Blood Transfusion ComplicationNCT04344613
Evaluation of the Clinical Performances of a Point of Care Analyzer Enabling Pre-transfusion ABOD Group Ultimate Verification at the Patient Bedside
A study testing ABODpoct device in people with Blood Transfusion Complication, run by Francis Corazza at 1 site in Belgium.
Trial summary
ABO-incompatible red blood cell transfusions still represent an important hazard in transfusion medicine. Therefore, some countries have introduced a systematic bedside ABO agglutination test checking that the right blood is given to the right patient. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Blood Transfusion Complication
- What is being tested?
- ABODpoct device
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBelgium
- Study dates
- 10 Apr 2020to 1 Oct 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- For the device evaluation inside the laboratory : every patient for whom a blood group is ordered to the blood transfusion laboratory.
- For the device bedside evaluation : each patient from the hematology unit (one day clinic) requiring a transfusion.
Who cannot join
- Emergency circumstances requiring an urgent transfusion
- Patient older than 80 years old
- Patients with venous access
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
ABO-incompatible red blood cell transfusions still represent an important hazard in transfusion medicine. Therefore, some countries have introduced a systematic bedside ABO agglutination test checking that the right blood is given to the right patient. However, this strategy is entirely manual, requires an extremely time-consuming learning program and relies on a subjective interpretation of agglutination on ABO test cards (for example Biorad, Diagast).
The ULB spinoff Antigon developed a prototype device on the basis of a technology developed in the Translational research laboratory of CHU-Brugmann, ULB. This device is specifically dedicated to perform a "near patient" control of the blood group of the patient and of the blood bag just before transfusion, and to control that the right blood bag is given to the right patient by cross-checking their identifications. The principle of the assay relies on an agglutination and filtration in a disk including anti A,B and D antibodies.
The goal of this study is to validate the analytical performances of this device (phase A) and to validate the clinical performances of this device (phase B).
Read the detailed description
ABO-incompatible red blood cell transfusions still represent an important hazard in transfusion medicine. Therefore, some countries have introduced a systematic bedside ABO agglutination test checking that the right blood is given to the right patient. However, this strategy is entirely manual, requires an extremely time-consuming learning program and relies on a subjective interpretation of agglutination on ABO test cards (for example Biorad, Diagast).
The ULB spinoff Antigon developed a prototype device on the basis of a technology developed in the Translational research laboratory of CHU-Brugmann, ULB. This device is specifically dedicated to perform a "near patient" control of the blood group of the patient and of the blood bag just before transfusion, and to control that the right blood bag is given to the right patient by cross-checking their identifications. The principle of the assay relies on an agglutination and filtration in a disk including anti A,B and D antibodies.
Results of a preliminary study using a first Proof of Concept Prototype demonstrated the feasibility of ABO determination with a simple device, eliminating manipulation and subjective interpretation responsible for transfusion errors.The investigators then developed an end-user friendly, portable device using disposable fluidic disks and including everything needed to perform an agglutination test to determine the ABO group + RHD status of a patient and a blood bag, or alternatively of two patients.The system is designed to be used near the patient just before the beginning of transfusion.
The goal of this study is to validate the analytical performances of this device (phase A) and to validate the clinical performances of this device (phase B).
Phase A will be conducted in the laboratory and will allow the determination of the cut off values for the quantitative optical measures. These cut-off values will define the presence or absence of antigens A, B or D. Blood groups will be determined using the prototype and compared to the blood group determined in the blood transfusion laboratory with an automate using gel filtration technology. The validation will be performed both on blood bag samples and on random EDTA blood samples collected from consecutive unselected patients of our institution for whom a blood group had been requested (no additional sampling procedure nor additional blood volume will be required). The performances of the defined cut-off values will be tested in a second step on additional blood pathological samples selected from the routine samples received at the laboratory. They will cover a large range of hematological and immunological anomalies susceptible to interfere with or impair test performance and results. Finally, tests will be run on residual blood samples of neonates.
Phase B will be conducted to investigate the performances of the device in real conditions for the ultimate control of the ABO compatibility by comparing the patient and blood bag ABO groups. It will be conducted for its most part inside the laboratory and for another part in clinical units where the test will be performed by the nurses, with the assistance of the technologist involved in the validation of the device. For the part of the study conducted inside the lab, blood bags routinely attributed to patients will be selected the be tested on the device in parallel with the blood from the correct patient or from a 'wrong' (with other blood group) patient, in order to simulate situations of transfusion errors and evaluate the performances of the device to identify and block these errors. If the results are satisfying, the device will be tested in real life at the bedside in real conditions of transfusion. For this part of validation the results provided by the device (expressed as Compatible/not compatible/undetermined) will be compared with the results obtained with the manual point of care compatibility control (according to local procedure), and with the known groups of the patient and the blood bag stored in the patient blood bank file.
The number of ABO tests both on patients and on blood bag from donors has been determined in accordance with the recommendations from European Commission for Technical Specifications for In vitro diagnostic medical devices. ABOD assay performances have to be evaluated on at least 3000 samples.
- Conditions
- Blood Transfusion Complication
- Being tested
- ABODpoct device
- Medical subject headings
- Transfusion Reaction
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ABODpoct deviceDevice
The device has been developed by a consortium including the Université Libre de Bruxelles, research centers (SIRRIS, CER), a private company (CISEO), and the spin-off Antigon S.A..The device includes a reader and a disposable disk (ABOD disk) for testing one patient et a blood bag. Four blood drops from the patient are deposited on one side of the disk and 4 blood drops from the blood bag one the other side. The disk correctly filled is inserted in the reader and after 2 minutes the result is displayed on the screen as a message GO or No GO. In case of incompatibility or any other problem a red Stop message will appear on the screen.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Blood samples | Experimental | Not described Receives: Device: ABODpoct device |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Cut off value of optical signal - antigen A
Determination of the analytical performances of each channel of the disk:analysis of discrimination between positive and negative samples for each blood group antigen.
Measured: 6 months
Cut off value of optical signal - antigen B
Determination of the analytical performances of each channel of the disk:analysis of discrimination between positive and negative samples for each blood group antigen.
Measured: 6 months
Cut off value of optical signal - antigen D
Determination of the analytical performances of each channel of the disk:analysis of discrimination between positive and negative samples for each blood group antigen.
Measured: 6 months
Cut off value of optical signal - negative control
Determination of the analytical performances of each channel of the disk:analysis of discrimination between positive and negative samples for each blood group antigen.
Measured: 6 months
Percentage of concordance of the blood group
Percentage of concordance between the blood group result delivered by the tested device and the blood group determined by the validated laboratory methods.
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Apr 2020
- Study start10 Apr 2020
- Primary completion1 Oct 2025
- Study completion1 Oct 2025
Why it stopped: Practical considerations
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Blood Transfusion ComplicationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Francis Corazza
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Francis Corazza, Brugmann University Hospital
- Investigators
- Hanane El Kenz, MD, Principal investigator, CHU Brugmann
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04344613
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- LRT-ABOD- PICABO
- Status last verified
- Oct 2025
- First submitted
- 27 Feb 2020
- Last updated
- 6 Oct 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Oct 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of the Clinical Performances of a Point of Care Analyzer Enabling Pre-transfusion ABOD Group Ultimate Verification at the Patient Bedside
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04344613
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LRT-ABOD- PICABO
- Conditions
- Blood Transfusion Complication
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Practical considerations
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Francis CorazzaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 10 Apr 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Oct 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Oct 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Apr 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
ABO-incompatible red blood cell transfusions still represent an important hazard in transfusion medicine. Therefore, some countries have introduced a systematic bedside ABO agglutination test checking that the right blood is given to the right patient. However, this strategy is entirely manual, requires an extremely time-consuming learning program and relies on a subjective interpretation of agglutination on ABO test cards (for example Biorad, Diagast).
The ULB spinoff Antigon developed a prototype device on the basis of a technology developed in the Translational research laboratory of CHU-Brugmann, ULB. This device is specifically dedicated to perform a "near patient" control of the blood group of the patient and of the blood bag just before transfusion, and to control that the right blood bag is given to the right patient by cross-checking their identifications. The principle of the assay relies on an agglutination and filtration in a disk including anti A,B and D antibodies.
The goal of this study is to validate the analytical performances of this device (phase A) and to validate the clinical performances of this device (phase B).
Detailed description
ABO-incompatible red blood cell transfusions still represent an important hazard in transfusion medicine. Therefore, some countries have introduced a systematic bedside ABO agglutination test checking that the right blood is given to the right patient. However, this strategy is entirely manual, requires an extremely time-consuming learning program and relies on a subjective interpretation of agglutination on ABO test cards (for example Biorad, Diagast).
The ULB spinoff Antigon developed a prototype device on the basis of a technology developed in the Translational research laboratory of CHU-Brugmann, ULB. This device is specifically dedicated to perform a "near patient" control of the blood group of the patient and of the blood bag just before transfusion, and to control that the right blood bag is given to the right patient by cross-checking their identifications. The principle of the assay relies on an agglutination and filtration in a disk including anti A,B and D antibodies.
Results of a preliminary study using a first Proof of Concept Prototype demonstrated the feasibility of ABO determination with a simple device, eliminating manipulation and subjective interpretation responsible for transfusion errors.The investigators then developed an end-user friendly, portable device using disposable fluidic disks and including everything needed to perform an agglutination test to determine the ABO group + RHD status of a patient and a blood bag, or alternatively of two patients.The system is designed to be used near the patient just before the beginning of transfusion.
The goal of this study is to validate the analytical performances of this device (phase A) and to validate the clinical performances of this device (phase B).
Phase A will be conducted in the laboratory and will allow the determination of the cut off values for the quantitative optical measures. These cut-off values will define the presence or absence of antigens A, B or D. Blood groups will be determined using the prototype and compared to the blood group determined in the blood transfusion laboratory with an automate using gel filtration technology. The validation will be performed both on blood bag samples and on random EDTA blood samples collected from consecutive unselected patients of our institution for whom a blood group had been requested (no additional sampling procedure nor additional blood volume will be required). The performances of the defined cut-off values will be tested in a second step on additional blood pathological samples selected from the routine samples received at the laboratory. They will cover a large range of hematological and immunological anomalies susceptible to interfere with or impair test performance and results. Finally, tests will be run on residual blood samples of neonates.
Phase B will be conducted to investigate the performances of the device in real conditions for the ultimate control of the ABO compatibility by comparing the patient and blood bag ABO groups. It will be conducted for its most part inside the laboratory and for another part in clinical units where the test will be performed by the nurses, with the assistance of the technologist involved in the validation of the device. For the part of the study conducted inside the lab, blood bags routinely attributed to patients will be selected the be tested on the device in parallel with the blood from the correct patient or from a 'wrong' (with other blood group) patient, in order to simulate situations of transfusion errors and evaluate the performances of the device to identify and block these errors. If the results are satisfying, the device will be tested in real life at the bedside in real conditions of transfusion. For this part of validation the results provided by the device (expressed as Compatible/not compatible/undetermined) will be compared with the results obtained with the manual point of care compatibility control (according to local procedure), and with the known groups of the patient and the blood bag stored in the patient blood bank file.
The number of ABO tests both on patients and on blood bag from donors has been determined in accordance with the recommendations from European Commission for Technical Specifications for In vitro diagnostic medical devices. ABOD assay performances have to be evaluated on at least 3000 samples.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Blood samples | Experimental | Device: ABODpoct device |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- For the device evaluation inside the laboratory : every patient for whom a blood group is ordered to the blood transfusion laboratory.
- For the device bedside evaluation : each patient from the hematology unit (one day clinic) requiring a transfusion.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Emergency circumstances requiring an urgent transfusion
- Patient older than 80 years old
- Patients with venous access
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ABODpoct deviceThe device has been developed by a consortium including the Université Libre de Bruxelles, research centers (SIRRIS, CER), a private company (CISEO), and the spin-off Antigon S.A..The device includes a reader and a disposable disk (ABOD disk) for testing one patient et a blood bag. Four blood drops from the patient are deposited on one side of the disk and 4 blood drops from the blood bag one the other side. The disk correctly filled is inserted in the reader and after 2 minutes the result is displayed on the screen as a message GO or No GO. In case of incompatibility or any other problem a red Stop message will appear on the screen. | Device | Blood samples |
Primary outcome
Cut off value of optical signal - antigen A
Time frame: 6 months
Determination of the analytical performances of each channel of the disk:analysis of discrimination between positive and negative samples for each blood group antigen.
Cut off value of optical signal - antigen B
Time frame: 6 months
Determination of the analytical performances of each channel of the disk:analysis of discrimination between positive and negative samples for each blood group antigen.
Cut off value of optical signal - antigen D
Time frame: 6 months
Determination of the analytical performances of each channel of the disk:analysis of discrimination between positive and negative samples for each blood group antigen.
Cut off value of optical signal - negative control
Time frame: 6 months
Determination of the analytical performances of each channel of the disk:analysis of discrimination between positive and negative samples for each blood group antigen.
Percentage of concordance of the blood group
Time frame: 6 months
Percentage of concordance between the blood group result delivered by the tested device and the blood group determined by the validated laboratory methods.
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Oct 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Blood Transfusion Complication
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Systematic Intraoperative Cell Salvage in On-Pump Cardiac Surgery Within a Mature Patient Blood Management Programme
Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Blood Transfusion
Recruiting
Blood Transfusion Strategies During Major Surgery
Perioperative Red Blood Cell Transfusion
RecruitingObservational study
The Correlation Between Red Cell Transfusion and Complications of Prematurity
Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP), Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia (BPD)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Mechanisms of Anaphylaxis
Anaphylaxis, Allergy
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Challenge Transfusion of INTERCEPT Pathogen Reduced Red Blood Cells (RBCs) in Subjects With or Without Pre-existing Antibodies to INTERCEPT RBCs
Transfusion Reaction, Hemolytic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Hanane El Kenz, MD principal investigator
CHU Brugmann
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing ABODpoct device in people with Blood Transfusion Complication, run by Francis Corazza at 1 site in Belgium.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Oct 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Cut off value of optical signal - antigen A (time frame: 6 months). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Oct 2025.