eye and maintain moisture | Drug | Group A: Bromfenac then Artificial Tears, Group B: Artificial Tears then Bromfenac, Group C: Artificial Tears then Artificial Tears |
Primary outcome
McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) Scores at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline
Assessment of topical 0.09% Bromfenac's analgesic effect pre- and post-injection in participants undergoing intravitreal injections (IVI) of anti-VEGFs as measured by the SF-MPQ. The SF-MPQ questionnaire contains 15 sensory and affective descriptors each rated on a 0-3 scale where 0 is none, 1 is mild, 2 is moderate, and 3 is severe. The total possible range of scores is 0-45 where the higher the score, the more intense the pain.
McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) Scores at 6 Hours Post Injection
Time frame: 6 hours post injection
Assessment of topical 0.09% Bromfenac's analgesic effect pre- and post-injection in participants undergoing intravitreal injections (IVI) of anti-VEGFs as measured by the SF-MPQ. The SF-MPQ questionnaire contains 15 sensory and affective descriptors each rated on a 0-3 scale where 0 is none, 1 is mild, 2 is moderate, and 3 is severe. The total possible range of scores is 0-45 where the higher the score, the more intense the pain.
McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) Scores at 24 Hours Post Injection
Time frame: 24 hours post injection
Assessment of topical 0.09% Bromfenac's analgesic effect pre- and post-injection in participants undergoing intravitreal injections (IVI) of anti-VEGFs as measured by the SF-MPQ. The SF-MPQ questionnaire contains 15 sensory and affective descriptors each rated on a 0-3 scale where 0 is none, 1 is mild, 2 is moderate, and 3 is severe. The total possible range of scores is 0-45 where the higher the score, the more intense the pain.
Wong-Baker FACES Pain Scale Scores at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline
Assessment of topical 0.09% Bromfenac's analgesic effect pre- and post-injection in patients undergoing intravitreal injections of anti-VEGFs as measured by the Wong-Baker FACES pain scale. This scale is compromised of drawings of faces that appear to be experiencing increasing pain, from which the participant chooses their current level of pain. Scoring is defined on the scale as, "Face 0 doesn't hurt at all. Face 2 hurts just a little bit. Face 4 hurts a little bit more. Face 6 hurts even more. Face 8 hurts a whole lot. Face 10 hurts as much as you can imagine, although you don't have to be crying to have this worst pain."
Wong-Baker FACES Pain Scale Scores at 6 Hours Post Injection
Time frame: 6 hours post injection
Assessment of topical 0.09% Bromfenac's analgesic effect pre- and post-injection in patients undergoing intravitreal injections of anti-VEGFs as measured by the Wong-Baker FACES pain scale. This scale is compromised of drawings of faces that appear to be experiencing increasing pain, from which the participant chooses their current level of pain. Scoring is defined on the scale as, "Face 0 doesn't hurt at all. Face 2 hurts just a little bit. Face 4 hurts a little bit more. Face 6 hurts even more. Face 8 hurts a whole lot. Face 10 hurts as much as you can imagine, although you don't have to be crying to have this worst pain."
Wong-Baker FACES Pain Scale Scores at 24 Hours Post Injection
Time frame: 24 hours post injection
Assessment of topical 0.09% Bromfenac's analgesic effect pre- and post-injection in patients undergoing intravitreal injections of anti-VEGFs as measured by the Wong-Baker FACES pain scale. This scale is compromised of drawings of faces that appear to be experiencing increasing pain, from which the participant chooses their current level of pain. Scoring is defined on the scale as, "Face 0 doesn't hurt at all. Face 2 hurts just a little bit. Face 4 hurts a little bit more. Face 6 hurts even more. Face 8 hurts a whole lot. Face 10 hurts as much as you can imagine, although you don't have to be crying to have this worst pain."
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Jun 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Intravitreal Injections
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of VIS-101 in Participants With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Neovascular Age Related Macular Degeneration(nAMD)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Phase 3 Trial for Intravitreal Injection of 4D-150 in Adults With Diabetic Macular Edema (DME).
Diabetic Macular Edema (DME)
RecruitingObservational study
Blepharoptosis After Repeated Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Injections: A Prospective Study
Blepharoptosis, Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
A Study About the Safety of ASP3021 Eye Injections and if They Help People in Japan With Vision Loss From Age-related Macular Degeneration
Geographic Atrophy, Age-Related Macular Degeneration
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of a Single Intravitreal Injection of RTx-015 in Participants With Retinitis Pigmentosa (PERCEPT)
Retinitis Pigmentosa (RP), Inherited Retinal Diseases
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mihai Mititelu, MD, MPH principal investigator
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Maxwell Wingelaar, MD principal investigator
University of Wisconsin, Madison
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Bromfenac and Artificial tears in people with Intravitreal Injections and IVI, run by University of Wisconsin, Madison at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jun 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Oct 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) Scores at Baseline (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jun 2023.